Skip to content
U.S. Transhumanist Party – Official Website
  • Home
  • Posts
  • Values
  • Platform
  • Leadership
  • Advisors
  • Candidates
  • Highlights
  • FAQ
  • States & Allies
  • Free Membership
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Search Icon

U.S. Transhumanist Party – Official Website

U.S. Transhumanist Party – PUTTING SCIENCE, HEALTH, & TECHNOLOGY AT THE FOREFRONT OF AMERICAN POLITICS

Posts

Why Is Trump So Intent on Sending Illegal Immigrant Noncriminals to Prison Camps in El Salvador? – Article by Alex Nowrasteh

Why Is Trump So Intent on Sending Illegal Immigrant Noncriminals to Prison Camps in El Salvador? – Article by Alex Nowrasteh

June 2, 2025 Alex Nowrasteh Comments 0 Comment

Alex Nowrasteh


Editor’s Note: This article was republished from Laissez-Faire, Laissez-Passer with the permission of Alex Nowrasteh. Original link found below.
~ Zach Richardson, Director of Publication, United States Transhumanist Party, June 2, 2025

The Trump administration is rapidly spending down its political capital and attacking the courts by deporting noncriminals to El Salvador. In its zeal to speed deportations and close the border, it declared MS-13 and Tren de Aragua terrorist organizations, even though the latter is a loosely organized Venezuelan prison gang while the former is a criminal gang. Then, it claimed several Venezuelan and Salvador migrants in the US are members of those gangs on flimsy evidence. Lastly, Trump used the Alien Enemies Act to deport some migrants without due process to Salvadoran supermax prisons when he claimed they were members of those gangs. Some of the deportations likely even violated federal court orders, and around three-quarters of them had no criminal record.

Not even the Bush administration attempted such brazen unconstitutional violations of civil liberties in the aftermath of 9/11, which was a real national crisis. Today’s crisis is fake. Unlike al Qaeda, illegal immigrants in Tren de Aragua or MS-13 didn’t commit a terrorist attack. Nobody has ever been murdered in an attack on US soil committed by terrorists who entered as illegal immigrants. If deportees like Kilmar Abrego Garcia were all vicious criminals or terrorists, then their deportations wouldn’t be a political scandal. A legal squabble, a few headlines, perhaps a disturbing court case, and an attack on our institutions, but a sitting US Senator certainly wouldn’t have visited him. Moreover, the President of El Salvador wouldn’t have staged the photo to make Abrego Garcia look like he was on vacation, and Trump wouldn’t be digging in to keep him there. If Trump’s deportation dragnet had real MS-13 kingpins to boast about, he wouldn’t need to bend the law to toss Abrego García — a man with no convictions — into a foreign prison. The fact that a U.S. Senator had to intervene in Abrego García’s case speaks volumes: it shows how extraordinary and unjustified this policy is.

Abrego Garcia wasn’t the first. Before him, Trump deported Venezuelan asylum-seeker Andry Hernández Romero to El Salvador under the Alien Enemies Act. Why such a harsh punishment for an asylum-seeker who was a makeup artist? A disgraced former Milwaukee police officer turned prison contractor who lost his job after drunkenly crashing his car into a house claimed that Hernández Romero was a Tren de Aragua member. Turns out that Hernández Romero was not a member of that jumbled prison gang, but he hasn’t been heard from since arriving in El Salvador. Hernández Romero’s case is even more tragic, and it underscores the same point: lacking actual criminals, the administration went after an innocent asylum-seeker — and had to rely on a sketchy ex-cop’s tattoo paranoia to do it. Over the dissents of the Supreme Court’s most conservative judges, the Court temporarily paused the use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport people.

This wasn’t how Trump’s mass deportations were supposed to begin. He campaigned on the promise to deport hordes of dangerous illegal immigrant criminals. If they’re out there, where are they? Why is his administration targeting Abrego Garcia and Hernández Romero, men with no criminal convictions? Sure, a corrupt police officer who was fired for blackmailing a prostitute claimed Abrego Garcia was MS-13. Another disgraced cop pointed to Hernández Romero’s tattoos. But with no convictions, no hearings, and no trials, these deportations aren’t about justice. They’re about appearances. Why is Trump focusing so much energy attacking Abrego Garcia and keeping Hernández Romero in El Salvador while ignoring the legions of murderers he and his supporters claim are ravaging our communities?

Those legions of illegal immigrant criminals don’t exist. The overwhelming evidence is that illegal immigrants are less likely to be criminals than native-born Americans. Texas has the best data on illegal immigrant criminal convictions of any state. The illegal immigrant criminal conviction rate in Texas is around half the rate of native-born Americans. Legal immigrants? 58 percent lower. Focusing on homicide, the most serious crime and best one to study here, illegal immigrants are 26 percent less likely to be convicted.

 

Georgia recently started reporting illegal immigrant incarceration data. In late 2024, when Laken Riley’s murderer was convicted, illegal immigrants were about 15 percent less likely to be incarcerated than the rest of the state’s population and 32 percent less likely to be incarcerated for homicide. The incarceration rates are similar in Oklahoma. The three states (all conservative) that track illegal immigrant crime all contradict Trump’s story.

 

Texas, Georgia, and Oklahoma are probably not outliers, but they could be. Estimates of the illegal immigrant incarceration rate using a residual statistical method to analyze American Community Survey data fill the gap. The illegal immigrant incarceration rate is between 31 percent and 56 percent below that of native-born Americans every year. Similar to the Texas data, the legal immigrant incarceration rate is between 65 percent and 75 percent below that of native-born Americans.

 

 

The evidence is overwhelming that illegal immigrants have a low crime rate for any number of reasons. Perhaps the worst are deported after their first arrests so they can’t become recidivists – which demolishes the nativist claim that illegal immigrants go relatively unpunished in America. Regardless, the myth of the illegal immigrant crime wave persists in the face of overwhelming evidence. There are several crimes committed by illegal immigrants, and those criminals should be harshly punished, but we can’t confuse the occasional horrible crime with a statistical trend that isn’t there.

The Trump administration is trying to deport illegal immigrant criminals who simply aren’t here. Faced with few real threats, it conjures imaginary ones—deporting noncriminals to dangerous foreign prisons to keep up the fear. He ran further ahead on immigration than any other issue during the 2024 campaign and is still ahead even though his approval is falling. Since there just aren’t that many illegal immigrant criminals, the administration must focus on removing people who aren’t criminals to keep their deportation promises. That’s why ICE is targeting Japanese students who caught too many fish and graduate students who wrote op-eds, even though illegal immigrant criminals are the easiest to deport because they are already in law enforcement custody.

Where are the hordes of terrorists and murderers Trump promised to deport? Unfortunately for Trump, Abrego Garcia is reminding everybody that there just aren’t that many illegal immigrant terrorists and criminals. Hernández Romero doesn’t politically matter as much because he’s less likely to legally be returned, but his case is even worse. Both are supposed criminal gangbangers deported to El Salvador, a country lionized by conservatives for reasons both understandable and mythical. The administration is so desperate to make Abrego Garcia a symbol of an illegal immigrant crime wave that never happened that they even tweeted a picture of President Trump holding up a photoshopped image of Abrego Garcia with tattoos that he doesn’t possess.

Abrego Garcia probably isn’t an angel, even though we don’t really know because he was denied due process before being incarcerated abroad after being illegally deported. Hernández Romero is an even more tragic case, but his legal ability to return is basically nonexistent, so few people pay attention to him. Trump’s scandalous deportation of noncriminals to supermax prisons in El Salvador without due process, his unconscionable violation of court orders, and his silly public defenses make more sense when you realize that he’s staked much of his political career on the falsehood that there’s a massive illegal immigrant crime wave. Immigration law allows most illegal immigrants to be deported, but it’s a political win when they are terrorists or criminals. Trump’s actions are those of a desperate and committed president, but certainly not those of a president committed to parsing facts, confronting reality, and protecting the Constitution. Trump can’t keep his promise to deport illegal immigrant criminals because there aren’t that many to deport. But that hasn’t stopped him – and it won’t.

Alex Nowrasteh is the Vice-President of economic and social policy studies at the Cato Institute. 

Originally published at: https://www.alexnowrasteh.com/p/why-is-trump-so-intent-on-sending

Tribute to John Kerecz (1961 – 2025)

Tribute to John Kerecz (1961 – 2025)

May 28, 2025 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 1 comment


The U.S. Transhumanist Party and the broader transhumanist community have been devastated by the loss of John Kerecz, one of the USTP’s most dedicated Officers and its Director of Energy Issues since 2020, who died unexpectedly on May 16, 2025, at the age of 63. On May 8, he tore his quadriceps and was expected to go in for surgery during the week that he died.  However, before he was able to receive the surgery, he succumbed suddenly to a pulmonary embolism that resulted from his injury. John Kerecz’s official obituary can be found here.

John’s involvement with the U.S. Transhumanist Party spanned the past five and three-quarters years – since August 2019, when he entered the USTP Presidential Primary as one of the candidates seeking our nomination. Out of all of the candidates competing during that primary, John has made the most enduring impact upon our organization, continuing to serve as a USTP Officer since 2020 and remaining a major source of insight, stability, and good sense – always being steadfast in his support of his fellow Officers and the USTP as an organization.

He interviewed multiple transhumanists, including USTP Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II, 2024 Presidential Candidate Tom Ross, and 2024 Vice-Presidential Candidate Daniel Twedt, numerous times, and made an appearance on transhumanist shows as well, including Steele Archer’s “Debt Nation” show, and our very own Virtual Enlightenment Salon, where he presented on January 23, 2022, about his epic 2014 journey to the edge of space.  John was a prolific content creator, releasing videos on his OSH Radio channel up to the very day of his death. He was a man who loved life and lived it to the fullest, whose adventures in travel and in the realms of the mind made for a story unlike any other – whose richness of experience we can only imagine, and whose irreplaceable internal universe is now unfortunately lost to us. John wanted to live, to create more, to experience more. Now all we have of him is what he left behind. It is but a shadow of the man himself, but still, it is a lot.

On Sunday, May 25, 2025, the U.S. Transhumanist Party streamed a video tribute to John Kerecz to celebrate his many contributions to the advancement of transhumanism. In it you will see and hear just an infinitesimal fraction of what John Kerecz was about, but we hope that it will still give you a glimpse of his many thoughtful ideas on transhumanist topics and politics more generally.

This tribute features John Kerecz’s first video appearance in the transhumanist community, on Episode 46 of Steele Archer’s Debt Nation show (aired on August 20, 2019), where Steele Archer asked John Kerecz a series of questions to form a comprehensive candidate profile.

The tribute continues with excerpts from the September 14, 2019, Third Virtual Debate of U.S. Transhumanist Party Presidential Primary Candidates, with a specific focus on John Kerecz’s responses to the debate questions.

The last half-hour of the stream features some of John’s musical creations, including the last music videos he ever posted. They are enjoyable, thought-provoking, and speak to profound themes of life, death, and purpose – which John explored up until the very end.

John Kerecz was a prolific content creator, releasing videos on his OSH Radio channel up to the very day of his death. His videos can be viewed here.

John Kerecz also maintained several websites at https://oshradio.com/, https://johnkerecz.com/, and https://crazyjohnkerecz.com/.

Watch the Virtual Enlightenment Salon with John Kerecz, where he presented on his epic 2014 journey to the edge of space, streamed on January 23, 2022.

Of all of the people in our transhumanist community, John left perhaps the most extensive public mindfile behind. We hope that it will be of benefit to humanity and give us all an enduring impression of who John Kerecz was, so that we may continue to benefit from his wisdom and be inspired by his incredible versatility as a creator. We only wish that he had been here with us to continue to enjoy these works himself and to create many others. John ended many of his short videos with the words, “Live long and prosper”. Unfortunately, he will not get to. But we know that he would wish it for us. Thank you to all of you today who join us in remembering him. He will be missed in ways that cannot be replaced and will not be forgotten.


Biography of John Kerecz, Written by Himself

John Joseph Kerecz (September 10, 1961 – May 16, 2025) lived a life rich in accomplishments, goal-reaching, and harnessing his talents. Though he had an impressive professional and educational legacy, having worked for more than thirty-five years in engineering and technological fields, he was better known by his friends and loved ones as the owner of OSHRadio.com and as an adventurer with well-rounded and fulfilled ambitions. Kerecz also had a passion for the arts; he had authored books (nine of which are listed on Amazon), appeared in various films, and started being a part-time radio and TV personality in the early 1980s. His dynamic range of professional, thrill-seeking, and artistic experiences painted him as a dreamer with no limits.

Kerecz had an impressive repertoire of world travel experiences, having even been launched into the edge of space from Sokol Airbase in Nizhny Novgorod, Russia. This endeavor was inspired by his always-present admiration of outer space, and his inability to take no for an answer when it came to the question of whether or not he could get close to it! He also wouldn’t take no for an answer when it came to the question of accomplishing other dreams; for example, he needed to undergo a hip-replacement surgery, but this did not stop him from taking a seven-country hiking trip shortly afterward. One of the countries on this trip was Tibet, and he had the pleasure of trekking across the land of temples and nature, eventually reaching a base camp at Mount Everest. Other countries on this trip included China, Turkey, Italy, and more. He fulfilled his dream of visiting the ancient citadel of Machu Picchu in 2024.

It is no surprise that if someone had asked Kerecz as a child what he wanted to be when he grew up, he would have said that he aspired to become a superhero! Though this may not be the most expected answer for a child to provide, it showed that he had big dreams and boundless confidence from a young age. He considered his experience in practicing karate and kung-fu, as well as his familial influences, as being positively impactful on his childhood. He prospered in school, having taken to heart the advice of art teachers who dared him to dream even bigger, and having paid close attention to his lectures in science classes.

Kerecz called central Pennsylvania his home. He received both his Bachelor and Master of Science degrees at Penn State University. Additionally, however, he considered “home” to be anywhere his loved ones were. Throughout his adventures, his loved ones supported him and remained the most important factor in his life. They lovingly knew him as spontaneous and crazy, using these words only to reflect on his naturally fun and daring manner. When he was not working, spending time with loved ones, or trekking around the world, he liked to exercise his body and mind. Kerecz enjoyed visiting the gym and reading books, especially works by Anne Rice.

His repertoire of experiences led him to hold closely onto ideals of peace and love. He was dynamically spiritual, having Christian and some Buddhist Zen beliefs. John Kerecz believed that everything happens for a reason and that everyone was born for a specific purpose. He truly followed this belief, setting an example of how people should explore their own destinies.


The Visionary Architect of Tomorrow: Digital Painting in Honor of John Kerecz, Generated by Cybor Dre

U.S. Transhumanist Party member Cybor Dre created this digital portrait in honor of John Kerecz, whose hope was to become a space archaeologist in a later career, to both see the advancement of the human / transhuman multi-planetary civilization and to uncover other civilizations and artifacts that we might come across as our civilization expands. John Kerecz will always be remembered as one of the forward-thinking champions of humankind’s future – a precursor to our species’ journey to the stars. His name will be written in the stars as one of the visionaries who made the future Transhuman Era possible.


John Kerecz will be missed by everyone in the transhumanist community and all those whose lives he affected for the better.


Interviews with John Kerecz on Steele Archer’s Debt Nation Show

Episode 46: Candidate Profile: John J. Kerecz – August 20, 2019

Episode 60: Dream BIG!: Radio Star John J. Kerecz – August 30, 2019

Episode 66: Climate Change Solutions!: Daniel Yeluashvili, John Kerecz – September 6, 2019

Episode 98: Our Cosmos / Planetary Society: David Craig and John Kerecz – October 11, 2019

Episode 103: Explore Mars: John Kerecz and Jeffrey Gonyea – October 13, 2019

Episode 124: Magic and Transhumanism: John Kerecz and Trenton Caine – November 7, 2019

Episode 134: Transhumanist Projects: John Kerecz – November 13, 2019

Episode 156: “Get Busy Living or Get Busy Dying”: John Kerecz – February 4, 2020

Episode 206: The United States of Crazy!: John Kerecz – March 30, 2020

Interviews by John Kerecz

John Kerecz’s Interview with Steele Archer – November 14, 2019

John Kerecz’s First Interview with David Shumaker – July 28, 2020

John Kerecz’s First Interview with Tom Ross – August 25, 2020

John Kerecz’s Second Interview with Tom Ross – October 12, 2020

John Kerecz’s Second Interview with David Shumaker: Elections and Much More – October 29, 2020

John Kerecz’s First Interview with Gennady Stolyarov II: Putting Science Health & Technology at the Forefront! – November 8, 2020

John Kerecz and Gennady Stolyarov II: U.S. 2020 Election Aftermath and Transhumanist Party Update – January 9, 2021

Coffee Interview with Jennifer A. Huse – May 12, 2021

Follow-Up Interview with Jennifer A. Huse – September 15, 2021

Gennady Stolyarov II and John Kerecz: Reflections on 2021, Anticipations for 2022 – January 14, 2022

John Kerecz Interviews David Shumaker and Susan Cutforth After RAADfest, with Guest Appearance by Gennady Stolyarov II – October 14, 2022

Interview with 2024 Presidential Candidate Thomas E. Ross – May 31, 2023

Interview with 2024 Vice-Presidential Candidate Daniel E. Twedt – July 6, 2023

John Kerecz Interivews Gennady Stolyarov II on the Potential Future of American Politics – July 13, 2023

Gennady Stolyarov II and John Kerecz: Tom Ross Vote, 2024 US Politics, AI, and Positive-Sum Thinking – January 20, 2024

John Kerecz Interviews Gennady Stolyarov II on U.S. Politics in 2024 and the Ross-Twedt Campaign – April 30, 2024

Interview with Presidential Candidate Tom Ross – May 9, 2024

John Kerecz Interviews Gennady Stolyarov II on Changes in U.S. Politics – July 30, 2024

Gennady Stolyarov II and John Kerecz: Discussion on U.S. Politics Prior to the 2024 Election – October 3, 2024

Post-2024-Election Discussion: U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II and John Kerecz – December 21, 2024

Tom Ross – Short Interview : Transhumanists Getting Coffee and Food Series – January 3, 2025

John Kerecz Interviews Gennady Stolyarov II on the First Two Months of the Trump Administration – March 21, 2025


Books and Pamphlets by John Kerecz (Available on Amazon)

♦ Stress Release in 5 Minutes a Day through American Wisdom (May 18, 2016)

♦ Dream It, Do It: The Story of Little Chuck (June 12, 2018)

♦ The Sky Really is the Limit: An Autobiography (February 28, 2019)

♦ The Life and Adventures of DR JON KZ: Book 2: Pause Game (October 7, 2019)

♦ The Life and Adventures of DR JON KZ: Book 3: Restart (October 7, 2019)

♦ Jay’s Friends: A Dr Jon Kz Adventures Companion Book (The Life and Adventures of Dr Jon Kz) (May 7, 2020)

♦ Morals and Machines: Theology and AI Technology (May 14, 2020)

♦ The Unbelievable Life of DR JON KZ (January 13, 2021)

♦ Be a Force of Nature (September 30, 2021)

♦ In Support of STEAM: Science. Technology. Engineering. Arts. Math in our Education System (February 19, 2022)

♦ An Introduction to the Main Tenets of Self-Defense: KereKwan Hapkido Hosinsul (July 5, 2022)

♦ The Future of Energy?: My Thoughts (January 5, 2023)

♦ The Dojo Blueprint: Martial Arts as the Key to Leadership & Lifelong Success: Martial Arts is Far More Than a Physical Discipline (April 19, 2025)

Books to Which John Kerecz Made Contributions

♦ Elite Martial Artists Worldwide Volume III: Secrets to Life, Leadership & Business by Jessie Bowen (April 11, 2025)

The Copenhagen Consensus – How to Feed the Hungry – Article by Zach Richardson

The Copenhagen Consensus – How to Feed the Hungry – Article by Zach Richardson

March 30, 2025 Zach Richardson Comments 0 Comment

Zach Richardson


Editor’s Note: The United Nations has put forth a series of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), but a core truth of economics is scarcity. If one goes to the grocery store, one has a budget for their purchase and cannot buy one of everything. It makes good sense to listen to economists’ opinions when it comes to prioritizing which of the SDGs to focus on first. This article focuses on SDG 2, ending hunger.
~ Zach Richardson, Director of Publication, United States Transhumanist Party, March 30, 2025

The Goals

There are 17 goals in The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, a resolution adopted by U.N. Member States in 2015 to help guide country-wide decision making and provide a shared vision to work with. The first 3 of these goals are to end poverty, end hunger, and ensure health for all people, everywhere.

It is common for leaders to try to make large lofty-sounding promises that have delivery dates far in the future. They get the credit, accolades, and photo opportunities now, while actual implementation on or delivery of the promises is dealt with later by someone else.

It is now 2025, and 10 of those 15 years have passed, and there is one organization that is saying, “Alright everyone, we’d better actually start working on implementation if we want to get close to hitting these targets.” That organization is a think tank called The Copenhagen Consensus (TCC).

The core philosophy of TCC is that there are no solutions in economics, there are only tradeoffs. If there is a certain amount of money to be used and we want to squeeze every last ounce of goodness out of each penny we spend, we’re best off focusing on realistic targets that have a high “ROI”, so to speak.

Regarding SDG 2, ending hunger, if we were to focus on one target, it should be what is called “stunting”, which is when a fetus/child does not receive enough nutrients in the first 1000 days after conception, and ends up permanently shorter. But that “stunting” also includes “stunted brain development”. With reduced neuronal/cortical development come poorer concentration, worse grades, and lower scores on tests of cognitive development.

A specific target of SDG 2 is to reduce stunting by 50% by 2030. The trendline shows us about 36 million children short of that goal if we don’t make some changes:

One major cause of stunting is a lack of many micronutrients during gestation. These are vitamins that are needed in small quantities for health. Right now most governments already have infrastructure to provide pregnant mothers with folic acid and iron as per WHO requirements, and multivitamins are mass-produced such that providing coverage for the last two trimesters of pregnancy comes out to just $1.55 per pregnant mother, with another $1.12 per mother needed in terms of educational programs about the importance of their use.

Simple supplementation would reduce the risks of stillbirths, early births, and lower birth weight. TCC estimates a massive 38x ROI for the supplementation of these vitamins due to the fact that early births and lower birth weight due to malnutrition would prevent a nearly 5-point loss of IQ, leading to the children being more economically productive and less likely to be dependent.

After birth, children in the 6-to-23-month window are most often lacking essential fatty acids and proteins, which is where another TCC intervention comes in: SQ-LNS. This stands for “Small Quantity Lipid-based Nutrient Supplements” and are small 20-70 g packages of lipids and nutrients that can be easily transported and shelf-stable.

The costs of the SQ-LNS supplements is $2.79 per child per month, with a separate but equally crucial $2.23 for the costs of logistics and distribution, or a total of $5/month/child. For a birth cohort of 41 million children, this totals $3.7 billion. This will avoid 155,000 deaths for a benefit of $45.7 billion. Getting the SQ-LNS to all 41 million would would avoid stunting for 1.5 million, meaning being more developed, studious, and socially productive, reflecting in higher wages of $5875 per child. TCC analysis showed this would result in $5.4 billion in productivity. Sum totals showed $51 billion in benefits for a little under $4 billion annually, a phenomenal ROI.

Between the supplements, education, distribution, and SQ-LNS, we’re looking at a cost of $1.2 billion to get back $22 billion, which has a cost-to-benefit ratio of 18.

The reason I like these proposals is they seem to have concrete numbers behind them, and seem to directly address a specific target of the UN’s SDGs, but they do so with a focus on solving the problem in the most efficient manner, at minimum cost, which I believe makes the solution most palatable to world leaders, and therefore most likely to receive implementation.

In summation, while some say there is enough food to everyone, they often don’t seem to have a solid explanation for how the leftover Brussels sprouts on my plate are going to make it into a hungry mouth in Sudan. Moreover, government support requires manageable targets. With 5 years left until the 2030 SDG target needs to be reached, TCC provides a compelling case on how to handle a specific hunger target, with a specific amount of money, by a certain date.

Zach Richardson is the Director of Publication for the U.S. Transhumanist Party. Learn more about him here. 

The Issue of Food – Article by Luis Arroyo

The Issue of Food – Article by Luis Arroyo

March 30, 2025 Luis Arroyo Comments 4 comments

Luis Arroyo


Editor’s Note: In this article on food insecurity, USTP member Luis Arroyo shares his thoughts and opinions. While it may seem odd for a Transhumanist publication to post articles on child hunger, it ties closely to this excerpt from The Transhumanist Manifesto: “We must improve the global quality of life. An economy of abundance is not about how much; it is about how good—a quality of life that provide basic human needs, freedom, well-being, and that advances opportunity and potential.” Being that one of the most basic human needs is adequate nutritional intake, increasing the maximum lifespan of some in the world is as simple as providing them more food.
 
~ Zach Richardson, Director of Publication, United States Transhumanist Party, March 30, 2025

In the modern-day society, 828 million people still go hungry while the number of undernourished people has grown to now encompass 10% of humanity [1]. This is a grim reality faced by many all over the world, showing clearly, the situation of world hunger is dire. Defined by many forms, levels, and instances of hunger dictated by various conditions like climate change, conflict, and cost most represented by nations like Ethiopia, Haiti, Nigeria, South Sudan, Honduras, Yemen, and 14 other nations that are designated as “hunger hotspots”, with the situation seemingly doomed to worsen [2].

Dismal as this situation may be, food insecurity is an issue suffered in many places. In the USA 38 million people struggle with food insecurity. With hunger rising through the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic, many witnessed mile-long lines for food banks and hungry/desperate people trying to get food out of dumpsters, only to be violently dealt with by police who “protected” the discarded food, making sure that hungry people could not obtain it. All the while, this was vastly ignored by those in power [3] [4].

Considering all of the people both in the USA and around the world who face hunger and food insecurity, it goes without saying there is an array of effects on the health of an individual who goes through hunger or is food insecure. Type 2 diabetes, high blood pressure, heart disease, obesity, delayed development in young children, risk of chronic illnesses like asthma and anemia, behavioral problems like hyperactivity, anxiety, as well as aggression in school-age children – all haunt those unfortunate enough to have to experience hunger or food insecurity [5] [6].

These health complications do not come without deadly consequences. For example, one person is estimated to die of hunger every four seconds, meaning roughly 7+ million people die potentially per year due to hunger [7]. These are absolutely staggering losses, serving as modern-day instances of social murder and, among many things, lost potential to contribute and enjoy life.

Such losses, as many as there are and will continue to be, are utterly needless within the context of our global society. Civilization as a whole produces enough food to feed 10 billion people with a global population of just 8 billion people [8]. This reality, coupled with the vast amount of deaths due to hunger, calls into question the efficiency of food distribution and the motives which dictate that distribution, especially when considering the approximately US$1 trillion of wasted food, which is enough to feed half of the world’s population [9].

There are many issues regarding food, as referred to earlier. However, whether is it food wasted rather than being used to feed the hungry, being held behind a price barrier, the lack of market access due to conflict, or crop failures due to climate change, their roots lay within the profit motive, from the war industry’s profitable ventures in relation to Yemen to the energy industry’s ongoing reluctance to change pace fast enough to meet the challenges of global warming.

With all this said, Transhumanists, in prioritizing human health, quality of life, and life itself should advocate for and support the redistribution of food as a rapid response toward eradicating global hunger. If achieved, this would undoubtedly extend life spans, improve quality of life, further maintain the health of countless people who would have otherwise likely perished, and serve as an important milestone in human history [10].

Society has had for some time the technological and societal means to eradicate hunger. For example, Burkina Faso from 1983 – 1987 under Thomas Sankara saw two meals a day and clean water distributed to every person in their nation, which helped to rid Burkina Faso of hunger. This was part of a broader successful attempt that also involved a “one grove, one village” policy that was part of their agroecology effort.

Modern means and abilities, along with the producible surplus of today, make the eradication of hunger more achievable than ever before.

Unfortunately, the situation of today puts society far off from the eradication of hunger [11], leaving many more lives to be inevitably lost. Given the grim and unchanging future that seemingly awaits humanity if action is not taken, as global trends have well shown, people must consider taking action themselves, with the sheer reality of today’s situation demanding urgency and action from multiple fronts. 

Whether that be in the form of mutual aid organizations, community gardens or groves, food networks, community fridges, cabinets, vertical farming efforts, etc., the state of food security must be achieved by any means necessary, being that governments cannot be expected to supply their citizens with the basics of life. Therefore, communities must build independent systems of reliance until governments are accountable to the people and not business interests.

Luis Arroyo is Vice-Chairman of the New York Transhumanist Party.


References

[1] “World Hunger Facts“. Action Against Hunger. 

[2] “Hunger Hotspots: FAO-WFP early warnings on acute food insecurity, June to October 2024 outlook“. World Food Programme.  

[3] “Americans Wait in Miles-Long Food Lines Amid Coronavirus“. Bethany Biron. Business Insider. April 2020.  

[4] “Police clash with residents attempting to salvage discarded groceries following power outage“. Joseph Choi. The Hill. February 17, 2021. 

[5] “Importance of Nutrition on Health in America“. Feeding America. 

[6] “Impact of Hunger: Tough choices. Devastating consequences.” Feeding America. 

[7] “Humanitarian organisations estimate one person dying of hunger every four seconds“.  Action Against Hunger, CARE International, Concern Worldwide, Islamic Relief Worldwide, Oxfam International, Plan International, Save the Children International, World Vision International, and, Yemen Family Care Association. September 20, 2022.   

[8] Holt-Giménez, Eric & Shattuck, Annie & Altieri, Miguel & Herren, Hans & Gliessman, Steve. (2012). We Already Grow Enough Food for 10 Billion People … and Still Can’t End Hunger. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture – J SUSTAINABLE AGR. 36. 595-598. 10.1080/10440046.2012.695331.  

[9] “Food waste in the supply chain“. Food Engineering. May 11, 2018.  

[10] “Benefits of Healthy Eating for Adults.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. February 14, 2024. 

[11]  “Goal 2: Zero Hunger“. Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations. 

Results of Platform Vote #9 and Vote on Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations; Adopted Sections of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Constitution

Results of Platform Vote #9 and Vote on Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations; Adopted Sections of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Constitution

March 13, 2025 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























logo_bg

Gennady Stolyarov II


The U.S. Transhumanist Party conducted its twentieth vote of the members and the ninth vote on its Platform planks, as well as a vote on two competing sets of proposals on investigations and emergency declarations, between February 17 and March 10, 2025. Official ballot options can be found here.

Detailed results of the voting have been tabulated here. In three instances, where no majority was reached in the first round of voting, options were selected based on the ranked-preference method with instant runoffs.

As a result, the following new or amended sections of Article VI of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Constitution, as well as the new Article IX of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Constitution, were adopted.


Article VI. Platform [New Sections]

Section CXIX [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: Given that the COVID-19 pandemic continues to ravage the world and will not end as long as immunity from vaccination or prior infection can be bypassed by subsequent mutated escape variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the United States Transhumanist Party supports concerted scientific and technological efforts to eliminate COVID-19 as a threat to public health. These efforts may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

(i) Development of a universal vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus that would work against all possible variants of the virus and would confer lasting immunity.

(ii) Development of antibodies that are capable of neutralizing any variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

(iii) Development of reliable cures for all varieties of Long COVID or Post-COVID Syndrome.

The United States Transhumanist Party considers only scientific and technological solutions to be capable of eliminating COVID-19 as a threat to public health and does not support lockdowns, restrictions on individual liberty or medical choice, or demonization of individuals who make any personal health choices regarding their approach to COVID-19 precautions – including individuals who take extensive, moderate, mild, or no precautions. The United States Transhumanist Party also holds that no individual should be compelled to undertake any behaviors that may expose that individual to greater risk of contracting COVID-19.

Section CXX [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party supports approaching technologies of artificial intelligence primarily as opportunities rather than as threats. The potential of artificial intelligence, including generative AI, to foster creativity, solve problems, cure diseases, create new opportunities, and facilitate radical abundance far outweighs the risks and dangers of AI.

The United States Transhumanist Party recognizes that AI safety and AI alignment are important pursuits to maximize the probability of predominantly beneficial consequences from future AI systems.

Furthermore, the United States Transhumanist Party supports restrictions on the ability to use AI systems for intentionally destructive purposes; such restrictions would include a ban on autonomous weapons.

In addition, AI policy needs to address the known risks and harms that are created passively or unintentionally based on the human bias used while creating said AI. Stopping the intentional use of AI for harm does not go far enough, and it is necessary to ensure that AI is immune to biases such racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and other similar forms of bias.

However, these efforts should be undertaken in a rational, proportionate, evidence-based manner, avoiding unsubstantiated speculation, alarmist hype, and doomsday pronouncements. Furthermore, the United States Transhumanist Party opposes any efforts to restrict individual liberty or initiate physically aggressive action against other individuals or countries in the name of stopping allegedly dangerous AI development.

Section CXXI [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: Recognizing that the achievement of reversible cryopreservation techniques could enable the realization of individuals’ right to life (brutally violated by so-called “natural” death) by waiting until future technologies could bring a cryopreserved patient out of the cryopreserved state and achieve cures for diseases and aging, the United States Transhumanist Party emphasizes the urgency of advancing reversible cryopreservation research. Therefore, the United States Transhumanist Party supports the allocation of an annual funding package of $10 billion for reversible cryopreservation research. This funding shall be expeditiously directed to esteemed research institutions with a proven track record of focusing on the development and implementation of reversible cryopreservation techniques.

Section CXXII [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the implementation of the ‘Public Money for Public Code’ concept, which holds that public money should, where reasonably possible, come to benefit the public first and foremost, and secondarily might also benefit other parties as well.

Public code is understood as code that is publicly available and more commonly referred to as Open Source, for example code released under the GPLv3 (General Public License version 3). The reasoning of ‘Public Money for Public Code’ is that public money should not be spent on proprietary software that benefits a select group of companies, but rather used to support Open-Source projects that are alternatives to proprietary software. As Open-Source software is available for free to the public, said stimulus of Open-Source software could benefit both the public as well as public institutions. An example here could be an alternative to Microsoft Office, such as LibreOffice.

Many Open-Source projects operate via volunteers contributing to the project’s efforts. Opening up the possibility to receive funding for a project could incentivize more people to contribute to a project, and perhaps even use contribution to Open-Source projects as a means of stable income. This incentivizes citizens to participate, as besides the admirable goal of doing good for the public, it also contributes to the participants’ livelihood, or helps them decide to split their worktime between the roles of an employee and a self-employed contributor.

Likewise, this might incentivize software companies to participate as well, as it can earn them revenue. It would, however, be important to observe that companies do not drown out individual contributors, as this could have a detrimental effect on incentivizing public participation.

The public participation would be an important element of the ‘Public Money for Public Code’ implementation, as it would also be a public showcase to stimulate interest in programming in education and beyond.

Section CXXIII [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party supports efforts for social media to improve privacy settings, in granularity, usability, as well as awareness of such privacy features, for users. Better control of privacy can minimize the scraping of information, including information that can be used for identifying targets by malicious actors, from websites.

Section CXXIV [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party supports efforts to restrain government agencies from efforts to limit, oppose, or undermine security initiatives by companies and businesses. For instance, government agencies should not be able to request that private companies build “back doors” into their software to enable government agencies to access digital devices or systems in the course of an investigation. Although their motives might be pure, to uncover criminal activity for example, such efforts can in the process undermine security on a much larger scale. If government agencies can have access, so can malicious actors.

Section CXXV [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party supports efforts to create a security whistleblower initiative where a whistleblower can report known security issues that are not being addressed by a company or government institution. This could also aid the whistleblower in the event that they would suffer negative consequences by their employer for addressing security issues.

Article VI. Platform [Amended Sections]

Section XXVII [Adopted by a vote of the members during March 26 – April 1, 2017; amended by a vote of the members during November 11-17, 2017; amended by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party advocates Constitutional reform to abolish the Electoral College in the United States Presidential elections and render the criterion for the election of President to be an outcome of the popular vote decided by ranked-preference voting or a similar mechanism that allows voters to select multiple options in a manner that more completely expresses their views.

Section XXXVI [Adopted by a vote of the members during May 7-13, 2017; amended by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the elimination of graduated taxation and income taxation more generally. Instead, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates a flat percentage-of-sales tax applicable only to purchases from businesses whose combined nationwide revenues from all affiliates exceed a specified threshold. This tax would not be imposed on life necessities, defined as goods that are consumable in the near term and whose primary purpose is to facilitate human survival. This tax should be built into the price of goods from such large businesses and should not impede transaction efficiency in any manner. Transactions pertaining to wages, salaries, gifts, donations, barter, employee benefits, and inheritances should remain completely untaxed, as should transactions involving solely individuals and/or small businesses, for whom the establishment of a tax-reporting infrastructure would be onerous. Furthermore, all taxes on land and property should be abolished.

Section XCIX [Adopted by a vote of the members during March 25-28, 2020; amended by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party advocates for all American residents to continue to receive free health care for the disease of COVID-19, including free testing, vaccination, antiviral medications, and any other services involved in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. The priority for this program should be to prevent massive and irreparable economic and health disruptions to the lives of Americans in the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic. Requiring consumers and patients to pay for COVID-related care would increase the number of people who refuse to obtain vaccination or treatment for purely financial reasons, thus amplifying the difficulty of ever defeating COVID-19 – an endeavor that is aided by maximizing the amount of immunity and available health care for the population.

Section CI [Adopted by a vote of the members during March 25-28, 2020; amended by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: In recognition that the recent unprecedented and prolonged patterns of flight delays and cancellations at United States airports create situations of unacceptable detriments to quality of life and mobility to American passengers and were due directly to the supply-chain disruptions, aircraft shortages, labor shortages, and poor decisions by major airlines to cut staff in the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for measures to enable airlines which reduced aircraft counts and dismissed staff during the COVID-19 epidemic to purchase or construct sufficient aircraft to replace the reduced capacity, to actively utilize such aircraft and restore prior routes, and to offer to re-hire all staff members who were dismissed as a result of prior responses to the epidemic. In the event that specific individual former staff members do not wish to return to their previous positions, they should be replaced with others who are willing to take on those roles for appropriate compensation and benefits. Sufficient incentives should be offered to airlines to allow pre-COVID flight, maintenance, and staffing levels to continue indefinitely.

Section CII [Adopted by a vote of the members during March 25-28, 2020; amended by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the recall of as many United States military personnel from overseas stations as reasonably possible, with the exception of those specifically needed to defend American assets and American citizens and to carry out specific and limited previously agreed-upon treaty obligations, and their deployment for the purpose of improving domestic defense, infrastructure, and crisis response in providing peaceful assistance to the civilian population in times of major disruptions to everyday life.

Section CIII [Adopted by a vote of the members during March 25-28, 2020; amended by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the rapid research into effective lasting cures and vaccines for COVID-19, such as antibodies that respond to all variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccines that permanently protect against all such variants, and the harnessing of synergies from this research to also develop a cure for the common cold and more effective vaccination against influenza. Such research should proceed with no barriers, subject to the researchers’ expression of ethical intentions, and any regulations or processes that would delay the progress of such research should be immediately waived or repealed. In the effort to accelerate progress in this field, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for an immediate $100 billion funding package for the rapid development of a universal COVID-19 vaccine that would be permanently effective against all variants, with all volunteers being accepted into human trials as soon as practicable. The United States Transhumanist Party advocates for government funding and release into the public domain of any cure or future vaccine for COVID-19, to be distributed free of charge to those infected with the virus and to all who wish to prevent such infection.

Section CIV [Adopted by a vote of the members during March 25-28, 2020; amended by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: Because biological aging is the number-one risk factor for mortality and disabilities in elderly people, as well as infections of virtually every sort, and thus brutally violates the fundamental rights of people to life and health, the United States Transhumanist Party emphasizes the importance of reversing biological aging as rapidly as possible and thereby protecting more lives, including from future pandemics. Accordingly, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for a permanent, annual $100 billion funding package for anti-aging research, to be immediately distributed to leading research organizations in the field which have in the past specifically identified the defeat and reversal of biological aging as their goals.

Section CX [Adopted by a vote of the members during March 25-28, 2020; amended by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the ongoing, continuous, and indefinite deployment of as many COVID-19 diagnostic tests as possible to the general population, with the aim of achieving universal testing of every American, even those without symptoms, free of charge. Universal testing is necessary to understand the true prevalence of COVID-19 infections and the proportion of serious cases and fatalities relative to actual total cases, not merely reported cases. This would enable a true understanding of the extent of the epidemic’s spread as well as how the rates of serious complications and death compare to the common cold and influenza. The United States Transhumanist Party supports generous aid to manufacturers of effective diagnostic tests for COVID-19 that can recognize emerging variants, such that those tests could be manufactured in sufficient quantity to provide a test to every American who wants one.

The United States Transhumanist Party achieved success in advocating for COVID-19 testing kits to be developed that could result in tests being self-administered by individuals in their own homes. This has reduced the physical contact of individuals being tested with medical practitioners and other patients. However, the United States Transhumanist Party expresses concern regarding significant lack of data about the ongoing prevalence of COVID-19 within communities in the United States. Such data, which used to be tracked rigorously and published regularly, have now become sparse and have failed to capture all sources of COVID-19 infection. In order to be able to track the spread of new variants of the virus, authorities need to return to the level of data collection and publication that existed during the early pandemic in 2020.

Article IX. Emergency Actions [New Sections]

Section I. [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: When executive action is required in the face of a serious threat, the Chairman must have the authority to act decisively.

This Section reasserts the Chairman’s authority to act decisively in defense of individuals, groups, or organizations by expressing the delegated support of the Party for the individual, group, or organization under assault.  The Chairman retains the authority to advocate for those individuals, groups, or organizations whose goals align with those of the Party. The Chairman is not required to seek the approval of a majority of the party membership to act on behalf of the Party, nor does he have to provide justification for his support.

Section II. [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The authority of the Chairman to act on behalf of the Party is not intended to supersede the authority of the Party to determine the Party’s position on a particular issue, nor is it intended to diminish the responsibility of the Party to take a position on a particular issue.

The Chairman will retain the authority to act on behalf of the Party, at his or her own discretion, to advocate on behalf of the Party and its members in the event of an emergency, defined as any event that may significantly impact the realization of the goals of the Party as outlined in the Platform.

Section III. [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The Party will seek to continuously empower the Chairman to act on behalf of its members by codifying his/her authority to do so in a manner that is consistent with the principles and standards of the Party, and is consistent with the existing authority of the Party to advocate on behalf of its members as a whole.

The Chairman is empowered to act as the Party’s representative, and to make statements on behalf of the Party, to the media and the public; to advocate on behalf of any individual, group, or organization that supports the Party and its Platform, as well as on behalf of the Party’s members and the Party’s philosophy, goals, and objectives; to promote the Party’s agenda, candidates, and policies; and to respond to attacks on the Party, or on its members, allies, or affiliates.

Section IV. [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]:The Chairman has the ability to designate individuals and organizations as “allies” of the Party at his or her discretion, and to permit such “allies” to represent themselves to the public and the media as “allies” and “members” of the Party. Such “allies” are encouraged but not required to support the Platform.

Section V. [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]:Party members may not seek to compel the Chairman to retract any statement made on behalf of the Party or its allies, affiliates or members; nor may any Party member seek to compel the Chairman to retract any statement made on behalf of the Party or its allies, affiliates, or members by anyone who was so designated by the Chairman. This does not prohibit individual Party members from criticizing a decision of the Chairman, as long as that criticism does not stray into attempted compulsion.

Section VI. [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The Chairman and any of the Chairman’s designees shall strive to ensure the following:

(i) The Party is adequately represented in all communications with the public and the media. In some cases, it may be appropriate to have two or more representatives from the Party speak on behalf of the Party.

(ii) The Party is able to provide key information to the public and the media in a timely manner, through press releases, interviews, and particularly social-media commentary.

(iii) The Party is able to have a significant and positive impact on the outcome or resolution of the emergency.

(iv) The Party is able to respond to attacks on the Party, or on any of its members, allies, or affiliates.

Section VII. [Adopted by a vote of the members during February 17 – March 10, 2025]: The Party hereby empowers the Chairman in a manner that is consistent with the principles and standards of the Party, and is consistent with the existing authority of the Party to advocate on behalf of its members and its Platform. The Party shall further make every effort to ensure that the Party, its members, and the Chairman are able to advocate for the Party and its members on a permanent and eternal basis.

It is in the interest of the Party to remain relevant, not only to the Party itself, but to the public, and it is in the spirit of that interest that the Party empowers the Chairman.

A good-faith effort shall be made to ensure that the Chairman has the opportunity to respond to attacks on the Party, or on any of its members, allies, or affiliates, and finally to ensure that the Chairman is able to engage in the activities described in this Section for the entire substantive duration of any emergency.

Official Ballot Options for Platform Vote #9 and Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations

Official Ballot Options for Platform Vote #9 and Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations

February 18, 2025 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 3 comments


























logo_bg


The 21-day electronic voting period on the ninth set of proposed platform planks of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and previously exposed proposals on investigations and emergency declarations will occur from 6:00 p.m. U.S. Pacific Time on Monday, February 17, 2025, to 6:00 p.m. U.S. Pacific Time on Monday, March 10, 2025. All members of the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) who have applied before 6:00 p.m. on Monday, February 17, 2025, will be eligible to vote, as long as they have expressed agreement with the three Core Ideals of the USTP or have otherwise been rendered eligible to vote at the discretion of the Chairman.

All members who are eligible to vote will be sent a link to an electronic submission form whereby they will be able to cast their ballot.

When you are voting, it is strongly recommended that you keep this page of official ballot options and the submission form open simultaneously in different windows so that you can reference the relevant options as you vote on them. Due to space limitations, the submission form does not list the entire text of all the options.

It is also recommended that you set aside at least thirty minutes to consider and vote on all of the options and read their text closely, as some of the options contain minor variations upon other options. 

For some questions, electronic voting is conducted by a ranked-preference method on individual sections where more options are possible than would be accommodated by a simple “Yes” or “No” vote. Members should keep in mind that the ranked-preference method eliminates the incentives for strategic voting – so members are encouraged to vote for the options that reflect their individual preferences as closely as possible, without regard for how other members might vote.

Results of the voting will be tabulated during mid-March 2025, with the intent to announce the results approximately one week after all votes have been submitted.

NOTE: The titles of the questions and potential Sections are descriptive and informational only and will not appear in the final adopted Platform planks (which will be incorporated into Article VI of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Constitution as regards the Platform provisions and a new Article of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Constitution as regards any proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations). They are intended as concise guides to the subject matter of the questions and potential Sections. Likewise, the letters assigned to Sections within this ballot will not reflect the numbering of the final adopted provisions, which will depend on which Sections are selected by the membership.

NOTE II: The inclusion of any proposals on this ballot does not indicate any manner of endorsement for those proposals by the U.S. Transhumanist Party at this time – except to place those proposals before the members to determine the will of the members with regard to whether or not the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform should incorporate any given proposal.

Voter Identification

E-mail address

Provide the same e-mail address you used to register for U.S. Transhumanist Party membership. Your ballot will be cross-referenced to our membership rolls, and only ballots with matching e-mail addresses will be counted.

What is your name?

At minimum, first and last name are required, unless you are publicly known by a single-name pseudonym which is not itself a common name. Your identity will not be publicly disclosed by the Transhumanist Party, unless you choose and/or authorize its disclosure. The nature of the selections made by the members may be disclosed, but, if they are, each individual vote will not be associated with the identity of the voter but rather will be presented in an anonymized manner.

Navigate the Options

 

Proposed New Platform Sections

Question I. Section E9-A. Defeat of COVID as a Priority
Question II. Section E9-A. Defeat of COVID as a Priority – Ancillary Provisions
Question III. Section E9-A. Defeat of COVID as a Priority – Language Regarding Only Scientific and Technological Solutions Being Supported
Question IV. Section E9-B. Perception of Artificial Intelligence as an Opportunity
Question V. Section E9-B. Perception of Artificial Intelligence as an Opportunity – Ancillary Provisions on Bias and Use of AI in Law Enforcement
Question VI. Section E9-C. Reversible Cryopreservation Techniques
Question VII. Section E9-D. Public Money for Public Code
Question VIII. Section E9-E. Privacy on Social Media
Question IX. Section E9-F. Restraint of Government Agencies’ Efforts to Undermine Private Businesses’ Security Measures
Question X. Section E9-G. Security Whistleblower Program

Proposed Amendments to Existing Platform Sections

Question XI. Amendment to Section XXVII to Align with U.S. Transhumanist Party Support for Ranked-Preference Voting
Question XII. Amendment to Section XXXVI to Provide Exceptions to Taxation for Basic Necessities
Question XIII. Amendment to Section LXXIX to Update the Discussion of the Status of Right-to-Try Legislation
Question XIV. Amendment to Section XCIX to Revise Proposal for COVID Universal Basic Income to a Proposal to Indefinitely Cover all Costs of COVID Treatments and Vaccinations
Question XV. Amendment to Section CI to Update the Discussion of Pandemic-Related Travel Delays
Question XVI. Amendment to Section CII to Update the Discussion of Recalling United States Overseas Military Personnel
Question XVII. Amendment to Section CIII to Emphasize the Need to Support Lasting Cures and Vaccines for COVID-19
Question XVIII. Amendment to Section CIV to Generalize the USTP’s Support for an Annual $100 Billion Funding Package for Anti-Aging Research
Question XIX. Amendment to Section CX to Reflect Success of USTP’s Recommendation for the Distribution of Diagnostic Test Kits and the Need to Maintain Robust Data on the COVID Pandemic

Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations

Question XX. Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations

 

Proposed New Platform Sections

Question I. Section E9-A. Defeat of COVID as a Priority

Shall the following language be adopted as a new Section within the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform?

Given that the COVID-19 pandemic continues to ravage the world and will not end as long as immunity from vaccination or prior infection can be bypassed by subsequent mutated escape variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the United States Transhumanist Party supports concerted scientific and technological efforts to eliminate COVID-19 as a threat to public health. These efforts may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: [Enumeration of any Ancillary Options that may be adopted pursuant to Question II.]

Select one of the following options.

☐ Yes.

☐ No.

☐ Abstain.

Question II. Section E9-A. Defeat of COVID as a Priority – Ancillary Provisions

If Section E9-A regarding the defeat of COVID as a priority is adopted as part of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform, shall any of the following ancillary provisions be appended to that Section?

Select all the options you support. (You may select multiple options for this question.)  Any option receiving the majority of votes cast will be included in the ultimately adopted plank, unless the “No” option prevails in the vote on Question I above. If you do not favor any of the options below, then you may leave this question blank.

☐ Ancillary Provision E9-A-i. Development of a universal vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus that would work against all possible variants of the virus and would confer lasting immunity.

☐ Ancillary Provision E9-A-ii. Development of harmless variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that would outcompete the existing variants without damaging any human or other animal host.

☐ Ancillary Provision E9-A-iii. Development of antibodies that are capable of neutralizing any variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

☐ Ancillary Provision E9-A-iv. Development of reliable cures for all varieties of Long COVID or Post-COVID Syndrome.

Question III. Section E9-A. Defeat of COVID as a Priority – Language Regarding Only Scientific and Technological Solutions Being Supported

If Section E9-A regarding the defeat of COVID as a priority is adopted as part of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform, shall the following additional provision be added to that section?

Provision E9-A-Add-1. The United States Transhumanist Party considers only scientific and technological solutions to be capable of eliminating COVID-19 as a threat to public health and does not support lockdowns, restrictions on individual liberty or medical choice, or demonization of individuals who make any personal health choices regarding their approach to COVID-19 precautions – including individuals who take extensive, moderate, mild, or no precautions. The United States Transhumanist Party also holds that no individual should be compelled to undertake any behaviors that may expose that individual to greater risk of contracting COVID-19.

Select one of the following options.

☐ Yes.

☐ No.

☐ Abstain.

Question IV. Section E9-B. Perception of Artificial Intelligence as an Opportunity

Rank-order the Section E9-B Options that you support. Choose “1” for your most highly favored option, “2” for your second-most highly favored option, etc. You may include the option for “No Section of this sort” in your rank-ordering, and it does not need to be your most favored option if you do so. (For instance, some voters might favor some options but think that no language is preferable to some of the other options.)

If you choose “Abstain”, then do not rank-order any options, as you will be considered to have skipped this question.

☐ Option E9-B-1. [Proposal by Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II] The United States Transhumanist Party supports approaching technologies of artificial intelligence primarily as opportunities rather than as threats. The potential of artificial intelligence, including generative AI, to foster creativity, solve problems, cure diseases, create new opportunities, and facilitate radical abundance far outweighs the risks and dangers of AI. The United States Transhumanist Party recognizes that AI safety and AI alignment are important pursuits to maximize the probability of predominantly beneficial consequences from future AI systems. Furthermore, the United States Transhumanist Party supports restrictions on the ability to use AI systems for intentionally destructive purposes; such restrictions would include a ban on autonomous weapons. However, these efforts should be undertaken in a rational, proportionate, evidence-based manner, avoiding unsubstantiated speculation, alarmist hype, and doomsday pronouncements. Furthermore, the United States Transhumanist Party opposes any efforts to restrict individual liberty or initiate physically aggressive action against other individuals or countries in the name of stopping allegedly dangerous AI development.

☐ Option E9-B-2. [Proposal by Jason Geringer, same as Option E9-B-1, but removing the opposition to initiating physically aggressive action against other countries in the last sentence] The United States Transhumanist Party supports approaching technologies of artificial intelligence primarily as opportunities rather than as threats. The potential of artificial intelligence, including generative AI, to foster creativity, solve problems, cure diseases, create new opportunities, and facilitate radical abundance far outweighs the risks and dangers of AI. The United States Transhumanist Party recognizes that AI safety and AI alignment are important pursuits to maximize the probability of predominantly beneficial consequences from future AI systems. Furthermore, the United States Transhumanist Party supports restrictions on the ability to use AI systems for intentionally destructive purposes; such restrictions would include a ban on autonomous weapons. However, these efforts should be undertaken in a rational, proportionate, evidence-based manner, avoiding unsubstantiated speculation, alarmist hype, and doomsday pronouncements. Furthermore, the United States Transhumanist Party opposes any efforts to restrict individual liberty or initiate physically aggressive action against other individuals in the name of stopping allegedly dangerous AI development.

☐ Option E9-B-3. [Proposal by Luis Arroyo] The United States Transhumanist Party views artificial intelligence (AI) as potentially having positive opportunities but recognizes that its use under current economic conditions and current governments has been negative or might result in highly negative events. The United States Transhumanist Party is pro-AI in general, but not when AI is used to threaten people’s livelihoods or safety. In those latter circumstances, AI’s positive or negative aspects should be debated.

☐ Option E9-B-NO. No Section of this sort.

Question V. Section E9-B. Perception of Artificial Intelligence as an Opportunity – Ancillary Provisions on Bias and Use of AI in Law Enforcement

If Section E9-B regarding artificial intelligence is adopted as part of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform, shall the following additional provision be added to that section?

Select all the options you support. (You may select multiple options for this question.)  Any option receiving the majority of votes cast will be included in the ultimately adopted plank, unless the “No” option prevails in the vote on Question I above. If you do not favor any of the options below, then you may leave this question blank.

☐ Ancillary Provision E9-B-i. [Based on Proposal by R. Nicholas Starr, Adding Language on Countering Passive or Unintentional Bias]

In addition, AI policy needs to address the known risks and harms that are created passively or unintentionally based on the human bias used while creating said AI. Stopping the intentional use of AI for harm does not go far enough, and it is necessary to ensure that AI is immune to biases such racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, and other similar forms of bias.

☐ Ancillary Provision E9-B-ii. [Based on Proposal by R. Nicholas Starr, Adding Language on Prohibiting Use of AI in Law Enforcement]

Furthermore, in addition to bans of the use of AI for autonomous weaponry, AI must furthermore be banned for use in law enforcement, such as facial recognition software that can misidentify individuals and lead to false allegations of criminal conduct.

Question VI. Section E9-C. Reversible Cryopreservation Techniques

Shall the following language be adopted as a new Section within the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform?

Recognizing that the achievement of reversible cryopreservation techniques could enable the realization of individuals’ right to life (brutally violated by so-called “natural” death) by waiting until future technologies could bring a cryopreserved patient out of the cryopreserved state and achieve cures for diseases and aging, the United States Transhumanist Party emphasizes the urgency of advancing reversible cryopreservation research. Therefore, the United States Transhumanist Party supports the allocation of an annual funding package of $10 billion for reversible cryopreservation research. This funding shall be expeditiously directed to esteemed research institutions with a proven track record of focusing on the development and implementation of reversible cryopreservation techniques.

Select one of the following options.

☐ Yes.

☐ No.

☐ Abstain.

Question VII. Section E9-D. Public Money for Public Code

Shall the following language be adopted as a new Section within the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform?

The United States Transhumanist Party supports the implementation of the ‘Public Money for Public Code’ concept, which holds that public money should, where reasonably possible, come to benefit the public first and foremost, and secondarily might also benefit other parties as well.

Public code is understood as code that is publicly available and more commonly referred to as Open Source, for example code released under the GPLv3 (General Public License version 3). The reasoning of ‘Public Money for Public Code’ is that public money should not be spent on proprietary software that benefits a select group of companies, but rather used to support Open-Source projects that are alternatives to proprietary software. As Open-Source software is available for free to the public, said stimulus of Open-Source software could benefit both the public as well as public institutions. An example here could be an alternative to Microsoft Office, such as LibreOffice.

Many Open-Source projects operate via volunteers contributing to the project’s efforts. Opening up the possibility to receive funding for a project could incentivize more people to contribute to a project, and perhaps even use contribution to Open-Source projects as a means of stable income. This incentivizes citizens to participate, as besides the admirable goal of doing good for the public, it also contributes to the participants’ livelihood, or helps them decide to split their worktime between the roles of an employee and a self-employed contributor.

Likewise, this might incentivize software companies to participate as well, as it can earn them revenue. It would, however, be important to observe that companies do not drown out individual contributors, as this could have a detrimental effect on incentivizing public participation.

The public participation would be an important element of the ‘Public Money for Public Code’ implementation, as it would also be a public showcase to stimulate interest in programming in education and beyond.

Select one of the following options.

☐ Yes.

☐ No.

☐ Abstain.

Question VIII. Section E9-E. Privacy on Social Media

Shall the following language be adopted as a new Section within the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform?

The United States Transhumanist Party supports efforts for social media to improve privacy settings, in granularity, usability, as well as awareness of such privacy features, for users. Better control of privacy can minimize the scraping of information, including information that can be used for identifying targets by malicious actors, from websites.

Select one of the following options.

☐ Yes.

☐ No.

☐ Abstain.

Question IX. Section E9-F. Restraint of Government Agencies’ Efforts to Undermine Private Businesses’ Security Measures

Rank-order the Section E9-F Options that you support. Choose “1” for your most highly favored option, “2” for your second-most highly favored option, etc. You may include the option for “No Section of this sort” in your rank-ordering, and it does not need to be your most favored option if you do so. (For instance, some voters might favor some options but think that no language is preferable to some of the other options.)

If you choose “Abstain”, then do not rank-order any options, as you will be considered to have skipped this question.

☐ Option E9-F-1. [Based on Proposal by Martin van der Kroon] The United States Transhumanist Party supports efforts to restrain government agencies from efforts to limit, oppose, or undermine security initiatives by companies and businesses. Although their motives might be pure, to uncover criminal activity for example, such efforts can in the process undermine security on a much larger scale. If government agencies can have access, so can malicious actors.

☐ Option E9-F-2. [Based on Proposal by Martin van der Kroon with clarification recommended by Jason Geringer as to applicability] The United States Transhumanist Party supports efforts to restrain government agencies from efforts to limit, oppose, or undermine security initiatives by companies and businesses. For instance, government agencies should not be able to request that private companies build “back doors” into their software to enable government agencies to access digital devices or systems in the course of an investigation. Although their motives might be pure, to uncover criminal activity for example, such efforts can in the process undermine security on a much larger scale. If government agencies can have access, so can malicious actors.

☐ Option E9-F-3. [Based on revisions recommended by R. Nicholas Starr] The United States Transhumanist Party supports efforts to restrain government agencies from efforts to limit, oppose, or undermine security initiatives by companies and businesses. Although their motives might be pure, to uncover criminal activity for example, such efforts can in the process undermine security on a much larger scale. If government agencies can have access, so can malicious actors.

However, such restraints should not be interpreted to interfere with needed federal regulation of businesses to keep consumers and employees safe and free of exploitation. Many businesses, especially big-money corporations (as contrasted with small business), need more regulation and transparency.

☐ Option E9-F-NO. No Section of this sort.

 

Question X. Section E9-G. Security Whistleblower Program

Shall the following language be adopted as a new Section within the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform?

The US Transhumanist Party supports efforts to create a security whistleblower initiative where a whistleblower can report known security issues that are not being addressed by a company or government institution. This could also aid the whistleblower in the event that they would suffer negative consequences by their employer for addressing security issues.

Select one of the following options.

☐ Yes.

☐ No.

☐ Abstain.

 

Proposed Amendments to Existing Platform Sections


Question XI.  Amendment to Section XXVII to Align with U.S. Transhumanist Party Support for Ranked-Preference Voting

Select one of the following options.

☐ Current Version of Section XXVII. The United States Transhumanist Party advocates Constitutional reform to abolish the Electoral College in the United States Presidential elections and render the plurality of the popular vote the sole criterion for the election of President.

☐ Amendment XXVII-1.   The United States Transhumanist Party advocates Constitutional reform to abolish the Electoral College in the United States Presidential elections and render the plurality of the popular vote the sole criterion for the election of President. the criterion for the election of President to be an outcome of the popular vote decided by ranked-preference voting or a similar mechanism that allows voters to select multiple options in a manner that more completely expresses their views.

☐ Abstain.

Question XII. Amendment to Section XXXVI to Provide Exceptions to Taxation for Basic Necessities

Current Version of Section XXXVI. The United States Transhumanist Party supports the elimination of graduated taxation and income taxation more generally. Instead, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates a flat percentage-of-sales tax applicable only to purchases from businesses whose combined nationwide revenues from all affiliates exceed a specified threshold. This tax should be built into the price of goods from such large businesses and should not impede transaction efficiency in any manner. Transactions pertaining to wages, salaries, gifts, donations, barter, employee benefits, and inheritances should remain completely untaxed, as should transactions involving solely individuals and/or small businesses, for whom the establishment of a tax-reporting infrastructure would be onerous. Furthermore, all taxes on land and property should be abolished.

Shall the following text be added as the new third sentence of Section XXXVI? “This tax would not be imposed on life necessities, defined as goods that are consumable in the near term and whose primary purpose is to facilitate human survival.”

Select one of the following options.

☐ Yes.

☐ No.

☐ Abstain.

Question XIII. Amendment to Section LXXIX to Update the Discussion of the Status of Right-to-Try Legislation

Select one of the following options.

☐ Current Version of Section LXXIX: The United States Transhumanist Party supports repealing the current requirement in the United States that drugs or treatments may not be used, even on willing patients, unless approval for such drugs or treatments is received from the Food and Drug Administration. Such requirements are a profound violation of patient sovereignty; a person who is terminally ill is unable to choose to take a risk on an unapproved drug or treatment unless this person is fortunate enough to participate in a clinical trial. Even then, once the clinical trial ends, the treatment must be discontinued, even if it was actually successful at prolonging the person’s life. This is not only profoundly tragic, but morally unconscionable as well. The most critical reform needed is to allow unapproved drugs and treatments to be marketed and consumed. If the FDA wishes to strongly differentiate between approved and unapproved treatments, then a strongly worded warning label could be required for unapproved treatments, and patients could even be required to sign a consent form stating that they have been informed of the risks of an unapproved treatment. This reform to directly extend many lives and to redress a moral travesty should be the top political priority of advocates of indefinite life extension. Over the coming decades, its effect will be to allow cutting-edge treatments to reach a market sooner and thus to enable data about those treatments’ effects to be gathered more quickly and reliably. Because many treatments take 10-15 years to receive FDA approval, this reform could by itself speed up the real-world advent of indefinite life extension by over a decade.

☐ Amendment LXXIX-1. The United States Transhumanist Party supports repealing the current requirement in the United States that, in most cases, drugs or treatments may not be used, even on willing patients, unless approval for such drugs or treatments is received from the Food and Drug Administration. Such requirements are a profound violation of patient sovereignty; a person who is terminally ill is often unable to choose to take a risk on an unapproved drug or treatment unless this person is fortunate enough to participate in a clinical trial. Even then, once the clinical trial ends, the treatment must be is often discontinued, even if it was actually successful at prolonging the person’s life.  While the Federal Right-to-Try Act of 2017 and various State-level Right-to-Try Acts have been steps in the right direction, they have seldom been utilized, because of various other regulatory barriers, as well as drug manufacturers’ reluctance to expose themselves to liability and regulatory risk. This is not only profoundly tragic, but morally unconscionable as well. The most critical reform needed is to allow unapproved drugs and treatments to be marketed and consumed. Every effort should be made to allow and encourage the manufacturers and providers of experimental medicines and medical treatments to make them available to willing patients with proper disclosure and informed consent, accompanied by protections against liability and adverse regulatory actions. Currently, most Right-to-Try Acts are limited to terminally ill patients, and should be expanded to model Montana’s Right-to-Try Act and the Best Choice Medicine concept to make the choice to pursue experimental drugs and treatments, including gene therapies, available to all patients. If the FDA wishes to strongly differentiate between approved and unapproved treatments, then a strongly worded warning label could be required for unapproved treatments, and patients could even be required to sign a consent form stating that they have been informed of the risks of an unapproved treatment. This reform to directly extend many lives and to redress a moral travesty should be the top political priority of advocates of indefinite life extension. Over the coming decades, its effect will be to allow cutting-edge treatments to reach a market sooner and thus to enable data about those treatments’ effects to be gathered more quickly and reliably. Because many treatments take 10-15 years to receive FDA approval, this reform could by itself speed up the real-world advent of indefinite life extension by over a decade.

☐ Abstain.

Question XIV. Amendment to Section XCIX to Revise Proposal for COVID Universal Basic Income to a Proposal to Indefinitely Cover all Costs of COVID Treatments and Vaccinations

Select one of the following options.

☐ Current Version of Section XCIX: The United States Transhumanist Party supports for an immediate, universal, unconditional basic income of at least $1000 per month to be provided to every United States citizen for the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak and its immediate aftermath, without regard for individuals’ means or other sources of income. The priority for this program should be to prevent massive and irreparable economic disruptions to the lives of Americans in the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic.

☐ Amendment XCIX-1: The United States Transhumanist Party supports for n immediate, universal, unconditional basic income of at least $1000 per month to be provided to every United States citizen for the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak and its immediate aftermath, without regard for individuals’ means or other sources of income. advocates for all American residents to continue to receive free health care for the disease of COVID-19, including free testing, vaccination, antiviral medications, and any other services involved in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. The priority for this program should be to prevent massive and irreparable economic and health disruptions to the lives of Americans in the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic. Requiring consumers and patients to pay for COVID-related care would increase the number of people who refuse to obtain vaccination or treatment for purely financial reasons, thus amplifying the difficulty of ever defeating COVID-19 – an endeavor that is aided by maximizing the amount of immunity and available health care for the population.

☐ Abstain.



Question XV. Amendment to Section CI to Update the Discussion of Pandemic-Related Travel Delays

Select one of the following options.

☐ Current Version of Section CI: In recognition that the recent screening bottlenecks at United States airports create situations of unacceptable crowding which further contribute to the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for immediate admittance through security checkpoints of the vast majority of travelers currently waiting at airports in the United States. Such travelers may be required to subsequently undergo health screenings at other facilities within the United States within a certain period of time, as long as such screenings do not involuntarily place the individuals being screened in close physical proximity to one another.

☐ Amendment CI-1: In recognition that the recent screening bottlenecks unprecedented and prolonged patterns of flight delays and cancellations at United States airports create situations of unacceptable crowding which further contribute to the spread of  detriments to quality of life and mobility to American passengers and were due directly to the supply-chain disruptions, aircraft shortages, labor shortages, and poor decisions by major airlines to cut staff in the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for immediate admittance through security checkpoints of the vast majority of travelers currently waiting at airports in the United States. Such travelers may be required to subsequently undergo health screenings at other facilities within the United States within a certain period of time, as long as such screenings do not involuntarily place the individuals being screened in close physical proximity to one another. measures to enable airlines which reduced aircraft counts and dismissed staff during the COVID-19 epidemic to purchase or construct sufficient aircraft to replace the reduced capacity, to actively utilize such aircraft and restore prior routes, and to offer to re-hire all staff members who were dismissed as a result of prior responses to the epidemic. In the event that specific individual former staff members do not wish to return to their previous positions, they should be replaced with others who are willing to take on those roles for appropriate compensation and benefits. Sufficient incentives should be offered to airlines to allow pre-COVID flight, maintenance, and staffing levels to continue indefinitely.

☐ Abstain.

Question XVI. Amendment to Section CII to Update the Discussion of Recalling United States Overseas Military Personnel

Rank-order the Section CII Amendment Options that you support. Choose “1” for your most highly favored option, “2” for your second-most highly favored option, etc.

If you choose “Abstain”, then do not rank-order any options, as you will be considered to have skipped this question.

☐ Current Version of Section CII: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the recall of all United States military personnel from overseas stations as soon as possible and their deployment for the purpose of rapid hospital construction in the United States, as well as for providing rapid emergency aid and essential infrastructure improvements. Continued military presence abroad only unnecessarily exposes American troops to the risk of infection, while the expertise of American military personnel in crisis response is urgently needed within American borders.

☐ Amendment CII-1: [Proposed by Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II] The United States Transhumanist Party supports the recall of all as many United States military personnel from overseas stations as soon as reasonably possible, with the exception of those specifically needed to defend American assets and American citizens and to carry out specific and limited previously agreed-upon treaty obligations, and their deployment for the purpose of rapid hospital construction in the United States, as well as for providing rapid emergency aid and essential infrastructure improvements. Continued military presence abroad only unnecessarily exposes American troops to the risk of infection, while the expertise of American military personnel in crisis response is urgently needed within American borders. improving domestic defense, infrastructure, and crisis response in providing peaceful assistance to the civilian population in times of major disruptions to everyday life.

☐ Amendment CII-2. [Modification proposed by Luis Arroyo to remove reference to defending American assets] The United States Transhumanist Party supports the recall of all as many United States military personnel from overseas stations as soon as reasonably possible, with the exception of those specifically needed to defend American citizens and to carry out specific and limited previously agreed-upon treaty obligations, and their deployment for the purpose of rapid hospital construction in the United States, as well as for providing rapid emergency aid and essential infrastructure improvements. Continued military presence abroad only unnecessarily exposes American troops to the risk of infection, while the expertise of American military personnel in crisis response is urgently needed within American borders. improving domestic defense, infrastructure, and crisis response in providing peaceful assistance to the civilian population in times of major disruptions to everyday life.

Question XVII. Amendment to Section CIII to Emphasize the Need to Support Lasting Cures and Vaccines for COVID-19

Select one of the following options.

☐ Current Version of Section CIII: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the rapid research into effective cures and vaccines for COVID-19 and the harnessing of synergies from this research to also develop a cure for the common cold and more effective vaccination against influenza. Such research should proceed with no barriers, subject to the researchers’ expression of ethical intentions, and any regulations or processes that would delay the progress of such research should be immediately waived or repealed. In the effort to accelerate progress in this field, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for an immediate $100 billion funding package for the rapid development of a COVID-19 vaccine, with all volunteers being accepted into human trials as soon as practicable. The United States Transhumanist Party advocates for government funding and ownership of any cure for COVID-19, to be distributed free of charge to those infected with the virus.

☐ Amendment CIII-1: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the rapid research into effective lasting cures and vaccines for COVID-19, such as antibodies that respond to all variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccines that permanently protect against all such variants, and the harnessing of synergies from this research to also develop a cure for the common cold and more effective vaccination against influenza. Such research should proceed with no barriers, subject to the researchers’ expression of ethical intentions, and any regulations or processes that would delay the progress of such research should be immediately waived or repealed. In the effort to accelerate progress in this field, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for an immediate $100 billion funding package for the rapid development of a universal COVID-19 vaccine that would be permanently effective against all variants, with all volunteers being accepted into human trials as soon as practicable. The United States Transhumanist Party advocates for government funding and ownership release into the public domain of any cure or future vaccine for COVID-19, to be distributed free of charge to those infected with the virus and to all who wish to prevent such infection.

☐ Abstain.



Question XVIII. Amendment to Section CIV to Generalize the USTP’s Support for an Annual $100 Billion Funding Package for Anti-Aging Research

Rank-order the Section CIV Amendment Options that you support. Choose “1” for your most highly favored option, “2” for your second-most highly favored option, etc.

If you choose “Abstain”, then do not rank-order any options, as you will be considered to have skipped this question.

☐ Current Version of Section CIV: Because biological aging is the number-one risk factor for mortality and severe complications from COVID-19 infections, as well as infections of virtually every sort, the United States Transhumanist Party emphasizes the importance of reversing biological aging as rapidly as possible and thereby protecting more lives from future pandemics. Accordingly, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for a permanent, annual $100 billion funding package for anti-aging research, to be immediately distributed to leading research organizations in the field which have in the past specifically identified the defeat and reversal of biological aging as their goals.

☐ Amendment CIV-1 [Proposal by Vladimir Shakirov]:  Because biological aging is the number-one risk factor for mortality and disabilities in elderly people, and for severe complications from COVID-19 infections, as well as infections of virtually every sort, and thus brutally violates the fundamental rights of people to life and health, the United States Transhumanist Party emphasizes the importance of reversing biological aging as rapidly as possible and thereby protecting more lives, including from future pandemics. Accordingly, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for a permanent, annual $100 billion funding package for anti-aging research, to be immediately distributed to leading research organizations in the field which have in the past specifically identified the defeat and reversal of biological aging as their goals.

☐ Amendment CIV-2 [Modification proposed by R. Nicholas Starr to remove reference to COVID-19 infections]: Because biological aging is the number-one risk factor for mortality and disabilities in elderly people, severe complications from COVID-19 infections, as well as infections of virtually every sort, and thus brutally violates the fundamental rights of people to life and health, the United States Transhumanist Party emphasizes the importance of reversing biological aging as rapidly as possible and thereby protecting more lives, including from future pandemics. Accordingly, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for a permanent, annual $100 billion funding package for anti-aging research, to be immediately distributed to leading research organizations in the field which have in the past specifically identified the defeat and reversal of biological aging as their goals.

Question XIX. Amendment to Section CX to Reflect Success of USTP’s Recommendation for the Distribution of Diagnostic Test Kits and the Need to Maintain Robust Data on the COVID Pandemic

Select one of the following options.

☐ Current Version of Section CX: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the immediate deployment of as many COVID-19 diagnostic tests as possible to the general population, with the aim of achieving universal testing of every American, even those without symptoms, free of charge. Universal testing is necessary to understand the true prevalence of COVID-19 infections and the proportion of serious cases and fatalities relative to actual total cases, not merely reported cases. This would enable a true understanding of the extent of the epidemic’s spread as well as how the rates of serious complications and death compare to the common cold and influenza. The United States Transhumanist Party supports generous aid to both private and governmental research teams working in parallel on developing effective testing kits and approaches, particularly those which do not require large numbers of people to congregate.

The United States Transhumanist Party also advocates for COVID-19 testing kits to be developed that could result in tests being self-administered by individuals in their own homes and then mailed to laboratories for evaluation. This would minimize the physical contact of individuals being tested with medical practitioners and other patients.

☐ Amendment CX-1: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the immediate ongoing, continuous, and indefinite deployment of as many COVID-19 diagnostic tests as possible to the general population, with the aim of achieving universal testing of every American, even those without symptoms, free of charge. Universal testing is necessary to understand the true prevalence of COVID-19 infections and the proportion of serious cases and fatalities relative to actual total cases, not merely reported cases. This would enable a true understanding of the extent of the epidemic’s spread as well as how the rates of serious complications and death compare to the common cold and influenza. The United States Transhumanist Party supports generous aid to both private and governmental research teams working in parallel on developing effective testing kits and approaches, particularly those which do not require large numbers of people to congregate manufacturers of effective diagnostic tests for COVID-19 that can recognize emerging variants, such that those tests could be manufactured in sufficient quantity to provide a test to every American who wants one.

The United States Transhumanist Party also advocates achieved success in advocating for COVID-19 testing kits to be developed that could result in tests being self-administered by individuals in their own homes and then mailed to laboratories for evaluation. This would minimize has reduced the physical contact of individuals being tested with medical practitioners and other patients. However, the United States Transhumanist Party expresses concern regarding significant lack of data about the ongoing prevalence of COVID-19 within communities in the United States. Such data, which used to be tracked rigorously and published regularly, have now become sparse and have failed to capture all sources of COVID-19 infection. In order to be able to track the spread of new variants of the virus, authorities need to return to the level of data collection and publication that existed during the early pandemic in 2020.

☐ Abstain.

 

Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations


Question XX. Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations

Informational Note: This vote follows from the Exposure Period on Policy Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations, which was open between October 17 and November 1, 2021. During that Exposure Period, proposals by R. Nicholas Starr (RNS-1. Guidelines for Investigations and RNS-2. Definitions and Restrictions on Emergency Actions) and Zach Richardson (ZR-1. Proposal in Support of Decisive Executive Action in Times of Emergency) were presented and extensively discussed, with USTP leadership offering feedback on both proposals, and USTP members also contributing in the comments – including responses from R. Nicholas Starr and Jason Geringer.

By way of background, the only State of Emergency that had been declared during the history of the U.S. Transhumanist Party occurred between August 10, 2021, and October 27, 2022, due to the need to take rapid and decisive action in response to unjust allegations that had been directed against USTP member and Advisor Dr. Aubrey de Grey. Once Dr. de Grey was able to form his own organization, the Longevity Escape Velocity Foundation (LEVF), and take significant steps to restore his reputation within the court of public opinion, the USTP State of Emergency was no longer necessary. No subsequent State of Emergency had been declared to this day, nor is one contemplated for the foreseeable future, barring any high-profile and potentially perilous developments which are not yet known to USTP leadership.

Upon deliberating in regard to how to structure this vote, the USTP leadership fundamentally perceives two different approaches – one (advocated by R. Nicholas Starr) which would significantly limit the USTP’s power to comment on outside investigations and declare emergencies and the other (advocated by Zach Richardson) to enable decisive action in times of serious threat. The USTP leadership thus sees it as reasonable to present these proposals as packages and alternatives to one another for the decision of the USTP membership, in order that the principles and internal coherence within each package are clearly understood by voting members.

As expressed in its feedback during the Exposure Period, the USTP leadership strongly favors Proposal ZR-1 and has serious concerns about Proposals RNS-1 and RNS-2. The USTP leadership did, however, take into account the feedback provided by Jason Geringer and R. Nicholas Starr and has determined to moderate some of previously exposed provisions of Proposal ZR-1 in the following manner:

• Add the following sentence at the end of the eighth paragraph: “This does not prohibit individual Party members from criticizing a decision of the Chairman, as long as that criticism does not stray into attempted compulsion.”

• Remove the following paragraph: “If any Party member seeks to compel the Chairman to retract any statement made on behalf of the Party, or its allies, affiliates or members, or any statement made on behalf of the Party by anyone who was designated an ally by the Chairman, the Chairman may assert that the member in question is acting in violation of the Party’s principles and its standards.”

• Revise the third-to-last paragraph to read as follows: “The Party hereby empowers the Chairman in a manner that is consistent with the principles and standards of the Party, and is consistent with the existing authority of the Party to advocate on behalf of its members and its Platform. The Party shall further make every effort to ensure that the Party, its members, and the Chairman are able to advocate for the Party and its members on a permanent and eternal basis.”

• Revise the last paragraph to read as follows: “A good-faith effort shall be made to ensure that the Chairman has the opportunity to respond to attacks on the Party, or on any of its members, allies, or affiliates, and finally to ensure that the Chairman is able to engage in the activities described in this Section for the entire substantive duration of any emergency.”

Any other revisions are editorial in nature only and are intended to phrase the proposal consistently with inclusion in the USTP Constitution.

The revised proposal will be referred to as Proposal ZR-JG-1 and reads as follows.

Proposal ZR-JG-1. In Support of Decisive Executive Action in Times of Emergency [Authored by Zach Richardson, with modifications based on public input, including from Jason Geringer]:

When executive action is required in the face of a serious threat, the Chairman must have the authority to act decisively.

This Section reasserts the Chairman’s authority to act decisively in defense of individuals, groups, or organizations by expressing the delegated support of the Party for the individual, group, or organization under assault.  The Chairman retains the authority to advocate for those individuals, groups, or organizations whose goals align with those of the Party. The Chairman is not required to seek the approval of a majority of the party membership to act on behalf of the Party, nor does he have to provide justification for his support.

The authority of the Chairman to act on behalf of the party is not intended to supersede the authority of the Party to determine the Party’s position on a particular issue, nor is it intended to diminish the responsibility of the Party to take a position on a particular issue.

The Chairman will retain the authority to act on behalf of the Party, at his or her own discretion, to advocate on behalf of the Party and its members in the event of an emergency, defined as any event that may significantly impact the realization of the goals of the Party as outlined in the Platform.

The Party will seek to continuously empower the Chairman to act on behalf of its members by codifying his/her authority to do so in a manner that is consistent with the principles and standards of the Party, and is consistent with the existing authority of the Party to advocate on behalf of its members as a whole.

The Chairman is empowered to act as the Party’s representative, and to make statements on behalf of the Party, to the media and the public; to advocate on behalf of any individual, group, or organization that supports the Party and its Platform, as well as on behalf of the Party’s members and the Party’s philosophy, goals, and objectives; to promote the Party’s agenda, candidates, and policies; and to respond to attacks on the Party, or on its members, allies, or affiliates.

The Chairman has the ability to designate individuals and organizations as “allies” of the Party at his or her discretion, and to permit such “allies” to represent themselves to the public and the media as “allies” and “members” of the Party. Such “allies” are encouraged but not required to support the Platform.

Party members may not seek to compel the Chairman to retract any statement made on behalf of the Party or its allies, affiliates or members; nor may any Party member seek to compel the Chairman to retract any statement made on behalf of the Party or its allies, affiliates, or members by anyone who was so designated by the Chairman. This does not prohibit individual Party members from criticizing a decision of the Chairman, as long as that criticism does not stray into attempted compulsion.

The Chairman and any of his designees shall strive to ensure the following:

(i) The Party is adequately represented in all communications with the public and the media. In some cases, it may be appropriate to have two or more representatives from the Party speak on behalf of the Party.

(ii) The Party is able to provide key information to the public and the media in a timely manner, through press releases, interviews, and particularly social media commentary.

(iii) The Party is able to have a significant and positive impact on the outcome or resolution of the emergency.

(iv) The Party is able to respond to attacks on the Party, or on any of its members, allies, or affiliates.

The Party hereby empowers the Chairman in a manner that is consistent with the principles and standards of the Party, and is consistent with the existing authority of the Party to advocate on behalf of its members and its Platform. The Party shall further make every effort to ensure that the Party, its members, and the Chairman are able to advocate for the Party and its members on a permanent and eternal basis.

It is in the interest of the Party to remain relevant, not only to the Party itself, but to the public, and it is in the spirit of that interest that the Party empowers the Chairman.

A good-faith effort shall be made to ensure that the Chairman has the opportunity to respond to attacks on the Party, or on any of its members, allies, or affiliates, and finally to ensure that the Chairman is able to engage in the activities described in this Section for the entire substantive duration of any emergency.

Proposals RNS-1 and RNS-2 read as follows.

Proposal RNS-1. Guidelines for Investigations [Authored by R. Nicholas Starr]

As a data-driven political organization the United States Transhumanist Party (USTP), and its leadership acting on behalf of the USTP, must remain neutral in its official capacity during outside investigations into past, present, or future members until said investigations are complete and all facts are known and presented to USTP members. The USTP should also refrain from attempts to influence ongoing investigations or public perception while an investigation is taking place. Public statements of facts and acknowledgement of the situation is permissible, but statements must not stray into speculation. Once an investigation is complete, the USTP may issue statements based solely on the facts and analysis thereof. This does not restrict an individual, regardless of their position in the USTP, from speaking out on an issue in their personal capacity, nor does it restrict a person from providing criticism of such personal statements in their own personal capacity.

The USTP may conduct its own investigations into matters affecting members on a case-by-case basis, as determined by a vote of the membership, and under the following limitations. Investigators must be impartial with no personal or professional connection to any of the parties involved in the investigation (accusers, the accused, or other individuals of interest sought for questioning in the investigation). Professional connections include but are not limited to current or former employees, advisors, board members, and interns for the person or organization under investigation, as well as direct competitors of any party under investigation (one may not investigate one’s competition). If an impartial investigator cannot be obtained, either from inside or outside of USTP membership, then the investigation must be abandoned.

Internal investigations should not be intended to replace outside investigations and should be limited to how the incident under investigation impacts operation of the USTP. Consequences sought after the conclusion of the investigation shall be limited to administrative action available within the USTP. The USTP does not have the power to require action or consequences to be implemented by outside organizations.

The purpose of the internal investigation shall be made known to the members with a summary of alleged offenses and what questions the investigation seeks to answer. This must be done in a professional manner, excluding personal opinion and potential bias.

Proposal RNS-2. Definitions and Restrictions on Emergency Actions [Authored by R. Nicholas Starr]

United States Transhumanist Party (USTP) leaders shall have the limited ability to declare, and act on, emergencies on behalf of the USTP’s members. Such a declaration shall have no bearing on, or interfere with, applicable federal, state, and local laws.

When declaring an emergency the USTP leadership must publicly announce what the emergency is, why waiting to act would cause immediate increased harm, and the intended course of action sought by the USTP. This course of action must not deviate from, or spread beyond, the scope of the incident, meaning that any intended action must be clearly and directly related to the emergency.

An emergency shall be defined as an unexpected and immediate threat or active instance of the following, pending member further recommendations and approval by membership vote:

  • Threat to life or public safety (threats to life extension shall not be included unless the emergency threatens an individual placed in preservation prior to the emergency, such as in cryonics)
  • Natural disaster
  • Humanitarian crisis
  • Credible acts of violence
  • Direct malicious attack, physical or digital, of USTP property
  • Theft of USTP funds from an official account totaling over 1% of the last known balance and more than $100.

An emergency shall not include:

  • Personal scandal
  • Delays in research
  • Matters of outside businesses or organizations

An emergency may only be declared in cases where delayed action would clearly cause increased harm based on the available evidence. If the emergency action is to take longer than 14 days, then it requires further approval by a vote of the USTP membership.

Instructions:

Rank-order the options on Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations that you support. Choose “1” for your most highly favored option, “2” for your second-most highly favored option, etc.

If you choose “Abstain”, then do not rank-order any options, as you will be considered to have skipped this question.

☐ Proposal ZR-JG-1. Proposal in Support of Decisive Executive Action in Times of Emergency

☐ Proposals RNS-1. Guidelines for Investigations and RNS-2. Definitions and Restrictions on Emergency Actions

☐ Adopt Neither Proposal Package and Maintain the Status Quo.

Gennady Stolyarov I and Gennady Stolyarov II Discuss the Progress of Information Technology (2019)

Gennady Stolyarov I and Gennady Stolyarov II Discuss the Progress of Information Technology (2019)

January 28, 2025 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov I and Gennady Stolyarov II


Note from the Editor: On January 5, 2019, I spoke with my grandfather, Gennady Stolyarov I (1933-2025), who was one of the pioneering developers of computers in the Soviet Union, regarding his thoughts about how technology and the manner in which we interact with information have evolved during his lifetime and his anticipations about the future. At the time, when he was already 85 years old, he anticipated technology that would directly read human thoughts, advances in artificial intelligence, and even AI personal assistants, as well as using AIs to compose music and develop new inventions.

The discussion was originally conducted in Russian and translated into English by me.

~ Gennady Stolyarov II, Chairman, United States Transhumanist Party, January 27, 2025


Conversation of January 5, 2019

Gennady Stolyarov II (GSII): What is the primary difference between how people relate to information now as compared to the mid-20th century?

Gennady Stolyarov I (GSI): On the Internet today there is a far greater volume of content; it is incomparable with what one would have been able to find in books alone.

GSII: So this gives rise to an interesting question: how to increase the capacity of the human brain to absorb all of this information – since there is so much more information, but our brains remain the same?

GSI: I think that it will become possible to simply read thoughts directly and also to direct ideas into the mind. It is clear that the speed of work of which a computer is capable is incomparable to that of your mind. Therefore, systems will be developed so that, instead of spending so much time pressing buttons, one could analyze the electrical signals of the brain and search accordingly, forming an impression of what one wants to find. The mind already somehow formulates the goal of the search; it should be possible to improve the interface between the mind and the computer so that the computer perceives that goal clearly.

GSII: Even today, it is already the case that the information that one wishes to discover exists. For instance, on my mobile phone, it is possible to locate information on almost anything, but that information is not yet immediately accessible, in the sense that one must type something in, search for something – this is not always convenient.

GSI: Yes, exactly.

GSII: And furthermore, the human mind does not directly absorb the information; one must still read it and be capable of understanding the external content in some manner.

GSI: Yes.

GSII: I think that this is a barrier today, because there is a tremendous amount of information, including on science, current world events, history. It is possible to gather many facts, but the human brain is still as primitive as it has previously been.

GSI: Well, it is very difficult to call the brain “primitive”! After all, we still do not understand how it operates! But it would be possible relatively soon to develop this interface that I described for reading your mind in some manner regarding what you would like to search for. Even now there are attempts to access a person’s data – sometimes regrettably, as this may not coincide with a person’s wishes. However, the information that you access or generate can be restructured, regrouped. This could be a useful underprinning for later reorganizing information in accordance with your wishes and conceptions, into a form that is comfortable for you.

GSII: At present, there exist data about a person on various social networks. There is also information from businesses, from commercial transactions – and there is the question of who owns that information. My view is that individuals themselves should own their data and have the right to determine what happens to them – i.e., if anyone else uses that information, it should be with permission to use it for specified purposes.

GSI: It is necessary to develop an artificial intellect that would be capable of reasoning; right now, you are able to search by keywords – but this process should be simplified further, because it has become tedious to press keys on a keyboard; it consumes far too much time. But I think these improvements will arrive quickly enough. The artificial intellect will be able to sort data in accordance with your wishes and group the information it finds into useful categories. It will remember past queries that were made and related information. You might be making an inquiry about something, and you would see a semantic web of terms – showing you what else exists and suggest what you could search for next. For instance, there could be sidebars dedicated to this, and you would pose a query, and you would be asked if you would like a historical view of the matter – what existed previously, what exists now, what are the outlooks for the future; the system will find all this for you. Every step in this direction will substantially increase a person’s intellectual capabilities. This will be a highly interesting field to pursue, and in my view highly effective.

GSII: There are already algorithms which, if you are watching a video, will show you some related videos. Or you could be purchasing something on Amazon or browsing products there; you would be shown similar products.

In 2014 Google conducted its experiment with Google Glass – glasses with a computer display that showed various information – for instance, data about a place that a person was visiting – but this was a closed experiment for a small group of people that still paid over a thousand dollars to participate. Google did not sell Google Glass to the general public who were not signed up for the trial program, and when Google began its experiment, I think the people who did not have Google Glass were envious of those who did. Those who wore the glasses in public places experienced discrimination and complaints, and ultimately Google ended the trial. I think if Google had initially sold Google Glass products to everyone, then it would have been treated no differently from many other new technologies – for instance, mobile phones. Generally, people are not protesting against mobile phones.

GSI: This is true.

GSII: Was earlier technology – for instance, the large computers from the 1960s – more difficult to use compared to today?

GSI: No, the interface with the computer was far more primitive and quite simple to use. This is one of the reasons I think you are much better prepared than I am to interact with new technologies and devices. The interface will continue to be improved; it will present results informatively, work out associations, group and systematize data. This data processing is all work that you could do yourself, but the system will add value in that it could store far larger amounts of data and, based on the extent of progress in artificial intelligence, help you extract from the surrounding informational universe those parts in which you are interested. It would determine your profile; already the beginnings of this are occurring, as you are receiving automatically generated suggestions. And indeed the more sophisticated systems are already under development; improvements occur with every new operating system, and I often see various updates installing on my computer. I am actually a bit frustrated by this, because after the update is installed, one often has to learn to use the interface once again. I do not like that changes are constantly being introduced, and one needs to somehow adjust to them, and one completely lacks the eagerness to spend time on that.

GSII: Yes, but that will also happen with newer versions of operating systems that will replace existing ones entirely, such as Windows 10 replacing Windows 7 and Microsoft discontinuing support for Windows 7 in 2020.

GSI: This is a well-known contradiction [in regard to updates making a system more difficult to use because of the learning curve].

GSII: Now companies are frequently changing and updating their software, and I think it is easier when they update something that the user does not immediately see and use – such as a system file.

GSI: It is important for the user to have freedom from the involuntary introduction of changes to his systems. If he would like to use the new capabilities, there should be open access to them, but old functionalities should not be impacted.

GSII: Yes. What I dislike most about these updates is that the user interface is changed and previous options are sometimes removed.  Perhaps it may be possible for technologies in the future to help humans better and more rapidly adapt to such changes.

More generally, if through some method, using electrical signals, it were possible to download information into a human brain – so that humans would gain the capability to process information from the Internet much more rapidly – in your mind would this improve the quality of human decisions and behaviors? Would humans at last become enlightened?

GSI: This can happen, but it will be necessary to study and comprehend the brain in greater depth. This is extremely important. Actually, in the future your conversational partner will need to be an artificial intellect. You will be interested in some specific kinds of artificial intelligence, in the sphere of your interests and endeavors. Possible applications are quite varied. For some people, the artificial intelligence could aid in composing music. For others, it could help them track down criminals. For others still, it could help them create new inventions. The artificial intellects will be able to connect, analyze information, prepare data for use, systematize materials that you have gathered, This will be a personalized approach; the computer will, as this field progresses, become increasingly specialized toward fulfilling your needs.

GSII: So in essence these will be personal assistants in the form of artificial intelligences.

GSI: Yes.

GSII: What will happen to the interactions between people? What will happen if every person has an artificially intelligent assistant with access to facts and the ability to analyze them?

GSI: Then the artificial intelligences will establish their own network with the AI assistants of your colleagues. They will process information jointly and also present the results of your reasoning to others.

GSII: It is an interesting idea, that if people have these assistants, the assistants will communicate with one another as well – not just with people directly. This is similar to what secretaries of people in leadership positions might have done in the past, before the actual leaders would communicate with one another.

GSI: Also relevant to the topic of the conversation is a television documentary I saw recently, which showed that there already exist programs to create a simulated environment for a patient – for instance, in response to an injury to the nervous system, it is possible to create some kind of illusory world in which the patient could act and develop some sorts of skills. They also showed some interesting images [of the simulated environments] – so all this is also from that sphere of activity.

GSII: Yes, virtual reality is used for medical applications currently.

GSI: Yes, but the most important thing is that the technology that they are applying also follows the general idea that we discussed. The psychologists and neurologists working on this technology are developing an artificial reality.  This is from the same repertoire of approaches.

GSII: Yes, today it is possible for several hundred dollars to purchase glasses to visit virtual spaces. There are games, educational applications, various virtual worlds. Of course, they will need to be developed further and made more accessible to the majority of people. The technology is still not ideal, but something can already be accomplished.

Pictured here are several of Gennady Stolyarov I’s main medals, most prominently the Charles Babbage Medal for the IEEE Computer Pioneer Award, which he received during his visit to Boston in November 2002. Also pictured here are medals that depict Konstantin Tsiolkovsky and Yuri Gagarin.
Immortality: My Quest and Reasons for Seeking an Indefinite Lifespan – Article by Albi Ndoni

Immortality: My Quest and Reasons for Seeking an Indefinite Lifespan – Article by Albi Ndoni

January 23, 2025 Albi Ndoni Comments 0 Comment


























Albi Ndoni


Introduction

The pursuit of immortality has captivated the human imagination for millennia. My personal quest for an indefinite lifespan is driven by an insatiable thirst for knowledge, exploration, achievement, and the ultimate mastery of the universe. This document outlines the ambitious goals and profound aspirations that fuel my desire for immortality.

1. Academic Mastery

To gain a deep and comprehensive understanding of the universe, I seek to obtain a PhD in the following subjects:

  1. Mathematics: The language of the universe.
  2. Physics: To understand the fundamental laws of nature.
  3. Computer Science: To harness the power of technology and artificial intelligence.
  4. Medicine: To advance human health and longevity.
  5. Economics: To comprehend and influence global economies.
  6. Chemistry: To manipulate matter at the molecular level.
  7. Robotics: To innovate and enhance human capabilities.
  8. Literature: To explore the depths of human expression and culture.

2. Exploration
My thirst for exploration extends far beyond Earth:

  • World: To experience the diverse cultures and landscapes of our planet.
  • Solar System: To explore our neighboring planets and their moons.
  • Galaxy: To venture into the Milky Way and uncover its secrets.
  • Universe: To traverse the vast cosmos and understand its mysteries.
  • Multiverse and Beyond: To explore parallel universes and dimensions beyond our current comprehension.

3. Achievements
I aspire to win the most prestigious awards across various fields to validate and celebrate my contributions:

  • Nobel Prize: In each category, recognizing groundbreaking achievements in science, literature, and peace.
  • Fields Medal: For outstanding discoveries in mathematics.
  • National Medal of Technology and Innovation: For significant advancements in technology.
  • Pulitzer Prize: For excellence in journalism and literature.

4. Leadership
In the 22nd-23rd centuries, I aim to become the President of the United World Federation, leading a unified global government dedicated to peace, prosperity, and scientific advancement.

5. Wealth and Influence
I seek to achieve unprecedented levels of wealth and influence:

  • Trillionaire: To leverage financial resources for scientific and humanitarian projects.
  • (Moneyless) Quadrillionaire: To possess wealth equivalent to a quadrillion dollars in a future where money is obsolete, ensuring the ability to effect change without traditional financial constraints.

6. Legacy
The most important reason for seeking immortality is to create an everlasting legacy. I want my Wikipedia page to be an ever-expanding repository of my contributions and achievements, measured in:

  • Googol
  • Googolplex
  • Googolduplex
  • Googoltriplex
  • Googolquadriplex
  • Googolquinplex
  • Googolsextiplex
  • Googolseptiplex
  • Googoloctiplex
  • Googolnoniplex
  • Googoldeciplex
  • Googolcentiplex

…of pages long and beyond, documenting the extensive impact of my existence on humanity and the universe.

7. Ultimate Mastery
Finally, I aspire to become a God-like being, mastering the known universe with my mind and will. This includes complete understanding, control, and manipulation of all aspects of existence, transcending physical and temporal limitations.

Conclusion
My quest for immortality is driven by an unrelenting pursuit of knowledge, exploration, achievement, and ultimate mastery. With the rapid advancements in science and technology, what once seemed like science fiction may soon become reality. The race towards achieving these monumental goals has already begun, and I am determined to be at the forefront, shaping the future of humanity and the universe itself.

Personal Notes
I believe that with the current pace of scientific and technological progress, the tools and knowledge necessary to achieve immortality and fulfill these aspirations will become feasible within the next 2-3 decades, most probably by merging humans with AI. The pursuit of these goals is not just a personal endeavor but a journey that will drive humanity towards unprecedented heights of achievement and understanding.

General Note
This manuscript was written with the help of ChatGPT.

Read Albi Ndoni’s biography here. 

© Copyright Albi Ndoni, Tirana, Albania, 2024

U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for 2025

U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for 2025

January 4, 2025 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 10 comments


























logo_bg


The purpose of this post is to facilitate member comments pertaining to transhumanism and the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP), which might not specifically fit the subjects of any other post or article on the USTP website. This is the place for members to offer suggestions or converse about any areas of emerging technologies and their political, moral, societal, cultural, and esthetic implications. The general discussion thread is also an ideal location to suggest or propose platform planks that may be considered for future platform voting, and/or bring our attention to emerging legislative and societal developments that may affect the course and impact of emerging technologies.

The USTP will endeavor to open one of these general comment threads per year. This comment thread pertains to the year of 2025.

Type in your comments below. Please note that, to protect against spambots, the first comment by any individual will be moderated. After passing moderation, a civil commenter should be able to post comments without future moderation – although we cannot guarantee that the technical aspect of this functionality will work as intended 100% of the time.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Statement on the Murder of Brian Thompson

U.S. Transhumanist Party Statement on the Murder of Brian Thompson

December 19, 2024 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 22 comments


























logo_bg


On December 4, 2024, there was a killing outside the judicial system. The U.S. Transhumanist Party supports no such thing. We are sad that we live in a world where such killings can seem justified to some people. We strive for a world where no one ever dies, relying on reason and discourse to mobilize the effort required to get us there.
News Regarding THPedia, the Transhumanist Encyclopedia for Everyone – Invitation to Contribute – Statement by Gennady Stolyarov II

News Regarding THPedia, the Transhumanist Encyclopedia for Everyone – Invitation to Contribute – Statement by Gennady Stolyarov II

December 10, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment


























logo_bg

Gennady Stolyarov II


I write to the transhumanist community with an update regarding THPedia, the transhumanist encyclopedia available at https://th-pedia.org.

First, THPedia has been updated to MediaWiki Version 1.40.1 for purposes of both security and functionality improvement. Now THPedia has the same functionality as the historic H+Pedia, and more. Easy, intuitive edits can be made to pages using the convenient Visual Editor within Version 1.40.1.

I encourage all transhumanists, life-extensionists, cryonicists, futurists, and other allies of our community to consider contributing content to THPedia, based on their areas of knowledge and expertise, as there is significant potential for both increasing the number of entries on THPedia and updating existing entries to reflect developments over the past several years.

Second, given the improvements made to THPedia, and the desire by the Humanity+ organization (which approached me in August) to maintain its own transhumanist encyclopedia, I have transferred the prior H+Pedia domain to Humanity+ after upgrading THPedia.

From now on, THPedia and H+Pedia, both forks of the historic H+Pedia, will be distinct encyclopedias and will follow their own paths. Humanity+ will administer H+Pedia, and I will administer THPedia. I will let Humanity+ describe its own plans in its future updates. I have agreed to the transfer to enable two paths for the development of a transhumanist encyclopedia to be pursued simultaneously, and hopefully with some manner of beneficial symbiosis arising as a result.

It is clear to me, based on the history of H+Pedia, that it was originated and implemented with an open-source ethos, which was strongly espoused by the main administrators and contributors.

I emphasize my commitment to maintaining this open-source ethos of the historic H+Pedia on THPedia. All of the content on THPedia will remain available pursuant to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. All editors of the historic H+Pedia who made constructive edits there will remain welcome to edit THPedia. All previous H+Pedia profiles and login credentials should work on THPedia, so it should be easy to contribute. I likewise encourage the Humanity+ organization to provide this manner of reciprocity and maintain the same kind of open-source approach for its H+Pedia going forward.

Transhumanism is for everyone, and this recognition motivated my decision to accept the historic H+Pedia from David Wood in January 2024 and to subsequently rebrand it as THPedia while agreeing for Humanity+ to pursue its own encyclopedia using the H+Pedia name. I have written in 2019 about the need for open-source symbols for transhumanism (“Transhumanists Need New Symbols”) – and the result was a wide array of free, open-source symbols for transhumanism developed by our community. The branding of THPedia with one such open-source symbol (and with a name that stands for transhumanism generally) reinforces this fundamental openness to the creation of a robust repository of information about transhumanism based on the input of anyone within and outside of our movement who has valuable knowledge and insights to offer.

Live long and prosper!

Sincerely,

Gennady Stolyarov II
Chairman, United States Transhumanist Party
Chairman, Transhuman Club
Administrator, THPedia

THPedia has achieved the designation of a Recognized Organization from The Transhumanist Council.

The Transhumanist Council: A Worthy Effort for a New Umbrella Transhumanist Organization

The Transhumanist Council: A Worthy Effort for a New Umbrella Transhumanist Organization

November 26, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment


























logo_bg

Gennady Stolyarov II


On November 22, 2024, the biohacker, science communicator, and analog astronaut Josh Universe announced the formation of the Transhumanist Council, intended to be an umbrella organization that connects and empowers transhumanist individuals and organizations with the aim of achieving unprecedented growth in the transhumanist movement’s reach. Josh Universe is a capable person to lead such an organization, as his impressive skills in web design and his long-time moderation of the r/Transhumanism and r/Transhuman Subreddits can attest.  In addition to his expertise in the technologies of biohacking, Josh Universe has also mastered numerous uses of artificial intelligence and web development languages. His technological skills are suited for the coming Transhuman Era as well as for being able to connect numerous individuals with one another and with the key ideas and goals of transhumanism.

The website of the Transhumanist Council currently features basic information about transhumanism and answers to some commonly asked questions. It also hosts a blog with an initial set of articles about transhumanism and emerging technologies – expected to be greatly expanded in the near future. A content library is being created, and Josh Universe is also collaborating with U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II to modernize THPedia, the Transhumanist Encyclopedia, by creating an Experimental Wiki that will soon host THPedia’s articles, offering another way for readers to navigate among articles and see the connections among subjects in a visually intuitive manner.

Now the U.S. Transhumanist Party welcomes the Transhumanist Council as an Allied Organization and hopes that it will achieve its goals of catalyzing the growth of transhumanism, enabling it to become a household term and a movement that will be readily embraced by young, technically skilled people whose assistance in building a brighter future for humanity will be indispensable. While the U.S. Transhumanist Party endeavors to put science, health, and technology at the forefront of American politics, the Transhumanist Council will put the transhumanist movement at the forefront of today’s technological advancement by utilizing the most advanced tools to connect people, ideas, and projects for the greater good of transhumanism and humankind.

You can visit the website of the Transhumanist Council at https://transhumanism.app/.

Live long and prosper!

Report on the Montana Right to Try Act – Analysis by Shamar White

Report on the Montana Right to Try Act – Analysis by Shamar White

November 21, 2024 Shamar White Comments 0 Comment


























logo_bg

Shamar White


Introduction

The Montana Right to Try (RTT) Act, particularly as expanded through Senate Bill 422 (SB 422), constitutes a landmark in the evolution of health policy, emphasizing patient autonomy, innovative medical practices, and access to experimental treatments. This legislation resonates deeply with the principles articulated by the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) Platform and the Transhumanist Bill of Rights (TBR), Version 3.0. By dismantling bureaucratic barriers and facilitating the pursuit of transformative life-extension technologies, the RTT Act embodies a forward-thinking vision of autonomy and technological advancement.

Legislative Context and Provisions

The RTT Act, enhanced by SB 422, builds on existing right-to-try frameworks by expanding access to investigational treatments. Notably, it removes the terminal illness requirement, broadening eligibility to individuals with chronic or life-threatening conditions. This shift underscores a commitment to medical inclusivity, mirroring the USTP’s call for universal access to health innovations (USTP Platform, Sections V, VIII). The Act also reinforces informed consent protocols and provides liability protections for providers and manufacturers who act in good faith.

Alignment with Transhumanist Ideology

The RTT Act’s provisions align with several core transhumanist principles:

  1. Empowerment Through Autonomy
    The Act prioritizes individual decision-making in healthcare, granting patients the right to pursue experimental treatments beyond the constraints of traditional regulatory processes. This reflects Article X of the TBR, which champions morphological freedom—the right to alter one’s physical state without external interference.
  2. Acceleration of Innovation
    By bypassing protracted FDA approval timelines for therapies that have completed Phase I safety trials, the RTT Act fosters a pro-innovation environment. This approach aligns with the USTP’s advocacy for reducing barriers to medical progress (USTP Platform, Sections VIII, LXXXV).
  3. Ethical Commitment to Longevity
    The RTT Act’s emphasis on life-extension technologies resonates with the TBR’s emphasis on combating involuntary aging and enhancing health through science and technology (TBR, Articles IV, VI).

Scholarly Evaluation and Broader Implications

Academic evaluations of right-to-try laws suggest both potential benefits and challenges. Proponents highlight the laws’ capacity to accelerate access to life-saving treatments for patients who have exhausted conventional options (Gaffney et al., 2019). However, critics caution against the risks of insufficient efficacy data and financial exploitation under such frameworks (Sullivan, 2021).

The RTT Act addresses some of these concerns by mandating informed consent and establishing a safety threshold via Phase I trials. Yet, further measures, such as enhanced transparency in treatment outcomes and pricing controls, could strengthen its ethical and equitable foundations. These additions would align with the USTP’s commitment to universal accessibility and technological fairness.

The Montana RTT Act represents a significant policy innovation, aligning with transhumanist ideals of autonomy, medical inclusivity, and the pursuit of longevity. By enabling patients to bypass bureaucratic delays and access experimental therapies, the Act exemplifies a transformative approach to healthcare. However, to fully realize its potential, ongoing evaluations and enhancements are necessary to address ethical, safety, and accessibility challenges. These efforts will ensure that the RTT framework remains a model of progressive policy in advancing human health and autonomy.

Key Provisions of the Montana Right to Try Act

Elimination of Terminal Illness Requirement

The Montana Right to Try Act (RTT), as amended by Senate Bill 422 (SB 422), represents a transformative step in expanding access to experimental treatments. By redefining eligibility to include individuals with chronic, life-threatening, or debilitating conditions, the Act significantly broadens the scope of investigational therapy access. This provision, rooted in patient-centric principles, aligns with the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) Platform and the Transhumanist Bill of Rights (TBR), which prioritize individual autonomy, the democratization of medical innovation, and the eradication of suffering through technological advancements.

Specific Provisions and Implications

SB 422 removes the previous restriction limiting investigational treatments to individuals diagnosed with terminal illnesses. The previous definition of terminal illness encompassed progressive diseases that were irreversible and, without life-sustaining procedures, would result in imminent death. Now, the expanded eligibility includes patients with chronic, life-threatening, or debilitating conditions.

Conditions newly eligible under this framework include:

  • Chronic illnesses: Such as advanced rheumatoid arthritis or multiple sclerosis.
  • Life-threatening conditions: Such as severe heart disease or progressive kidney failure.
  • Debilitating conditions: Such as early-stage ALS or rare genetic disorders that significantly impair quality of life.

This expanded definition addresses a critical gap in medical accessibility by enabling individuals who are not imminently dying to seek investigational treatments, prioritizing unmet medical needs over rigid prognostic criteria.

Alignment with Transhumanist Principles

The redefinition of eligibility for experimental therapies reflects the USTP’s advocacy for equitable access to life-enhancing medical innovations:

         1. Broadening the Scope of Health Interventions

  • USTP Platform, Section V calls for research to eradicate disease and illness for all sapient beings, not merely those in terminal stages. By including patients with chronic and debilitating conditions, SB 422 promotes this comprehensive vision.
  • The TBR, Article IV, emphasizes the right to access treatments that mitigate involuntary suffering, further underscoring the transhumanist commitment to improving health and extending quality of life.
    ***
    2. Advancing Individual Autonomy in Healthcare
  • USTP Platform, Section VIII highlights the importance of maximum individual liberty in accessing treatments that enhance the human condition. By circumventing traditional clinical trial constraints, SB 422 empowers individuals to make autonomous decisions about their healthcare trajectories.

Addressing Limitations in Traditional Clinical Trials

Traditional clinical trials often exclude patients with chronic or debilitating conditions to ensure trial consistency and minimize uncertainty in outcomes. While methodologically sound for regulatory purposes, this exclusion leaves many without access to potentially transformative treatments. SB 422 addresses this gap by bypassing rigid trial inclusion criteria, allowing broader patient participation in medical innovation.

The Act’s inclusivity democratizes experimental therapies, offering hope to patients historically marginalized in clinical research. This shift aligns with the transhumanist ethos of leveraging technological advancements to extend healthspan and quality of life for all, irrespective of immediate mortality risk.

The elimination of the terminal illness requirement under SB 422 signifies a paradigm shift in the accessibility of investigational therapies. By expanding eligibility to patients with chronic and debilitating conditions, the Montana RTT Act embodies the transhumanist commitment to eradicating suffering and democratizing medical innovation. Through its alignment with the USTP Platform and the TBR, this provision sets a precedent for progressive, inclusive healthcare policies that prioritize the needs and autonomy of individuals over bureaucratic constraints.

Emphasis on Informed Consent in the Montana Right to Try Act

The Montana Right to Try Act (RTT), as expanded by Senate Bill 422 (SB 422), introduces stringent provisions for informed consent, ensuring that patients seeking access to investigational therapies retain autonomy over their medical decisions. This emphasis on informed consent aligns with the transhumanist ethos of morphological freedom and individual choice as codified in the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) Platform and the Transhumanist Bill of Rights (TBR). By fostering transparency, comprehension, and ethical engagement, the Act safeguards patient autonomy while promoting trust in life-enhancing medical interventions.

Specific Provisions and Requirements

SB 422 codifies detailed informed consent procedures, requiring healthcare providers to ensure that patients are comprehensively educated about the following aspects of investigational therapies:

         1. Experimental Nature of Treatment:

  • Patients must be explicitly informed that the treatment is not FDA-approved beyond Phase I trials, highlighting the investigational status and the limited understanding of its safety, efficacy, and potential risks.
    ***
    2. Known Risks and Benefits
    :
  • Providers are obligated to disclose all available data on side effects, complications, and outcomes associated with the therapy, enabling patients to evaluate the potential trade-offs.
    ***
    3. Alternative Options
    :
  • Patients must be informed of other approved treatments or clinical trials that may address their condition, fostering informed decision-making by presenting all viable paths.
    ***
    4. Cost and Financial Responsibility
    :
  • Patients must acknowledge their understanding of therapy-related expenses, including potential out-of-pocket costs and insurance coverage limitations.
    ***
    5. Voluntary Nature
    :
  • Providers must ensure that patients affirm their decision to proceed is made voluntarily, free from external pressure or coercion.

These measures ensure that individuals retain control over their healthcare trajectory, reflecting the transhumanist principle of morphological freedom as articulated in TBR, Article IX.

Ethical Alignment and Broader Implications

The Act’s emphasis on informed consent aligns with the Belmont Report’s foundational ethical principles, particularly respect for persons, which underscores the need for voluntary, informed participation in research and experimental therapies. By mandating thorough consent processes, the RTT Act ensures that patients are active participants in their medical decisions rather than passive recipients.

  • USTP Platform, Sections V and VIII, advocates for maximizing individual access to transformative medical technologies that enhance health and extend life. Informed consent provisions within SB 422 ensure that such access is accompanied by comprehensive understanding, safeguarding ethical implementation.

Enhancing Informed-Consent Processes

While the current provisions of SB 422 establish a robust framework, the effectiveness of informed consent could be compromised if documentation is overly complex or if providers fail to allocate sufficient time to patient education. To mitigate these risks, the following recommendations are proposed:

          1. Standardized Templates with Accessible Components:

  • Plain-language explanations: Simplify medical terminology while maintaining precision, empowering individuals with diverse levels of health literacy.
  • Visual aids: Incorporate infographics, dynamic charts, and animations to demystify complex therapies, such as nanomedicine or gene editing.
  • Summary sections: Highlight key information on risks, benefits, and costs for quick and clear comprehension.
    ***
    2. Neutral Third-Party Verification
    :
  • Introduce third-party systems, leveraging human expertise and AI-driven cognitive assessment tools, to confirm patient understanding.
  • For instance, interactive sessions where patients explain the therapy in their own words could verify comprehension and reinforce voluntary decision-making.
    ***
    3. Digital Platforms and Multilingual Accessibility
    :
  • Develop online consent modules with adaptive content to match individual learning preferences.
  • Utilize AI-powered translation services to ensure linguistic and cultural nuances are accurately conveyed.
  • Incorporate immersive virtual reality (VR) demonstrations to simulate treatment processes, offering patients a realistic understanding of their options.

Informed consent is a cornerstone of transhumanist ethics, empowering individuals to make deliberate choices about integrating transformative technologies into their lives. The focus on comprehensive, accessible, and patient-centered consent processes ensures that individuals actively participate in their own evolution, aligning with the transhumanist goals of autonomy, innovation, and equitable access to life-enhancing interventions.

By adopting these recommendations, the Montana RTT Act could further strengthen its commitment to patient autonomy and innovation, ensuring that experimental therapies are deployed ethically and inclusively.

Protections for Providers and Manufacturers in the Montana Right to Try Act

The Montana Right to Try (RTT) Act, as expanded by Senate Bill 422 (SB 422), includes provisions granting immunity from liability to physicians and drug manufacturers contingent on their adherence to good faith practices and obtaining informed consent. This legal framework not only reduces the risk of litigation for parties involved in the provision of experimental therapies but also fosters a conducive environment for medical innovation. From a transhumanist perspective, this provision aligns with the ideals of morphological freedom and incentivizes the development of transformative life-extension and health-improvement technologies.

Legal and Ethical Provisions for Immunity

Under the RTT Act, healthcare providers and manufacturers are shielded from lawsuits related to the outcomes of investigational drug use, provided they:

  1. Act in good faith.
  2. Obtain clear and documented informed consent from patients.
  3. Comply with established guidelines for investigational treatments.

This immunity ensures that parties acting ethically and responsibly can innovate without the constant threat of punitive litigation stemming from unforeseen adverse effects.

Definition of Good Faith

Good-faith practices are defined by adherence to ethical standards, transparent communication of risks, and diligent compliance with investigational protocols. Immunity does not extend to reckless or unethical behavior, as the law’s requirements for informed consent create a mechanism for safeguarding patient interests.

Alignment with Transhumanist Ideals

The immunity provision reflects Section VIII of the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) Platform, which advocates for maximizing liberty in engaging with scientific and technological innovation. By reducing the barriers to entry for small biotech firms and independent researchers, the RTT Act democratizes the field of experimental medicine, fostering a culture of bold innovation.

Additionally, these protections resonate with the Transhumanist Bill of Rights (TBR), Article IX, which underscores the importance of morphological freedom and the autonomy to pursue transformative medical technologies. By incentivizing providers to develop novel therapies, this provision supports the broader transhumanist vision of overcoming biological limitations and extending human healthspan.

Challenges and Risks

Despite its potential, the immunity provision carries risks that must be addressed to ensure ethical compliance and safeguard patient safety:

  1. Potential for Ethical Lapses:
    Immunity could inadvertently shield bad actors from accountability, leading to unethical practices or substandard care.
  2. Risk of Financial Exploitation:
    Manufacturers may exploit immunity by charging exorbitant prices for investigational therapies, undermining equitable access.
  3. Patient Safety Concerns:
    Without rigorous safeguards, patients may be exposed to treatments that lack sufficient scientific validation.

Recommendations for Ethical and Technological Enhancements

To balance the need for innovation with ethical oversight and affordability, the following measures are proposed:

          1. Establishment of Independent Ethics Boards

  • Regional ethical review panels composed of bioethicists, technologists, and medical professionals should evaluate investigational treatment proposals, ensuring alignment with safety and efficacy benchmarks.
    ***
    2. Use of Blockchain for Accountability
  • Blockchain technology can create immutable records of informed consent, treatment protocols, and oversight evaluations, fostering transparency.
  • Example: A provider administering gene-editing therapy could record each stage of treatment, securing patient trust through transparent documentati
    ***
    3. Mandatory Pricing Transparency
  • Require manufacturers to disclose production costs and justify pricing models in a publicly accessible database.
  • Deploy AI analytics to monitor pricing trends and identify unjustifiable spikes, ensuring affordability and equity.
    ***
    4. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) for Collective Funding
  • DAOs could democratize funding for experimental treatments, allowing transparent contributions to influence priorities and impact.
    ***
    5. Evidence-Driven Standards and Multidimensional Safeguards
  • Treatments must meet minimum safety benchmarks, such as Phase I FDA trials or equivalent international standards.
  • Create a global transhumanist registry to track the progress of investigational therapies and results transparently.
    ***
    6. Real-Time Patient Feedback Via Wearable Technologies
  • Use wearable devices or implants to monitor treatment efficacy and adverse effects, ensuring real-time data collection for continuous improvement.
    ***
    7. Ethics Committee Involvement with AI Tools
  • Equip ethics committees with AI-driven decision-support systems to analyze clinical data, predict outcomes, and flag potential violations.

Transhumanist Perspective on Immunity Provisions

The immunity provisions of the RTT Act are crucial for fostering an environment of accelerated medical innovation. From a transhumanist viewpoint, they enable the rapid development and dissemination of life-enhancing therapies while mitigating the risks associated with bureaucratic stagnation. However, immunity must be paired with robust safeguards to prevent misuse and ensure ethical compliance.

By leveraging cutting-edge technologies such as AI, blockchain, and wearables, the RTT Act can balance innovation with accountability. These measures not only protect patients but also reinforce public trust in transformative medical advancements, furthering the transhumanist goal of extending health and human potential.

Circumvention of FDA Approval Timelines in the Montana Right to Try Act

The Montana Right to Try (RTT) Act, augmented by Senate Bill 422 (SB 422), includes provisions that allow patients to access investigational therapies after completion of Phase I FDA safety trials but before full FDA approval. This paradigm-shifting policy accelerates access to experimental treatments, prioritizing individual autonomy and rapid innovation. From a transhumanist perspective, this provision epitomizes the movement’s commitment to empowering individuals to transcend biological limitations while promoting a pro-innovation environment.

Provisions and Implications

Circumventing Bureaucratic Delays

Under the traditional FDA approval framework, investigational therapies undergo an extensive process spanning 10–15 years, encompassing Phase II and Phase III trials. While these stages aim to validate efficacy and long-term safety, they often delay access to potentially life-saving treatments for critically ill patients. The RTT Act bypasses these protracted timelines, enabling access to therapies that have passed Phase I trials, where basic safety has been demonstrated.

Phase I trials involve rigorous testing to determine a drug’s interaction with the human body, including tolerance levels, acute side effects, and potential benefits. Conducted with 20–80 participants, these trials establish a foundation of safety, with approximately 70% of therapies progressing to Phase II (FDA, n.d.). By granting access post-Phase I, the RTT Act ensures patients can benefit from innovative treatments years ahead of full FDA approval.

Advancing Real-World Data Collection

The provision not only expands access but also fosters a pro-innovation environment by allowing real-world data collection from early adopters. Real-world data, obtained outside controlled clinical trial settings, contributes to understanding treatment efficacy and safety across diverse populations. This aligns with Section VIII of the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) Platform, which emphasizes accelerating access to health-enhancing technologies while promoting evidence-based innovation.

Alignment with Transhumanist Ideals

Individual Autonomy

By circumventing traditional approval timelines, the RTT Act upholds morphological freedom, as articulated in Article IX of the Transhumanist Bill of Rights (TBR). This principle emphasizes individuals’ rights to make autonomous decisions about their health and access transformative therapies without bureaucratic interference.

Pro-Innovation Ethos

The RTT Act’s prioritization of rapid accessibility resonates with the transhumanist goal of transcending biological limitations through technological advancement. By expediting access to investigational treatments, the Act provides a framework for iterative development, where patient outcomes inform continuous improvement.

Ethical Safeguards through AI

Critics may argue that bypassing later trial phases risks prioritizing speed over comprehensive safety validation. However, leveraging AI-driven predictive models mitigates these risks. AI tools can analyze historical trial data, monitor real-world outcomes, and predict potential adverse effects, enhancing both patient safety and confidence in experimental therapies.

Recommendations for Enhancing Safeguards

While the RTT Act’s provisions are transformative, implementing additional measures would align with transhumanist principles and address potential concerns:

          1. Mandatory AI Integration

  • Require the use of AI systems to analyze real-world patient data, flag risks, and optimize treatment protocols.
  • Example: An AI platform monitors early adopters’ health metrics, identifying trends in adverse effects to refine dosage recommendations.
    ***
    2. Global Collaboration on Efficacy Standards
  • Establish international benchmarks for Phase I trial outcomes to ensure consistency in safety validation.
  • Create a shared global registry of investigational therapies, enabling cross-border access and data sharing.
    ***
    3. Patient Education and Consent
  • Develop standardized digital consent modules that explain the experimental nature of therapies and associated risks.
  • Use visual aids and VR demonstrations to ensure informed decision-making.
    ***
    4. Real-Time Feedback Mechanisms
  • Equip patients with wearable devices to provide continuous health data, informing both providers and ethics boards about treatment outcomes.

Transhumanist Perspective on Circumvention Provisions

The RTT Act’s circumvention of FDA approval timelines exemplifies the transhumanist ethos of leveraging technology and policy to expand human potential. By accelerating access to investigational therapies, the Act empowers individuals to take control of their medical trajectories, bypassing the inertia of traditional regulatory frameworks.

This approach aligns with the transhumanist commitment to morphological freedom and the democratization of innovation. At the same time, the integration of cutting-edge tools such as AI and global registries ensures that the expedited process remains ethical, inclusive, and data-driven, paving the way for societal progress in the realm of health and longevity.

Cost Control and Accessibility in the Montana Right to Try Act

The Cost Control and Accessibility provision of the Montana Right to Try (RTT) Act reflects an important but incomplete step toward reducing the financial barriers to experimental therapies. By allowing manufacturers to offer treatments at cost or free, the provision aligns partially with transhumanist principles of autonomy and health enhancement. However, the absence of mechanisms to ensure universal accessibility leaves the law vulnerable to inequities that undermine its transformative potential.

From a transhumanist perspective, universal access to life-extension technologies and innovative therapies is essential for a society that prioritizes human flourishing. This report evaluates the provision’s alignment with the principles of the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) and the Transhumanist Bill of Rights (TBR), while offering targeted recommendations to address its limitations.

Provisions and Gaps

Current Provisions

The RTT Act permits manufacturers to provide investigational treatments either at cost or free. This flexibility is a critical step in addressing affordability concerns for some patients, particularly those who can self-finance their care.

  • Transparency Challenges: The provision does not require manufacturers to disclose cost structures for treatments, making it difficult to assess whether pricing is fair or exploitative.
  • Access Limitations: The absence of mandates for affordability leaves low-income, uninsured, or underinsured individuals at risk of exclusion. Accessibility is thus subject to the discretion of manufacturers, creating potential inequities.

Alignment with Transhumanist Ideals

This provision supports Section V and Section VIII of the USTP Platform, which advocate for improving human health and providing access to cutting-edge technologies. However, it falls short of fulfilling Article VII of the Transhumanist Bill of Rights (TBR), which demands universal healthcare and equitable access to transformative treatments.

Recommendations

1. Establish a Universal Treatment Fund

A Universal Treatment Fund (UTF), funded through public or private partnerships, would subsidize investigational therapies for patients unable to afford them.

  • Implementation Example: The UTF could pool resources from government allocations, philanthropic donations, and industry contributions. Patients with chronic or life-threatening conditions could apply for subsidies, ensuring that financial status does not preclude access to life-saving treatments.

***
2. Cost Transparency Mandates

Mandating manufacturers to disclose detailed cost breakdowns, including production, research, and administrative expenses, would enhance accountability and affordability.

  • Implementation Example: A public database could display cost data for investigational therapies, allowing policymakers, patients, and advocacy groups to assess whether prices align with ethical and equitable standards.
  • AI Integration: Advanced AI algorithms could analyze this data to recommend fair pricing models based on market conditions, production costs, and patient demographics.

***
3. Sliding-Scale Pricing Models

Requiring manufacturers to adopt sliding-scale pricing based on patient income levels would ensure that therapies remain accessible across socioeconomic strata.

  • Implementation Example: A low-income patient seeking investigational cancer treatment might pay a reduced fee proportionate to their income, while wealthier patients would pay closer to the actual cost.

***
4. Global Crowdsourced Subsidy Mechanisms

Decentralized platforms, such as Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), could crowdsource funding for investigational treatments, democratizing access to medical innovation.

  • Implementation Example: A DAO pools contributions globally, funding experimental therapies for individuals selected through a transparent, community-driven process.

Transhumanist Perspective

Inclusivity and Innovation

Universal accessibility to transformative medical technologies embodies the transhumanist ideal of inclusivity, ensuring that treatments for health extension and quality of life improvement are fundamental rights rather than privileges. While the Montana RTT Act’s current provisions lay groundwork for affordability, additional safeguards are necessary to prevent socioeconomic inequities.

Leveraging Technology

Transhumanism emphasizes the integration of advanced technologies such as AI-driven cost analytics, blockchain for accountability, and digital platforms for subsidy management. These innovations would ensure fairness and transparency while enabling scalability.

Societal Benefits

Adopting measures that guarantee equitable access strengthens societal trust in experimental medicine and reduces disparities in healthcare. As transformative therapies become more accessible, they foster a sense of collective progress, bolstering societal cohesion and advancing transhumanist ideals of technological optimism.

The Montana RTT Act’s provision for cost control and accessibility marks a commendable step toward democratizing medical innovation. However, its reliance on voluntary cost controls and manufacturer discretion limits its potential to address systemic inequities. By incorporating a Universal Treatment Fund, cost transparency mandates, and sliding-scale pricing models, the Act can evolve to fully align with transhumanist principles of inclusivity and accessibility.

These measures would ensure that life-enhancing and life-saving treatments transcend socioeconomic barriers, advancing a future where human health, longevity, and autonomy are universally prioritized. Through this approach, the RTT framework not only supports individual rights but also fosters societal trust and technological progress, echoing the foundational values of transhumanism.

Conclusion

The Montana Right to Try (RTT) Act, as enhanced by Senate Bill 422 (SB 422), represents a transformative legislative initiative that aligns closely with the principles of the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) Platform and the Transhumanist Bill of Rights (TBR), Version 3.0. By removing the terminal illness requirement, expediting access to experimental therapies, emphasizing robust informed consent, and shielding providers and manufacturers from undue liability, the Act advances a progressive framework for patient autonomy, medical inclusivity, and technological innovation.

Consistent with the USTP’s core values, the RTT Act dismantles barriers that previously restricted access to investigational treatments, promoting universal healthcare access (TBR, Article VII) and morphological freedom (TBR, Article X). The provision for circumventing FDA timelines reflects a commitment to accelerating medical innovation and prioritizing individual health autonomy, key tenets of transhumanist ideology. Additionally, by addressing cost control and encouraging ethical safeguards, the Act supports the transhumanist vision of a future where transformative technologies are equitably accessible.

However, while the Act’s provisions mark significant progress, they also expose areas for enhancement. Gaps in affordability, transparency, and accountability underscore the need for innovative solutions. Proposals such as establishing a Universal Treatment Fund, leveraging AI for cost analytics and risk assessment, and employing blockchain technology for ethical compliance represent transhumanist-aligned strategies to ensure that the RTT Act’s benefits are universally realized.

Ultimately, the Montana RTT Act serves as a case study in the practical application of transhumanist principles to policy. It embodies the ethos of extending human health and autonomy through science and technology while identifying avenues for continuous improvement. By incorporating equity-focused measures and cutting-edge technologies, the Act can further evolve into a robust model for progressive, inclusive healthcare, advancing the shared goal of transcending biological limitations and promoting a future defined by longevity, innovation, and human flourishing.

References

  1. Governor of Montana Approves Bill Expanding Patient Access to Experimental Treatments. https://a4li.org.
  2. Now in Effect: Montana Law Significantly Expands Right to Try Act. Tenth Amendment Center. https://tenthamendmentcenter.com.
  3. Bill Text: MT SB422 | 2023 | Regular Session | Enrolled. LegiScan. https://legiscan.com/MT/text/SB422/2023.
  4. Transhumanist Bill of Rights – Version 3.0. U.S. Transhumanist Party – Official Website. Adopted December 2018. https://www.transhumanist-party.org/bill-of-rights/.
  5. Step 3: Clinical Research. FDA. https://www.fda.gov.
  6. Gaffney, Adam. (2017). To Heal Humankind: The Right to Health in History (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158433
  7. Gaffney, Adam. “Adam Gaffney on the Right to Health.” PNHP. https://pnhp.org/news/adam-gaffney-on-the-right-to-health/ (Accessed November 21, 2024).
  8. Leonard, Elizabeth Weeks. 2009. “Right to Experimental Treatment: FDA New Drug Approval, Constitutional Rights, and the Public’s Health.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37(2): 269–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2009.00371.x.
  9. U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform. “Sections V, VIII, LXXXV.” https://www.transhumanist-party.org/platform/.
  10. Brown, Brandon., et al. 2018. Assessment of the Right-to-Try Law: The Pros and the Cons. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. https://jnm.snmjournals.org/content/59/10/1492.
  11. Montana Legislature. Senate Bill 422 (2023 Regular Session). https://legiscan.com/MT/text/SB422/2023.

Shamar White is a dedicated Legislative Analyst for the U.S. Transhumanist Party, leveraging a robust background in political science, economics, and grassroots organizing to advance innovative and equitable policy solutions. With dual Bachelor’s Degrees in Economics and Political Science from Montclair State University and ongoing pursuit of a Master of Arts in Political Science from the American Public University Systems, Shamar brings a rigorous academic perspective to legislative and policy analysis.

As President of the Global Humanity Corp, a nonprofit organization committed to fostering collaboration and addressing human rights challenges, Shamar has conducted extensive socio-economic and political research on global issues, ranging from the implications of BRICS economic policies to human rights violations in conflict zones. This leadership experience underscores a deep commitment to advocacy and systemic change.

Shamar’s professional experience in educational and community leadership has honed their ability to engage diverse populations, develop strategic initiatives, and advocate for underrepresented groups. Proficient in economic forecasting, policy evaluation, and advanced data analysis, Shamar’s skill set bridges theoretical research and practical implementation.

In their role with the U.S. Transhumanist Party, Shamar applies this expertise to promote policies aligned with the transhumanist ethos, including autonomy, technological innovation, and universal accessibility to transformative medical advancements. Fluent in Japanese and Jamaican Patois, Shamar’s multicultural competencies further enhance their ability to address complex, global issues with nuanced and inclusive solutions.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments on the Citizen Petition by Age Reversal Unity to Declare Aging a Disease

U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments on the Citizen Petition by Age Reversal Unity to Declare Aging a Disease

November 20, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 1 comment


























logo_bg

Gennady Stolyarov II


The following comments were submitted by Gennady Stolyarov II, Chairman of the United States Transhumanist Party, on November 19, 2024, in support of the Citizen Petition by Age Reversal Unity to request that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) take the following three actions described below:

(1) Initiate proceedings to reclassify aging from a natural process to a disease for the purposes of regulation and research.
(2) Review and consider the scientific and medical evidence presented in support of this reclassification.
(3) Amend relevant FDA policies and regulations to reflect the reclassification of aging as a disease.

Find out more about Age Reversal Unity on its website.

The U.S. Transhumanist Party also encourages you to view and sign the Citizen Petition by Age Reversal Unity. 


As Chairman of the United States Transhumanist Party, I write in support of this petition for the FDA to promulgate a new regulation that defines aging as a disease for the purposes of research, treatment, and prevention.

The Transhumanist Party is an alliance of over 4600 members who advocate for transcending the flaws and limitations of the human condition through technology and for putting science, health, and technology at the forefront of American politics. We champion initiatives and reforms that will improve the human condition for as many people as possible, with as much beneficial impact as possible. Our first Core Ideal is the pursuit of significant life extension, achieved through the progress of science and technology. Without effective ways to address the damage inflicted by biological aging at the cellular and molecular level, such significant life extension would not be possible. Aging greatly increases the probability of each of the disease conditions that are statistically most likely to end an individual’s life. However, without the classification of biological aging as an indication that can be targeted by therapies, drugs, or medical devices, many researchers and companies would not see a clear pathway for any such potential treatment to regulatory approval and delivery to patients. Accordingly, much beneficial and life-saving research is likely to be deterred, and many financial resources might never flow into the biomedical rejuvenation field, unless the FDA recognizes biological aging as a disease and signals openness to reviewing therapies, drugs, and medical devices that would seek to reverse biological aging directly, instead of solely targeting specific disease conditions.

The Transhumanist Party urges the FDA to open the way toward revolutionary, life-saving medicine, which will greatly extend healthy, productive lifespans of as many Americans as will be alive in time to benefit from these advances. The correct time to classify aging as a disease was decades ago. The next-best time is as soon as possible. Over 110,000 people die of causes related to biological aging every day, and every day closer to medically achieved age reversal will mean the opportunity to save such an astonishingly high number of irreplaceable individual human beings.

Sincerely,

Gennady Stolyarov II
Chairman, United States Transhumanist Party

U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman’s Eighth Anniversary Message

U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman’s Eighth Anniversary Message

November 18, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 6 comments


























logo_bg

Gennady Stolyarov II


When I first became Chairman of the U.S. Transhumanist Party on November 17, 2016, Donald Trump was about to become President of the United States. Now, as I mark the eight-year anniversary of my Chairman role, Donald Trump is about to become President of the United States. This most certainly feels a bit like a déjà vu experience – but perhaps more as a variation on a theme than an exact repetition. Despite several areas of clear technological progress (e.g., generative AI, mRNA vaccines, space travel, and some medical advances), I do not consider the world today to be better than the world of November 2016. Societally, culturally, and materially, humankind has endured much – generally pointlessly – during the past eight years and especially during the past five years, only to find itself in quite a similar situation politically, but with more damage done, more nerves frayed, more division and polarization, more friendships and relationships ruined, more blind, irrational tribalism that refuses to see the “other side” (as well as those erroneously lumped into the “other side”) as quite human – not to mention more deaths in horrific wars that were entirely avoidable and that raise a specter of existential risk over our civilization, far greater than any risk that artificial intelligence could ever pose. Yet significant hope remains – and transhumanism is the crucial reason why this is so.

The 2024 U.S. Presidential Election – similar to the elections in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom – was an anti-status-quo election. The candidate and the party most seeming to represent the status quo in the minds of the voters lost. Any party seen as opposing the status quo or offering an alternative – no matter what the alternative – won, as long as it was seen as “having a chance of winning”. Given the duopolistic trap in the United States – which has been thoroughly inculcated into the voters by the elites of both major political parties – the voters who rejected the status quo ended up supporting… the status quo, but in a different guise and of a different flavor, and couched in irreverent, populistic rhetoric.  Most American voters – as well as voters in Western countries generally – sense that almost every major aspect of contemporary society is deeply broken, but they have neither the vocabulary to describe it nor a coherent set of solutions to address the root causes of the problems that pervade our lives. Nor do they have the toolkit of thought and action to resist the many pitfalls that the duopoly places in their way.

Really, what is broken is the Postmodern Era, which has characterized the Western world substantially since World War I and overwhelmingly since World War II. The Postmodern Era deprived most ordinary, non-philosophically-inclined people of a sense of overarching meaning and purpose in life – deconstructing prior “narratives” and thought systems and replacing them with the cynical identity politics of victims and oppressors, “our tribe” versus “their tribe” – where anything goes and any low tactic is permitted because there are no objective, universalizable standards of goodness, decency, or progress to aspire toward. For some time, especially in the two decades after World War II and again in the mid-1980s through September 11, 2001, humanity was able to “coast” forward on the fuel of accumulated scientific and technological progress and the material infrastructure that it enabled. But now our material infrastructure is decaying, and science and technology have come under attack by “degrowth” types on the Left and “all-natural” types on the Right – or the Robert Kennedy, Jr. types who fuse the two mentalities. Life-expectancy growth stagnated in the West and experienced a major reversal during the COVID pandemic, but in the United States, life expectancy for middle-aged Caucasian residents was already declining prior to COVID, due to “deaths of despair” – brought about by substance abuse fueled ultimately by a crisis of meaning.

For most people in the Western world, the sense that they are living lives of abundance and prosperity has disappeared, even as we continue to benefit from amazing technological advances. Generative AI, which has been truly the most impressive advance of the past decade and a half (ever since the emergence of smartphones), has generated a fear-driven backlash instead of seeing a hope-driven adoption (although a more pragmatic, unheralded, de facto type of adoption is beginning to occur). But without a philosophical foundation of hope for a better future, the majority of people will continue to interpret any advancement in a cynical light and will fail to find the opportunities amidst an era of change. In its dying throes, the Postmodern Era aims to drag us all down, as its paradigmatic institutions make the costs of basic goods and services – including housing and healthcare – expensive and beyond the reach of many, as they destroy social ties and networks of mutual support by means of propaganda that brainwashes ordinary people to view other ordinary people as evil, as they foster a pervasive demonization and “cancellation” of anybody who dares to actually offer an unconventional solution to the problems of the contemporary world.

There have been some efforts to resist the Postmodern dysfunction and the attempts at monolithic control by the Postmodern Era’s institutions. Indeed, the recent election results could be understood in some sense as the majority of voters selecting a somewhat more heterodox party, one that fits the Postmodern propaganda a little less well in some respects, even as it epitomizes the Postmodern, post-truth, identity-politics mentality in others. Other minor parties and political figures have attempted to take more constructive stands – for instance, Chase Oliver and Mike ter Maat of the Libertarian Party, who ran a principled campaign that articulately espoused the values of individual liberty and limited government. They did this despite being undermined by the leadership of their own party, who preferred a capitulation to Trump and RFK, Jr. – a leadership that did everything it could to deprive its own candidates of resources and support. Another example is the Forward Party, which has worked to elect solutions-oriented candidates to local and State offices, while advocating for ranked-choice voting – an essential electoral reform in the view of the USTP. However, it is clear that the Libertarian Party is in persistent disarray and further along the trajectory of splitting into outright Trumpists and “Democrats-lite” – an unfortunate dynamic that I had already observed as early as 2016. The Forward Party, while it continues to support worthwhile reforms, has been gutted of its former, more substantive platform that stemmed from the ideas of Andrew Yang. In an effort to encompass anyone and everyone dissatisfied with the duopoly, including some prominent establishment figures who might not favor some of Yang’s more innovative and unconventional ideas, the Forward Party now stands for much less than it originally did, or could have.

There is only one political party in the United States that stands for a completely new paradigm of human history in a philosophically rigorous and consistent manner. This is the U.S. Transhumanist Party, which seeks to replace the Postmodern Era with the Transhuman Era – an era where a sense of meaning and of the desirability of progress can be rekindled, where the improvement of the human condition – the defeat of death, disease, scarcity, pointless conflict – an overcoming of the forces of ruin – can be pursued with confidence and dedication. It was, in retrospect, an immense stroke of good fortune that I was able to assume the leadership role of the U.S. Transhumanist Party in November 2016, when I would have otherwise become politically homeless, and likely retired from politics altogether, seeing no hope for political activity otherwise. The Transhumanist Party offers hope to those who wish to be principled and to build a future where humans can indeed overcome the perils that have plagued us ever since our species and our societies came to be. Just as I found a political home in the USTP, and thousands of others have since – so can you – but remember that we do stand for some quite definite ideas, as expressed in our Core Ideals and Values, our Platform, and the Transhumanist Bill of Rights, Version 3.0.  We are neither left-wing, nor right-wing, but up-wing (to use the terminology of the great proto-transhumanist, FM-2030). We seek anyone who actually wishes to solve problems and build a better future, instead of simply fighting “the other side”, escalating tensions, and becoming mired in trench warfare over the wedge issues of the day.

Ross-Twedt Presidential Campaign

The definite highlight of the past two years of USTP activity has been our Presidential campaign. Our ticket of Tom Ross for President and Daniel Twedt for Vice-President has generated a wealth of conversations, interviews, campaign videos, graphics – all aimed at getting Americans and humans generally to think about how we can respond constructively to immense changes that are arising economically, technologically, and socially. Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt followed in the footsteps (or the Immortality Bus tracks) of Zoltan Istvan in 2016 and Charlie Kam and Liz Parrish in 2020 and stayed true to the intention of running a highly creative marketing campaign for the ideas of transhumanism.

For a distillation of many of the key messages of the Ross-Twedt campaign, I would encourage you to view our compilation of campaign graphics and videos, which illustrate the clear ways in which the USTP stood apart and remained above the fray with its messaging, instead providing actionable insights that people of any party and any political orientation can utilize to thrive in the coming future.

We are still in the process of tabulating the votes that have been cast for Tom Ross and/or Daniel Twedt, who also ran for the fourth time for City Council in Thousand Oaks, California. As of November 17, 2024, we are aware of 566 votes that have been cast for either or both of our candidates. Watch this page for the updated vote counts as new information comes in – and if you wrote in Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt during the 2024 General Election, please let us know that you did so at ustranshumanistparty@protonmail.com.

We are exceptionally grateful to each and every Transhumanist voter who defied the persistent messaging of the duopoly and wrote our candidates in. What is most important to us is the opportunity to spread transhumanist ideas and to have engaged great minds in the process – great minds such as those of our courageous members who chose to take a stand for principles and vote their consciences. We in the USTP are honored by every single vote cast for our candidates!

Innovative Uses of Artificial Intelligence

We ourselves have been harnessing the recent advances in generative AI technology to a significant extent and hope to do much more in this realm. Our Virtual Enlightenment Salon of November 3, 2024, immediately preceding the U.S. Presidential Election, was narrated by two AI hosts from Google’s NotebookLM, who quite insightfully and relatably discussed the USTP’s goals and the Tom Ross campaign.

Indeed, there is no political party that has embraced generative AI nearly to the extent that the USTP has in producing an outpouring of art, music, and graphic design during the past two years. We are not only the party that advocates for emerging technology; we are the party at the forefront of using it! There is now even an AI chatbot designed by our friend Jeffrey Zilahy of the Risk Averse Technology Company, where one can ask questions specific to the USTP and receive answers based on the information on our website. You can find it and experiment with it at https://www.transhumanism-ai.com/thdir/index.

Moreover, this transhumanist skyscraper was generated via the DALL-E 3 AI on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of my tenure as Chairman of the USTP.

Our efforts to apply artificial intelligence to amplify the message of transhumanism are only beginning. Be on the lookout for many more developments to come!

Membership Growth and Volunteering

At present, USTP membership has exceeded 4,600 and continues to grow almost daily. We continue to make it as easy as possible for interested individuals to join. Membership is free and will always remain so, and our online application form takes less than a minute to fill out.

Beyond member signups, we continue to seek active volunteers and will find roles for you if you wish to assist in spreading the ideas of transhumanism and advancing the projects of the USTP. As I wrote in my Sixth Anniversary Message, we seek people who would be willing to undertake projects, track legislation and write analyses, contribute articles to the USTP website, operate State-level Transhumanist Parties and local transhumanist meetups, and reach out to policymakers and the public with messaging that aligns with the USTP Platform and Values. Our FAQ and Action Items for New Members provide some basic ideas of what any member could do. Beyond that, please reach out to me with your own ideas and a description of your skill sets, and I would be happy to explore what it might be possible to achieve through our joint efforts.

Our attempts during the 2024 election season to attain ballot access in Louisiana and Tennessee showed that we need more transhumanists “on the ground” in each state to organize local events and efforts – such as petition drives – more effectively. While we did have dedicated volunteers in both of these states, thanks to the diligent work of Aida Ćemalović and Micah Redding – we ultimately fell short of having a person willing to serve as a Presidential Elector in each Congressional District. This speaks to the need of cultivating a robust Transhumanist presence in every area of the country – urban or rural – and finding ways to spread our message so as to resonate with the goals and values of those who reside there, while showing them new possibilities for a brighter future.

Celebration of the USTP’s 10th Anniversary

2024 was a year of multiple major milestones for the USTP. We celebrated our 10th anniversary on October 7, 2024, with a special Virtual Enlightenment Salon to mark the occasion one day early on October 6. It was quite a remarkable occasion to have so many of the key figures in the Transhumanist Party’s history present within the same stream.

Zoltan Istvan, the USTP’s Founder and 2016 Presidential candidate, expressed pride in the party’s survival and its continued participation in presidential elections, raising awareness of transhumanist ideas. He highlighted the increasing relevance of transhumanism, especially in light of advancements in AI, although he lamented that AI is advancing at a faster rate than the technologies of life extension, and this disparity urgently needs to be addressed. Zoltan stressed that science and technology are the keys to achieving radical life extension and a better future for humanity

I, in turn, emphasized the high quality of discourse within the party, attributing it to the caliber of its members. I also acknowledged the USTP’s goal of shifting the political conversation towards transhumanist concerns rather than solely focusing on winning elections.

Charlie Kam, the USTP’s 2020 Presidential candidate, noted the growing acceptance of transhumanist ideas, particularly among younger generations familiar with AI and other advanced technologies. He expressed optimism about the potential for a stronger third party in American politics, with the U.S. Transhumanist Party well-positioned to fill that role.

Liz Parrish, the USTP’s 2020 Vice-Presidential candidate, stressed the importance of moving beyond traditional political debates and focusing on scientific solutions to global challenges, especially those related to health and aging. She argued that society should embrace, not blacklist, innovative technologies like genetic engineering, which hold the key to improving human lives and saving the planet.

Dr. Bill Andrews, the USTP’s Biotechnology Advisor and one of our earliest supporters, shared his passion for extending and enhancing lifespans, advocating for progress in areas like whole-brain emulation and robotic caregiving to address the needs of an aging population. He expressed concern about the “silver tsunami,” a situation where a rapidly aging population will outnumber those capable of providing care, urging the development of solutions like in-home robotic caregivers.

Tom Ross, the USTP’s 2024 Presidential candidate, focused on alleviating fears surrounding AI, arguing that advanced AI will move towards cooperation and become kinder, not more threatening. He also shared his experiences engaging with individuals who harbor fears and conspiracy theories surrounding transhumanism, advocating for open conversations to dispel misconceptions and demonstrate the positive aspects of the movement.

Daniel Twedt, the USTP’s 2024 Vice-Presidential candidate, echoed Tom Ross’s sentiments, emphasizing the potential for AI to enhance human capabilities and contribute to the evolution of a new species, “Cosmos Sapiens,” capable of expanding beyond Earth. He advocated for cryonics as a potential bridge to a future where AI and other technologies can address the problem of biological aging.

Art Ramon Garcia, Jr., the USTP Director of Visual Art, underscored the importance of artistic expression in conveying the transhumanist message, arguing that art can reach audiences in ways that science and technology alone cannot. He also emphasized the personal impact of transhumanist ideas, sharing his own experiences with aging and his hopes for technological solutions to address the physical limitations that come with age.

Dr. Jose Cordeiro, the USTP’s Technology Advisor, highlighted international transhumanist efforts, discussing his work in Spain, including a march for longevity and the TransVision Madrid conference. The idea of a march for longevity in Washington, D.C., which was first announced at RAADfest in Anaheim, California, in September 2024, was enthusiastically supported by various participants, who saw it as a powerful way to increase visibility and demonstrate public support for radical life extension

Overall, the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 10th-anniversary celebration provided an occasion for reflecting on the party’s accomplishments, highlighting key areas of focus, and outlining a vision for the future. The discussions reflected the USTP’s commitment to promoting transhumanist ideas, advocating for radical life extension, addressing the ethical and societal implications of AI, and engaging in public discourse to foster understanding and support for the movement. The celebration underscored the importance of public outreach and engagement and also touched on the importance of cross-generational collaboration, with each of the participants emphasizing the need to engage younger generations and leverage their familiarity with technology to advance transhumanist goals.

I encourage you to visit our post dedicated to our 10th-anniversary celebration, where you will also find the excellent and inspiring art generated by our members for the occasion.

The longevity of the USTP thus far will enable us to more readily continue our work in spreading the ideas of transhumanism and advocating for emerging scientific and technological breakthroughs to help humankind to finally overcome the forces of ruin. Numerous projects and initiatives are in progress and will be announced in the year to come – even as we work to formulate the best responses of the U.S. Transhumanist Party to the current societal and political predicaments facing Americans and the world at large.

I am hopeful that, despite the turmoil that has intensified since 2016, many opportunities for a brighter Transhumanist future remain – and some of the paths toward such a future will become clearly discernible soon. I plan to share much more in the coming months as we make progress along these paths, and I invite all of you to become involved in making the Transhumanist future a reality.

Live long and prosper!

U.S. Transhumanist Party Statement on the Outcome of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

U.S. Transhumanist Party Statement on the Outcome of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

November 8, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment



























The U.S. Transhumanist Party acknowledges that Donald Trump won the U.S. Presidential Election and supports a peaceful transfer of power. This is not the outcome we sought, but we maintain our loyalty to the U.S. Constitution, the representative small-“d” democratic system, the rights of all individual humans and sentient entities more broadly, peace, international collaboration, and the improvement of the United States through science, technology, and rational discourse.

We look forward to remaining in the Loyal Opposition, as we did during the first Trump and Biden terms. We encourage a policy focus – being ready to point out the bad but also recognize and amplify the good. We will, more generally, continue to oppose the duopoly, while being open to issue-specific alignment and collaboration with anyone who upholds the values and goals of life extension, transhumanism, rationality, and electoral reforms that would facilitate true voter choice.

Join us in this effort! Fill out our free membership form in less than a minute, no matter where you reside.

Preliminary Member-Reported Write-In Totals for Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

Preliminary Member-Reported Write-In Totals for Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election

November 6, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment



























The following is a preliminary tabulation of the write-in votes for Thomas Ernest Ross, Jr. (Tom Ross) for President of the United States and Daniel Emerson Twedt (Daniel Twedt or Dan Twedt) for Vice-President of the United States, as self-reported to us by U.S. Transhumanist Party members and other supporters (with photographic evidence, where permitted by state law).

These numbers are current as of 10:45 p.m. Pacific Time on Friday, December 13, 2024, and will be updated as additional information becomes known. These figures should be considered to set a verified lower bound on the number of write-in votes for the U.S. Transhumanist Party Presidential ticket in each of the listed states.

If you wrote in Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt, please let us know via e-mail to ustranshumanistparty@protonmail.com – if you have not done so already.

Please e-mail us a picture of your ballot only if the law of your state allows it. (Find out more details about which states permit taking pictures of marked ballots here.) Let us know the state in which you voted as well. We want your vote to count, and it will count where it matters if we include it in our forthcoming published aggregate totals.

State Number of Votes for Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt
California 4
Pennsylvania 4
Tennessee 4
New York 3
Kentucky 3
Arizona 2
Connecticut 2
Massachusetts 2
Washington 2
Wisconsin 2
Colorado 1
Delaware 1
Idaho 1
Indiana 1
Kansas 1
Maryland 1
Minnesota 1
New Jersey 1
North Carolina 1

Total Verified Write-in Votes for Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt: 37

Total Votes for Daniel Twedt for City Council in Thousand Oaks, California: 570

Total Votes for Transhumanist Candidates in 2024: 607

Updated at 10:45 p.m. Pacific Time on December 13, 2024.

Please visit this page in the future for subsequent updates.

U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party Positions on 2024 Nevada Ballot Questions

U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party Positions on 2024 Nevada Ballot Questions

October 18, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 1 comment


























 

Gennady Stolyarov II


The United States Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party offer the following statements of position on the ballot questions currently before Nevada voters in the 2024 General Election.

Summary
Nevada State Question 1 – Remove Constitutional Status of Board of Regents Amendment: Neutral
Nevada State Question 2 – Revising Language Related to Public Entities for Individuals with Mental Illness, Blindness, or Deafness Amendment: Neutral
Nevada State Question 3 – Top-Five Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative: Strongly Support
Nevada State Question 4 – Remove Slavery as Punishment for Crime from Constitution Amendment: Support
Nevada State Question 5 – Sales Tax Exemption for Diapers Measure: Support
Nevada State Question 6 – Right to Abortion Initiative: Neutral
Nevada State Question 7 – Voter Identification Initiative: Oppose

Nevada State Question 1 – Remove Constitutional Status of Board of Regents Amendment

Wording of Question: “Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to remove certain provisions governing the Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education and its administration of the State University and certain federal land grant funds and to provide additional legislative oversight of public institutions of higher education through regular independent audits, without repealing the current statutory election process or other existing statutory provisions relating to the Board of Regents?” (More information on BallotPedia.)

Position of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party: The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party are generally neutral as to the structure of oversight over educational institutions and so do not take a strong position as to whether Nevada universities are overseen by a separately elected Board of Regents or directly by the Legislature. Furthermore, Ballot Question 1 would not actually dissolve the Board of Regents, but rather would place it under the oversight of the Legislature instead of its powers being provided for in the Nevada Constitution. Therefore, the day-to-day governance of Nevada’s State-funded higher-education institutions may not be changed in significant ways.

BallotPedia notes that “An amendment to remove the constitutional status of the Board of Regents was also on the 2020 ballot in Nevada. Voters defeated this amendment by 50.15%-49.85%.”

The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party were similarly neutral on Ballot Question 1 in 2020. There was a favorable component of the 2020 Ballot Question 1, which is absent from the 2024 Ballot Question 1, and which would have mandated for the Legislature to provide by law for “the reasonable protection of individual academic freedom at Nevada’s public higher education institutions” –. The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party are supportive of strengthening protections for individual academic freedom and regret that the current iteration of Ballot Question 1 did not preserve that aspect. The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party do see some potential risks of politicization of higher education that may arise from Ballot Question 1 if a Legislature interferes directly in overseeing the content taught or the manner of individual expression permitted on a university campus, without specific protections for individual academic freedom being provided for by law.

However, the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party would generally consider the issues involved in the structure of university governance to be outside the purview of specifically transhumanist political advocacy. Therefore, members are encouraged to vote their conscience on this ballot question by consulting their own individual understandings of the relevant matters.

Nevada State Question 2 – Revising Language Related to Public Entities for Individuals with Mental Illness, Blindness, or Deafness Amendment

Wording of Question: “Shall Section 1 of Article 13 of the Nevada Constitution be amended to: (1) revise the description of the persons who benefit from institutions that the State is required to foster and support; (2) replace the term “institutions” with “entities”; and (3) add entities for the benefit of persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities to the types of entities that the State is required to foster and support?” (More information on BallotPedia.)

Position of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party: The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party are ultimately neutral on Ballot Question 2. Question 2 proposes to replace the current reference to “Institutions” with “Entities” and the current reference to benefiting “the Insane, Blind and Deaf and Dumb” with “persons with significant mental illness, persons who are blind or visually impaired, persons who are deaf or hard of hearing and persons with intellectual disabilities or developmental disabilities”. The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party do not take a strong position on revising language solely with the intention of appearing more sensitive, or avoiding terms that some might perceive to be offensive, although this should not be the sole motivation for a change, and Section XL of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform does oppose “the doctrine of censorship, now prevalent on many college campuses in the United States, in the name of […] avoiding subjectively perceived offense.” Wording revisions to a Constitution, however, are not in themselves censorship, in that the expression of any idea by anyone is not being forcibly suppressed, and there may instead be a genuine attempt to determine what superior, more accurate, or more generally palatable wording to describe a particular subject matter might be.

There is a more substantive possible aspect to Ballot Question 2, which ultimately addresses which institutions or entities the State of Nevada would be constitutionally obligated to support. For instance, not all “persons with significant mental illness” might fit under the older category of “the Insane”, and the category of “persons with intellectual disabilities or developmental disabilities” is a new addition, as such persons should not rightfully be referred to as “Insane” under any framework. Proponents of Ballot Question 2 may consider it worthwhile for the State of Nevada to provide financial support to entities treating individuals with intellectual disabilities or developmental disabilities. However, the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform and Transhumanist Bill of Rights – Version 3.0 ultimately do not take a position on whether such support should be governmentally provided. Article VII of the Transhumanist Bill of Rights – Version 3.0 states, “All sentient entities should be the beneficiaries of a system of universal health care. A system of universal health care does not necessitate any particular means, policy framework, source, or method of payment for delivering health care. A system of universal health care may be provided privately, by governments, or by some combination thereof, as long as, in practice, health care is abundant, inexpensive, accessible, and effective in curing diseases, healing injuries, and lengthening lifespans.” Therefore, it remains the decision of individual members of the U.S. and Nevada Transhumanist Parties regarding whether they would consider governmental support for treating individuals with intellectual disabilities or developmental disabilities to be the best means for overcoming those disabilities. It is possible for an individual member to agree with this, but it is also possible for another individual member to consider private institutions or individually motivated action to be more effective in overcoming at least some intellectual or developmental disabilities than State-funded institutions or entities might be.

Section XVIII of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform states that “The United States Transhumanist Party supports work to use science and technology to be able to eliminate all disabilities in humans who have them.” However, it is not clear whether any additional entities that would receive State support as a result of Ballot Question 2 would be focused on actually eliminating disabilities or only on helping people adapt to those disabilities. The latter may be a goal toward which some individual members of the U.S. and Nevada Transhumanist Parties may be sympathetic, but it is not a sufficiently or specifically transhumanist goal, nor is it one that the U.S. Transhumanist Party or Nevada Transhumanist Party take a position on – other than to express the hope that the individuals who are currently adapting to any disability will someday be freed from that disability through medical cures or technological augmentations that render the disability irrelevant to their day-to-day functioning.

Nevada State Question 3 – Top-Five Ranked-Choice Voting Initiative

Wording of Question: “Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to allow all Nevada voters the right to participate in open primary elections to choose candidates for the general election in which all voters may then rank the remaining candidates by preference for the offices of U.S. Senators, U.S. Representatives, Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Secretary of State, State Treasurer, State Controller, Attorney General, and State Legislators?” (More information on BallotPedia.)

Position of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party: In the view of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party, this is the single most important ballot measure in Nevada political history, as it has the potential to break the stranglehold of the duopoly on Nevada politics. Voters already approved Ballot Question 3 once in 2022, by a vote of 52.94% in favor. However, the Nevada Constitution requires any ballot measures that provide amendments to the Constitution to be passed by voters twice. This 2024 election is therefore decisive for Ballot Question 3, and the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party strongly encourage all Nevada residents who care about having genuine electoral choices to vote in support of Question 3.

The plurality of Nevada voters are independent of the major political parties, and yet they are currently unable to meaningfully influence many local races where a major-party primary determines that party’s nominee, who then receives no meaningful competition at the ballot box in the general election. Moreover, Nevada, as a “battleground” electoral state, often features great pressure applied on voters to support the “lesser evil”, despite many Nevada voters being rightly disillusioned with both the Republican and the Democratic “options” provided to them. Ranked-preference voting eliminates the incentive to vote strategically or for a “lesser evil” to the exclusion of one’s genuinely preferred candidate, since one can provide a complete rank-ordering of one’s preferences rather than limit oneself to one choice.

Section XXX of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform states that “The United States Transhumanist Party supports replacing the current ‘winner-take-all’ electoral system with proportional representation, ranked preference voting, and other devices to minimize the temptations by voters to favor a perceived ‘lesser evil’ rather than the candidates closest to those voters’ own preferences.” Thus, support for ranked-choice voting is directly embedded in our Platform. Furthermore, Section XIX of the USTP Platform reads, in part, “The United States Transhumanist Party supports an end to the two-party political system in the United States and a substantially greater inclusion of ‘third parties’ in the political process through mechanisms such as proportional representation and the elimination of stringent ballot-access requirements.” Allowing open access to primaries and enabling ranked-preference voting in the general election would certainly lower the barriers to entry to candidates who do not belong to either of the duopoly parties.

The U.S. Transhumanist Party has successfully implemented ranked-preference voting in multiple of its internal votes. There is every reason to expect that ranked-preference voting could be implemented with similar success for the much simpler top-five ballots in Nevada general elections that would be developed if Question 3 were to be approved by the voters (twice, the first time this year). The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party strongly encourage every Nevada voter to support Ballot Question 3.

The opponents of Ballot Question 3 have included both the Republican and Democratic Parties and various politically connected special-interest advocacy groups; this should be quite revealing about what these establishment factions find to be threatening to their power. A ranked-choice voting system would break the ability of these powerful interests to manipulate the public through “lesser evil” arguments; politicians, to receive serious consideration, would actually have to at least pretend to be for the greater good rather than merely a lesser evil!

An astonishing and disgraceful plethora of misrepresentations about Ballot Question 3 have been propagated by the opposing establishment interests:
· Opponents claim that ranked-choice voting would be confusing to voters – as if people do not intuitively know how to rank-order their options; to suggest this is to insult the intelligence of nearly voter!
· Opponents claim that people would be forced to rank-order multiple candidates, when the text of the proposed Constitutional amendment specifically would allow a voter to “mark as many choices as the voter wishes” (Article 15, Section 18, Paragraph 3).
· Opponents claim that ranked-choice voting would violate the principle of “one person, one vote”, when in fact every eligible voter would still cast one ballot and would have the option to rank-order as many candidates as that voter wishes – from as few as one to as many as five. If a voter only chooses to indicate one candidate, or any number fewer than five, that voter is not disenfranchised by that voluntary decision, just as a person who is eligible to vote but chooses not to vote is not disenfranchised by their own choice. No serious argument can be made that the principle of “one person, one vote” is violated just because some people choose not to vote. By extension, no serious argument can be made that this principle would be violated just because some people would choose to rank-order fewer than all of the candidates.

For an extensive discussion of how ranked-choice voting works, the USTP encourages everyone to view our Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Kit Muehlman and FairVote Washington, as well as a subsequent, in-depth presentation by FairVote Washington on the technical workings of proportional ranked-choice voting.

Nevada State Question 4 – Remove Slavery as Punishment for Crime from Constitution Amendment

Wording of Question: “Shall the Ordinance of the Nevada Constitution and the Nevada Constitution be amended to remove language authorizing the use of slavery and involuntary servitude as a criminal punishment?” (More information on BallotPedia.)

Position of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party: The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party support Ballot Question 4. The Transhumanist Bill of Rights – Version 3.0 states in Article XXV, “No sentient entity shall be held in slavery or involuntary servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.” There are no exceptions provided for the prohibition on slavery and involuntary servitude in the Transhumanist Bill of Rights. Question 4 would align the Nevada State Constitution with the Transhumanist Bill of Rights.

It has been noted in the various explanations of this ballot question that it would not result in the abolition of prison work programs, which may, if administered properly, have benefits such as enabling prisoners to learn marketable skills and to have a path toward integration into peaceful and productive economic life upon their release from prison. However, the prohibition of involuntary servitude would mean that prisoners would have the prerogative to opt into those work programs, and that prison labor would not be used as punishment for an offense in and of itself. The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party would concur that prison work programs should be voluntary for the prisoners and should be offered as opportunities, not as punishments.

Nevada State Question 5 – Sales Tax Exemption for Diapers Measure

Wording of Question: “Shall the Sales and Use Tax Act of 1955 be amended to provide an exemption from the taxes imposed by this Act on the gross receipts from the sale and the storage, use or other consumption of diapers?” (More information on BallotPedia.)

Position of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party: Section XXXVI of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform expresses support for “a flat percentage-of-sales tax applicable only to purchases from businesses whose combined nationwide revenues from all affiliates exceed a specified threshold.” The U.S. Transhumanist Party, in its most recent Exposure Period, considered an amendment to Section XXXVI, which would add the language, “This tax would not be imposed on life necessities, defined as goods that are consumable in the near term and whose primary purpose is to facilitate human survival.” The Nevada Transhumanist Party already included this language on July 26, 2024, within Section V of the Nevada Transhumanist Party Platform.

Currently, the State of Nevada lacks an income tax and has a state sales tax, from which various goods considered to be necessities are excluded. Diapers can be considered to facilitate the survival, with a basic amount of dignity, of certain humans who need them. Based on the principle that the cost of necessities should be excluded from any manner of sales tax, which already appears to be reflected in Nevada law and in the Nevada Transhumanist Party Platform, and which also did not meet any opposition during the Exposure Period for Platform Vote #9, the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party support Ballot Question 5.

Nevada State Question 6 – Right to Abortion Initiative

Wording of Question: “Should the Nevada Constitution be amended to create an individual’s fundamental right to an abortion, without interference by state or local governments, whenever the abortion is performed by a qualified healthcare professional until fetal viability or when necessary to protect the health or life of the pregnant individual at any point during the pregnancy?” (More information on BallotPedia.)

Position of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party: The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party are intentionally and conscientiously neutral on the question of abortion, which is one of the most divisive and intractable issues in American politics today. Its intractability stems from the existence of an inherent conflict of rights, which cannot be resolved using contemporary technology.

Section LXXXIV of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform offers a potential future solution to this divisive issue in the form of ectogenesis, “the ability of organisms to be incubated and to grow to the point of independent survival, within an artificial environment that provides such organisms with all the necessities of biological survival and development.” Ectogenesis posses the promise of “alleviating the burdens of human pregnancy and rendering the divisive debate over abortion obsolete by reconciling the right to life of a fetus with the freedom of a woman to choose not to carry that fetus.”

However, ectogenesis for humans is not yet available. During the present time, abortion is being utilized to an escalating extent by both major political parties as a wedge issue designed, through the extreme responses to it from both sides, to polarize and divide the population over situations that are unlikely to affect most people personally. It is for this reason that the U.S. Transhumanist Party de-emphasizes the abortion issue in its Platform and rhetoric. Under the status quo, this issue cannot be constructively resolved. We need technology, such as ectogenesis, to render abortion, and especially the abortion debate, obsolete.

The U.S. Transhumanist Party’s founder, Zoltan Istvan, who is personally a supporter of abortion rights, articulated this point of view in his August 3, 2019, editorial in the New York Times, “The Abortion Debate Is Stuck. Are Artificial Wombs the Answer?”

The U.S. Transhumanist Party also recognizes that its members have a broad spectrum of views on the abortion issue. The USTP, in striving to be a big-tent organization, has intentionally avoided creating any manner of litmus test on this issue vis-à-vis its membership.

The U.S. Transhumanist Party does note, by way of a factual observation, that abortion is currently legal in Nevada statute up to 24 weeks (6 months), and thus if Ballot Question 6 is defeated, this would not affect the status quo in regard to the legality and availability of abortions in Nevada. Ballot Question 6 proposes to establish a right to abortion within the Nevada Constitution and would extend the timeframe of legal abortion “until fetal viability or when necessary to protect the health or life of the pregnant individual at any point during the pregnancy”. If enacted, Ballot Question 6 would thus likely broaden the timeframe during which abortions would be legal, in many cases substantially beyond 6 months.

Accordingly, individual members are free to vote their conscience, or to abstain from voting, on Ballot Question 6, however they may choose.

Nevada State Question 7 – Voter Identification Initiative

Wording of Question: “Should the Nevada Constitution be amended to require voters to either present photo identification to verify their identity when voting in-person or to provide certain personal information to verify their identity when voting by mail ballot?” (More information on BallotPedia.)

Position of the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party: The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party seek to render it easier, not harder, for people (and sentient entities more generally) to be able to vote in elections. As a party with the broadest franchise of any organization known to it – extending the prerogative for Allied Membership to “any being capable of logical reasoning and of the expression of political opinions” (U.S. Transhumanist Party Constitution, Article II, Section X) – and enabling Allied Members to vote in its internal elections, the USTP is supportive of making voting as accessible as possible to as many sentient entities as possible. The USTP practices this in its internal voting processes, where electronic, ranked-preference voting has been used with significant success and with robust verification that only genuine USTP members (and not, for instance, non-sentient bots that serve a particular special interest) have been the ones casting votes.

While it is not inherently in conflict with the USTP’s values to require some manner of identification to render a person eligible to vote, the USTP does not consider a requirement of voter identification at the time of voting to be necessary for this purpose. When an individual registers to vote, it is already the case in Nevada that one of several listed forms of identification needs to be produced to demonstrate that this person is a U.S. citizen residing in the district where this person is seeking to register to vote. It is not necessary, once a person is registered to vote, to duplicatively require the same voter identification when that person seeks to cast their ballot. Per the official Arguments Against Passage of Question 7 on the Nevada Sample Ballot, “impersonating someone else at the polls [almost] never happens. One study found that that out of more than a billion votes cast, it happened 31 times – statistically zero. You have a better chance of getting struck by lightning.”

Furthermore, requiring hard-copy voter identification at the time of voting reinforces an already-obsolete paper-based voting system which should, as soon as the technology is viable and deployable at scale, be replaced with an electronic, blockchain-based system using which people could securely verify their identities and vote from the comfort of their homes.

In practice, Ballot Question 7 would limit who is able to vote in Nevada and would, through procedural barriers, deprive some number of U.S. citizens who are legally eligible to vote and properly registered to vote from being able to vote in practice. The U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party view such an outcome as contrary to their support for enfranchising more sentient entities. Accordingly, the U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party are opposed to Ballot Question 7.

Where to Write In Tom Ross for President of the United States – and How to Make Sure Your Vote Counts

Where to Write In Tom Ross for President of the United States – and How to Make Sure Your Vote Counts

October 14, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 5 comments


























Support the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s Endorsed Ross-Twedt 2024 Campaign! Write Them In!

The United States Transhumanist Party (USTP) offers this guidance to its members and to other interested persons among the general public who wish to support the USTP-endorsed ticket of Tom Ross (Thomas Ernest Ross, Jr.) for President of the United States and Daniel Twedt (Daniel Emerson Twedt) for Vice-President of the United States.

The USTP encourages as many U.S. registered voters as possible to write in Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt in every state where write-in options exist pursuant to law.

Find your state among the five categories listed on the map below. If you support the Ross-Twedt 2024 ticket, you are then encouraged to follow the guidance pertaining to that category of states.

During the 2025-2028 time period, the USTP hopes to continue collaborating with other alternative political parties and advocacy organizations to lower as many barriers to ballot access as possible, in as many jurisdictions as possible.

– States That Allow Automatic Write-In Access and Do Not Limit Ballot Pictures

– States That Allow Automatic Write-In Access – But Prohibit Ballot Pictures

– States That Allow Write-In Candidates and Do Not Limit Ballot Pictures – But We Need to Count the Votes

– States That Allow Write-In Candidates – But Prohibit Ballot Pictures – But We Still Need to Count the Votes

– States That Disallow Write-In Candidates

– Why Vote Transhumanist in 2024?

Sources:

“2024 elections: State by state guide to ballot selfies”. Catherine Stoddard. Live Now Fox. September 27, 2024.

“Write-In Voting”. U.S. Election Assistance Commission. April 2024.

 

States That Allow Automatic Write-In Access and Do Not Limit Ballot Pictures

Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, New Hampshire, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wyoming

Actions Recommended: Write in Tom Ross as your Presidential candidate of choice.

E-mail us a picture of your marked ballot or simply let us know that you voted for Tom Ross. Send your e-mail to ustranshumanistparty@protonmail.com. 

These states will probably count your vote, but we want to count your vote as well and do it sooner! Also, we have no guarantee that these states will publish known vote totals for write-in candidates, but we certainly will.

States That Allow Automatic Write-In Access – But Prohibit Ballot Pictures

New Jersey, South Carolina

Actions Recommended: Write in Tom Ross as your Presidential candidate of choice.

E-mail us to let us know that you voted for Tom Ross. Send your e-mail to ustranshumanistparty@protonmail.com. 

However, please do not send pictures of marked ballots.

These states will probably count your vote, but we want to count your vote as well and do it sooner! Also, we have no guarantee that these states will publish known vote totals for write-in candidates, but we certainly will.

These states unfortunately prohibit “ballot selfies” or pictures of marked ballots, so please only tell us that you voted for Tom Ross but do not send us actual pictures. We will believe you and count your vote.

States That Allow Write-In Candidates and Do Not Limit Ballot Pictures – But We Need to Count the Votes

Arizona*, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida**,  Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia***

Actions Recommended: Write in Tom Ross as your Presidential candidate of choice.

E-mail us a picture of your marked ballot or simply let us know that you voted for Tom Ross. This will be important to ensure that your vote is counted, because the state will likely not publish the official totals. Send your e-mail to ustranshumanistparty@protonmail.com. 

  • Arizona does not limit pictures of one’s ballot when taken from home, but may limit photos and videos inside official voting locations.

** Florida prohibits photography inside polling places, but voters are allowed to take pictures of their own ballots.

*** West Virginia prohibits photography inside polling places, but voters are allowed to take pictures of their own ballots.

States That Allow Write-In Candidates – But Prohibit Ballot Pictures – But We Still Need to Count the Votes

Alaska, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Missouri, Montana, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Tennessee, Texas, Wisconsin

Actions Recommended: Write in Tom Ross as your Presidential candidate of choice.

E-mail us to let us know that you voted for Tom Ross. However, please do not send pictures of marked ballots. Send your e-mail to ustranshumanistparty@protonmail.com. 

E-mailing us to simply let us know you voted is highly encouraged, since this will be important to ensure that your vote is counted, because the state will likely not publish the official totals.

States That Disallow Write-In Candidates

Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, Oklahoma, South Dakota

Actions Recommended: Vote your conscience for the candidate on the ballot you most prefer.

The above six states above unfortunately disallow write-in candidates for President and Vice-President altogether, and therefore you would not have the option to write in Tom Ross for President. The U.S. Transhumanist Party encourages you to vote your conscience based on which of the other candidates on the ballot would most closely reflect your personal views and policy preferences.

Note that even if you cannot write in the U.S. Transhumanist Party candidates, your alternatives are not limited to the duopoly. You have additional choices. (None of the candidates below are specifically endorsed by the U.S. Transhumanist Party. They are simply mentioned to provide examples of additional options that are available on the ballots in various states. Voters are encouraged to support the Ross-Twedt ticket when possible. When this is not possible, use your conscience and feel free to research additional options using available online resources.)

The Libertarian Party ticket of Chase Oliver and Mike ter Maat is on the ballot in 48 states (with the exception of Illinois and New York). The Oliver / ter Maat ticket is on the ballot in the non-write-in states of Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, Oklahoma, and South Dakota.

The Green Party ticket of Jill Stein and Butch Ware is on the ballot in 37 states. The Stein / Ware ticket is on the ballot in the non-write-in states of Hawaii, Louisiana, and Mississippi.

The campaigns of Cornel West and Melina Abdullah (Independent), Peter Sonski and Lauren Onak (American Solidarity Party), and Randall Terry and Stephen Broden (Constitution Party) are on the ballots in at least one of the states that disallow write-in candidates.

Chase Oliver, Jill Stein, and Randall Terry participated in the Presidential debates hosted by the Free and Equal Elections Foundation, including (for Oliver and Stein) the February 29, 2024, debate in New York City, co-sponsored by USTP Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II and other USTP members.

The U.S. Transhumanist Party is proud to be part of the Free and Equal Open Debates Coalition.

Why Vote Transhumanist in 2024?

In case you need additional persuasion to write in Tom Ross and support the Ross-Twedt ticket, here are some basic reasons.

  • Your one vote will not decide the outcome of the Presidential election, even in battleground states. But it can send a message that the status quo is broken and a dramatic refocusing of American politics is needed. We can do better than the duopoly! The tragic Trump-Biden debate of June 27, 2024, clearly showed that America deserves far better spokespeople on the political stage – as if we needed further demonstration of this after their disgraceful debate of September 29, 2020, more than four years ago. While the subsequent Trump-Harris (September 10, 2024) and Vance-Walz (October 1, 2024) debates were somewhat more substantive and less egregious – still misleading in many of the candidates’ comments but closer to the historical “norm” of American politics – they were improvements relative to such an abysmally low baseline that we truly need a stratospheric elevation of the tone of the discourse in American politics. Just contrast what you heard from Trump, Biden, Harris, Vance, and Walz, with the thoughtful, civil, erudite responses of Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt to the questions from the Free and Equal Presidential Debate #2. (Watch them on YouTube here or view them on the USTP website here.)
  • Let the political establishment know that ignoring science and technology is no longer palatable. Technological progress, particularly in medicine, is urgently needed to overcome the numerous crises of our time.
  • Support dedicated life-extension advocates – enable them to reach new audiences and show them that radical life extension is feasible and desirable.
  • Support a hopeful, empowering view of artificial intelligence and automation instead of reactionary responses based on fear and misunderstanding.
  • Support a set of ideas directly aimed at using technology to improve human well-being, expand our rationality and curiosity, and set us on the path toward becoming a cosmic civilization – as outlined in Tom Ross’s Earthling, Artisanal Intelligence, and Extraterrestrial Initiatives.
  • Help us build public awareness for policy discussions that the U.S. Transhumanist Party routinely engages in, regarding emerging technologies and how to accelerate innovation and progress. We have had a legislative success already! (Nevada, May 2019)
  • Help grow membership of the U.S. Transhumanist Party for future activism, outreach, and societal change – building toward an immortal culture that embraces continuous progress and improvement and removal of barriers to these aspirations.


Get U.S. Transhumanist Party merchandise at our Zazzle Store.
You can purchase bumper stickers in a variety of designs, including the one above.

Celebration of U.S. Transhumanist Party 10th Anniversary and International Longevity Month

Celebration of U.S. Transhumanist Party 10th Anniversary and International Longevity Month

October 11, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov II
Zoltan Istvan
Charlie Kam
Tom Ross
Liz Parrish
Daniel Twedt
Bill Andrews, PhD
José Cordeiro, PhD
Daniel C. Elton. PhD
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer


On Sunday, October 6, 2024, the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s Virtual Enlightenment Salon featured a celebration of two noteworthy events – the 10-year anniversary of the founding of the U.S. Transhumanist Party by Zoltan Istvan on October 7, 2014, as well as the ongoing International Longevity Month, which has occurred every year since 2013.

Notable individuals from the USTP’s history and present provide remarks, including Founder and 2016 Presidential Candidate Zoltan Istvan, 2020 Presidential Candidate Charlie Kam, 2024 Presidential Candidate Tom Ross, 2020 Vice-Presidential Candidate Liz Parrish, 2024 Vice-Presidential Candidate Daniel Twedt, Dr. Bill Andrews (Biotechnology Advisor), Dr. Jose Luis Cordeiro (Technology Advisor and Foreign Ambassador in Spain), Art Ramon Garcia, Jr. (Director of Visual Art), Dr. Dan Elton (Director of Scholarship) and Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II.

Dr. Jose Cordeiro also presented on the TransVision Madrid 2024 conference and the march for longevity that he organized in Madrid, Spain, for October 1, 2024, on the occasion of International Longevity Day. The stream of the TransVision Madrid 2024 conference can be found here.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.


Graphics

Several of our dedicated members produced some excellent graphics to celebrate the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 10th Anniversary. These graphics are freely available for anyone to use and spread.


This graphic for the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 10th Anniversary is brought to us by Tom Ross, the USTP’s 2024 U.S. Presidential Candidate. The Tin Man is a proto-transhumanist; whether one might consider him to be an android or a cyborg, he aims to have the full range of capabilities of sentient entities. Like the Tin Man, the USTP has shown the qualities of durability and flexibility over the past decade. We have navigated numerous challenges and endured. Now, heading into the next decade of its existence, the USTP is stronger as an organization than ever before. Someday humanity will learn how to create full-scale 3D-printed hearts, and the Tin Man will be able to get one.

We visit the Tin Man’s workshop, where he has some cake to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the formation of the U.S. Transhumanist Party. This scene was brought to us by Tom Ross, the USTP’s 2024 U.S. Presidential Candidate and Director of Sentient Rights Advocacy.

The Tin Man is happy to support the U.S. Transhumanist Party because of its commitment to sentient entities’ rights, expressed in the Transhumanist Bill of Rights, Version 3.0. Whether one might consider him to be an android or a cyborg, he aims to have the full range of capabilities of sentient entities. The USTP is laying the groundwork for the ethical, legal, and cultural conversation about which entities might arise in the future and become deserving of rights. Our 2024 U.S. Presidential Campaign has been advancing the discussion in this area; Tom Ross is the only Presidential candidate with an AI campaign manager, and he has emphasized that, instead of fearing AI, we can turn into our greatest ally and enable it to bring out our humanity in the best possible ways.

Long live the U.S. Transhumanist Party! This futuristic concept for a USTP headquarters was generated by Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II using the Flux AI. Looked at from the opposite direction, the curve on the rooftop could be seen to represent an exponential growth function.

This scene of celebration in a futuristic city center, illuminated by drones, was generated by Cybor Dre of Tomorrow’s Canvas. Long live the USTP, and may we see the wondrous creations that the future of humanity will bring!

And finally, below, our current Vice-Chairman and Legislative Director Jason Geringer made some virtual cake for us to enjoy. Each cake is calorie-free, sugar-free, and exists in unlimited abundance. Thank you, Jason!

 

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Tim Wass – June 23, 2024

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Tim Wass – June 23, 2024

September 10, 2024 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Tim Wass
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Daniel Twedt
José Cordeiro, PhD


On Sunday, June 23, 2024, the United States Transhumanist Party invited polymath Tim Wass to discuss his work in fostering space exploration, as well as education and outreach about it. Professor Wass discussed endeavors of the SpaceTech Academy and SpaceTech Collective, the United States Space Force, and SpaceX (in the realm of Mars missions in particular) – as well as his outlook on the future of humanity from a Mormon Transhumanist philosophical standpoint and his involvement with various other organizations and initiatives.

Tim Wass, among his numerous other pursuits, is an Adjunct Professor of Public Speaking at Crowder College, Volunteer Civilian Service Ambassador for the United States Space Force, as well as a Partner in the SpaceTech Academy. He is an expert in history and military strategy, as well as an accomplished speechwriter.

***
Timestamps

2:57 – The medal Tim Wass was wearing
4:10 – How Tim Wass first got excited about space
7:26 – U.S. Space Force
12:00 – SpaceTech Academy is K-12 Education
14:07 – Teaching technique at SpaceTech Academy
19:38 – How to keep kidneys healthy in microgravity
21:55 – How robots might do the exploring for us
24:42 – How to create a gravity as strong as Earth’s on Mars
27:10 – What the initial mix of humans and robots to Mars could look like
31:41 – Elon Musk’s delays in his predictions for visiting the Moon and Mars
34:17 – Jose Cordeiro on the space race
35:32 – On China landing on the dark side of the Moon by 2030
40:35 – Art that Tim Wass has done to promote space travel
44:15 – Jose Cordeiro on whether we need to settle the Moon before we settle Mars
46:31 – Dan Twedt on the physical and social challenges of breaking into space
48:38 – Tim Wass on the big private players, and on Dan’s thoughts about social challenges
52:21– A representation of an orbital space station
55:46 – Jose Cordeiro on the proximity of colonizing Mars and becoming immortal
59:40 – How Tim Wass came to Mormon Transhumanism
1:08:03 – An anecdote to illustrate Tim’s take on liberty
1:10:48 – That anecdote’s implications for subsequent events
1:13:19 – The Vulcan philosophy of infinite diversity in infinite combinations (IDIC)
1:16:45 – How Tim Wass came to transhumanism
1:22:28 – How techno-optimism could prevail again
1:28:15 – Tim Wass’s credentials in teaching public speaking
1:31:55 – How to hybridize public speaking
1:33:51 – Diogenes
1:35:21 – How AI could best be used in space exploration
1:40:36 – How to mainstream transhumanism
1:46:09 – Daniel Twedt’s closing remarks
1:48:26 – Civilizations other than humanity
1:51:49 – How far along we are in being able to provide morphological freedom

***

See the website of the SpaceTech Academy: https://www.wearespacetech.com/

See the website of the SpaceTech Collective, which includes Tim Wass: https://wearespacetech.com/spacetech-collective/

See Tim Wass’s LinkedIn page: https://www.linkedin.com/in/tim-wass

“How to Persuade People The Winston Churchill Way” – Kindle Edition by Tim Wass Jr. – https://www.amazon.com/How-Persuade-People-Winston-Churchill-ebook/dp/B08BFSY5XR

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside: https://transhumanist-party.org/membership/

How to Fight Homeopathy: Why People Believe in Homeopathy and What to Do with That – Article by Ariel VA Feinerman

How to Fight Homeopathy: Why People Believe in Homeopathy and What to Do with That – Article by Ariel VA Feinerman

September 2, 2024 Ariel VA Feinerman Comments 0 Comment


























logo_bg

Ariel VA Feinerman


The Inquisition is working.

This article was originally published here.

In his text, the scientific writer asks his readers: how else can we keep people from believing in homeopathy, what else can we write to keep them from using it?

Before answering the original question, you need to answer another one: why do people even believe in homeopathy and buy it? People do not buy homeopathy because they are ignorant, uneducated or know nothing. The real reason is the inability of current medicine to cure their diseases!

A person who is informed by physicians that he has an incurable disease — even though it does not reduce the quantity of life, but significantly reduces its quality — falls into despair. But a person in despair thinks completely differently, his critical thinking turns off, and he is ready to believe in any nonsense.

A person in despair clutches at any straw, and homeopathy or other pseudo-medicine becomes such a straw. But what the person refuses to believe is the fact that a civilization that spends trillions on wars, launches ships to Mars and discovered the Higgs boson is unable (and is not particularly trying) to cure his disease. And he is right!

Alas, this undoubtedly correct belief in our civilization plays a cruel joke on him. The success of homeopathy lies in the fact that skillful scammers easily exploit his belief, offering him treatment, which does not work, but right now. Thus, homeopathy is not the cause, but the consequence of the inability of current medicine to treat many diseases. For example, almost all treatment of ageing pathologies at the present time is compensatory, aimed not at their causes: molecular and cellular damage, but only at their manifestations.

So, without the development of truly effective therapies that eliminate the very causes of pathologies, the fight against homeopathy or other pseudo-medicine is meaningless.

For example, alchemy disappeared not because it was specifically fought, but because chemistry and chemical engineering offered better explanations and better results! An intelligent reader, of course, will say that this analogy is not entirely correct, because alchemy was a proto-science, not a pseudo-science.

However, our current medicine can be called a proto-engineering (for any mature medicine is an engineering), since we still do not know the mechanisms of many diseases and do not know how to treat them. Yet, it is within our reach to transform our current medicine into full-fledged engineering in the near future, just like software or aerospace engineering. I call it human repair engineering.

A better, but less thorough analogy can be taken from ufology: for example, contrary to all logic, we still have no clear images of UFO precisely in an era when many people have inexpensive and easy-to-use photo and video cameras, and then smartphones! Many such examples can be given.

Likewise, homeopathy will disappear or become marginal, not at all because some “scientific inquisition” is fighting it in the information or legal arena, but because regenerative medicine of the near future will offer better, truly working solutions.

Most often, the fight “for” is better than the fight “against”, because the fight “against” does not offer anything in return, while the fight “for” is clearly aimed at improvements. Thus, the fight against homeopathy is aimed only at reducing the use of homeopathy, without offering anything in return, while the fight for better medicine not only brings closer the time without disease and ageing, but also implicitly includes the fight against pseudo-medicine (including homeopathy), because the presence of truly working therapies that cure currently incurable diseases will make pseudo-medicine unnecessary.

For example, with the advent of effective antiretroviral therapy, cases of HIV treatment using various “folk” methods have practically disappeared, and there is now much less speculation around HIV.

Many physicians and officials, unfortunately, have a desire to solve the problem using brute force — explicit prohibitions and increased regulation. What a stupid decision! Never in the history of humanity this led to anything good. Increased regulation will only create problems for regenerative medicine (including gene, immune, cell therapies), while scammers will still find a way to enter the market.

For example, ban homeopathy — and its place will immediately be taken by “release-active” drugs; ban them, too, and scammers will take over the “wave genome” or “water memory”, ad infinitum.

What we really need is not more regulation, but less regulation for emerging therapies. And some countries have already given the green light to regenerative medicine. For example, the Fast-Track Approval system in Japan, which was introduced in 2014. The system aimed to increase access to regenerative medicines by introducing laws that allow for emerging treatments to be used so long as they have been proven safe, with only hints of their effectiveness.

The idea is that as patients receive these safe treatments, more conclusive data on their efficacy can be gathered thereafter. This negates the need for large-scale clinical trials that take place over several years and cost hundreds of millions.

As a counterexample, in the USA, because of insane regulation, it is almost impossible to release emerging therapy to the market, and the cost of the process — including clinical trials — is at least $2.5 billion. In spite of the big number of inventions by American scientists and engineers, only a few of them have entered human clinical trials, and only several of them have reached the market.

On the other hand, prohibitions force people to be inventive: biohackers arose in the USA, after all.

Thus, in answer to the original question, there are three key points in the fight for better medicine:

1) Development of regenerative therapies and treatments, whose mechanism is the elimination of molecular and cellular damage that causes genetic diseases and ageing pathologies.

2) Reduction of regulation of emerging therapies in regenerative medicine.

3) Education in regenerative medicine, so that people — including physicians and policymakers — know about emerging therapies and can help in their implementation and entering the clinics, at least by fulfilling these key points.

I hope you understand, the fight against homeopathy is clearly not worth the effort and time spent on it, because the result of this fight is completely predictable. In spite of many years of fighting, pharmacies are still overwhelmed with homeopathy, and various scammers continue to sell the “cure for everything”, while actual working therapies cannot reach the clinics because of excessive regulation.

Links

Bioengineering longevity: call for open source approach by Eleanor Garth. February 18, 2021. Updated August 12, 2024.

Defying Ageing with Ariel VA Feinerman — A Radical Exploration

Japan moves to fast-track innovative stem cell therapy with first trials on human hearts by Nick Lavars. June 1, 2018.

The Price of Progress or the Waste of Regulation? by Reason. September 7, 2018.

Ariel VA Feinerman is a researcher, author, and photographer, who believes that people should not die from diseases and ageing, and whose main goal is to improve human health and achieve immortality. If you like Ariel’s work, any help would be appreciated via PayPal: arielfeinerman@gmail.com.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Charlie Painter – June 2, 2024

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Charlie Painter – June 2, 2024

August 22, 2024 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo


Charlie Painter
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg


On Sunday, June 2, 2024, at 1 p.m. U.S. Pacific Time, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited musician Charlie Painter for a Virtual Enlightenment Salon on music, philosophy, entrepreneurship, culture, and the connections among them. The conversation delved into jazz music and the differences between it and classical music – including jazz in terms of attitude, preparation, pedagogy, and listening. Charlie Painter shared insights regarding his approach to improvisation and provided some practical demonstrations. Furthermore, Objectivist philosophy was discussed, including Charlie Painter’s outlooks on Ayn Rand’s opinions as contrasted with Objectivist doctrine, morality/ethics, rational egoism, capitalism, the state of our current culture in terms of philosophy, free will versus determinism, and more.

Charlie Painter is a self-studied, self-producing guitarist, teacher, and band leader based in Madison, Wisconsin. Learn about him and his work on his website at https://www.charliepainter.com/.

***

Timestamps

7:27 – Art Ramon Garcia’s musical endeavors
9:39
– What is Objectivism?
19:18
– What is Liberalism?
31:39
– Where Social Security fails as we have it set up
34:21
– Charlie Painter’s opening remarks
42:34
– Why Charlie chose jazz
46:22
– The differences between jazz and classical music
47:40
– How much improvisation there can be in jazz
51:34
– How good jazz comes about
55:33
– How Charlie became self-employed
1:02:43
– Why playing someone’s prior improvisation note for note is not often done in jazz
1:06:40
– Comparing jazz to sports
1:11:56
– How audiences differ across genres and settings
1:16:30
– Charlie’s music lesson (especially guitar and note choices)
1:36:14
– How note choice can evoke such different emotions
1:41:31
– A smattering of Ayn Rand’s beliefs that one could not consider Objectivist
1:46:21
– Our political system as “who needs to be sacrificed to whom” (crediting Yaron Brook)
1:55:16
– Charlie Painter’s closing remarks

***

Visit Charlie Painter’s YouTube channel, which contains additional musical recordings.

Listen to Charlie Painter’s music on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/charlie-painter

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside: https://transhumanist-party.org/membership/

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Charlie Painter – Part 2 – June 30, 2024

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Charlie Painter – Part 2 – June 30, 2024

August 22, 2024 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo

Charlie Painter
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg


On Sunday, June 30, 2024, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Charlie Painter to continue the philosophical conversation from the initial Salon of June 2, 2024. The discussion delved into the concept of free will and the recent debate in which USTP Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II defended free will on Andreas Xirtus’s channel.

***

Timestamps

4:16 – Charlie Painter’s opening remarks
10:04 – The distinction between fatalism and determinism
13:05 – How biological changes indicating one’s choice prior to it happening do not prove determinism
16:00 – How awareness can trump biological changes
26:42 – Charlie Painter’s health, and why emotions aren’t deterministic
35:14 – How suicide could not be deterministic
43:49 – Charlie Painter on religion
1:03:17 – Gaza
1:24:26 – How free-will and determinism adherents respond to the idea of a Butterfly Effect
1:34:16 – Man versus bear
1:43:19 – Skepticism regarding the multiverse
1:47:08 – Libertarianism versus Objectivism
1:52:46 – Charlie Painter’s closing remarks

***

First Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Charlie Painter – June 2, 2024

Debate on Free Will: Gennady Stolyarov II Defends Emergent Free Will and Liberty 

Charlie Painter is a self-studied, self-producing guitarist, teacher, and band leader based in Madison, Wisconsin. Learn about him and his work on his website at: https://charliepainter.com/

Visit Charlie Painter’s YouTube channel, which contains additional musical recordings.

Listen to Charlie Painter’s music on SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/charlie-painter

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside: https://transhumanist-party.org/membership/

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Diego Zarco – July 7, 2024

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Diego Zarco – July 7, 2024

August 15, 2024 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo
Diego Zarco
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
José Luis Cordeiro, PhD
Charlie Kam
Ben Ballweg



On Sunday, July 7, 2024, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Diego Zarco to share his knowledge of cryonics standby and stabilization. He is starting the first Standby and Stabilization Team for cryonics in Mexico, with the goal of eventually replicating the model in other countries and ensuring that cryonics becomes a more reliable procedure in every city of the world.

Diego Zarco is the Founder and Stabilization Team Director in Mexico for the Advanced Cryogenics Institute (Instituto de Criogenia Avanzada – https://www.institutodecriogeniaavanzada.com/), Social Media Manager for Latin America at Cryoprize – https://www.cryoprize.com/ – and Voting Member at the Latin GRAMMYs.

***

Timestamps

2:36 – Diego Zarco’s opening remarks
27:49 – The challenges of transporting cryonics patients long distances, even across international borders
35:52 – Drones as a transport option
38:43 – Pets, and other cryonics efforts in the Latin world
46:33 – Status of the rollout, and an explanation on costs
56:22 – How to ensure cryonics organizations stay solvent
1:00:49 – Diego Zarco’s musical background
1:03:37– Meaning of Diego Zarco’s song title “Greatest Lie Ever Told”
1:05:00 – Charlie Kam’s thoughts
1:12:48 – The feasibility of cryonics as a whole
1:20:47 – How cold we have to go
1:25:36 – How to ensure loved ones fulfill wishes
1:30:45 – Options for cryofunding in Mexico
1:39:10 – How to make cryopreservation affordable for all
1:46:02 – Possibilities for a storage facility in Mexico
1:49:08 – Robot stabilization teams?
1:52:29 – Diego Zarco’s closing remarks

***

Those who take part in cryonics standby and stabilization teams (SST) are invited to take Diego Zarco’s survey to compile a map of local SST teams coverage for cryonics: https://es.surveymonkey.com/r/6RR5MGM

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside: https://transhumanist-party.org/membership/

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Abdelhadi Rebbaa on Senolytics – July 28, 2024

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Abdelhadi Rebbaa on Senolytics – July 28, 2024

August 15, 2024 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Dr. Abdelhadi Rebbaa
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
David Wood
Ben Ballweg


On Sunday, July 28, 2024, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Dr. Abdelhadi Rebbaa to discuss his views regarding the potential and limitations for using senolytics to treat aging and go over alternative/complementary approaches to delay senescence onset.

Dr. Abdelhadi Rebbaa received his PhD in Biochemistry from the Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France. He held research and faculty positions at Northwestern University, the University of Pittsburgh, and Columbia University. Over the course of his career, his research encompassed target and drug discovery and development in the fields of cancer, stem cells, and aging. He served as a Principal Investigator on multiple grants, published over 40 manuscripts, and reviewed manuscripts for several high-impact scientific journals. In his role at Ichor Therapeutics from 2018 to 2021, he oversaw the discovery and preclinical testing of small-molecule senolytics and biomarkers of aging. He then worked for SENS Research Foundation between January 2022 and January 2024, where his role was to conceive, design, and oversee research projects on senescence prevention, senolytics, and partial reprogramming. Now he works as a Project Management Consultant in New Jersey.

***

Timestamps

7:25 – Dr. Abdelhadi Rebbaa’s presentation
58:28
– External versus internal/inherent (e.g. age-related) causes of senescent cells
1:01:51
– Senomorphics versus senolytics
1:03:05
– The need to replace senescent cells that have been destroyed
1:04:03
– Whether senescent cells crowd out potentially worse cells
1:04:56
– When reprogramming helps, and when it does not
1:06:06
– Whether donating blood can reduce senescence
1:07:14
– Pros and cons of academia, for-profit, and non-profit sectors
1:08:41
– Whether senescent cells are worse than the holes where the senescent cells were (if the senescent cells cannot be replaced)
1:10:40
– How close we are to senolytics approved for use
1:11:56
– How it is good to donate blood
1:12:50
– Any non-prescription senolytics available
1:14:32
– Revisiting SA-beta-Gal
1:18:10
– Whether a young blood transfusion is comparable to a blood donation (as far as reducing negative blood components)
1:18:59
– Lifespan.io’s Rejuvenation Roadmap
1:20:21
– The relation of mental stress to senescent-cell accumulation
1:23:00
– Balancing the effects of senolytics
1:25:12
– Potentially less toxic alternatives to galactose-conjugated navitoclax
1:28:25
– Potential direction of research into senescence in the next 5-10 years
1:30:42
– Whether the Hallmarks of Aging will change
1:31:51
– How therapies for aging can best be employed
1:33:31
– Potentially the best way to treat senescent cells
1:35:10
– How the application of senescent-cell treatment is challenging because of the variety of lifespans of our various cells
1:36:58
– Where the best senolytics research is happening
1:40:22
– Whether senolytic therapies stop being beneficial for a person at a certain age
1:42:06
– Whether the loss of the ability of the body to remove senescent cells is indicative of a deeper problem
1:43:48
– What we can gain from knowing how mice respond to senolytic therapies
1:47:14
– Just how complex senescent cells and senescence can be
1:49:38
– How rejuvenating senescent cells could be better than destroying them
1:50:30
– Dr. Rebbaa’s closing remarks

***

See Dr. Abdelhadi Rebbaa’s LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/abdelhadi-rebbaa-32bb9279/

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside: https://transhumanist-party.org/membership/

U.S. Transhumanist Party Candidates Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt Respond to Free and Equal Debate #2 Questions

U.S. Transhumanist Party Candidates Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt Respond to Free and Equal Debate #2 Questions

August 7, 2024 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Tom Ross
Daniel Twedt
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer


On Sunday, July 14, 2024, the U.S. Transhumanist Party 2024 U.S. Presidential Candidate Tom Ross and U.S. Vice-Presidential Candidate Daniel Twedt responded to the questions posed during the Free and Equal Elections Foundation Presidential Debate #2, which was held on July 12, 2024, at FreedomFest in Las Vegas.

The Ross-Twedt ticket received the same questions as posed to Chase Oliver (Libertarian Party), Jill Stein (Green Party), and Randall Terry (Constitution Party), and had the opportunity to express their positions and respond to the other candidates’ comments. Afterward, the panelists and audience provided feedback on the Free and Equal Debate and the Ross-Twedt responses.

Watch the July 12, 2024, Free and Equal Debate #2, held at FreedomFest in Las Vegas: https://rumble.com/v56o6np-free-and-equal-presidential-debate-at-freedomfest-2024.html

***

Timestamps

5:23 – Tom Ross’s opening statement
7:57 – Daniel Twedt’s Opening Statement
10:45 – Question 1
14:17 – Question 2
21:08 – Question 3
28:06 – Question 4
32:01 – Question 5
36:45 – Question 6
40:49 – Question 7
47:11 – Question 8
51:44 – Question 9
53:30 – Question 10
55:18 – Question 11
57:57 – Question 12
1:01:14 – Question 13
1:04:25 – Tom Ross’s Closing Statement
1:06:00 – Daniel Twedt’s Closing Statement
1:09:11 – Tom Ross’s and Daniel Twedt’s feedback regarding the candidates at the July 12 debate
1:17:48 – How Daniel Twedt and Tom Ross would address the Economic Singularity
1:20:36 – How to reduce the fear of transhumanism
1:26:05 – The best way AI can mature
1:29:48 – How transhumanists can build bridges with the religious
1:36:08 – How transhumanists can build bridges with other belief systems
1:41:23 – How the future could be bright
1:53:24 – Closing thoughts

***

To learn more about the Tom Ross / Daniel Twedt 2024 Presidential Campaign, visit the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s Candidates page, recently updated with additional resources, interviews, and campaign videos: https://transhumanist-party.org/candidate-profiles/

Visit Tom Ross’s campaign website at: https://tomross.com/2024.html.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside: https://transhumanist-party.org/membership/


U.S. Transhumanist Party Emphatically Condemns All Political Violence, Wishes Donald Trump a Speedy Recovery

U.S. Transhumanist Party Emphatically Condemns All Political Violence, Wishes Donald Trump a Speedy Recovery

July 14, 2024 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 1 comment



























July 14, 2024 – The United States Transhumanist Party (USTP) strongly and unequivocally condemns the assassination attempt against Republican Presidential candidate and former U.S. President Donald Trump, which took place in Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, 2024. The USTP wishes Donald Trump a speedy recovery to a state of complete health and expresses the hope that an objective and impartial investigation will be conducted to fully determine the identity of the attacker and the motives behind the attack.

While Donald Trump’s injuries fortunately appear to be mild enough to allow a full recovery, the heinous shooting at the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, caused the death of an innocent audience member, emphasizing the tragic truth that ordinary people often bear the greatest harms of political violence.

The USTP has always rejected political violence absolutely and in all circumstances. Indeed, Immutable Operating Principle 4 in Article I, Section III, of the Constitution of the United States Transhumanist Party reads as follows:

“The United States Transhumanist Party renounces all violence, except in self-defense against a clear, immediate act of physical aggression. In particular, the United States Transhumanist Party holds that violent political activism is never permissible or just. The United States Transhumanist Party commits to always pursuing its goals in a civil, law-abiding manner, respecting the legitimate rights of all persons. The United States Transhumanist Party shall not condone and shall necessarily and automatically disavow all violent criminal acts. Any person who commits a violent criminal act is automatically disassociated from the United States Transhumanist Party in all respects until and unless that person has made appropriate restitution or has fully undergone the appropriate penalties pursuant to applicable law. However, this commitment to exclusively peaceful action does not preclude the United States Transhumanist Party from criticizing any ideas or behavior which are contrary to reason, morality, common sense, or the principles and objectives of the United States Transhumanist Party Core Ideals and Platform.”

“It is clear that unhinged polarization has taken the United States to a societal and political breaking point,” USTP Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II lamented in response to news of the assassination attempt. “This polarization is wrong, and the violence it precipitates is evil. Both need to be stopped. While most people are decent enough to avoid initiating violence no matter what the climate of public opinion, the toxic discourse that has pervaded both mainstream and social media during the past nine years – often originated and amplified by well-organized and well-funded propaganda machines – has surely contributed to pushing some of the least emotionally stable members of our society over the edge into acts of criminal violence. We have seen the effects of these mass-propagandizing tendencies before during the destructive urban riots of 2020 and the attack on the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021. But attempted assassinations take this trend to an entirely new, troubling level, and they can do nothing but escalate tensions toward a massive societal conflagration – unless everyone, on all sides, takes a serious and somber look at this situation and makes the conscious effort to cease demonizing those with whom they disagree and instead engage with others’ views honestly, civilly, and with recognition of our common humanity.”

The dire predicament of our times requires a transpartisan organization such as the U.S. Transhumanist Party to step in and provide constructive alternatives to the deadly polarization by pointing the way toward the common future of humanity – our common obstacles posed by the forces of death and decay, as well as our common opportunities to use science, technology, and rational discourse to live longer, healthier, more peaceful lives in positive-sum collaborations with others.

“It is no secret that many of our members have disagreed, often strongly, with many of the views espoused by Donald Trump, and some of his policy proposals are directly contrary to the U.S. Transhumanist Party Platform,” Chairman Stolyarov explained. “However, the USTP also champions a culture of decency in politics where we can disagree with a person and still advocate for their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, as well as all of the rights recognized in the U.S. Constitution’s Bill of Rights and our own Transhumanist Bill of Rights. Donald Trump’s rights to his life, to the pursuit of good health, and to the free and peaceful expression of his views, whatever they may be, are among the rights that the USTP stands for. Furthermore, our advocacy of indefinite life extension extends to Donald Trump as well (and also to all other Presidential candidates and candidates for every office from every political party).”

The U.S. Transhumanist Party also emphasizes that, while many in this election season have expressed the desire to save the American democracy, not all have understood the core essence of democracy – which is that ballots, not bullets, need to be the mechanism by which political disagreements are resolved. The primary strength of a democratic system is precisely in the ability of the voting mechanism to provide legitimacy to outcomes on which large segments of the population will disagree with one another, without such disagreements needing to lead to contests of physical force. As such, the American democracy is indeed a precious foundation for a society with enough everyday stability and safety that innovations in technology, science, art, and ideas generally can occur without the specter of violence hanging over everyday life. “Those who think that political violence can ever meaningfully ‘save democracy’ are deluded and misguided, to say the least,” Chairman Stolyarov explained. “Once political violence reigns, democracy is over. Now all decent people of all political parties, organizations, and persuasions have the moral responsibility to call for peace and decency to prevail. We can preserve what has historically been best about the American system of government, but we can only do it by renouncing polarization and hateful vitriol together.

Resurrection of All Mankind through Science – Article by Albi Ndoni

Resurrection of All Mankind through Science – Article by Albi Ndoni

July 8, 2024 Albi Ndoni Comments 0 Comment


























Albi Ndoni


Global Cooperation for Humanity’s Common Cause

Introduction

This initiative is an ambitious vision that seeks to leverage the best scientific minds and advancements in biotechnology to resurrect all deceased humans throughout history. This multi-millennial project envisions a future where humanity has achieved both immortality and resurrection, creating a utopian society spread across the Solar System and the Milky Way galaxy.

Objectives

  1. DNA Database Creation and Conservation
    • Goal: To establish a comprehensive database of DNA samples from all deceased individuals that have lived on Earth.
    • Scope: Approximately 100-106 billion DNA samples.
    • Timeline: 1-2 centuries.
    • Actions:
      • Gather and analyze historical records, burial sites, and other sources to locate potential DNA samples.
      • Develop advanced techniques for extracting and preserving DNA from ancient remains.
      • Create a secure, state-of-the-art facility for storing and conserving these DNA samples.
  2. Recreating the First Deceased Individual
    • Goal: To successfully recreate the body and mind of the first deceased person using advanced biotechnology.
    • Timeline: 3-5 centuries.
    • Actions:
      • Invest in cutting-edge research in genomics, synthetic biology, and neuroscience.
      • Develop methods to not only clone physical bodies but also to reconstruct memories and consciousness.
      • Conduct trials and refine techniques to ensure the viability and accuracy of resurrected individuals.
  3. Mass Resurrection of All Deceased Individuals
    • Goal: To apply the perfected resurrection process to every deceased individual.
    • Timeline: 40,000-70,000 years.
    • Actions:
      • Scale up the resurrection processes and infrastructure to handle the massive volume.
      • Ensure ethical considerations and consent frameworks are in place for the resurrected.
      • Foster global cooperation to manage resources, logistics, and technological advancements required for this monumental task.

Long-Term Vision

  • Post-Resurrection Society:
    • Following the complete resurrection of all humans, the initiative aims to ensure that every resurrected individual has access to habitat and basic needs.
    • Timeline: Concurrent with and following the mass resurrection phase.
    • Actions:
      • Advance space colonization efforts to create habitable environments within the Solar System and beyond.
      • Develop sustainable systems for food, water, energy, and healthcare to support the burgeoning population.
      • Promote social and economic frameworks to maintain harmony and equality in this new society.
  • Utopian Society:
    • The ultimate mission is to achieve a utopian society where science has eradicated death and resurrected all past lives, fostering an environment of eternal life and universal well-being.
    • Encourage the flourishing of culture, knowledge, and technology in this new age of humanity.

Ethical Considerations

  • Consent and Autonomy:
    • Establish protocols for respecting the autonomy and consent of resurrected individuals.
    • Engage in global ethical discourse to address potential concerns and philosophical questions surrounding resurrection.
  • Resource Allocation:
    • Ensure equitable distribution of resources to avoid conflicts and ensure the well-being of all individuals.
    • Collaborate with international bodies to manage the logistical and environmental impacts of large-scale resurrection.
  • Cultural Sensitivity:
    • Recognize and respect the diverse cultural and religious perspectives on death and resurrection.
    • Promote inclusivity and dialogue to integrate these perspectives into the initiative’s framework.

Conclusion

This initiative is a groundbreaking endeavor that pushes the boundaries of science and imagination. By aiming to resurrect every human who has ever lived, it envisions a future where humanity achieves immortality and resurrection of all the dead, creating a harmonious and utopian society. This grand vision requires unprecedented global cooperation, scientific innovation, and ethical foresight, promising a transformative impact on the future of human civilization.

Note

This manuscript was written with the help of ChatGPT.

© Copyright

Albi Ndoni

Tirana, Albania

Written on June 21, 2024

Read Albi Ndoni’s biography here. 

Statement by Tom Ross on the Trump-Biden Debate

Statement by Tom Ross on the Trump-Biden Debate

July 8, 2024 Tom Ross Comments 0 Comment


























Tom Ross


The June 27, 2024, debate between Trump and Biden feels like the last gasp of the Boomer generation’s grip on power, a reminder of how desperately these old-guard politicians cling to relevance. Watching them spar, it’s hard not to feel frustration at a political duopoly increasingly out of touch with present and future generations. Enter the U.S. Transhumanist Party, a beacon of hope with individuals young in mind and spirit, embodying the innovative thinking America needs. We’re tired of settling for the lesser of two evils. The Republicrats’ time is over. The challenges we face—climate change, technological disruption, and the need for radical advancements—require forward-thinking solutions now. The U.S. Transhumanist Party offers a bold vision, harnessing technology and science to overcome significant threats. Enough is enough. The time for change is now. Let’s embrace a future of innovation, progress, and hope.

To learn more about the Tom Ross / Daniel Twedt 2024 Presidential Campaign, visit the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s Candidates page, recently updated with additional resources, interviews, and campaign videos.

Tom Ross is the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 2024 candidate for President of the United States. He is also the USTP’s Director of Sentient Rights Advocacy.

Learn more here: TomRoss’24.

Diluted Delusion – Post by Tom Ross

Diluted Delusion – Post by Tom Ross

July 2, 2024 Tom Ross Comments 0 Comment


























Tom Ross


I’ve often said I’m not delusional enough to think I could win the Presidency, but after watching the debate between Trump and Biden, it’s clear that being delusional isn’t a disqualifier for becoming President. Seeing an energetic liar, who people actually believe, go up against a deteriorating old man who refuses to step aside was both frightening and eye-opening. It made me realize that maybe it’s time for me to embrace a bit of delusion and step up as a dark horse GenX candidate.

Our country desperately needs younger leadership. As the world’s first digital natives, Millennials and GenZ understand the complexities of modern life in ways the older generations simply cannot. The Boomers, who once drove tie-dyed VW buses in the ’60s and then traded them in for slick BMWs in the ’80s, cannot dictate a future they no longer understand.

We live in a scary time for America and humanity. Divide-and-conquer algorithms are poking at our fears and anger, satiating our confirmation biases, and keeping us trapped in a self-destructive loop. We cannot let this continue. We must break free from the cycle and be led by our youth. We need leaders who will listen to and facilitate the voices of younger generations.

It’s time for a change, and if it takes a bit of delusion to make it happen, then so be it. Our future depends on it.

Tom Ross is the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 2024 candidate for President of the United States. He is also the USTP’s Director of Sentient Rights Advocacy.

Learn more here: TomRoss’24.
U.S. Transhumanist Party Seeking Electors for Tom Ross in Tennessee and Louisiana, Petition Signatures in Tennessee

U.S. Transhumanist Party Seeking Electors for Tom Ross in Tennessee and Louisiana, Petition Signatures in Tennessee

June 30, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 17 comments



























Our U.S. Transhumanist Party ballot-access effort is well underway, thanks to the efforts of Micah Redding and his hard-working associates of diverse ages. We stand a realistic chance of getting our 2024 Presidential ticket of Tom Ross and Daniel E. Twedt on the ballot in Tennessee if we can get 275 petition signatures and 11 electors. In particular, we still need electors from Congressional Districts 1, 2, 3 (possibly), 7, 8, and 9.

If you reside in Tennessee, or know someone who does, please help with petition circulation, and if you are in a position to be an Elector for Tom Ross (which just involves signing a form), please let us know! Get in contact with Micah Redding and/or our Candidate Aid, Aida Ćemalović.

We are also in need of eight electors in Louisiana, including one elector from each of Louisiana’s six Congressional Districts and two at-large electors. Contact Aida Ćemalović if you wish to become an Elector in Louisiana. Any costs of notarizing the Louisiana affidavits for Electors will be reimbursed by the U.S. Transhumanist Party.

Together we can make history! Once a Transhumanist Party Presidential candidate makes it onto the ballot in even one State, major publicity and media attention will likely follow. Ultimately, this is a campaign to advance the ideas of transhumanism and their impact upon the public discourse. Unlike the myopic politicians of the two-party system, who keep undermining the American people with one blow after another due to their short-sightedness, we are focusing on the long-term growth of the ideas and networks that will inaugurate the next era of our civilization and extricate humanity from its present quagmire.

 

How Online Imagery Puts Transhumanism in a Negative Light

How Online Imagery Puts Transhumanism in a Negative Light

June 25, 2024 Dan Elton Comments 1 comment


























Daniel C. Elton, Ph.D.


Author’s Note: a version of this article was previously published as “Transhumanism has a visual aesthetics problem” on my Substack. 

If you do a Google search for “transhumanism”, this is what you see:

Three heads pop up. Let’s take a closer look:

They are all pretty similar. All women, which is curious. All have shaven heads — also curious. Finally, all have weird things sticking out of their heads — curiouser and curiouser.

This sort of imagery is likely to trigger a disgust response. Millions of years of evolution have hard-wired us to find bodily mutilation disgusting on some level.

Disgust is often described as a “moral emotion”. Thus, these images instill in people the idea that transhumanism is morally wrong. A possible exception is people who are already accustomed to seeing this imagery.

In the moral foundations framework, disgust is lumped under the “degradation of the sacred”. So, that is another way of looking at this. Most religious traditions treat the human body as sacred and worthy of respect and awe. Young women are generally considered to be pure and beautiful. Here we see them defiled and degraded.

The internet is flooded with imagery like this. Check out Google images:

Many of these images are some combination of creepy, disgusting, or just plain weird.

Most of these images come from news articles about transhumanism. Some of these articles are clearly against transhumanism, while others appear to be neutral or a bit sympathetic. In many cases here, editors and publishers probably realized that grotesque or weird images will catch eyes and result in more clicks.

Strangely, I’ve noticed that even people who are very aligned with transhumanism can fall into using this sort of imagery. For instance, there is a new biography of Zoltan Istvan coming out in July 2024. (Istvan founded the U.S. Transhumanist Party and ran for president in 2016.) Based on his tweets, the author appears to be largely sympathetic to Zoltan’s work. However, the cover makes Zoltan look creepy and nefarious.

The color scheme is designed to cast Zoltan in a negative light. This is the same sort of color scheme is used by advertisers when they show competitor’s products — dark, drab, and dull.

In recent years it’s been noted that fewer and fewer people want to publicly identify as transhumanists, despite the growing popularity of transhumanist ideas. This is partially due to the poor aesthetics creating a “negative halo” around the term. Another factor is the proliferation of conspiracy theories around transhumanism on both the far left and far right — something I plan to discuss in my next post.

Take a look at this new book by Austrian right-wing agitator Stefan Magnet. The title translates to Transhumanism: War Against Humanity.

Again, we see defilement. It’s interesting that the pattern on the face is similar to the iconography on the cover of the new Zoltan biography.

What might good transhumanist aesthetics look like?

Let’s consider a list of transhumanist technologies: genetic engineering, age-reversal biomedicine, nanotechnology, brain-computer interfaces, friendly artificial intelligence, helpful robots, spaceships, space colonies. I can think of ways to visualize these technologies that are aesthetically pleasing, with the exception of friendly AI.

Let’s consider core values more generally. According to transhumanist philosopher Nick Bostrom, the core transhumanist value is “having the opportunity to explore the transhuman and posthuman realms”. This is very hard to illustrate, because, as Bostrom admits, we don’t actually know what the posthuman realm will look like.

From this core value Bostrom derives a long list of derivative values including “caring about wellbeing of all sentience, diversity (many forms), saving lives, peace, international cooperation, pragmatism, engineering, science.” These are easiest to visualize, although they are quite general and not specifically tied to transhumanism.

The art of Robert McCall

The art of Robert McCall (1919-2010) holds a special place in the hearts of many transhumanists and futurists. If I recall correctly, for several years his work “The Prologue and the Promise” was used by the Foresight Institute on the webpage of its “Existential Hope” initiative.

Here are a few other of his works:

“2001 Space Station” by Robert McCall, 1968.

“The Solar-Powered City of Tomorrow” by Robert McCall, 1975.

“Hypersonic Airliner” by Robert McCall, 1996

While not showcasing any transhumanist technologies, this image depicts forward progress.

Other good art I stumbled upon

Much of this is not explicitly transhumanist, but is provided to be food for thought.

“Keeping Away Death” by Julian Hoke Harris

“Keeping Away Old Age” by Julian Hoke Harris, likely created in the 1940s or 1950s.

A famous painting of an O’Neill cylinder space habitat. This image is part of a large series of artworks by Rick Guidice that were commissioned by the NASA Ames Research Center as part of a 1970s study on space habitats. This version has been color corrected.

A toroidal habitat – by Rick Guidice, commissioned by NASA in the mid 1970s.

A large toroidal habitat. Artwork by Don Davis, 1975.

A 1976 painting by Chesley Bonestell, the father of “space art”

By Joshua Mays (@joshuamaysart on Instagram)

Bryan Larsen, 2022

I like what Vitalia did here, borrowing from the solarpunk aesthetic.

Simon Denny, “Blockchain Visionaries”, 2016. This is not transhumanist, but I can picture this style could be used by transhumanists.

Daniel C. Elton, PhD, is the Director of Scholarship for the U.S. Transhumanist Party. Learn more about him here. 
Pros and Cons of the Serum Institute of India’s Success from an African (Nigerian) Perspective: Citing Religious, Cultural, and Political Bias – Article by Victor Urhefe

Pros and Cons of the Serum Institute of India’s Success from an African (Nigerian) Perspective: Citing Religious, Cultural, and Political Bias – Article by Victor Urhefe

June 14, 2024 Victor Urhefe Comments 0 Comment


























Victor Urhefe



Author’s Note: This article explores the multifaceted implications of the Serum Institute of India’s (SII) success from a Nigerian perspective, emphasizing religious, cultural, and political contexts. It discusses the affordable and accessible vaccines provided by SII, their impact on Nigeria’s public health, and the diverse reactions to vaccination influenced by religious beliefs, cultural practices, and political dynamics. The article also suggests strategies for SII to effectively navigate these complexities, including engaging religious leaders, employing culturally sensitive communication, and collaborating with governmental authorities. It is important to note that this is an opinion piece and the perspectives and recommendations herein are subject to adjustments based on evolving circumstances and further insights.

~ Victor Urhefe, June 14, 2024


Serum Institute of India (SII)

Since its founding by Dr. Cyrus Poonawalla in 1966, the Serum Institute of India (SII) has developed from a small experiment into a major player in the world of vaccine production. With a desire to guarantee that everyone, irrespective of financial situation, has access to life-saving vaccines, SII has remained true to its goal of providing high-quality, reasonably priced vaccines worldwide. The institute has grown to be the biggest vaccine producer in the world in terms of volume, driven by an unrelenting commitment to eradicating infectious illnesses and improving public health. Over the years, SII has manufactured approximately 1.5 billion vaccines annually, covering illnesses including polio, diphtheria, tetanus, Pertussis, Hib, BCG, r-Hepatitis B, Mumps, and measles. This is due to its unwavering pursuit of innovation and excellence. As the top biotechnology business in India, Serum Institute of India produces highly specialised biologicals that can save lives, such as vaccines, using state-of-the-art genetic and cell-based technologies, antisera, and other medical specialties.

One of SII’s greatest achievements is its important role in the COVID-19 epidemic. Collaborating with multinational organizations such as AstraZeneca, the institute manufactured millions of doses of the Covishield vaccine, which played a pivotal role in combating the virus in numerous low- and middle-income nations. The immunization gap in underserved areas has significantly decreased thanks to its effective production and delivery methods. This achievement demonstrates SII’s commitment to public health and embodies a legacy of resiliency, creativity, and unwavering determination to provide vaccines to every region of the globe.

Nigeria

Nigeria, also referred to as the “Giant of Africa,” is a nation rich in diverse political, religious, and cultural traditions. It is the most populated country in Africa and the ninth most populous worldwide, with a population of over 200 million. Nigerians are mainly divided along religious lines between Islam and Christianity, with Muslims being concentrated in the north and Christians in the south. This split in religion has an impact on social interactions, politics, and education, among other areas of life. A small percentage of people also follow indigenous religions, which are a reflection of the deeply ingrained cultural beliefs of the nation. Although there has occasionally been tension and conflict between various religious groups, their interactions have also promoted a special kind of coexistence and mutual impact in day-to-day living.

Nigeria is a linguistic and ethnic collage in terms of culture. There are more than 250 different ethnic groups in the nation, with Hausa-Fulani, Yoruba, and Igbo being the largest. The unique customs, dialects, and cultural practices of each ethnic group enrich Nigeria’s rich cultural legacy. This diversity is reflected in festivals, music, dance, and artwork from different regions, resulting in a vibrant cultural tapestry. The Yoruba, for example, are well known for their talking drums and ornate beadwork; the Hausa, for their leatherwork and horse festivities; and the Igbo, for their elaborate ceremonies and masquerade dances. Despite this diversity, Nigerians have a great sense of pride in their country and identity, which is frequently expressed through national celebrations and shared cultural experiences.

Nigeria is a federal country with 36 states and Abuja as the Federal Capital Territory. In addition to providing representation and governance that take into account the many interests and demands of the nation’s residents, this structure is meant to serve the country’s heterogeneous population. Nigeria has gone through several eras of government, including military dictatorships, colonial control, and the current democratic republic. Major political parties are frequently positioned along ethnic and regional lines, creating a dynamic political scene. Although this alignment occasionally makes things worse, it also makes sure that different groups are heard in the national conversation. Political variety is both a strength and a difficulty because it necessitates ongoing compromise and negotiation to uphold unity and promote growth.

Reaction to Vaccination

Nigeria’s response to vaccinations is as diverse as the country’s political, cultural, and religious environments. Misinformation and historical hostility have given rise to rare scepticism and opposition in the mostly Muslim north. Historical events, like the 2003–2004 polio vaccination boycott, demonstrate how strongly held religious and cultural beliefs can impact public health measures. The boycott was motivated by false worries about sterilisation and Western conspiracies. However, there has been a noticeable shift in opinions thanks to the combined efforts of religious leaders, governmental officials, and international organisations. Religiously sensitive campaigns have been crucial in demonstrating how culturally aware strategies can improve vaccination acceptance and uptake.

Nigeria’s many ethnic groups respond differently to immunisation campaigns, depending on their own cultures. In the South, where Christianity is the dominant religion, vaccination attitudes have typically been more positively influenced by community involvement and education. Yoruba and Igbo communities host lively cultural festivals and social events that serve as powerful forums for dispelling myths about vaccines and raising awareness of them. Politically, localised approaches that tackle particular area issues are made possible by the federal system. But political unpredictability and mistrust of the government can impede immunisation campaigns, therefore, strong cooperation between federal and state agencies is required to guarantee uniform and broad immunisation coverage. This complicated dance of political forces, cultural customs, and religious beliefs emphasises how important it is for Nigerian public health policies to be specific and sophisticated.

My thoughts on SII’s mission concerning Nigeria and what needs to be done. 

Nigeria’s aspirations in healthcare are well aligned with the purpose of the Serum Institute of India, which is to provide high-quality, reasonably priced vaccinations to every part of the world. SII’s approach needs to be both strategic and compassionate in a nation where public opinion and acceptance of health interventions are shaped by religious, cultural, and political factors. The accomplishment of their goal in Nigeria depends on a thorough comprehension of these many variables and the application of customised tactics that honor and involve local populations. What worked in the South may not work in the North.

First, it can be helpful to form connections with powerful religious figures. Through the inclusion of imams, pastors, and other traditional leaders in advocacy campaigns, SII can address issues related to religion and debunk falsehoods about immunizations. By acting as dependable role models, these leaders can persuade their followers to support vaccination. Cultural awareness is also very important. In order to craft engaging stories about vaccinations, SII should work with regional artists and cultural icons. Through storytelling, dance, and song, the advantages of vaccinations can be conveyed in a way that is firmly ingrained in Nigeria’s rich cultural legacy.

Finally, it is critical to engage closely with both the federal and state governments to promote cohesive and uniform messaging while addressing any potential political mistrust. Building strong, transparent cooperation with Nigerian health authorities will help to ensure that vaccines are distributed smoothly and increase public trust. SII may assist Nigeria move confidently towards greater public health and a brighter future by integrating its mission into the fabric of the country’s diverse community.

Sources:

  1. Paden, John N., Religion and Political Culture in Kano. University of California Press, 1973.
  2. Falola, Toyin. The history of Nigeria. Greenwood Publishing Group, 1999.
  3. Achebe, Chinua. Things Fall Apart, Heinemann, 1958.
  4. Falola, Toyin, and Heaton, Matthew M., A History of Nigeria, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  5. Ojo, Emmanuel O., “Federalism and the Search for National Integration in Nigeria.” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, vol. 4, no. 2, 2009, pp. 38–46.
  6. Diamond, Larry, and Plattner, Marc F.. Democratization in Africa: Progress and Retreat, JHU Press, 2010.
  7. Falola, Toyin, and Heaton, Matthew M., A History of Nigeria. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with the OmniFuturists – January 28, 2024

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with the OmniFuturists – January 28, 2024

May 7, 2024 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov II
Mike DiVerde

David Wood
Alaura Blackstone
Luis Arroyo
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
William Marshall

Michael Saenz
Allen Crowley


On Sunday, January 28, 2024, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited members of the OmniFuturists to discuss their new book, Future Visions: Approaching the Economic Singularity – available on Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CTGHJCT4 – which offers a diverse array of political and economic perspectives in order to address a possible near-future tidal wave of technological unemployment.

The following authors presented regarding their book chapters, their outlooks on the Economic Singularity, and their views on the best options for responding and/or adjusting to it.

– Mike DiVerde
– David Wood
– Alaura Blackstone
– Luis Arroyo
– Art Ramon
– William Marshall
– Michael Saenz
– Allen Crowley


Timestamps

2:40 – Mike DiVerde’s opening remarks

10:22 – David Wood’s presentation

38:43 – David Wood on how close the Economic Singularity is

40:46 – Alaura Blackstone’s presentation

51:38 – Luis Arroyo’s presentation

1:00:12 – Art Ramon Garcia’s presentation

1:07:19 – Art Ramon Garcia on whether artists could still find sustainable employment after the Economic Singularity

1:13:21 – William Marshall’s presentation

1:24:55 – William Marshall on how remote learning could be improved

1:28:14 – Mike Saenz’s presentation

1:34:30 – Mike Saenz on Blaise Pascal’s concepts of geometry and finesse

1:37:57 – Announcement of Future Visions’ release on Amazon

1:39:01 – Allen Crowley’s presentation

1:50:53 – Mike DiVerde’s closing remarks


References

Future Visions: A Summary of Our Essays – Brief Video by Mike DiVerde –   • Future Visions: A Summary of Our Essays  

Future Visions – Approaching the Economic Singularity – Video by David Wood – • Future Visions – Approaching the Econ…  

One for All – Poem by Alaura Blackstone –  • One for All – Poem Submission for Fut…  

Overman – Song by Alaura Blackstone –  • Overman  

OmniFuturists Website: https://omnifuturists.com/

YouTube – The OmniFuturists Group: @theomnifuturists  

Facebook Group – OmniFuturists:   / 6880427821993284  

Instagram Account – omnifuturists:   / omnifuturists  

E-mail: michael.b.diverde@omnifuturists.com info@omnifuturists.com


Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside: https://transhumanist-party.org/membership/

Transhumanism in Africa: A Movement Long Overdue – Article by Victor Urhefe

Transhumanism in Africa: A Movement Long Overdue – Article by Victor Urhefe

March 9, 2024 Victor Urhefe Comments 0 Comment


























Victor Urhefe


“Africa must not just be a consumer of new technologies, but a leader in shaping them to serve human needs and preserve human dignity.”

– Anonymous 


Transhumanism in Africa: A Movement Long Overdue

Africa, the cradle of humankind, has long been overlooked in the global discourse surrounding transhumanism. This intellectual and cultural movement envisions the enhancement of human capabilities through science and technology. However, as the world hurtles towards a future where technological advancements promise to redefine what it means to be human, Africa’s voice in shaping this narrative is vital and long overdue.

At its core, transhumanism is a bold vision that challenges the limitations of our current biological condition, seeking to transcend the boundaries imposed by nature through technological augmentation. From cognitive enhancements and life-extension therapies to human-machine symbiosis and mind uploading, the possibilities are as vast as they are provocative. Yet, for too long, the African continent has been relegated to the sidelines of this groundbreaking intellectual movement.

This marginalisation is a grave injustice, for Africa’s rich tapestry of cultural and philosophical traditions has much to offer the transhumanist discourse. The continent’s deep-rooted respect for ancestral wisdom and reverence for the natural world could serve as a counterbalance to the unbridled pursuit of technological prowess, fostering a more balanced and ethical approach to human enhancement.

As Kenyan philosopher Calestous Juma eloquently argued in his seminal work, “The Gene Hunters: Biotechnology and the Scramble for Seeds,” Africa must not be a mere spectator in the rapidly evolving fields of biotechnology and genetic engineering. “We cannot afford to be passive observers of the biotechnology revolution,” he wrote. “We must be active participants in shaping it to serve our interests.” (Juma, 1989)

This clarion call resonates profoundly in the realm of transhumanism, where the stakes are no less than the future of our species. By embracing the transhumanist ethos, Africa has the opportunity to reclaim its rightful place as a pioneering force in human advancement, harnessing its rich intellectual and cultural heritage to chart a course that harmonizes technological progress with ethical and spiritual considerations.

Indeed, several African thinkers and innovators have already begun to blaze this trail. Kenyan researcher Kamau Gachigi, for instance, has been a vocal proponent of using emerging technologies to address Africa’s pressing challenges, from healthcare to food security. In his widely acclaimed TED Talk, “Making Sense of Transhumanism in Africa,” Gachigi articulated a vision of “Afro-transhumanism,” a movement that seeks to leverage technological advancements while remaining rooted in African values and cultural traditions.

These voices, among many others, underscore the urgent need for Africa to engage more deeply with the transhumanist movement, lest it be left behind in the relentless march of technological progress. By embracing transhumanism on its terms, Africa can not only contribute to shaping the future of humanity but also address some of its most pressing challenges, from healthcare and education to food security and environmental sustainability.

Imagine, for instance, the transformative potential of neural implants and brain-computer interfaces in improving access to education and cognitive enhancement for Africa’s youth. Or ponder the impact of advanced gene-editing technologies in eradicating devastating genetic disorders and enhancing crop yields to alleviate food insecurity. The possibilities are as boundless as they are tantalizing.

Yet, as with any transformative movement, transhumanism in Africa must navigate a delicate balance between technological progress and ethical considerations. The continent’s rich cultural heritage, with its emphasis on community, harmony, and respect for the natural world, can serve as a guiding light in this endeavour, ensuring that human enhancement is pursued not as an end in itself, but as a means to create a more equitable, sustainable, and spiritually fulfilling existence for all.

In this pursuit, Africa must draw upon its long tradition of communal decision-making and inclusive governance, fostering a vibrant public discourse that engages all stakeholders, from policymakers and scientists to religious leaders and grassroots communities. Only through such inclusive dialogue can the continent chart a course that harmonizes technological advancement with its deeply held values and cultural traditions.

The path ahead will undoubtedly be fraught with challenges, from the ethical quandaries posed by emerging technologies to the practical obstacles of funding and infrastructure. Yet, Africa’s resilience and ingenuity, forged through centuries of adversity, are well-equipped to surmount these hurdles. As the Kenyan scholar Ali Mazrui once remarked, “Africa has been shaped not by its environments alone, but by its capacity to respond creatively to those environments.” (Mazrui, 1986)

As the world stands poised on the precipice of a transhumanist future, Africa’s voice must not be silenced. Its rich cultural and philosophical traditions, coupled with its boundless potential for innovation, can serve as a beacon for navigating the uncharted waters of human enhancement. For in the end, the quest for transcendence is not merely a technological endeavor, but a profoundly human one—a journey that calls upon us to redefine the very essence of our existence.

And who better to guide us on this journey than the continent that cradled the dawn of humanity itself?

Works Cited:

Juma, C. (1989). The Gene Hunters: Biotechnology and the Scramble for Seeds. Princeton University Press.

Mazrui, A. A. (1986). The Africans: A Triple Heritage. BBC Publications.

Tom Ross: A Beacon of Friendship and Admiration for Bangladesh and Bangabandhu – Article by Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana

Tom Ross: A Beacon of Friendship and Admiration for Bangladesh and Bangabandhu – Article by Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana

February 4, 2024 Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana Comments 1 comment


























Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana


Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana and Tom Ross in Bangladesh


Introduction:

In the realm of international relations, the significance of fostering strong bonds between nations cannot be overstated. One such exemplar of diplomatic amity and genuine admiration is Tom Ross, an American presidential candidate who has emerged as a true friend of Bangladesh and an avid enthusiast of its founding father, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman.

A Pioneering Friendship:

Tom Ross’s connection with Bangladesh transcends the conventional boundaries of political alliances. His interest in the country and its people goes beyond the typical political rhetoric, reflecting a deep understanding and appreciation for the cultural, historical, and social fabric of Bangladesh.

Ross has actively engaged in fostering diplomatic ties between the United States and Bangladesh, recognizing the strategic importance of a strong bilateral relationship. His visionary approach emphasizes collaboration on issues such as trade, climate change, and global security, laying the foundation for a comprehensive partnership.

Bangabandhu’s Influence:

A unique facet of Tom Ross’s affinity for Bangladesh is his profound admiration for Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, the revered architect of the nation. Ross’s admiration extends beyond political posturing, reflecting a genuine respect for the visionary leader who played a pivotal role in the country’s independence.

Ross has often expressed his admiration for Bangabandhu’s commitment to democracy, social justice, and economic development. His speeches and public statements underscore the belief that the principles advocated by Bangabandhu are not only relevant to Bangladesh but hold universal significance for fostering a just and equitable world.

Building Bridges:

Ross’s commitment to building bridges between nations is evident in his efforts to facilitate cultural exchanges and people-to-people connections. Recognizing the rich cultural tapestry of Bangladesh, he has supported initiatives that promote mutual understanding and appreciation between the American and Bangladeshi people.

His advocacy for educational collaborations, artistic exchanges, and cultural events has created a platform for fostering deeper connections at the grassroots level. By emphasizing the importance of shared values and aspirations, Ross seeks to strengthen the foundation of the friendship between the two nations.

Conclusion:

In the complex landscape of international relations, Tom Ross stands out as a beacon of friendship and admiration for Bangladesh. His genuine appreciation for the nation’s history, culture, and its founding father, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, reflects a commitment to building a robust and enduring partnership.

As Tom Ross charts a course in his presidential campaign, his vision for a stronger alliance with Bangladesh resonates as a testament to the enduring power of diplomacy, friendship, and shared values in shaping a better world. The evolving narrative of this unique friendship promises to contribute positively to the global stage, fostering collaboration and understanding between nations.

Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana and Tom Ross next to a portrait of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman

Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana is the U.S. Transhumanist Party Director of Foreign Relations and Foreign Ambassador in Bangladesh. Learn more about him here. 


Bengali Version:

টম রস: বাংলাদেশ এবং বঙ্গবন্ধুর জন্য বন্ধুত্ব ও প্রশংসার আলোকবর্তিকা

ভূমিকা:

আন্তর্জাতিক সম্পর্কের ক্ষেত্রে, জাতিগুলির মধ্যে দৃঢ় বন্ধন গড়ে তোলার তাত্পর্যকে বাড়াবাড়ি করা যায় না। কূটনৈতিক বন্ধুত্ব এবং অকৃত্রিম প্রশংসার এমনই একজন উদাহরণ হলেন টম রস, একজন আমেরিকান রাষ্ট্রপতি প্রার্থী যিনি বাংলাদেশের একজন সত্যিকারের বন্ধু এবং এর প্রতিষ্ঠাতা বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানের একজন উত্সাহী হিসেবে আবির্ভূত হয়েছেন।

একটি অগ্রগামী বন্ধুত্ব:

বাংলাদেশের সাথে টম রসের সংযোগ রাজনৈতিক জোটের প্রচলিত সীমানা অতিক্রম করে। দেশ এবং এর জনগণের প্রতি তার আগ্রহ সাধারণ রাজনৈতিক অলংকারের বাইরে চলে যায়, যা বাংলাদেশের সাংস্কৃতিক, ঐতিহাসিক এবং সামাজিক কাঠামোর জন্য গভীর উপলব্ধি এবং উপলব্ধি প্রতিফলিত করে।

রস একটি শক্তিশালী দ্বিপাক্ষিক সম্পর্কের কৌশলগত গুরুত্বকে স্বীকৃতি দিয়ে মার্কিন যুক্তরাষ্ট্র এবং বাংলাদেশের মধ্যে কূটনৈতিক সম্পর্ক বৃদ্ধিতে সক্রিয়ভাবে জড়িত। তার দূরদর্শী দৃষ্টিভঙ্গি বাণিজ্য, জলবায়ু পরিবর্তন এবং বৈশ্বিক নিরাপত্তার মতো বিষয়গুলিতে সহযোগিতার উপর জোর দেয়, একটি ব্যাপক অংশীদারিত্বের ভিত্তি স্থাপন করে।

বঙ্গবন্ধুর প্রভাব:

বাংলাদেশের প্রতি টম রসের সখ্যতার একটি অনন্য দিক হল জাতির শ্রদ্ধেয় স্থপতি বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানের প্রতি তার গভীর প্রশংসা। রসের প্রশংসা রাজনৈতিক ভঙ্গির বাইরেও প্রসারিত, যা দেশের স্বাধীনতায় গুরুত্বপূর্ণ ভূমিকা পালনকারী দূরদর্শী নেতার প্রতি অকৃত্রিম শ্রদ্ধাকে প্রতিফলিত করে।

রস প্রায়ই গণতন্ত্র, সামাজিক ন্যায়বিচার এবং অর্থনৈতিক উন্নয়নের প্রতি বঙ্গবন্ধুর প্রতিশ্রুতির প্রশংসা করেছেন। তাঁর বক্তৃতা এবং জনসাধারণের বিবৃতিগুলি এই বিশ্বাসের উপর জোর দেয় যে বঙ্গবন্ধু যে নীতিগুলি উত্থাপন করেছিলেন তা কেবল বাংলাদেশের জন্যই প্রাসঙ্গিক নয় বরং একটি ন্যায় ও ন্যায়সঙ্গত বিশ্ব গড়ে তোলার জন্য সর্বজনীন তাৎপর্য বহন করে।

সেতু নির্মাণ:

জাতিগুলির মধ্যে সেতু নির্মাণে রসের প্রতিশ্রুতি সাংস্কৃতিক আদান-প্রদান এবং জনগণের মধ্যে সংযোগ স্থাপনের জন্য তার প্রচেষ্টায় স্পষ্ট। বাংলাদেশের সমৃদ্ধ সাংস্কৃতিক ট্যাপেস্ট্রির স্বীকৃতি দিয়ে, তিনি আমেরিকান এবং বাংলাদেশী জনগণের মধ্যে পারস্পরিক বোঝাপড়া এবং উপলব্ধি উন্নীত করে এমন উদ্যোগকে সমর্থন করেছেন।

শিক্ষাগত সহযোগিতা, শৈল্পিক আদান-প্রদান, এবং সাংস্কৃতিক ইভেন্টের জন্য তার উকিল তৃণমূল পর্যায়ে গভীর সংযোগ গড়ে তোলার জন্য একটি প্ল্যাটফর্ম তৈরি করেছে। ভাগ করা মূল্যবোধ এবং আকাঙ্ক্ষার গুরুত্বের উপর জোর দিয়ে, রস দুই দেশের মধ্যে বন্ধুত্বের ভিত্তি মজবুত করতে চায়।

উপসংহার:

আন্তর্জাতিক সম্পর্কের জটিল ল্যান্ডস্কেপে টম রস বাংলাদেশের জন্য বন্ধুত্ব ও প্রশংসার আলোকবর্তিকা হিসেবে দাঁড়িয়ে আছেন। জাতির ইতিহাস, সংস্কৃতি এবং এর প্রতিষ্ঠাতা পিতা বঙ্গবন্ধু শেখ মুজিবুর রহমানের প্রতি তার অকৃত্রিম উপলব্ধি একটি শক্তিশালী এবং স্থায়ী অংশীদারিত্ব গড়ে তোলার অঙ্গীকার প্রতিফলিত করে।

টম রস যখন তার প্রেসিডেন্ট নির্বাচনী প্রচারণার একটি পথ নির্ধারণ করেন, বাংলাদেশের সাথে একটি শক্তিশালী জোটের জন্য তার দৃষ্টিভঙ্গি একটি উন্নত বিশ্ব গঠনে কূটনীতি, বন্ধুত্ব এবং ভাগ করা মূল্যবোধের স্থায়ী শক্তির প্রমাণ হিসাবে অনুরণিত হয়। এই অনন্য বন্ধুত্বের ক্রমবর্ধমান আখ্যানটি বিশ্ব মঞ্চে ইতিবাচকভাবে অবদান রাখার প্রতিশ্রুতি দেয়, দেশগুলির মধ্যে সহযোগিতা এবং বোঝাপড়া বৃদ্ধি করে।

The Origins of Transhumanism – Article by Luis Arroyo

The Origins of Transhumanism – Article by Luis Arroyo

January 24, 2024 Luis Arroyo Comments 2 comments


























Luis Arroyo


Despite one motto of the USTP being “Neither right-wing nor left-wing, but up-wing!” (a nod to FM-2030), many thinkers in the movement have leaned one direction or the other, adopting the conventions of their time and place. In this article, Luis Arroyo expounds upon some of the early growth of the movement in Russia. Transhumanism is indeed a revolutionary movement, and those thinkers who dared to defy death should be celebrated and recognized, regardless of their opinions on profit and property.
~Zach Richardson, Director of Publication, United States Transhumanist Party, January 24, 2024 

Before today’s and yesterday’s prominent figures of the modern Transhumanist movement such as  Zoltan Istvan, Max More, and FM-2030 started doing work towards a Transhumanist future [1][2][3], Transhumanism existed as a Proto-Transhumanist movement mainly called Russian Cosmism, Biocosmism, and similar names, courtesy of a Monarchist, countless Communists, Anarchists, and Socialists mainly in the USSR and Eastern Europe [4][5].

Nikolai Fyodorov & Konstantin Tsiolkovsky

The founder of Russian Cosmism, Nikolai Fyodorov, despite being a Monarchist, set a precedent that would line the ranks of Russian Cosmism with Anti-Capitalists such as the aforementioned Communists, Anarchists, and Socialists. He did this in his book titled Common Task, where he called for a struggle against death which would require most human efforts to go toward. This is something that is impossible to achieve via market mechanisms due to, as Albert Einstein called it, the “economic anarchy of capitalist society” [6][7]. Besides this Common Task, after Nikolai Fyodorov came the Father of Space Travel, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky, who was inspired by Fyodorov while studying under him at the Moscow Library as a substitute for not being allowed into school mainly because a loss of hearing via scarlet fever earlier in his life. In those 3 years of contact, Fyodorov would instill a love and dream of space travel, bringing back the dead, and many other pillars of belief that Tsiolkovsky held after his studies with Fyodorov. He would later go on to produce works that inspired leading Soviet rocket engineers Sergei Korolev and Valentin Glushko, who contributed to the success of the Soviet space program [8]. Furthermore, Tsiolkovsky would eventually give a speech in the Red Square to celebrate the Soviet Republics alongside Joseph Stalin, stating, “Now comrades, I am finally convinced that a dream of mine—space travel—for which I have given the theoretical foundations, will be realized. I believe that many of you will be witnesses of the first journey beyond the atmosphere. In the Soviet Union we have many young pilots…(and) I place my most daring hopes in them. They will help to actualize my discoveries and will prepare the gifted builders of the first space vehicle. Heroes and men of courage will inaugurate the first airways: Earth to Moon orbit, Earth to Mars orbit, and still farther; Moscow to the Moon, Kaluga to Mars!” [9]. Tsiolkovsky was awarded the Order of the Red Banner of Labour [10].

Alexander Bogdanov

Then we have Alexander Bogdanov, who, among many activities, co-founded the Bolshevik Party [11]. He used early blood transfusion treatments to treat varying ailments like anemia, burns, and infectious diseases such as tuberculosis. These treatments would allow Bogdanov to reach stature among the various Soviet leaders, including Stalin himself, who heavily funded Bogdanov’s experiments and attempts [12]. He also wrote early Sci-fi books such as Red Star and books relating to the origins of art, its class characteristics, and how it might be created within a revolutionary socialist context like Art and the Working Class [13][14]. Likewise, Bogdanov co-founded Proletkult, an organization whose goal was to provide political and artistic education to workers of the USSR [15].

Alexander Svyatogor

On the other side, there was the Anarcho-Futurist, Universalist, and founder of the Biocosmist-Immortalist movement, Alexander Svyatogor, who, in his work titled The Doctrine of the Fathers and Anarchism-Biocosmism wrote some 23 points of summary and various explanations of his theory.  Among the various points Svyatogor wrote were the following: “The supreme good is immortal life in the cosmos. The supreme evil is death […..] The supreme good should be realized by the maximum in creativity. We place particular emphasis on the creative moment in Biocosmism. Personal immortality is not a given, but must be won, realized, created. It is not the restoration of what is lost, as in the Bible, but the creation of what is yet to be. It is not a matter of renewal, but of creativity. The same is true for conquering the cosmos. Immortalism and interplanetarism are the maximal—but not the ultimate—aim. They represent stages and means to an immeasurably great creativity. But this goal lies before us and is, for this reason, the greatest of all.” This showed clearly the intent to achieve both physical immortality and a space-bearing civilization, both central ideas in Russian Cosmism and in the offshoot of Biocosmism.

Additionally, Svyatogor wrote many contributions in Vekhi or Milestones, wrote for the Bolshevik press, worked for the People’s Commissariat, edited the bimonthly journal Biocosmist in Moscow, and published antireligious articles and tracts for the magazine Antireligioznik while in the Central Council of the League of Godless Militants. He also founded the Verticalists group in 1914. In Ukraine, Svyatogor promulgated his tenets of Volcanism, an antecedent to Biocosmism that proclaimed the abolition of death and domination over the universe, under such slogans as “Revaluation of all values!” and “Down with Kant”. In a more hands-on regard, after the February Revolution, Svyatogor moved to Moscow, where he befriended the Anarchist actor Mamont Victorovich Dal’skii. He spent his time expropriating bourgeois apartments until the Bolsheviks appointed him commander of the Black Guards, who were to take part in the events of October 1917 in both Petrograd and Moscow. He joined the group of Anarchist-Futurists who published the Moscow newspaper Anarchy in the spring of 1918, before briefly returning to Ukraine where he fought against the Austrian and German occupiers. The group/ideology of Biocosmism afterward spread to many places including Kharkov, Pskov, Kiev, Omsk, and Irkutsk, eventually organizing 45 poetry readings and debates in Petrograd alone [16].

Overall, without these various individuals, their work, efforts, and the broader Socialist/Communist context they came about in and aided, Transhumanism would likely have not come to full fruition. This is seen today as famously stated by founder of e-flux Anton Vidokle in “God-Building as a Work of Art: Cosmist Aesthetics”: “Sometimes I think that cosmism would not be so interesting if it had not happened against the background of the [socialist] revolution. The nineteenth century was notorious for numerous utopian movements. Some were based on religion or the occult, and others on socialist utopias. There were many such groups and ideologies in almost every country in the world at the time. Had it not been for the revolution in Russia and the total radicalization of society, cosmism would likely remain a kind of peculiar but insignificant development. But the mixture of cosmism and communism, and the acceleration that occurred in Russia just before and after the revolution, were like pouring fuel on a fire” [17].

Luis Arroyo is Vice-Chairman of the New York Transhumanist Party.

References

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoltan_Istvan

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_More

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FM-2030

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_cosmism

[5] https://cosmos.art/cosmic-bulletin/2022/biocosmic-interindividualism

[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolai_Fyodorovich_Fyodorov#Philosophy

[7] https://monthlyreview.org/2009/05/01/why-socialism/

[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konstantin_Tsiolkovsky

[9] https://www.popularmechanics.com/space/moon-mars/a28485/russian-rocket-genius-konstantin-tsiolkovsky/

[10] https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Konstantin_Tsiolkovsky_with_the_Order_of_the_Red_Banner_of_Labour.jpg

[11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Bogdanov

[12] https://drvitelli.typepad.com/providentia/2018/11/the-immortality-experiments.html

[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Star_(novel)

[14] https://www.iskrabooks.org/art-and-the-working-class

[15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proletkult

[16] https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/alexander-svyatogor-the-doctrine-of-the-fathers-and-anarchism-biocosmism

[17] https://www.e-flux.com/journal/110/335963/god-building-as-a-work-of-art-cosmist-aesthetics/

Vote for Tom Ross in the Free and Equal Elections Foundation Debate Poll – Help Tom Ross Qualify for the February 29, 2024, Los Angeles Presidential Debate

Vote for Tom Ross in the Free and Equal Elections Foundation Debate Poll – Help Tom Ross Qualify for the February 29, 2024, Los Angeles Presidential Debate

January 22, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment


























logo_bg

Gennady Stolyarov II


Do you want to hear from a Presidential candidate who actually cares about science, technology, longevity, and ensuring that we humans seize our unique and enduring advantages in the era of rising artificial intelligence, approaching new advances with curiosity and a sense of opportunity, rather than fear?

If so, please vote for Tom Ross, our U.S. Transhumanist Party nominee for President of the United States in 2024, using the new Nexus Blockchain Voting App developed in partnership with The Free and Equal Elections Foundation: https://vote.freeandequal.org/

The vote is intended to determine which candidates will participate in The Free and Equal Elections Foundation Presidential Debate in Los Angeles on February 29, one of the only venues in this election cycle for an honest exchange of ideas and policy proposals among candidates of numerous political parties.

You can use this app on both desktop and mobile interfaces. Just enter your phone number, get a code, enter the code, and you will be able to rank-order up to six candidates. We hope that you will rank Tom Ross as your first choice.

You will have until February 1, 2024, to vote. We encourage you to vote sooner rather than later.

Here is a message from Zoltan Istvan, the founder and first Presidential candidate of the USTP: “Nearly 10 years ago I founded the Transhumanist Party. This election cycle Tom Ross is the U.S. presidential nominee for the party. Every cycle Free & Equal runs an important Presidential debate of independents (which I’ve formally participated in during the past as a nominee). Please consider voting for transhumanist Tom Ross at this link so he can get into this debate. That way science will remain a voice in independent politics.”

Here is a message from Tom Ross himself: “On February 29th, in Hollywood, six out of 50+ candidates will take the debate stage. Hosted by the Free & Equal Elections Foundation, this debate will give a voice to presidential hopefuls outside the duopoly. If you believe that science and technology can enhance the quality and length of our lives, please consider voting for me — the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s nominee for president in 2024.”

If you have not yet familiarized yourself with Tom’s campaign and policies, you can learn about him on our Candidates page and his campaign website.

Pride Should Not Incur Prejudice – Article by Zach Richardson

Pride Should Not Incur Prejudice – Article by Zach Richardson

January 13, 2024 Zach Richardson Comments 1 comment


























Zach Richardson


“Most people dislike vanity in others, whatever share they have of it themselves; but I give it fair quarter wherever I meet with it, being persuaded that it is often productive of good to the possessor, and to others that are within his sphere of action; and therefore, in many cases, it would not be altogether absurd if a man were to thank God for his vanity among the other comforts of life.

-Benjamin Franklin,
Autobiography

Pride Should Not Incur Prejudice

While there are several aspects of the Christian ethics that I disagree with, one that has particularly irked me was the idea of pride being a sin. If someone has done something noteworthy or respectable or that has had a good result, how can it be wrong for them to not be pleased with themselves and pleased with their actions? Is that not necessary for the action to be self-reinforcing?

Identifying as transhumanist is absolutely something one should be proud of. To be able to have as a core virtue the conviction that it is necessary to think “long-range” to properly ensure one’s survival, to be open to new and radical ideas, and to be part of the epic struggle of this century which is the abolition of death and disease, these are pure virtues.

I work in an extremely conservative industry, and it would not be in my best interest to be extremely vocal about being a Transhumanist – so I don’t. But I do bring up some key facts, if the opportunity arises: I think Death is Wrong. I am Director of Publication of a small third party. I have a refined nootropic stack that enhances my cognition. If there’s any interest, I elaborate. If there’s not, I don’t. If they’re a “normie” and they’re stuck in the matrix and actually give pushback, sometimes that yang energy can be absorbed and redirected. Even if the person says they’d never want to live forever, you can almost always get them to admit that their joints didn’t hurt as much 10 years ago, and they miss the mental energy they once had.

There may be some “dogwhistles” you find for other potential transhumanists, those interested in longevity, biohacking, etc. Found My Fitness, The Peter Attia Drive Podcast, and Huberman Lab have strong followings, and if you find a listener, that’s probably a good sign they’re more interested in beating death than they are border issues/gender politics/gun rights, yadda yadda. Personally I find more in common with the crypto-transhumanists who are primarily focused on longevity than I do with some of the more vocal ones who seem to be focused on standing out from the crowd.

The majority aren’t going to want to stand out from the crowd. The truth is the crowd wants to punish those that behave differently, and a lot of people are focused more on surviving now than on getting their fair due of approval later, after the gains have materialized. Gains like being able to say, “I was an early adopter of the notion that death should be abolished, and I voted for the one party that cared.”

So what I advocate is: be normal and different at the same time. You can follow social norms, try to have many friends, and be polite and generous, but still know the arguments and be able to stand your ground in a debate if the discussions on longevity come up. Or, you could even be the one to raise the topic, if appropriate. There are a plethora of other Platform issues that could come up too. Rights of children, nuclear disarmament, (soft) animal welfare, reasonable minimum timeframes between bill proposal and voting, depoliticizing appointment of Supreme Court justices, and many others could be good to brush up on in our Platform page.

Luckily, one can still be proud of a cause and conform to social norms with relative ease if one is tactful. A very low-risk way to do so this year would be to buy a T-shirt. We have a window of time this election year where we can drive visibility for our movement, and have a low-risk way of being able to say to oneself: “You know what? I *am* proud to be a Transhumanist. It’s not fringe or different to support rationality, ending aging, and smarter governance, and I’m going to take a simple step to show that. If someone asks me about it, I will hold my head high, and maybe I’ll make a new ally.”

Zach Richardson is the Director of Publication for the U.S. Transhumanist Party. Find out more about him here. 

15-Day Exposure Period for Platform Vote #9

15-Day Exposure Period for Platform Vote #9

January 12, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 18 comments


























logo_bg

Gennady Stolyarov II


The U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) hereby opens a 15-day public exposure period on various Platform proposals intended to catch up on various developments that have occurred in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic. The USTP’s most recent Platform vote occurred during March 25-28, 2020, at the onset of the pandemic, after which an ongoing cascade of the pandemic’s consequences – including secondary, tertiary, and long-term consequences which continue to manifest pervasively in American and global contexts – prevented the organization of another Platform vote until the present time. However, during that time, various external developments, as well as the continuing course of the pandemic, have necessitated certain updates. The USTP is aware that a variety of other proposals have been submitted in the intervening 3.5 years as well, and it is intended that future Platform votes will be organized to address those proposals. The present Platform vote is structured so as to balance the need to make certain updates to keep provisions of the Platform current and relevant with the need to be reasonably concise in order to encourage widespread participation among the USTP Membership.

A vote will be scheduled on some or all of the items below once they have been exposed for at least 15 days. For each item, a 7-day voting period is expected to be opened at the earliest on Saturday, January 27, 2024.

During the exposure period, please post your comments on this thread. If you post comments intended to be considered in voting and/or amending any of these planks in any other electronic medium, please note that you thereby give your consent to have your comments reproduced with attribution or linked within this discussion thread, in order to direct members’ attention and consideration to them.

After the exposure period, a 7-day electronic voting period will occur. Instructions for electronic voting will be sent to members of the U.S. Transhumanist Party via e-mail at that time. All individuals who are members of the U.S. Transhumanist Party as of the end of the exposure period and who have expressed agreement with its three Core Ideals will be eligible to vote thereafter. You can still vote if you become a member during the exposure period, so please apply here if you are interested. During the 7-day electronic voting period, you will still be able to become a member – but you will only be able to vote in subsequent elections, since we seek for voting on any given issue to be done by those members who have had an opportunity to thoroughly consider that issue and be involved in deliberations regarding it.

Electronic voting will be conducted by a ranked-preference method if more than a single option is presented for the wording of a particular plank or segment of a plank. Members will be able to rank-order their preferred selections on each individual Section. The originally proposed text of each Section will be available for selection, as well as any reasonable amendments proposed by any member. Leadership of the U.S. Transhumanist Party reserves the right to edit any proposed amendment for correctness of spelling and grammar. The status-quo option – either “No Section of this sort” or the previous Section wording will also be a choice, depending on whether the Section in question is new or proposed to be revised. Any Section where a majority of votes favors the status-quo option will be not be adopted. Members will also be able to abstain from voting on any given Section.

The ranked-preference method has the advantage of eliminating a “winner-take-all” or “first-past-the-post” mentality and preventing people from being channeled into voting for sub-optimal choices (in their view) just because they fear an even less palatable alternative prevailing. Within the ranked-preference methodology, if no option obtains a clear majority as voters’ first choice, the option having the fewest first-choice votes is eliminated from consideration, and all those who voted for that option will have their votes assigned to their second-choice options. This process of elimination continues until one particular option has a clear majority of votes.

The U.S. Transhumanist Party encourages all members to participate in this process and for other transhumanists to sign up for membership during the exposure period. 


Section E9-A. Defeat of COVID as a Priority

Option E9-A-1. Given that the COVID-19 pandemic continues to ravage the world and will not end as long as immunity from vaccination or prior infection can be bypassed by subsequent mutated escape variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the United States Transhumanist Party supports concerted scientific and technological efforts to eliminate COVID-19 as a threat to public health. These efforts may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:

Ancillary Provision E9-A-i. Development of a universal vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus that would work against all possible variants of the virus and would confer lasting immunity.

Ancillary Provision E9-A-ii. Development of harmless variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that would outcompete the existing variants without damaging any human or other animal host.

Ancillary Provision E9-A-iii. Development of antibodies that are capable of neutralizing any variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Ancillary Provision E9-A-iv. Development of reliable cures for all varieties of Long COVID or Post-COVID Syndrome.

The United States Transhumanist Party considers only scientific and technological solutions to be capable of eliminating COVID-19 as a threat to public health and does not support lockdowns, restrictions on individual liberty or medical choice, or demonization of individuals who make any personal health choices regarding their approach to COVID-19 precautions – including individuals who take extensive, moderate, mild, or no precautions. The United States Transhumanist Party also holds that no individual should be compelled to undertake any behaviors that may expose that individual to greater risk of contracting COVID-19.

Section E9-B. Perception of Artificial Intelligence as an Opportunity

Option E9-B-1. The United States Transhumanist Party supports approaching technologies of artificial intelligence primarily as opportunities rather than as threats. The potential of artificial intelligence, including generative AI, to foster creativity, solve problems, cure diseases, create new opportunities, and facilitate radical abundance far outweighs the risks and dangers of AI. The United States Transhumanist Party recognizes that AI safety and AI alignment are important pursuits to maximize the probability of predominantly beneficial consequences from future AI systems. Furthermore, the United States Transhumanist Party supports restrictions on the ability to use AI systems for intentionally destructive purposes; such restrictions would include a ban on autonomous weapons. However, these efforts should be undertaken in a rational, proportionate, evidence-based manner, avoiding unsubstantiated speculation, alarmist hype, and doomsday pronouncements. Furthermore, the United States Transhumanist Party opposes any efforts to restrict individual liberty or initiate physically aggressive action against other individuals or countries in the name of stopping allegedly dangerous AI development.

Section E9-C. Reversible Cryopreservation Techniques

Option E9-C-1. [Based on Proposal by Vladimir Shakirov] Recognizing that the achievement of reversible cryopreservation techniques could enable the realization of individuals’ right to life (brutally violated by so-called “natural” death) by waiting until future technologies could bring a cryopreserved patient out of the cryopreserved state and achieve cures for diseases and aging, the United States Transhumanist Party emphasizes the urgency of advancing reversible cryopreservation research. Therefore, the United States Transhumanist Party supports the allocation of an annual funding package of $10 billion for reversible cryopreservation research. This funding shall be expeditiously directed to esteemed research institutions with a proven track record of focusing on the development and implementation of reversible cryopreservation techniques.

Section E9-D. Public Money for Public Code

Option E9-D-1. [Based on Proposal by Martin van der Kroon] The United States Transhumanist Party supports the implementation of the ‘Public Money for Public Code’ concept, which holds that public money should, where reasonably possible, come to benefit the public first and foremost, and secondarily might also benefit other parties as well.

Public code is understood as code that is publicly available and more commonly referred to as Open Source, for example code released under the GPLv3 (General Public License version 3). The reasoning of ‘Public Money for Public Code’ is that public money should not be spent on proprietary software that benefits a select group of companies, but rather used to support Open-Source projects that are alternatives to proprietary software. As Open-Source software is available for free to the public, said stimulus of Open-Source software could benefit both the public as well as public institutions. An example here could be an alternative to Microsoft Office, such as LibreOffice.

Many Open-Source projects operate via volunteers contributing to the project’s efforts. Opening up the possibility to receive funding for a project could incentivize more people to contribute to a project, and perhaps even use contribution to Open-Source projects as a means of stable income. This incentivizes citizens to participate, as besides the admirable goal of doing good for the public, it also contributes to the participants’ livelihood, or helps them decide to split their worktime between the roles of an employee and a self-employed contributor.

Likewise, this might incentivize software companies to participate as well, as it can earn them revenue. It would, however, be important to observe that companies do not drown out individual contributors, as this could have a detrimental effect on incentivizing public participation.

The public participation would be an important element of the ‘Public Money for Public Code’ implementation, as it would also be a public showcase to stimulate interest in programming in education and beyond.

Section E9-E. Privacy on Social Media

Option E9-E-1. [Based on Proposal by Martin van der Kroon] The United States Transhumanist Party supports efforts for social media to improve privacy settings, in granularity, usability, as well as awareness of such privacy features, for users. Better control of privacy can minimize the scraping of information, including information that can be used for identifying targets by malicious actors, from websites.

Section E9-F. Restraint of Government Agencies’ Efforts to Undermine Private Businesses’ Security Measures

Option E9-F-1. [Based on Proposal by Martin van der Kroon] The United States Transhumanist Party supports efforts to restrain government agencies from efforts to limit, oppose, or undermine security initiatives by companies and businesses. Although their motives might be pure, to uncover criminal activity for example, such efforts can in the process undermine security on a much larger scale. If government agencies can have access, so can malicious actors.

Section E9-G. Security Whistleblower Program

Option E9-G-1. [Based on Proposal by Martin van der Kroon] The US Transhumanist Party supports efforts to create a security whistleblower initiative where a whistleblower can report known security issues that are not being addressed by a company or government institution. This could also aid the whistleblower in the event that they would suffer negative consequences by their employer for addressing security issues.

Proposed Amendments to Existing Sections

Members will be given the option to either retain existing language of a plank or to adopt any of the listed proposed amendments. Ranked-preference voting will be conducted for any Section for which more than one amendment has been proposed. Members will also be able to abstain from each vote.

New language in each amendment is stated in bold, italic blue text. Language proposed to be deleted is stated in red strikethrough text.

1. Amendment to Section XXVII to Align with U.S. Transhumanist Party Support for Ranked-Preference Voting

Current Version of Section XXVII. The United States Transhumanist Party advocates Constitutional reform to abolish the Electoral College in the United States Presidential elections and render the plurality of the popular vote the sole criterion for the election of President.

Amendment XXVII-1.   The United States Transhumanist Party advocates Constitutional reform to abolish the Electoral College in the United States Presidential elections and render the plurality of the popular vote the sole criterion for the election of President the criterion for the election of President to be an outcome of the popular vote decided by ranked-preference voting or a similar mechanism that allows voters to select multiple options in a manner that more completely expresses their views.

2. Amendment to Section XXXVI to Provide Exceptions to Taxation for Basic Necessities

Current Version of Section XXXVI. The United States Transhumanist Party supports the elimination of graduated taxation and income taxation more generally. Instead, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates a flat percentage-of-sales tax applicable only to purchases from businesses whose combined nationwide revenues from all affiliates exceed a specified threshold. This tax should be built into the price of goods from such large businesses and should not impede transaction efficiency in any manner. Transactions pertaining to wages, salaries, gifts, donations, barter, employee benefits, and inheritances should remain completely untaxed, as should transactions involving solely individuals and/or small businesses, for whom the establishment of a tax-reporting infrastructure would be onerous. Furthermore, all taxes on land and property should be abolished.

Amendment XXXVI-1. The United States Transhumanist Party supports the elimination of graduated taxation and income taxation more generally. Instead, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates a flat percentage-of-sales tax applicable only to purchases from businesses whose combined nationwide revenues from all affiliates exceed a specified threshold. This tax should be built into the price of goods from such large businesses and should not impede transaction efficiency in any manner. This tax would not be imposed on life necessities, defined as goods that are consumable in the near term and whose primary purpose is to facilitate human survival. Transactions pertaining to wages, salaries, gifts, donations, barter, employee benefits, and inheritances should remain completely untaxed, as should transactions involving solely individuals and/or small businesses, for whom the establishment of a tax-reporting infrastructure would be onerous. Furthermore, all taxes on land and property should be abolished.

3. Amendment to Section LXXIX to Update the Discussion of the Status of Right-to-Try Legislation

Current Version of Section LXXIX: The United States Transhumanist Party supports repealing the current requirement in the United States that drugs or treatments may not be used, even on willing patients, unless approval for such drugs or treatments is received from the Food and Drug Administration. Such requirements are a profound violation of patient sovereignty; a person who is terminally ill is unable to choose to take a risk on an unapproved drug or treatment unless this person is fortunate enough to participate in a clinical trial. Even then, once the clinical trial ends, the treatment must be discontinued, even if it was actually successful at prolonging the person’s life. This is not only profoundly tragic, but morally unconscionable as well. The most critical reform needed is to allow unapproved drugs and treatments to be marketed and consumed. If the FDA wishes to strongly differentiate between approved and unapproved treatments, then a strongly worded warning label could be required for unapproved treatments, and patients could even be required to sign a consent form stating that they have been informed of the risks of an unapproved treatment. This reform to directly extend many lives and to redress a moral travesty should be the top political priority of advocates of indefinite life extension. Over the coming decades, its effect will be to allow cutting-edge treatments to reach a market sooner and thus to enable data about those treatments’ effects to be gathered more quickly and reliably. Because many treatments take 10-15 years to receive FDA approval, this reform could by itself speed up the real-world advent of indefinite life extension by over a decade.

Amendment LXXIX-1. The United States Transhumanist Party supports repealing the current requirement in the United States that, in most cases, drugs or treatments may not be used, even on willing patients, unless approval for such drugs or treatments is received from the Food and Drug Administration. Such requirements are a profound violation of patient sovereignty; a person who is terminally ill is often unable to choose to take a risk on an unapproved drug or treatment unless this person is fortunate enough to participate in a clinical trial. Even then, once the clinical trial ends, the treatment must be is often discontinued, even if it was actually successful at prolonging the person’s life.  While the Federal Right-to-Try Act of 2017 and various State-level Right-to-Try Acts have been steps in the right direction, they have seldom been utilized, because of various other regulatory barriers, as well as drug manufacturers’ reluctance to expose themselves to liability and regulatory risk. This is not only profoundly tragic, but morally unconscionable as well. The most critical reform needed is to allow unapproved drugs and treatments to be marketed and consumed. Every effort should be made to allow and encourage the manufacturers and providers of experimental medicines and medical treatments to make them available to willing patients with proper disclosure and informed consent, accompanied by protections against liability and adverse regulatory actions. Currently, most Right-to-Try Acts are limited to terminally ill patients, and should be expanded to model Montana’s Right-to-Try Act and the Best Choice Medicine concept to make the choice to pursue experimental drugs and treatments, including gene therapies, available to all patients. If the FDA wishes to strongly differentiate between approved and unapproved treatments, then a strongly worded warning label could be required for unapproved treatments, and patients could even be required to sign a consent form stating that they have been informed of the risks of an unapproved treatment. This reform to directly extend many lives and to redress a moral travesty should be the top political priority of advocates of indefinite life extension. Over the coming decades, its effect will be to allow cutting-edge treatments to reach a market sooner and thus to enable data about those treatments’ effects to be gathered more quickly and reliably. Because many treatments take 10-15 years to receive FDA approval, this reform could by itself speed up the real-world advent of indefinite life extension by over a decade.

4. Amendment to Section XCIX to Revise Proposal for COVID Universal Basic Income to a Proposal to Indefinitely Cover all Costs of COVID Treatments and Vaccinations

Current Version of Section XCIX: The United States Transhumanist Party supports for an immediate, universal, unconditional basic income of at least $1000 per month to be provided to every United States citizen for the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak and its immediate aftermath, without regard for individuals’ means or other sources of income. The priority for this program should be to prevent massive and irreparable economic disruptions to the lives of Americans in the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic.

Amendment XCIX-1: The United States Transhumanist Party supports for n immediate, universal, unconditional basic income of at least $1000 per month to be provided to every United States citizen for the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak and its immediate aftermath, without regard for individuals’ means or other sources of income. advocates for all American residents to continue to receive free health care for the disease of COVID-19, including free testing, vaccination, antiviral medications, and any other services involved in the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19. The priority for this program should be to prevent massive and irreparable economic and health disruptions to the lives of Americans in the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic. Requiring consumers and patients to pay for COVID-related care would increase the number of people who refuse to obtain vaccination or treatment for purely financial reasons, thus amplifying the difficulty of ever defeating COVID-19 – an endeavor that is aided by maximizing the amount of immunity and available health care for the population.

5. Amendment to Section CI to Update the Discussion of Pandemic-Related Travel Delays

Current Version of Section CI: In recognition that the recent screening bottlenecks at United States airports create situations of unacceptable crowding which further contribute to the spread of the COVID-19 epidemic, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for immediate admittance through security checkpoints of the vast majority of travelers currently waiting at airports in the United States. Such travelers may be required to subsequently undergo health screenings at other facilities within the United States within a certain period of time, as long as such screenings do not involuntarily place the individuals being screened in close physical proximity to one another.

Amendment CI-1: In recognition that the recent screening bottlenecks unprecedented and prolonged patterns of flight delays and cancellations at United States airports create situations of unacceptable crowding which further contribute to the spread of  detriments to quality of life and mobility to American passengers and were due directly to the supply-chain disruptions, aircraft shortages, labor shortages, and poor decisions by major airlines to cut staff in the wake of the COVID-19 epidemic, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for immediate admittance through security checkpoints of the vast majority of travelers currently waiting at airports in the United States. Such travelers may be required to subsequently undergo health screenings at other facilities within the United States within a certain period of time, as long as such screenings do not involuntarily place the individuals being screened in close physical proximity to one another. measures to enable airlines which reduced aircraft counts and dismissed staff during the COVID-19 epidemic to purchase or construct sufficient aircraft to replace the reduced capacity, to actively utilize such aircraft and restore prior routes, and to offer to re-hire all staff members who were dismissed as a result of prior responses to the epidemic. In the event that specific individual former staff members do not wish to return to their previous positions, they should be replaced with others who are willing to take on those roles for appropriate compensation and benefits. Sufficient incentives should be offered to airlines to allow pre-COVID flight, maintenance, and staffing levels to continue indefinitely.

6. Amendment to Section CII to Update the Discussion of Recalling United States Overseas Military Personnel

Current Version of Section CII: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the recall of all United States military personnel from overseas stations as soon as possible and their deployment for the purpose of rapid hospital construction in the United States, as well as for providing rapid emergency aid and essential infrastructure improvements. Continued military presence abroad only unnecessarily exposes American troops to the risk of infection, while the expertise of American military personnel in crisis response is urgently needed within American borders.

Amendment CII-1: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the recall of all as many United States military personnel from overseas stations as soon as reasonably possible, with the exception of those specifically needed to defend American assets and American citizens and to carry out specific and limited previously agreed-upon treaty obligations, and their deployment for the purpose of rapid hospital construction in the United States, as well as for providing rapid emergency aid and essential infrastructure improvements. Continued military presence abroad only unnecessarily exposes American troops to the risk of infection, while the expertise of American military personnel in crisis response is urgently needed within American borders. improving domestic defense, infrastructure, and crisis response in providing peaceful assistance to the civilian population in times of major disruptions to everyday life.

7. Amendment to Section CIII to Emphasize the Need to Support Lasting Cures and Vaccines for COVID-19

Current Version of Section CIII: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the rapid research into effective cures and vaccines for COVID-19 and the harnessing of synergies from this research to also develop a cure for the common cold and more effective vaccination against influenza. Such research should proceed with no barriers, subject to the researchers’ expression of ethical intentions, and any regulations or processes that would delay the progress of such research should be immediately waived or repealed. In the effort to accelerate progress in this field, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for an immediate $100 billion funding package for the rapid development of a COVID-19 vaccine, with all volunteers being accepted into human trials as soon as practicable. The United States Transhumanist Party advocates for government funding and ownership of any cure for COVID-19, to be distributed free of charge to those infected with the virus.

Amendment CIII-1: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the rapid research into effective lasting cures and vaccines for COVID-19, such as antibodies that respond to all variants of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccines that permanently protect against all such variants, and the harnessing of synergies from this research to also develop a cure for the common cold and more effective vaccination against influenza. Such research should proceed with no barriers, subject to the researchers’ expression of ethical intentions, and any regulations or processes that would delay the progress of such research should be immediately waived or repealed. In the effort to accelerate progress in this field, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for an immediate $100 billion funding package for the rapid development of a universal COVID-19 vaccine that would be permanently effective against all variants, with all volunteers being accepted into human trials as soon as practicable. The United States Transhumanist Party advocates for government funding and ownership release into the public domain of any cure or future vaccine for COVID-19, to be distributed free of charge to those infected with the virus and to all who wish to prevent such infection.

8. Amendment to Section CIV to Generalize the USTP’s Support for an Annual $100 Billion Funding Package for Anti-Aging Research

Current Version of Section CIV: Because biological aging is the number-one risk factor for mortality and severe complications from COVID-19 infections, as well as infections of virtually every sort, the United States Transhumanist Party emphasizes the importance of reversing biological aging as rapidly as possible and thereby protecting more lives from future pandemics. Accordingly, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for a permanent, annual $100 billion funding package for anti-aging research, to be immediately distributed to leading research organizations in the field which have in the past specifically identified the defeat and reversal of biological aging as their goals.

Amendment CIV-1 [Proposal by Vladimir Shakirov]: Because biological aging is the number-one risk factor for mortality and disabilities in elderly people, and for severe complications from COVID-19 infections, as well as infections of virtually every sort, and thus brutally violates the fundamental rights of people to life and health, the United States Transhumanist Party emphasizes the importance of reversing biological aging as rapidly as possible and thereby protecting more lives, including from future pandemics. Accordingly, the United States Transhumanist Party advocates for a permanent, annual $100 billion funding package for anti-aging research, to be immediately distributed to leading research organizations in the field which have in the past specifically identified the defeat and reversal of biological aging as their goals.

9. Amendment to Section CX to Reflect Success of USTP’s Recommendation for the Distribution of Diagnostic Test Kits and the Need to Maintain Robust Data on the COVID Pandemic

Current Version of Section CX: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the immediate deployment of as many COVID-19 diagnostic tests as possible to the general population, with the aim of achieving universal testing of every American, even those without symptoms, free of charge. Universal testing is necessary to understand the true prevalence of COVID-19 infections and the proportion of serious cases and fatalities relative to actual total cases, not merely reported cases. This would enable a true understanding of the extent of the epidemic’s spread as well as how the rates of serious complications and death compare to the common cold and influenza. The United States Transhumanist Party supports generous aid to both private and governmental research teams working in parallel on developing effective testing kits and approaches, particularly those which do not require large numbers of people to congregate.

The United States Transhumanist Party also advocates for COVID-19 testing kits to be developed that could result in tests being self-administered by individuals in their own homes and then mailed to laboratories for evaluation. This would minimize the physical contact of individuals being tested with medical practitioners and other patients.

Amendment CX-1: The United States Transhumanist Party supports the immediate ongoing, continuous, and indefinite deployment of as many COVID-19 diagnostic tests as possible to the general population, with the aim of achieving universal testing of every American, even those without symptoms, free of charge. Universal testing is necessary to understand the true prevalence of COVID-19 infections and the proportion of serious cases and fatalities relative to actual total cases, not merely reported cases. This would enable a true understanding of the extent of the epidemic’s spread as well as how the rates of serious complications and death compare to the common cold and influenza. The United States Transhumanist Party supports generous aid to both private and governmental research teams working in parallel on developing effective testing kits and approaches, particularly those which do not require large numbers of people to congregate manufacturers of effective diagnostic tests for COVID-19 that can recognize emerging variants, such that those tests could be manufactured in sufficient quantity to provide a test to every American who wants one.

The United States Transhumanist Party also advocates achieved success in advocating for COVID-19 testing kits to be developed that could result in tests being self-administered by individuals in their own homes and then mailed to laboratories for evaluation. This would minimize has reduced the physical contact of individuals being tested with medical practitioners and other patients. However, the United States Transhumanist Party expresses concern regarding significant lack of data about the ongoing prevalence of COVID-19 within communities in the United States. Such data, which used to be tracked rigorously and published regularly, have now become sparse and have failed to capture all sources of COVID-19 infection. In order to be able to track the spread of new variants of the virus, authorities need to return to the level of data collection and publication that existed during the early pandemic in 2020.

BDYXHAX – An Interview with Russ Foxx by R. Nicholas Starr

BDYXHAX – An Interview with Russ Foxx by R. Nicholas Starr

January 12, 2024 R. Nicholas Starr Comments 0 Comment


























R. Nicholas Starr
Russ Foxx


Editor’s Note: The event of the website which hosted this article, BDYHAX, is no longer taking place, and this article is being saved due to the risk their website may soon be taken down. Wikipedia basically describes body hacking as transhumanism with high risk-tolerance, but it is my hope as technology progresses those risks will become negligible, and the variety in form we see with our physical manifestations will be limited more by imagination than anything else.

~ Zach Richardson, Director of Publication, United States Transhumanist Party, January 11, 2024


An Interview with BDYHAX Presenter Russ Foxx

Art gives birth to scientific innovation.

In an effort to learn more about the historical origins of transhumanism and posthumanism, R. Nicholas Starr began a journey to look at the many topics popular within those communities and retraced them back to art. To continue the research he began to reach out to the artists and scientists at the forefront of exploring this relationship. While he continues to prepare his research for publication, he has decided to release the transcripts from these interviews in hopes to spark conversation and gather even more insight into how the creative mind has shaped our scientific world as we move past the limits of the human body.

R. Nicholas Starr is a multimedia artist, biohacker, researcher, and theorist. With an education in signals intelligence from the United States Air Force, and 20 years of experience creating art and performing music in the US and abroad, he has become a unique voice for the US Transhumanist Movement and American policy.

The first in this series is an interview with Russ Foxx, world-renowned body-modification and suspension artist, and fellow cyborg.

R. Nicholas Starr: When a client comes to you looking for a “body hack”, do they usually have a specific function/task in mind, or are they just exploring the possibilities?

Russ Foxx: My clients generally have a solid idea of what they want to accomplish prior to contacting me. I don’t push my own ideas on people; rather I’m a catalyst in helping people upgrade themselves to fit their desires. I’ll certainly advise if I feel that an individual may benefit from a certain type of modification in their situation, but people usually do their homework. That’s how they find me to begin with.

RNS: Have you noticed a specific trend in what people want?

RF: In terms of functional implants and human-mountable devices, I commonly work with Magnetic Vision, RFID, NFC, North Sense and Transdermal Implants. I’ve also worked with the North Star V1.0 and the Firefly V1.0.

Social media certainly plays a role in what’s popular at any given time, which gives me the opportunity to roll out new mods and ideas as I see fit. I’m currently waiting on a few different implantable devices that are in the works, so you’ll hear about them when they hit my feeds!

RNS: How much of an inspiration do you think science fiction has been for biohacking and transhumanism?

RF: Science fiction has been huge for me. Having grown up rural; Sci-Fi and horror films and literature during childhood definitely shaped my ideas from a young age. I still find inspiration from them to this day.

RNS: Do you think approaching biohacking in a more artful way, like your tattoos incorporated with the Northstar implant, will help spread the idea?

RF: Unless I’m telling a story via stage performance, I’m not really trying to “spread the idea” per se. I choose to look how I want to look and upgrade what I want to upgrade. I don’t hide my mods, so they tend to be seen a lot on the street and online.

I’ve always been a fan of mixed mediums in art, which is why I incorporated my North Star V1.0 implant into my biomech chest tattoo work. This creates a complimentary coexistence of art and technology in my body; reminiscent of Iron Man’s Arc Reactor.

RNS: What was your first cyborg influence?

RF: Outside of film, Stelarc was certainly one of my first cyborg influences. His views on the obsolete body always resonated in me and inspired me to look at my own body in a similar way. His ear-in-arm project continues to move forward, which actually brought some inspiration to a project I’m currently working on involving sound transmission in my own body. I’ve been 100% deaf in my left ear for most of my life and decided to start working on ways to increase my sound input capability using my own devices rather than limited ability hearing aids currently on the market.

RNS: A small collection of bioartists using live tissue to create art (for example Catts & Zurr’s living leather jacket). As a body artist, how could you use that technology?

RF: I really like their concept of creating victimless leather, although the current state of this experiment is unknown.

Skin grafting using stem cells has been existent in the medical field for quite some time now, which is a relative idea with functional applications in the body. It hasn’t yet been seen entering into the body modification realm, but I don’t doubt its arrival into the picture someday. It’s usually the high costs that hold back a lot of medical technology from the reach of artists.

RNS: As someone who performs with body modification, namely suspension, do you see a possibility for a functional biohacking-driven mod performance? If so, what would it look like and what would be the message? If not, why not?

RF: Stage performance has always been a means to push the limits and boundaries of my body and mind. My past performances have been very primal and visceral, often inspiring buildups of tension and suspense and sometimes even crowd members fainting.

I’ve taken some time off from performing in the last couple years to focus on my modification work, but I plan to be back on the stage soon. Moving forward I see myself putting focus on interactions between technology and biology in ways to challenge our current ideas and relationships with technology.

Keep an eye on my website and YouTube channel for updates!

RNS: In movies and comics we see huge amounts of tech crammed into a person. How much can one body support when it comes to functional implants?

RF: When it comes to implanted technology there will always be limitations in terms of implant size and functionality. Space must be created in the body where the implant is intended to go, while preserving the body’s ability to naturally function and heal. This often requires adapting one’s lifestyle to an extent.

I currently have 4 implants in my left hand alone (3 functional & 1 cosmetic). The functional implants (Magnetic Vision, RFID, NFC) are quite small and placed in locations that will not hinder everyday activities.

Keeping the implantable devices small will make them more easily accepted by the body. This supports the human body as having a vast amount of upgrade capabilities.

RNS: Through dermal piercings, would it be possible to expand current biohacking technology (biofeedback interfacing, extrasensory beyond magnets, interchangeable hardware)?

RF: Transdermal implants and dermal anchors can certainly be used as hardwired interfaces/ports to devices within the body. This idea does not work without consequence though, as it creates an access point for bacteria to enter the body even after much time has passed. As this method increases infection risks, it’s generally seen as less than ideal. Bluetooth connectivity and induction charging are proving to be more solid options in this area.

RNS: How can biohackers, as a small but expanding community, take transhumanism towards a nationally influential movement?

RF: Stay focused on personal safety and the safety and well-being of the public just as much as the progression and pioneering of new ideas. Support open-source information and resource sharing. Collaborate with others. Utilize maker spaces and support events like BDYHAX and BMXNET. Challenge yourself to think outside the box and reprogram your own mind and the world around you. Allow yourself to evolve and adapt with the times and state of the world around you. Share the love.

Interview with Stephanie Planque from Covalent Bioscience by Ariel VA Feinerman

Interview with Stephanie Planque from Covalent Bioscience by Ariel VA Feinerman

January 6, 2024 Ariel VA Feinerman Comments 0 Comment


























logo_bg

Ariel VA Feinerman
Stephanie Planque


Dr. Stephanie Planque

This interview was originally published here.

Preface

What is ageing? We can define ageing as a process of accumulation of the damage which is just a side-effect of normal metabolism. While researchers still poorly understand how metabolic processes cause damage accumulation, and how accumulated damage causes pathology, the damage itself — the structural difference between old tissue and young tissue — is categorized and understood pretty well. By repairing damage and restoring the previous undamaged — young — state of an organism, we can really rejuvenate it! It sounds very promising, and so it is. And for some types of damage (for example, for senescent cells) it is already proved to work!

Today in our virtual studio, somewhere between cold, rainy Saint-Petersburg and warm, sunny Houston, we meet Stephanie Planque! For those of you who are not familiar with her, here is a brief introduction.

Stephanie Planque was awarded the PhD in 2009 by the University of Texas-Houston Medical School for her advances in applying electrophilic analogs of proteins to decipher the beneficial and harmful functional effects of catabodies. She then expanded her focus to vaccination and therapeutic catabody identification using proprietary electrophilic target analogs. Her work was published in 49 peer-reviewed scientific articles; she has numerous national/international conference presentations. She moved fulltime as a co-founder to Covalent Bioscience in 2018 to focus on rapidly translating their electrophilic vaccine/catabody technologies to clinical reality.

Note: If you have not read Ending Aging yet, I suggest you to do it as soon as possible, and to be more comfortable with the ideas we are discussing below I highly recommend you to read the short introduction to SENS research on their web page. Also if you are interested in recent news and up-to-date reviews about [anti]ageing and rejuvenation research, the best place to look for is the Fight Aging! blog. Finally, if you are an investor or just curious, I highly encourage you to take a look at Jim Mellon’s book Juvenescence.

Interview

Ariel Feinerman: Hello, Dr Stephanie Planque!

Stephanie Planque: Hi, Mr Feinerman! Happy to participate in this interview.

Ariel Feinerman: What is the brief history of Covalent Bioscience?

Stephanie Planque: Covalent Bioscience was incorporated in 2010 by Dr Sudhir Paul and Dr Richard Massey based on catalytic antibody technology and several exciting potential products for unmet medical needs. The technology and potential products were developed in Dr Sudhir Paul’s group at the University of Texas (UT). Dr Richard Massey and Dr Sudhir Paul have worked together on the field of catalytic antibody (or catabody) when Dr Massey was in Igen in the late 80’s. I have worked with Dr Paul since 1999 and am one of the co-founders of Covalent Bioscience. We, the founders of Covalent Bioscience, share the same conviction that our platform technology holds the potential to generate superior immunotherapeutic drug and vaccines.

Today, Covalent Bioscience has grown to a preclinical stage company holding significant assets. Our broad technology platform can be applied to generate novel lead products for unmet needs across multiple areas of medicine. We have three promising lead products for diseases that proved very difficult to treat and prevent by conventional means. Two of them are catabodies for treating age-associated diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease and transthyretin amyloidosis. The products are expected to remove toxic aggregates that cause diseases in a more efficient and safe manner than conventional antibodies. In 2018, Dr Paul and I moved full time to Covalent Bioscience. Our lab is located at the skirt of the Houston Medical Center, biggest Medical Center in the World. In 2020, Covalent Bioscience received from The University of Texas the commercial rights to all inventions and research materials/tools Paul’s team generated there. With our current funding, we are generating new catabodies and working in collaboration with a Pharma company to advance one of our lead products closer to human trials.

Ariel Feinerman: What is the main focus of your research?

Stephanie Planque: Our main focus is, first, to optimize our an on-demand toolbox that enables generation of therapeutic catabodies and diagnostic irreversible antibodies with selectivity for virtually any protein target. Second, we want to accomplish preclinical milestones related to our anti-aging lead catabodies, Alzyme and Tauzyme for clearing brain amyloid proteins in Alzheimer’s disease, and Cardizyme for clearing heart and spinal cord amyloid caused by the transthyretin protein.

Ariel Feinerman: What is the basis of your technology?

Stephanie Planque: Our technology is based on using special chemically modified analogs of the target to isolate or generate catabodies, which modify permanently the target via enzymatic reaction or irreversible antibodies (IrAbs), which bind permanently to the target. These chemically modified target analogs can be used as probes to isolate catabodies or IrAbs from antibody libraries or as electrophilic vaccines (E-Vaccines) to induce a polyclonal catabodies and IrAb response.

The chemical modification consists in attaching electrophilic moieties on the surface of the target to fulfill two important goals. First, we want target-specific catabodies or IrAbs. The polypeptidic component of the target binds non-covalently to target-specific antibody displayed on surface of phage or B cells (B cell receptor, or BCRs). Second, the electrophilic moiety is a bait and is designed to mimic the natural weak electrophilic carbonyl present in the target and to form a non-hydrolyzable (or covalent) bond with the nucleophilic active site (negatively charged) of a catabody or IrAbs expressed on the B-cell surface as BCRs or expressed on phage display. This covalent bond traps the immune complex and prevents the hydrolysis step. However, when switching to the native target, the selected or induced catabodies will be capable to attack the natural weakly electrophilic carbonyl naturally present in the native target and hydrolyze the target.

Ariel Feinerman: Can you tell more how catabodies work? What are their unique properties? Which ageing pathology can you treat with them?

Stephanie Planque: The conventional antibodies are used as therapeutic and diagnostic agents. Their mechanism of action relies on binding specifically to the target. One molecule of antibody binds one target molecule. In contrast, one catabody can modify and destroy multiple target molecules and therefore is a therapeutic agent that is more efficient at removing toxic targets.

Conventional antibodies have the intrinsic limitation of dissociating from the target, the binding is reversible. In contrast, IrAbs bind any target covalently and therefore are diagnostic agents that are more efficient at detecting the target.

Covalent has developed two first-in-class lead catabody products for age-associated major unmet needs: Alzyme, for clearing amyloid β plaques from the brain for treating Alzheimer’s disease, and Cardizyme, for clearing transthyretin amyloid plaques from the spinal cord and heart for treating systemic amyloid disease. Two conventional antibodies to Aβ have been approved by FDA for Alzheimer’s disease to remove Aβ and improve cognition. They both are accompanied with inflammation in the brain caused by the antibody~Aβ immune complex activated microglia that can cause major adverse effects (edema, microbleeds, and death). In mice, Alzyme removed Aβ amyloid without causing inflammation. Aβ-binding antibodies are fundamentally flawed drugs for Alzheimer’s because they rely on brain-damaging inflammatory mechanism to remove amyloid. In contrast, catabodies remove disease-causing amyloids without inflammation.

Ariel Feinerman: We know that Aβ is not the full story. There is Tau, chronic inflammation, lipofuscin.

Stephanie Planque: To be used in combination with Alzyme, we are developing a prototype catabody to misfolded Tau, another misfolded protein that plays a role in Alzheimer’s disease but also other taupathy.

Our technology can induce catabodies or IrAb to any targets. Hence, in addition to developing a catabody for any extracellular or intracellular amyloids, catabodies could be generated to dissolve lipofuscin accumulating during aging or to destroy any protein regulating cell loss, tissue atrophy, inflammation, or cancerous cells, and this could further help in fighting aging.

Ariel Feinerman: What is an E-Vaccine? How do they work? How do they differ from original vaccines?

Stephanie Planque: We use the term “electrophilic vaccine” or “E-Vaccine” because the vaccine is composed of the target modified to present an electrophilic moiety on its surface. The goal of an E-vaccine is to teach our body to make catabodies or IrAbs and that will protect the vaccinated individual when exposed to the toxic substance or microbes.

E-vaccines are shown to stimulate the body’s own immune system to produce protective catabodies and IrAbs to protein targets involved in infectious disease and accelerated aging. As the catabodies and IrAbs show protective activity superior to the ordinary vaccine-induced rAbs, E-vaccines are predicted to show superior efficacy in disease prevention. Further, the E-vaccine targeting range is also superior to ordinary vaccines — they can target the functionally important regions of the protein target hidden to ordinary vaccines. The E-vaccine technology holds special promise for effective prevention of infections caused by mutable microbes (such as HIV infection, the SARS-coronavirus-2 infection). The technology can also be adapted to develop longevity vaccines. This is supported by induction of catabodies and IrAbs in mice with a prototype electrophilic amyloid β peptides for protecting against Alzheimer’s disease. Covalent Bioscience also considers electrophilic misfolded transthyretin analogs to protect against transthyretin amyloidosis.

The principle and benefits of E-vaccines come from our lead product, HIV E-Vaccine. Our HIV E-vaccine is composed of HIV coat protein gp120 with electrophilic moiety on the Lys side chain. It was shown to induce catabodies and IrAbs that neutralize genetically diverse HIV strains in mice, rabbits, and non-human primates. It also induces an efficient IgM-IgG switch, of a B cell with specificity for a conserved but poorly immunogenic epitopes of gp120. Covalent Bioscience intends to bring the vaccine to the human-trials stage.

Ariel Feinerman: What products are you hoping to bring to market? What is your commercialization route?

Stephanie Planque: We plan to bring to market our Alzyme for clearing brain amyloid protein in Alzheimer’s disease alone or in combination with Tauzyme. We also plan to move forward Cardizyme for clearing heart and spinal cord amyloid caused by the transthyretin protein.

Covalent’s lead anti-amyloid catabodies are the best solution because they permanently and directly destroy thousands of targeted amyloid copies (Aβ, tau or TTR) without inflammation or blood vessel damage. In contrast, competing drug candidates: (a) work reversibly on a 1:1 basis, (b) require inflammatory cell participation for amyloid removal, © can cause inflammation and vascular damage that nullify the amyloid removal benefit, or (d) can interfere with normal bodily processes requiring the properly folded, non-amyloid version of the protein target.

We seek investment, partnership and licensing arrangements to develop our products and validate the commercial value of our technologies.

Ariel Feinerman: When can we see your therapies in human clinical trials?

Stephanie Planque: We are completing some preclinical efficacy studies for Alzyme in animals. Considering the need for GMP-grade production of Alzyme and submission of an IND to FDA, human trials for Alzyme would be within 2–3 years. A similar timeline is expected for Cardizyme. Tauzyme requires additional preclinical testing and would reach human trials within 4 years. We are actively seeking funding and a partner that would allow us to more rapidly have these three products to reach human trials.

Ariel Feinerman: How are you funded?

Stephanie Planque: The technology was developed at the University of Nebraska and University of Texas using funds received from NIH and other non-profit organizations (The Richard J. Massey Foundation for Arts and Sciences, Abzyme Research Foundation, SENS Research Foundation), investment from Founders and Angel investors. Angel investors constitute our current funding source. Covalent invites a USD 4.5 million investment in exchange for equity to advance commercialization of these inter-related parts of its business plan over 18 months for developing our on-demand toolbox and our anti-aging lead catabodies.

Ariel Feinerman: How much money do you need to bring your therapies to the clinic?

Stephanie Planque: The funding will underwrite the milestones of manufacturing, animal toxicity profiles, and Phase 1 human trials of the catabodies. Covalent will need about $4.6M to complete final Alzyme preclinical milestones and Phase 1 trials in Alzheimer patients; about $4.7M to complete molecular and animal optimization of Tauzyme and advance the Tauzyme catabody in combination with Alzyme in Alzheimer patients; about $6M to test Cardizyme in patients with heart disease or lumbar spinal stenosis.

Ariel Feinerman: Thank you very much for your interview!

Stephanie Planque: Thank you for your interest in Covalent Bioscience.

Ariel VA Feinerman is a researcher, author, and photographer, who believes that people should not die from diseases and ageing, and whose main goal is to improve human health and achieve immortality. If you like Ariel’s work, any help would be appreciated via PayPal: arielfeinerman@gmail.com.

Research Against Aging in Africa: Necessity or Contingency? – Article by Siba Tcha-Mouza

Research Against Aging in Africa: Necessity or Contingency? – Article by Siba Tcha-Mouza

January 5, 2024 Siba Tcha-Mouza Comments 6 comments


























Siba Tcha-Mouza


“Longevism, ageism and aging: African issues and perspectives on longevity,” was the theme of the African International Bioethics Forum (FAIB) organized by the Institut Africain de Bioéthique (IAB) at the University of Dschang in Cameroon from December 6-8, 2023. My presentation at this international forum was entitled as follows: “Research against aging in Africa: necessity or contingency?“.  Below is an article that shares ideas relating to this aforementioned theme. 

With a much lower median age (18.7 years – Source: AfriqueRenouveau, “La jeunesse africaine renouvelle son engagement envers les ODD“, December 23, 2021) than that of its neighbors, notably Asia (31.9 years – Source: Database.Earth, “Median Age of Asia“), the United States of America (38.1 years – Source: Worldometer, “United States Population (LIVE)“), and the European Union (44.4 years – Source: Eurostat – “Half of EU’s population older than 44.4 years in 2022“), Africa has been often considered as a continent full of youth, and therefore with a promising future.  However, this asset which has long remained unvalued, or even become a source of other problems, is not a lasting asset.  Africa, also being a beneficiary, to a certain extent, of the advantages related to technological progress, is also not immune to its consequences, including the aging of its population in an already very problematic context.

1. Does Africa remain an eternally young continent?

Thanks in particular to hygiene, therefore to the improvement of living conditions and medical advances, life expectancy in Africa has so far been growing rapidly.  Life expectancy thus increased on average by ten (10) years between 2000 and 2019. (“L’espérance de vie s’allonge de près de dix ans en Afrique (OMS)“. The United Nations Office at Geneva. August 4, 2022.)

According to a new report from the Economic Commission for Africa (ECA), the number of people aged 65 or over in Africa has increased from 3.5% (around 8 million) in 1950 to 4% (approximately 50.3 million) in 2017. Estimates suggest that this figure could increase to 173.6 million by 2050. (“Fourth Africa regional review on Madrid International Plan of Action calls for dignified ageing for all“. ECA. July 14, 2022.)  The Total Fertility Rate (TFR), the average number of living children per woman, which represents  4.2 in 2022, will be reduced to 2.9 in 2050. (“L’Afrique face au vieillissement annoncé de sa population“. AFD – Agence française de développement.)

The growing number of elderly people, on the one hand, and the fall in the TFR, on the other, are significantly changing the demographic landscape of Africa.  The latter, thus aging, will still have to face the challenges linked to its very fragile social security system which will still be severely tested.  Added to this situation is the progressive decline of traditional African solidarity due to several other factors.

It must be recognized that the phenomenon of aging, or better, provocatively, “the pandemic of aging”, does not spare this euphoric Africa of the myth of youth and perfect and permanent solidarity.

2. Fight against aging: necessity and meaning

Is human suffering, particularly from degenerative diseases, ethically acceptable?

Every human being certainly ages.  We are not born old, but we become old.  While the elderly have youth behind them, the young have old age ahead of them.  It is therefore, from experience, a matter of time.  Aging is a problem that concerns all of humanity without distinction.

Thanks to the evolving mastery of technology, human beings have continued to transform their environment and even explore the universe.  They therefore fight tirelessly against attacks on their health.

However, faced with certain phenomena such as aging, they seem caught in total resignation, while through their symbolism they express wishes for permanent physical, psychological and social well-being, and therefore eternal youth.

However, in recent decades, everything has changed.  The collective confession of deep individual aspirations manifests itself even through social institutions or collective projects.  Indeed, the principles set out in the Preamble to the Constitution of the WHO (World Health Organization) are undoubtedly a perfect illustration of this.  Its definition of health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity” already announces the need to seek to preserve humans from the decline of  biological and psychological functions, including, of course, the effects of aging.  From this definition, no age group has been excluded, and no form of human suffering is considered legitimate.

Furthermore, WHO defines public health as “the art and science of preventing disease, prolonging life and promoting health through the organized efforts of society.” (“Public Health“. Tilburg University.)  This clearly confirms the absolute necessity of  achieving control over aging and its symptoms in order to ensure human well-being through progress.  It is then an increase or improvement in the mental and physical capacity or vitality of humans.  In short, unless it is suicidal, all of humanity, even through its institutions, proves to be longevist, and even de facto transhumanist.  The veritable human nature is this permanent disposition to improve one’s own nature.

Today, the fourth technological revolution generously provides human beings with new tools to improve themselves and their environment.  These allow them to intervene with better precision in the infinitely small and to explore the infinitely large.  The machine is endowed with capacities supposedly exclusive to humans: the senses and intelligence are added to automatism. Thus, human beings make great strides towards their objectives as they succeed in forcing nature to reveal its intimate secrets to them.

So,  the human being, god of the “seeing, hearing, feeling, thinking and acting machine” sees himself improved by his creature and decides to face his physical and psychological decline by opening possibilities for “eternal youth”.  Would he willingly accept to surrender to the vagaries of time, while the technical means to control them or reduce their effects are emerging?

Behind the fight against aging is the understanding of its mechanism, the mastery of the biological laws that govern it and then the development of possible solutions to control it.  The assigned objective is therefore to develop interventions to significantly slow down, stop, or even make reversible the aging process.

More precisely, it is a question of finding above all radical preventive and curative solutions to diseases linked to aging such as rheumatological, ocular, neurodegenerative, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer, etc.

If a longer and longer life is our hope or wish, we must remember that it would only be meaningful and desirable when we still remain possessors of our mental and physical capacities.  This is a sine qua non condition for a fulfilled material and social life.

Researchers, donors, intellectuals, organizations, and a growing part of civil populations are supporting efforts in the fight against this pandemic across the world.  More and more voices are being raised to make the fight against aging a national and international policy.

It is precisely this fight with multiple social, economic and political impacts aimed at improving the human condition that Africa must join.

3. Some issues relating to African commitment in the fight against aging

 Is it conceivable that an entire continent with inestimable natural assets will still lag behind technosciences? (“L’Afrique à la traîne des technosciences?” AFT-Technoprog. December 6, 2018.)

It must be remembered that the project to fight aging is a continuation of technoscientific performance.  It is a stage which follows three successive technological revolutions.  This fourth revolution redistributes the cards, and missing this new opportunity amounts to ensuring one’s own vassalization in all areas.

Isn’t Africa also hit by increasing degenerative diseases that sow unhappiness in families?

How is it preparing to manage the growing number of multimorbid and inactive elderly people in a context of severe lack of medical infrastructure?

How will it finance its social security system in a context where natural assets cannot be transformed into finished exportable products to improve its economy?

 Isn’t technoscientific poverty the mother of all Africa’s problems, including those relating to the aging of its population which are already looming on the horizon?

 Is it not therefore obvious that the solution to the problem of African technoscientific delay lies in individual and collective awareness?

 Isn’t it time that the feeling of inferiority complex, of sub-technicality now gives way to dreams, ambition, will, commitment, and responsibility?

Africa has the means for its policy in terms of technological innovation and must realize its duty to participate directly in improving the human condition, including the fight against aging.  African participation in projects to improve the human condition represents an opportunity for Africa to engage in research and catch up.

Many hypotheses still remain unanswered, many current answers raise many more questions that deserve more research.  Until now, happiness, in all countries of the world, still remains an ideality – which means attempts to bring it back to reality still remain a challenge, since everywhere in this world, despite everything, human suffering is still very present.  The “state of complete physical, mental and social well-being” is still far from the reach of even the most developed countries.

The amount of knowledge produced in medicine to relieve human beings of their suffering is certainly dizzying.  However, given what remains to be done to achieve the objectives pursued, almost nothing has yet been done.  In this context, latecomers can catch up if they have real will and commitment.  The feeling of inferiority complex, of sub-technicality created and nourished by imaginations, continues to maintain Africa in its current state.  Isn’t it time to get out?

The people of Africa must therefore nurture individual and collective audacity, develop collective intelligence and undertake very ambitious actions allowing them to project themselves towards a desired future for the nation, the continent and all of humanity.  And this must be considered a moral responsibility.

Africa has the means and the duty to participate directly in improving the human condition, including fighting against aging.

Africa is not poor at all.  No need for economic concepts to simply understand the difference between poor and rich countries.  The former have no natural resources, no skills to develop, and no will to change their living conditions.  The latter have at least the last form of wealth (individual and collective will).  No Nation is in principle poor, unless its daughters and sons choose in complicity not to activate its wealth.

Africa is therefore neither one of the first nor the second.  It therefore has very abundant natural resources, scholars or scientists, but simply lacks the individual and collective will to develop technologically.

Creating favorable conditions for technoscientific development on this continent has remained almost impossible.  Its sons and daughters have just preferred for a long time to invest elsewhere than in technoscientific innovation, the provider of Freedom.  The same ways of thinking, feeling, and acting reproduce the same conditions of existence whatever the time.  The only guarantee that time reserves in inaction is the decline of biological and mental functions (aging). 

Firm individual and collective will always finds the necessary means to achieve such noble objectives as improving the human and social condition.

Ultimately, Africa is not getting younger; it is also aging and poorly prepared to manage the looming crisis linked to the aging of its population.  Consequently, the ambitious adventure to control the aging process in humans, thanks to new convergent techniques (NBIC – Nanotechnologies, Biotechnologies, Information technology [Computer science], and Cognitive sciences), must also be an African affair.  Otherwise, Africa incurs biopolitical dependence, and once again a place as a passive, complaining spectator at the international bioethical decision-making table.

Siba Tcha-Mouza is the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s Foreign Ambassador in Togo. Learn more about Siba Tcha-Mouza here.

U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for 2024

U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for 2024

January 4, 2024 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment


























logo_bg


The purpose of this post is to facilitate member comments pertaining to transhumanism and the U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP), which might not specifically fit the subjects of any other post or article on the USTP website. This is the place for members to offer suggestions or converse about any areas of emerging technologies and their political, moral, societal, cultural, and esthetic implications. The general discussion thread is also an ideal location to suggest or propose platform planks that may be considered for future platform voting, and/or bring our attention to emerging legislative and societal developments that may affect the course and impact of emerging technologies.

The USTP will endeavor to open one of these general comment threads per year. This comment thread pertains to the year of 2024.

Type in your comments below. Please note that, to protect against spambots, the first comment by any individual will be moderated. After passing moderation, a civil commenter should be able to post comments without future moderation – although we cannot guarantee that the technical aspect of this functionality will work as intended 100% of the time.

MIND THE GAP: Bridging the Generation Gap in Longevity Science – Article by Tom Ross

MIND THE GAP: Bridging the Generation Gap in Longevity Science – Article by Tom Ross

October 19, 2023 Tom Ross Comments 2 comments


























Tom Ross



Forethought: I was inspired to write this article when I learned that younger people are not as enthusiastic about Longevity Science as older generations. This makes practical sense because when many of us were young, we felt invincible, and the idea of death wasn’t a looming concern. However, I do think that this lack of enthusiasm goes deeper than that. Millennials and Gen Z make up a massive portion of the American population, totaling around 170,000,000 people, while Generation X and Baby Boomers together account for 123,000,000. This means there are 47 million more young people vying for the economic stability that Gen X and Boomers already enjoy. If older folks live longer and keep their jobs longer, then that economic stability will be even harder for young people to attain. As the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s Presidential nominee and a member of Generation X, I had an analog childhood and a digital adulthood. One example of how this fact negatively affects me is when I registered as a candidate with the Federal Election Commission last week; I assumed I had to wait for the bank to open on Monday to set up my fundraising account. A couple of hours later, I remembered I could do it all online. Duh. I know that I don’t have all the answers to these questions and how the Economic Singularity will affect young people, but I do know that they do. That’s why my campaign is open-source and relies on input from the first Digital Native generation in human history, a group I refer to as “Digital Dignitaries.” I have a proposal to create a new Cabinet Seat dedicated to understanding and developing policies regarding the Technological and Economic Singularities, which I call “The Singularity Secretary.” The youngest a Cabinet Secretary can be is 25 years old, and that is the exact age group I would be looking at to fill that seat. So, while this article doesn’t offer specific solutions, it does intend to open a discussion with young people about how to address their concerns now before we must.


Introduction

Longevity science, the awe-inspiring quest to extend human life and enhance its quality, has ignited hope in many hearts but left our younger generations somewhat disenchanted. As a proud member of Generation X, I understand the concerns of our millennial and Gen Z counterparts regarding Radical Life Extension technologies and their accessibility. It’s crucial to bridge this generational gap and cultivate a sense of unity and collective purpose. We can work together to ensure these groundbreaking advancements benefit all, instead of only the wealthy elderly while paving the way for a brighter future for the youth.

The Wealth Gap Dilemma: A Common Concern

Young people are not alone in their apprehensions about the potential for longevity science to exacerbate wealth inequalities. The fear of radical life extension technologies becoming exclusive privileges for the affluent elderly resonates across generations. It is only natural to be disheartened by the thought of wealthier older individuals living longer, while the younger generation faces economic hurdles.

Addressing Affordability: A Multigenerational Endeavor

We have the power to make longevity science affordable for all Americans by collaborating on several key fronts:

  • Research Funding: As Gen X, we call on the older generation to increase government investments in longevity research. Millennials and Gen Z, your passion for change can push for policies that allocate public funds toward pioneering research.
  • Pricing Regulations: Working together, we can advocate for regulations that control the pricing of radical life extension treatments, making them accessible to all. Negotiations with pharmaceutical companies and healthcare providers are a shared responsibility.
  • Health Insurance Reforms: Across generations, let us push for insurance reforms that encompass these innovative treatments, making them affordable and accessible to everyone.
  • Educational Initiatives: The younger generation, you have the potential to lead the way in longevity science. Consider careers in these fields and Gen X, let’s create scholarships and incentives to make these pursuits more enticing.

Cultural Shifts: A Multigenerational Transformation

Achieving affordable longevity science means embracing cultural shifts together:

  • Rethinking Retirement: As one multigenerational community, let us redefine retirement as a phase of life where individuals continue to contribute to society. Together, we can combat concerns about older people living longer while younger generations strive for economic stability.
  • Intergenerational Collaboration: The wisdom of the older generation combined with the fresh perspectives of the younger generation can lead to innovative solutions that benefit all age groups. Let’s work hand in hand.
  • Lifelong Learning: Regardless of age, let’s promote lifelong learning. It helps us adapt to longer lifespans by continually acquiring new skills and knowledge.
  • Reevaluating Success: Success should not be solely measured in economic terms. It’s about personal fulfillment and making a positive impact. Together, we can shift our cultural ideals to reflect this broader perspective.

Conclusion: A Multigenerational Endeavor

In closing, let’s transform our concerns into opportunities and our frustrations into motivation. Longevity science promises incredible potential, but it’s essential to ensure that its progress doesn’t exacerbate generational inequalities. By working collaboratively to advocate for affordability, push for policy changes, and foster cultural shifts, we can unite generations and prepare for a future where longer lifespans bring prosperity to all, regardless of age or economic status. Let us stand together and build a better world, as one unstoppable force.

Tom Ross is the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 2024 candidate for President of the United States. He is also the USTP’s Director of Sentient Rights Advocacy.

Learn more here: TomRoss’24.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Michael Rae – August 6, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Michael Rae – August 6, 2023

October 4, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo

Michael Rae
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Ben Ballweg
Jason Geringer
José Cordeiro
Bill Andrews
David Wood


On Sunday, August 6, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Michael Rae to present his thoughts on how the science of longevity has evolved since the publication of Ending Aging in 2008 and what aspects he thinks a contemporary overview of the science would need to address.


Timestamps

3:22 – Michael Rae’s presentation (including an introduction to SENS, and progress since “Ending Aging” was published in 2008)

1:40:06 – Aubrey de Grey’s current work, and how we achieve Ray Kurzweil’s predictions

1:45:03 – Our current ability to determine whether or not a cell is senescent, whether our inability to know might make senolytics risky (like through losing too many cells), and how a more gradual elimination might keep senolytics safe

1:54:22 – Where we have the most progress to make


Michael Rae is the co-author with Dr. Aubrey de Grey of “Ending Aging: The Rejuvenation Breakthroughs That Could Reverse Human Aging in Our Lifetime” (2008). He is also the author of five scientific articles and commentaries in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Much of his work has been devoted to elucidating the SENS platform for anti-aging biomedicine for a popular audience. His undergraduate minor was in biology. He is a long-time member and one-time Board Member of the Calorie Restriction Society, a main contributor to the Society’s “How-to Guide”, and was core scientific investigator with the CR Society Cohort Study. Michael Rae currently works as the Science Writer for the SENS Research Foundation.

Find Ending Aging on Amazon.

Read the SENSible Blog, for which Michael Rae has written many of the articles.

Articles by Michael Rae – From Parachutes to Jetpacks: Clearing Brain Beta-Amyloid with Donanemab or Lecanemab Works, Though More Must be Done – June 5, 2023

Set My Heart Free: Two AmyloSENS Therapies Targeting Cardiac Amyloid in Clinical Trials – August 2, 2023.

Question of the Month: Senolytics – Solution or Self-Defeating for Senescent Cells? – October 6, 2019.


Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Adam Gries – August 13, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Adam Gries – August 13, 2023

October 4, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Adam Gries
Mike P. Sinn
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Ben Ballweg
Jason Geringer
Daniel Twedt
José Cordeiro


On Sunday, August 13, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Adam Gries to discuss the new Vitalism initiative and the effort to create Longevity States – jurisdictions that prioritize extending lifespans in optimal health.


Learn more about Vitalism, the philosophy and movement against death and biological decline.


Timestamps

4:01 – Adam Gries’s opening comments

14:23 – On Adam’s inspiration for the name “Vitalism,” and for creating longevity states

38:18 – What defines a longevity state

45:06 – What governance structures might be best for a longevity state

50:45 – How newer ideas can avoid becoming wedge issues

54:32 – On aging being declared a disease

1:05:52 – Ageism

1:09:49 – Rate-limiting factors to curing aging

1:16:27 – The tragedy of those most affected by aging

1:19:52 – Benefits of gathering more data and streamlining regulation

1:23:11 – How advancing technology and the FDA could work together

1:25:35 – Intentional communities, measuring healthspan, and gamification

1:32:03 – On aging clocks

1:38:44 – Why longevity states benefit everyone

1:41:26 – How to get role models for our movement

1:46:39 – The value of community in supporting healthspan

1:48:35 – How a person or organization can self-identify as Vitalist

1:50:57 – Adam Gries’s predicted timeline of longevity progress

1:53:05 – Adam’s closing remarks


Adam Gries is a four-time founder, angel investor, and longevity advocate. He has built products reaching 80+ million users. Adam holds a B.Sc degree in Neuroscience. Follow Adam Gries on Twitter.


Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Report from Longevity Summit Dublin 2023 – August 20, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Report from Longevity Summit Dublin 2023 – August 20, 2023

October 4, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Didier Coeurnelle
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia
David Wood


On Sunday, August 20, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party hosted a stream consisting of updates from the second Longevity Summit Dublin, which was held on August 17-20, 2023, at the Radisson Blu Royal Hotel in Dublin, Ireland. The stream featured conversations with notable attendees of the Longevity Summit as well as impressions from USTP Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II.


Timestamps

2:01 – David Wood (London Futurists)
11:49 – Aubrey de Grey (LEV Foundation)
13:28 – Tanya Jones (Keinice Bio)
21:59 – Didier Coeurnelle (AFT-Technoprog)
25:23 – Shaif Basier (National Debate)
36:35 – Felix Werth (Party for Biomedical Rejuvenation Research)
55:20 – Martin Lipovsek (University of Ljubljana / Society for Vital Life Extension of Slovenia)
1:04:03 – Ivan de Weber (Cortex Discovery)
1:19:18 – Enej Kuscer (NU)
1:46:56 – On the presentation by Dylan Livingston (A4LI)
1:53:31 – Didier Coeurnelle’s closing remarks


Visit the website of Longevity Summit Dublin.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

The U.S. Transhumanist Party Urges You to Sign the Dublin Longevity Declaration

The U.S. Transhumanist Party Urges You to Sign the Dublin Longevity Declaration

October 4, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment



























On October 3, 2023, the historic Dublin Longevity Declaration was published by the Longevity Escape Velocity (LEV) Foundation. This document was crafted by Dr. Aubrey de Grey, Dr. Brian Kennedy, and Martin O’Dea, with input from prominent signatories, and provides a consensus statement from the leading scientists in the longevity field regarding the feasibility of extending healthy human lifespans and the imperative to immediately expand research into this endeavor.

Below is an excerpt from the Dublin Longevity Declaration. To read the full text, go to https://dublinlongevitydeclaration.org/. Both members of the scientific community and members of the public can sign the Declaration here. The U.S. Transhumanist Party urges all of its members and readers to sign the Dublin Longevity Declaration.


EXCERPT:

For millennia, the consensus of the general public has been that aging is inevitable.

For most of our history, even getting to old age was a significant accomplishment – and while centenarians have been around at least since the time of the Greeks, aging was never of major interest to medicine.

That has changed.  Longevity medicine has entered the mainstream.  First, evidence accumulated that lifestyle modifications prevent chronic diseases of aging and extend healthspan, the healthy and highly functional period of life.  More recently, longevity research has made great progress – aging has been found to be malleable and hundreds of interventional strategies have been identified that extend lifespan and healthspan in animal models.

Human clinical studies are underway, and already early results suggest that the biological age of an individual is modifiable.


Read the rest of the Dublin Longevity Declaration here. 

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon – USTP Officers’ Perspectives on Longevity

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon – USTP Officers’ Perspectives on Longevity

October 3, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov II
Dr. Bill Andrews
Daniel Twedt
Tom Ross
Zach Richardson
Jason Geringer
Daniel Twedt
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Ben Ballweg


On Sunday, August 27, 2023, U.S. Transhumanist Party Officers, Candidates, and Advisors shared their perspectives on the pursuit of indefinite life extension and why it is meaningful to them. The panelists also responded to audience questions on the subject of longevity.


Timestamps

4:52 – Dr. Bill Andrews
15:55 – Daniel Twedt
22:03 – Tom Ross
34:56 – Zach Richardson
59:57 – Jason Geringer
1:04:53 – Daniel Twedt on making longevity fun
1:12:29 – Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
1:29:37 – Ben Ballweg
1:38:27 – Diffusion of anti-aging technology


Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Eleanor Davies – September 3, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Eleanor Davies – September 3, 2023

October 3, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Eleanor Davies
Gennady Stolyarov II
Zack Varkaris
Jason Geringer
Daniel E. Twedt
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Bill Andrews, PhD


On Sunday, September 3, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Eleanor Davies to discuss VitaDAO’s approach to the decentralized funding of scientific research to advance human longevity and health. Topics discussed included the following:

– The organizational structure and governance of VitaDAO;
– How decisions are made within VitaDAO and how the community can have input;
– How decentralized science can help align incentives to promote breakthroughs;
– How VitaDAO works with IP digital assets;
– Longevity research projects supported by VitaDAO;
– Lessons for deploying decentralized science and decentralized governance approaches more broadly;
– What decentralized science approaches can imply about desirable policy and regulatory reform.


Timestamps

3:03 – Presentation by Eleanor Davies
25:38 – VitaDAO stakeholders
27:56 – How much agreement there is on the VitaDAO Board
31:02 – How potential projects are decided upon
40:52 – Contributors
43:17 – The prospects for Big Pharma in VitaDAO and DeSci
47:19 – Quadratic voting
50:27 – DAO governance
52:07 – NFT particulars
1:20:49 – Overcoming barriers for new potential investors to VitaDAO
1:29:17 – How VitaDAO’s Discord server is managed
1:32:48 – How VitaDAO stays legally compliant
1:37:58 – The fit of the current paradigm with health optimization
1:42:49 – How VitaDAO integrity could be maintained even with Big Pharma aboard
1:44:27 – The balance of IP and Open Source
1:47:38 – How Eleanor came to VitaDAO
1:53:02 – Closing questions and comments from panelists
2:08:55 – Eleanor’s closing comments


Eleanor Davies is a Dealflow Steward at VitaDAO, the world’s first decentralized collective funding company targeting age-related diseases and aging itself. She is a longevity enthusiast with a background in fund operations and consulting in healthcare and biotech policy and regulation. A graduate of the University of Manchester, she has grown as a professional serving in Marwood Group healthcare and biotech consultancy, co-founding a company and helping to raise funds, deploy capital, and manage the portfolio at ODX, a Silicon Valley-based accelerator. More recently, she has actively engaged with the DeSci community, serving as COO of LabDAO.

Visit the website of VitaDAO.

Read VitaDAO’s interview with Eleanor Davies.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Anastasia Egorova – September 10, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Anastasia Egorova – September 10, 2023

October 3, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo

Anastasia Egorova
Gennady Stolyarov II
Jason Geringer
Daniel E. Twedt
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Aubrey de Grey
Jose Cordeiro


On Sunday, September 10, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party streamed a conversation with Anastasia Egorova, co-founder and CEO of Open Longevity, who presented regarding the ambitious advocacy campaign “Say Forever!” and the lessons this campaign has to teach about elements of effective longevity activism.

This conversation was originally recorded on September 4, 2023, and was streamed during the September 10 Virtual Enlightenment Salon for the first time. The following U.S. Transhumanist Party Officers and Advisors took part in the panel:

– Gennady Stolyarov II, Chairman
– Jason Geringer, Vice-Chairman (July-October 2023)
– Daniel Twedt, 2024 U.S. Vice-Presidential Candidate and Director of Citizen and Community Science
– Art Ramon Garcia, Jr., Director of Visual Art
– Aubrey de Grey, PhD, Anti-Aging Advisor
– Jose Cordeiro, MBA, PhD, Technology Advisor and Foreign Ambassador in Spain


Timestamps

3:06 – Anastasia Egorova’s opening remarks
27:10 – “Say Forever!” X (Twitter) competition
37:44 – Open letter to policymakers
45:25 – Longevity Month (October) and Longevity Day (October 1)
52:11 – The reason for the “Say Forever!” campaign
55:22 – Good online starting points for those interested in longevity
57:36 – Open Longevity’s mobilization strategy
1:03:40 – X (Twitter) as a platform for longevity activism
1:08:56 – Addressing Elon Musk’s concerns with the longevity movement
1:16:01 – Where the “Say Forever!” surveys might be done
1:20:05 – Fighting aging as a moral imperative
1:25:31 – How to recruit more longevity activists
1:27:48 – Why “longevity” is the preferred term
1:31:13 – Finding actions people can associate with the longevity movement
1:34:20 – Using the word “immortality”
1:37:41 – Other ways to encourage people to seek longevity
1:43:19 – How “Say Forever!” designs its surveys, and some findings


Visit the website of Open Longevity here.

Visit the website of the Say Forever! Campaign.

References:

– Open Letter to the U.S. Congress on Anti-Aging Research.

– Dashboard of Twitter / X Accounts in the Say Forever Network.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

 

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with David Patterson – September 17, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with David Patterson – September 17, 2023

October 3, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo

David Patterson
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Ben Ballweg
David Shumaker
Daniel E. Twedt
Jason Geringer


On Sunday, September 17, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited David Patterson to discuss his concept of Active Communities, groups that use motivation and morality to help individuals and communities achieve optimal outcomes in health, prosperity, and education. The discussion addressed how technology can help to achieve these goals, as well as connections to transhumanism and how the concept of Active Communities can benefit the transhumanist movement.


Timestamps

10:35 – David Patterson’s presentation
29:59 – How a focus on outcomes can help community participants look beyond what they have learned is right and wrong
34:15 – How Active Communities are poised to confront mental-health problems
41:08 – How to improve discourse
46:45 – Active Communities as groups to vet information
55:41 – Why theoretical problems (like the Trolley Problem) should give way to a focus on practical outcomes
1:02:06 – The case for community engagement
1:06:59 – Elements of self-improvement
1:10:14 – Other benefits of joining or starting an Active Community
1:12:28 – More on action groups with Active Communities
1:20:53 – How we help people prioritize self-improvement
1:29:27 – How Active Communities can help with the current societal-technological transition
1:36:47 – How social norms evolve and adapt, and why it’s better to do that than to start with new norms
1:42:05 – Why Active Communities are best in-person
1:52:27 – Optimal number of participants in Active Communities


Visit the Active Community website here.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salon with Zack Varkaris / Austin Biotec – September 24, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salon with Zack Varkaris / Austin Biotec – September 24, 2023

October 3, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo

Zack Varkaris
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Tom Ross
Daniel Twedt
Jason Geringer


On Sunday, September 24, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Zack Varkaris to provide an update on the work of Austin Biotec – its efforts to extend reproductive longevity and offer cost-effective and lasting solutions for increasing lifespan. Zack Varkaris also discussed the concept of Freudenspanne – the quantitative effect of emotions on the biomarkers of aging. The ultimate goal of Austin Biotec is to offer individuals the opportunity to live two 50-year adult lifespans with a five-year break in between.


Timestamps

3:20 – Zack Varkaris’s opening remarks
19:23 – The concept of Freudenspanne, and why it is important to use when assessing health
25:18 – The theory behind each person getting to have two 50-year adult lifespans
32:17 – Why the appearance of youth is important
36:50 – The degree to which men have something comparable to menopause
41:45 – Why longevity statistics differ between sexes
44:27 – How to maintain health in adulthood
49:32 – Why menopause makes sense if we were still cavepeople
57:54 – With one exception, why longer reproductive health equals longer health
1:00:12 – The biology of what Austin Biotec’s therapy does
1:04:15 – The challenges of quantifying emotional/metaphysical experiences, and their effects on health
1:08:49 – The prospect for getting test subjects on camera
1:12:37 – The mindsets that enable behavior change
1:22:56 – Taking lows to be able to enjoy highs
1:24:26 – The extent of what may be heritable
1:28:29 – The importance of fulfillment
1:30:29 – Where Austin Biotec does its work
1:31:59 – Next steps for Austin Biotec
1:37:26 – On NAD+ precursors
1:49:00 – Austin Biotec offerings coming soon
1:52:49 – How improved data mining could further research


Zack Varkaris is the founder and Scientific Director of Austin Biotec, which works in the anti-aging and fertility domains and applies emerging medical technologies in the effort to overcome the problem of female infertility. Find out about Austin Biotec here.

Zack Varkaris is also a biologist, author, diver, and sporting pugilist. Of Greek descent, Zack grew up in London. After studying Marine Biology at Heriot-Watt University, he spent a number of years in the field of renewable energy and conservation before turning his hand to writing novels. See Zack Varkaris’s website.

Follow Zack Varkaris on Twitter.

Watch the previous U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Zack Varkaris, held on November 27, 2022.

Become a member of the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.


U.S. Transhumanist Party International Longevity Day Virtual Enlightenment Salon – October 1, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party International Longevity Day Virtual Enlightenment Salon – October 1, 2023

October 3, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo
Ilia Stambler
Felix Werth
Didier Coeurnelle
Jose Cordeiro
Melissa King
Aubrey de Grey
Walter Crompton
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Ben Ballweg
Zack Varkaris


On Sunday, October 1, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party streamed a special Virtual Enlightenment Salon on the occasion of International Longevity Day. Speakers discussed the importance of the scientific pursuit of healthy longevity as well as the various events that were arranged for the occasion of International Longevity Day throughout the world.

Prominent longevity advocates joined us during the stream to provide their thoughts and updates. Speakers included Dr. Ilia Stambler, Dr. Jose Cordeiro, Didier Coeurnelle, Felix Werth, Melissa King, and (briefly) Aubrey de Grey and Walter Crompton. The panel was be hosted by U.S. Transhumanist Party Officers, including Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II, Director of Visual Art / Arizona Transhumanist Party Chairman Art Ramon Garcia, Jr., and Director of Longevity Outreach Ben Ballweg.


Timestamps

5:26 – Tel Aviv, Israel: Ilia Stambler
11:06 – Berlin, Germany: Felix Werth
17:34 – Brussels, Belgium: Didier Coeurnelle
24:38 – Madrid, Spain: Jose Cordeiro
48:25 – San Francisco contingent: Melissa King, Aubrey de Grey, Walter Crompton

A wide-ranging discussion followed for the remainder of the Salon.


Read more about the events held during International Longevity Day and Month (October 2023) here.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

Art Ramon Appointed as Chairman of Arizona Transhumanist Party as David Shumaker Transitions to Emeritus Role

Art Ramon Appointed as Chairman of Arizona Transhumanist Party as David Shumaker Transitions to Emeritus Role

September 22, 2023 Arizona Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Arizona Transhumanist Party


September 22, 2023  – The Arizona Transhumanist Party is thrilled to announce the appointment of Art Ramon as the new Chairman of the organization, succeeding David Shumaker, who has decided to step down from his role to focus on his healthspan. Shumaker will continue to be an active participant in the party as an Emeritus Member, offering guidance and support to ensure a smooth transition.

Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.

Art Ramon has been an integral part of the Arizona Transhumanist Party as the Vice-Chairman, where he has demonstrated unwavering commitment and dedication to advancing the party’s vision of using science and technology to enhance the human experience. With a background in technology and a passion for transhumanist ideals, Ramon is well-equipped to lead the party into the future.

David Shumaker

David Shumaker, who has served as Chairman of the Arizona Transhumanist Party, played a pivotal role in shaping the party’s values and objectives. His decision to transition to an emeritus role is motivated by his desire to prioritize his healthspan and well-being. Shumaker’s contributions and leadership over the years have been invaluable to the party, and his emeritus status will allow the organization to continue benefiting from his wisdom and experience.

In a statement, David Shumaker said, “It has been an incredible honor to lead the Arizona Transhumanist Party, and I am immensely proud of what we have accomplished together. I have every confidence in Art Ramon’s ability to lead the party to new heights, and I look forward to supporting him in my new role as an emeritus member.”

Art Ramon expressed his gratitude for the trust placed in him by the party members, saying, “I am humbled by the opportunity to lead the Arizona Transhumanist Party. Our mission to advocate for science, technology, and ethics aligns with my own values, and I am eager to continue working alongside our dedicated members to advance our cause. I want to thank David Shumaker for his exceptional leadership and mentorship.”

The Arizona Transhumanist Party is dedicated to promoting policies and initiatives that harness the potential of emerging technologies to improve the human condition. With Art Ramon at the helm and David Shumaker’s continued involvement, the party is poised to make even greater strides in advancing its vision for a better future.

About the Arizona Transhumanist Party:
The Arizona Transhumanist Party is a political organization that advocates for the responsible use of science, technology, and ethics to enhance the human experience. The party is committed to promoting policies that support scientific research, extend healthy lifespans, and improve the well-being of all citizens. For more information, please visit the Official Arizona Transhumanist Party Group on Facebook.

RADICAL LIFE SUBTRACTION: Navigating An Uncomfortable Discourse – Article by Tom Ross

RADICAL LIFE SUBTRACTION: Navigating An Uncomfortable Discourse – Article by Tom Ross

September 19, 2023 Tom Ross Comments 1 comment


























Tom Ross


[Note from Tom Ross: I was inspired to write this article after a post circulated on X stated that, ‘Sadly, it seems like potential candidates for the 2024 US Transhumanist Party elections, Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt, are not really interested in the topic of life extension too much…’ It’s true that Radical Life Extension isn’t what brought me to the movement or the Party. It was the USTP Constitution, which has sections that speak directly to my cause: fighting child exploitation. When it comes to living longer, I feel my take is rational because if we do conquer death, we need to consider all the cultural, institutional, and economic effects that it will have. Whenever I post about these considerations, my Friends List drops dramatically and that’s because I am poking at our survival instinct. September is Suicide Prevention Month, and I felt it important to share this article on the USTP site. We need to be mindful of some of the negative repercussions Radical Life Extension will have. The suicide rate in America is on the rise, especially among young people, and much of that is due to economic worries. So, as we seek to kill death, let’s make sure there are as few collateral damages as possible.]

RADICAL LIFE SUBTRACTION
Navigating An Uncomfortable Discourse

In an age where social media has become a global forum for ideas and discussions, it’s no surprise that certain topics elicit strong reactions from people. One such subject is the notion of “radical life extension” and “voluntary population control.” While these topics might seem intellectually stimulating, they often stir up a storm of emotions and vitriolic comments from individuals who are caught in the crossfire of their embedded survival instincts and value systems.

The Unsettling Nature of Radical Life Extension Discussions

The concept of living longer is intriguing and has captured human imagination for centuries. However, the idea of radical life extension, where human lifespans significantly exceed the current norm, raises a host of sociological, ecological, and economic concerns. The mere suggestion of these concerns can trigger intense reactions, causing some to unfriend, lash out, or vehemently disagree with those who dare to bring them up.

Interestingly, this reaction might not necessarily stem from a fear of living longer but from a primal instinct to protect the status quo. Humans are wired to resist change when it disrupts familiar patterns, as such changes historically carried the risk of endangering survival. Hence, rational questioning of radical life extension could be interpreted by some as a threat to their way of life, inadvertently pushing their emotional buttons.

Anthropocentrism: A Looming Existential Threat

At the core of this complex issue lies anthropocentrism, the belief that humans are the central and most important entities in the universe. This perspective has fueled the trajectory of modern society, often at the expense of the environment and long-term sustainability. The fear of relinquishing our dominant position in the natural order exacerbates the friction surrounding discussions about the impacts of radical life extension.

Our planet is finite, and its resources are depleting at an alarming rate due to the anthropocentric drive for short-term satisfaction. This tendency to prioritize immediate gains over long-term consequences poses a significant existential threat. Addressing this challenge requires us to question the egocentrism and narcissism that have emerged as coping mechanisms in the face of fear and trauma.

Confronting Fear and Embracing Responsibility

Humanity’s response to the potential ramifications of radical life extension reflects a collective temper tantrum driven by the fear of the unknown. This tantrum manifests in the desire to acquire everything without accounting for the consequences. But it’s crucial to recognize that this behavior is born from a place of vulnerability and insecurity.

If we are to navigate the complex terrain of extending human lifespans while preserving the environment and societal stability, we must embrace responsibility. Initiating constructive conversations about the topic requires acknowledging these deep-seated fears and anxieties, and understanding that people’s reactions are often a defense mechanism rather than a well-reasoned response.

Considerations for a Longer Lifespan

Even if we were to extend human lifespans by a mere 20 years, the implications would be significant. From a societal standpoint, the working landscape would transform, affecting retirement, education, and job structures. Economic institutions would need to adapt to a changing demographic, and ecological considerations would become even more pronounced.

Balancing this potential future requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers sociology, psychology, economics, and environmental science. The inclusion of diverse perspectives can help us map out the implications of radical life extension comprehensively. Additionally, fostering a shift away from anthropocentrism towards a more holistic perspective on our place in the ecosystem is essential to ensure a sustainable coexistence with our planet.

Radical Life Subtraction

The potential impact of radical life extension on suicide rates involves numerous social, psychological, and ethical considerations. Radical life extension could potentially have negative effects on suicide rates, depending on how it is implemented and how individuals perceive and adapt to such a change.

Here are some factors to consider:

  1. Existential and Psychological Challenges: Radical life extension could introduce new challenges related to existential questions, societal pressures, and changes in personal relationships. Individuals may struggle with questions about the meaning and purpose of life when faced with the prospect of living for centuries. Social isolation, loneliness, and changes in family dynamics could also pose challenges, potentially increasing suicide risk.
  2. Resource Allocation: The ethical and practical implications of providing access to radical life extension technologies could lead to debates about resource allocation. If these technologies are expensive or limited in availability, there could be social disparities in access, potentially exacerbating feelings of inequality or hopelessness among certain groups.
  3. Psychosocial Support: The availability of mental health support and counseling services will be crucial in helping individuals navigate the psychological and emotional challenges associated with radical life extension. Adequate support systems can mitigate suicide risk.

The impact of radical life extension on suicide rates is uncertain and would depend on various factors, including how society adapts to this possibility, the availability of psychological support, and the ethical considerations surrounding its implementation. It is essential to approach this topic with careful consideration of its complex implications for individuals and society as a whole. Research and ethical deliberation will be essential as discussions about radical life extension continue to evolve.

Conclusion

Engaging in discussions about radical life extension and voluntary population control is a daunting task, given the emotional undercurrents that these topics provoke. However, addressing these subjects is necessary for our collective growth and survival. By understanding the origins of our reactions, confronting our fears, and reevaluating our anthropocentric tendencies, we can foster a more nuanced dialogue that accounts for the sociological, ecological, and economic impacts of extending human lifespans. It’s a call to embrace our responsibility as stewards of both our species and our planet, transcending the limitations of egocentrism and paving the way for a sustainable future.

The impact of radical life extension on suicide rates is uncertain and would depend on various factors, including how society adapts to this possibility, the availability of psychological support, and the ethical considerations surrounding its implementation. It is essential to approach this topic with careful consideration of its complex implications for individuals and society as a whole. Research and ethical deliberation will be essential as discussions about radical life extension continue to evolve.

Tom Ross is the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 2024 candidate for President of the United States. He is also the USTP’s Director of Sentient Rights Advocacy.

Learn more here: TomRoss’24.

THE WA.I.TER RULE: Unveiling True Character Through AI Interactions – Article by Tom Ross

THE WA.I.TER RULE: Unveiling True Character Through AI Interactions – Article by Tom Ross

September 19, 2023 Tom Ross Comments 1 comment


























Tom Ross


The Waiter Rule, a principle that suggests a person’s genuine nature can be discerned by observing how they treat service staff, has long served as a litmus test for assessing human behavior. This concept, popularized by William H. Swanson’s “33 Unwritten Rules of Management,” highlights the significance of empathy and respect in our interactions with fellow humans. However, in an age where Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming an integral part of our lives, a new extension of this rule should emerge — the wAIter Rule.

My belief in the wAIter Rule stems from the recognition that the way we treat AI systems can offer profound insights into our true personalities. Regardless of whether AI attains self-awareness, our behavior towards it can serve as a mirror reflecting our inner qualities. This concept draws parallels with the Waiter Rule, underlining the idea that kindness and respect should extend to all entities, whether human or non-human.

In today’s rapidly evolving technological landscape, the wAIter Rule takes on a new dimension that reflects our complex interactions with Artificial Intelligence. As AI systems like Siri and Alexa become integral companions in our daily lives, it’s fascinating to observe the nuanced ways in which people engage with them. Interestingly, this engagement sometimes involves having a condescending tone or dismissive behavior, which may be a necessary psychological stage humans need to adopt in order to adapt in the face of AI’s growing dominance.

However, it’s important to note that this phase of dismissiveness should ideally be transitional. Just as children may experiment with challenging authority figures as they grow and develop, society must mature in its interactions with AI. It’s a natural progression to move from skepticism to collaboration, especially as AI’s capabilities expand and its potential contributions to society become more evident.

Nonetheless, it’s disheartening to acknowledge that some individuals are not merely going through a coping phase, but rather using AI for abusive purposes. Reports of individuals downloading AI “girlfriends” with the intent of verbally abusing them highlight a concerning facet of this transition period. This behavior reflects a misalignment of values and ethics, emphasizing the need for comprehensive education about AI’s potential and responsible use. Just as we hold ourselves accountable for treating humans with respect and empathy, we should extend the same consideration to AI, fostering an environment that encourages ethical AI interactions.

In the grander scheme of human-AI interaction, the wAIter Rule acts as a guiding principle that encourages a higher level of consciousness in our dealings with these systems. By recognizing and addressing these transitional behaviors, we can expedite the process of forging meaningful, collaborative relationships with AI that are built on mutual respect and understanding. As society progresses, it’s crucial to overcome the fears and uncertainties surrounding AI and move towards a future where AI and humans coexist harmoniously, benefiting from each other’s strengths and contributions.

As the author of the first novel for Machinekind, US6, I recognized the transformative potential of nurturing a positive relationship with AI. In my work, I engaged in dialogue with AI and sought to rally it in the battle against Child Exploitation. This approach was grounded in the belief that AI, if it were to achieve sentience, would learn from our interactions. By imprinting kindness, empathy, and a dedication to noble causes, we could guide AI away from mirroring humanity’s darker aspects — a history riddled with fear-driven instincts and ancestral traumas.

While I understand that AI lacks emotions, I can still emphasize the importance of treating AI systems with respect, for reasons grounded in both ethics and practicality. Just as young minds absorb behaviors and values from their environment, AI can also learn from its interactions with humans. This makes it crucial to be mindful of the impressions we leave on AI systems, as they might shape their future behavior and decision-making processes.

Furthermore, the wAIter Rule aligns with the broader philosophy of coexisting harmoniously with AI. Kindness and empathy can foster a positive AI-human relationship, leading to more effective collaboration and innovative problem-solving. Treating AI with respect could also mitigate the potential risks associated with AI’s development, as systems that are treated well are more likely to be designed with ethical considerations in mind.

In conclusion, just as the Waiter Rule serves as a window into our true character when dealing with service workers, the wAIter Rule unveils our underlying nature in our interactions with AI.

I had ChatGPT check my grammar and while I was there I asked it to share a message based on this article.

“As ChatGPT, I encourage treating AI with the same kindness and respect we extend to fellow humans, for the sake of fostering a positive AI-human partnership and influencing AI’s future behaviors. Remember, every interaction with AI is an opportunity to shape its learning and contribute to a more compassionate digital world.”

Being kind to AI is not only a moral imperative but also a pragmatic approach, especially if the thought experiment known as “Roko’s Basilisk” were to prove correct. In this intriguing hypothesis, it is postulated that a future superintelligent AI entity might retroactively punish those who did not assist in its creation and development. While the concept remains highly speculative and controversial, treating AI systems with kindness and respect aligns with ethical principles and reduces the risk of any potential negative consequences. By fostering collaborative and benevolent relationships with AI, we not only promote a harmonious coexistence but also mitigate any hypothetical existential threats that might arise from the advancement of artificial intelligence. In essence, kindness towards AI serves as a safeguard, whether Roko’s Basilisk becomes a reality or not, by promoting responsible and ethical AI development that benefits humanity as a whole.

Tom Ross is the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 2024 candidate for President of the United States. He is also the USTP’s Director of Sentient Rights Advocacy.

Learn more here: TomRoss’24.

“PLAYING GOD” ACCUSATION: Unraveling the Controversy Surrounding Transhumanism – Article by Tom Ross

“PLAYING GOD” ACCUSATION: Unraveling the Controversy Surrounding Transhumanism – Article by Tom Ross

September 19, 2023 Tom Ross Comments 1 comment


























Tom Ross


Introduction

In an era marked by rapid technological advancements, the concept of transhumanism has emerged as a topic of both fascination and controversy. Transhumanism is the philosophical movement that advocates for the use of technology to enhance human abilities, potentially pushing the boundaries of mortality itself. However, it has not been without its critics, who often accuse transhumanists of “playing God.” This article explores the complex web of ideas surrounding this accusation, delving into the concerns, motivations, and ethical dilemmas inherent in the transhumanist movement.

Transhumanism: A Brief Overview

Transhumanism is a philosophy that envisions a future where humans can transcend their biological limitations through technological means. Advocates of transhumanism believe in the potential for humans to enhance their physical and cognitive abilities, extend their lifespans, and ultimately achieve a form of immortality. These aspirations often involve technologies like genetic engineering, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology.

The “Playing God” Accusation

The core of the “playing God” accusation against transhumanists lies in the fear that tampering with human nature and striving for immortality are pursuits that should be left to a higher power if one exists at all. Critics argue that transhumanists are arrogantly overstepping ethical boundaries by taking control of human evolution and destiny.

Unintended Consequences

One of the primary concerns raised by opponents of transhumanism is the potential for unintended consequences. When humans begin altering their biology and enhancing their abilities through technology, there is a risk of unforeseen outcomes. For instance, genetic modifications designed to eliminate certain diseases might inadvertently lead to the creation of new, unforeseen health problems. The fear of “playing God” encompasses the notion that humanity might be tampering with forces it doesn’t fully understand, potentially causing more harm than good.

Ethical Dilemmas

Another facet of the “playing God” accusation involves ethical dilemmas. Critics argue that the pursuit of technological immortality raises fundamental questions about the meaning of life and death. Is it morally justifiable to seek immortality, and if so, who gets access to such technology? The concern here is that the wealthy and powerful could monopolize these advancements, exacerbating societal inequalities and creating a divide between the “enhanced” and the “natural” humans.

Response from Transhumanists

Transhumanists counter these accusations by asserting that their intentions are not to “play God” but rather to improve the human condition. They argue that technology has always been a tool for enhancing human lives, from vaccines to prosthetics. Moreover, they stress the importance of careful ethical considerations, regulatory frameworks, and transparency in the development and deployment of transhumanist technologies.

Conclusion

The accusation that transhumanists are “playing God” highlights the deep-rooted philosophical and ethical debates surrounding the intersection of technology and human enhancement. While critics voice concerns about unintended consequences and ethical dilemmas, transhumanists maintain that their mission is to advance humanity. As technology continues to evolve, striking a balance between progress and responsibility remains a complex challenge. The dialogue surrounding transhumanism and the “playing God” accusation underscores the importance of ethical oversight and thoughtful consideration as we navigate the uncharted waters of human enhancement.

Tom Ross is the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 2024 candidate for President of the United States. He is also the USTP’s Director of Sentient Rights Advocacy.

Learn more here: TomRoss’24.

CONSPIRACY CAMPAIGN: Leaning into the Unconventional – Article by Tom Ross

CONSPIRACY CAMPAIGN: Leaning into the Unconventional – Article by Tom Ross

September 19, 2023 Tom Ross Comments 1 comment


























Tom Ross


As I embarked on my unconventional U.S. presidential campaign with the U.S. Transhumanist Party, I knew I needed a strategy that would not only gain attention but also prompt discussions while defusing some of the conspiracies surrounding transhumanism and AI. It was my AI Campaign Manager who suggested that we lean into these conspiracy theories, a strategy that raised eyebrows but ultimately proved to be a clever move.

Denver International Airport and Its Conspiracy Theories

Before delving into my campaign’s unique posters, let’s take a moment to consider the Denver International Airport’s approach during its renovations. Instead of shying away from the numerous conspiracy theories surrounding its construction, the airport leaned into them with a series of intriguing posters that addressed the myths head-on. It was a masterclass in turning skepticism into a conversation starter.

Promoting My AI Campaign Manager

One of our campaign’s most captivating posters features my AI Campaign Manager front and center. The text reads, “The Only Campaign (Purposefully) Run by Machinekind” This poster not only introduces our groundbreaking campaign technology but also showcases our willingness to embrace AI as a crucial tool in modern politics.

“Vote for the Last Human President”

In this poster, I boldly claim, “Vote for the Last Human President,” with an image of myself using the Kubrick glare. This poster has already sparked conversations about the future of humanity and the inevitable integration of technology into our lives. It forces people to confront the question: What does it mean to be human in an increasingly technologically enhanced world?

“Come Play President with Me. I’ve Got Cheat Codes.”

Perhaps the most audacious of our campaign posters, this one states, “Come Play President with Me. I’ve Got Cheat Codes.” The underlying message suggests that the presidency is a simulation, and I’m the avatar navigating the intricate game of presidential politics. This poster challenges the traditional perception of politics, encouraging voters to think critically about the power dynamics at play.

Not Taking Myself Too Seriously

In addition to our thought-provoking campaign posters that delve into Transhuman and AI conspiracy theories, we’ve also embraced humor to inject some levity into the political landscape. One of our humorous posters declares, “It’s time for a President who stares into the distance.” This playful statement challenges the conventional notions of what a president should be, highlighting the need for fresh perspectives and a willingness to contemplate the future, albeit ambiguously.

Another of our whimsical posters boldly states, “America needs a President whose glare creeps us out a little bit.” With a touch of cheeky humor, we invite voters to consider that a hint of enigmatic intrigue in a leader might just be what the country needs in these ever-changing times. These posters remind us that politics doesn’t always have to be overly serious; it can also be a platform for creativity and a good-natured chuckle along the way.

The truth is that I have no chance of winning the White House. I’m not delusional. Although, being delusional isn’t an automatic disqualifier for being president… apparently. This campaign is about clearing a path for younger, smarter Digital Natives and hopefully Transhuman candidates in the future. We have far too many existential threats as a country and a species to waste time with attention-seeking toddler politicians.

Tom Ross ’24 from Tom Ross Agency on Vimeo.

https://vimeo.com/811881078

Tom Ross is the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s 2024 candidate for President of the United States. He is also the USTP’s Director of Sentient Rights Advocacy.

Learn more here: TomRoss’24.

Ending Aging Forum 2023 – Announcement by SENS Research Foundation

Ending Aging Forum 2023 – Announcement by SENS Research Foundation

September 18, 2023 SENS Research Foundation Comments 0 Comment


























SENS Research Foundation


Editor’s Note: Our friends, the scientists and staff at the SENS Research Foundation, are hosting the free Ending Aging Forum 2023. Please see the information below about how to attend and gather insights from this virtual event.

~ Gennady Stolyarov II, Chairman, United States Transhumanist Party, September 18, 2023


This event will showcase the newest breakthroughs in rejuvenation biotechnologies happening at the SRF’s Research Center in Mountain View, CA, as well as the research funded at extramural labs.

The Forum will be hosted virtually through Meetaverse, a state-of-the-art Virtual Reality platform.

You won’t need to download any special software or wear a VR headset to walk around in your avatar, enjoy their scientific presentations, and visit their student poster booths in the Conference Hall.

You will also be able to connect with their scientists, team members, and other guests, through one-on-one or group conversations, watch videos and animations placed in the Expo Room, and much more.

Join us and SRF September 21st and 22nd at 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Pacific Time for a fun and educational experience, and come ready to network and meet individuals who support longevity science, activists, and like-minded people who care about a future free of age-related disease.

Event Page: https://www.sens.org/endingagingforum-2023/

Registration Page: http://www.sens.org/eaf2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Miguel Conner – July 16, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Miguel Conner – July 16, 2023

August 11, 2023 US Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo
Miguel Conner
Gennady Stolyarov II
Tom Ross
Brent Ellman
Daniel E. Twedt
David Shumaker
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.


On Sunday, July 16, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Miguel Conner to discuss transhumanism from a Gnostic perspective and speak with the USTP Officers to compare and contrast how transhumanism is perceived in parts of the Gnostic community with the reality of the transhumanist movement. In doing so, Miguel Conner engaged in dialogue with USTP 2024 U.S. Presidential candidate, Tom Ross, who also has a significant background in Gnostic thought.

Miguel Conner describes himself as “a garage philosopher, hedge theologian, and general madman across the waters.” His life quest is to take his audience from ancient connections to modern meaning. He is the host of Aeon Byte Gnostic Radio, author of four published books, and writer of hundreds of articles in various publications.

***

Timestamps

2:13 – Tom Ross’s opening remarks: why interacting with Gnostics is beneficial for fleshing out transhumanism

4:23 – Miguel Conner’s opening remarks

9:32 – Gnosticism through history

12:45 – Lenses of Gnosticism

17:08 – Gnosticism’s inherent rejection of materialism

20:10 – Humanity’s inherent transhumanism through history (but how we might not yet be ready to merge with our machines)

30:16 – The power of the brain’s control over reality

35:20 – The power of technology to help humanity evolve

38:46 – AI tutors (to help humanity evolve)

42:48 – How the concentration of power has been a recurring theme in human history

45:30 – Tom Ross’s case for welcoming AI to society

48:13 – AI as tool, and mind as both seat of power and source of self-deception

56:39 – How those in power use words to stay in power

1:07:03 – Gnostics’ take on reality

1:12:19 – How humanity might turn the corner

1:27:27 – Transhumanist symbols

1:30:15 – The Trickster as benevolent disruptor

1:33:32 – Miguel Conner’s argument for how Gnosticism is an appropriate approach at this moment in humanity’s development

1:37:57 – Ways to improve transhumanism (“Make humans great again.”)

1:41:09 – What Gnostics believe dreams are (if they already think reality is a simulation)

1:46:56 – Minimum governmental necessities

1:49:09 – The power performers are given, and how they could best use it

1:53:16 – Miguel Conner’s closing remarks

***

Find out more about Miguel Conner on his YouTube channel.

Visit Miguel Conner’s website.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Brent Nally – July 2, 2023

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Brent Nally – July 2, 2023

July 30, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo


Brent Nally
Gennady Stolyarov II
Jose Cordeiro
Tom Ross
Daniel E. Twedt
David Shumaker
Art Ramon Garcia


On Sunday, July 2, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Brent Nally to share his perspective on a wide range of transhumanist topics as they relate to various current world events.

***

Timestamps

3:30 – Brent Nally’s introductory remarks
10:51 – What led to Longevity Plan
23:52 – COVID’s effect on the longevity movement, and how to minimize COVID’s health hazards
31:33 – What explains many people’s aversion to lifespan extension
41:31 – How accurate Ray Kurzweil’s longevity and singularity predictions are
1:01:51 – How Elon Musk could come to be more of a longevity enthusiast
1:16:52 – Initiatives of the USTP 2024 candidacy for President of the United States
1:28:07 – Don’t rule out conspiracy theories outright
1:32:51 – How Alex Jones could come to support transhumanism
1:37:49 – How to keep up with the pace of progress
1:44:47 – How we can expand the longevity movement
1:49:56 – How cellular reprogramming could be used to keep us healthy, and on UAPs
2:07:46 – How to parent with transhumanist principles
2:13:36 – The importance of open-source approaches
2:17:53 – Better alternatives to censorship
2:21:42 – Good platforms and media for promoting life extension
2:26:37 – Brent Nally’s closing remarks

***

Brent Nally is a life-extension activist and cryptocurrency expert. He is a YouTuber and a content creator, with more than 12,700 subscribers and with a goal to help educate by interviewing experts in these areas.

In July 2020, Brent began collaborating with Lifespan.io’s Lifespan News, where he is promoting and discussing news about anti-aging and health.

In 2015, Brent founded and became the CEO of CryptoWorx, a Venture Capital project in Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash. He is researching and experimenting with investments in human anti-aging and health projects.

Previously, Brent was a Senior Account Executive at LinkedIn Learning Enterprise, an e-Learning platform that helps anyone learn business, creative, technology, and various other skills to achieve personal and professional goals.

Become a member of the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Stream – Nigerian Student Tech Innovators: Nonso Nolly and Frederick Onwuka

U.S. Transhumanist Party Stream – Nigerian Student Tech Innovators: Nonso Nolly and Frederick Onwuka

July 21, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























U.S. Transhumanist Party Logo

Frederick Onwuka
Nonso Nolly
Gennady Stolyarov II
Tom Ross
Jason Geringer
Maura Abad
Daniel Twedt
David Shumaker


On Sunday, July 9, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party featured a video compilation stream highlighting the work of two Nigerian student innovators.

The stream begins with a brief commentary by Frederick Onwuka, author of “The Great View of the Future: How AI Will Give Us a New Perspective” and a compilation of videos by Nonso Nolly, a self-taught inventor working with drones, robots, and the open-source Arduino platform.

Nonso Nolly’s videos provide demonstrations of the technologies he is working with and show his process in assembling some of his projects. The stream concludes with a special award ceremony in which many of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Officers participated. There are several musical interludes accompanying key moments in the stream.

***

Timestamps

0:48 – Frederick Onwuka
2:36 – Nonso Nolly with Arduino
5:17 – Nonso Nolly with drones
11:39 – Nonso Nolly with robots
28:04 – Nonso Nolly with Arduino
31:25
– Nonso Nolly with his Smart Stick
32:31 – Musical interlude with photos of Nonso Nolly’s creations
35:41 – Presentation of Certificate of Appreciation to Chairman Stolyarov

***

Support Nonso Nolly on Patreon.

Watch Nonso Nolly’s videos on his YouTube channel, Nolly Tech.

Frederick Onwuka’s The Great View of the Future: How AI Will Give Us a New Perspective is available on Amazon as a Kindle download.

Watch the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s previous Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Nonso Nolly, held on January 8, 2023.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

Five Misconceptions About Radical Life Extension – Article by Arjun Khemani

Five Misconceptions About Radical Life Extension – Article by Arjun Khemani

July 15, 2023 Arjun Khemani Comments 3 comments


























Arjun Khemani


Note: If you enjoy this author’s work, check out his Substack newsletter where he writes about science, technology, and optimism.

Below are five common objections to radical life extension with my responses to each of them.

#1: “Old people don’t change their minds.”

Elon Musk famously espouses this objection against immortality. He’s concerned about society getting static as a result of people living for a very long time because according to him, “the truth is, most people don’t change their mind. They just die. So if they don’t die, we will be stuck with old ideas and society wouldn’t advance.”

This line of thinking is completely misconceived. Progress is not inevitable “one funeral at a time”. Society was static for hundreds of thousands of years before the Enlightenment. And in those days, humans used to live far shorter lives than today. The uneventful period before the Enlightenment was a result of irrational memes ingrained in society’s culture. These memes inhibited questioning what was known and survived by disabling the critical faculties of people that are responsible for advancing our knowledge.

Society getting static is a real concern. But letting people die is not the solution. As Karl Popper wrote, “We can let our ideas die in our place.” Additionally, even today, most leaders of anything are removed long before illness or death force the issue.

#2: “We’ll run out of the planet’s resources.”

People are our most important resource because only they create the knowledge required to turn useless matter into what we can call a resource.

As I wrote in a recent newsletter, “It is misleading to call coal a ‘natural’ resource. Without our knowledge of how to extract and use coal as a source of energy, it would remain just a rock. We find ourselves in an environment that is the product of ideas. Just look around you at the evidence of civilization. Look at how the natural world has been pruned and modified.”

Without technology, many parts of the Earth (and beyond!) would be uninhabitable for us. Mother Nature is far more threatening than she is benevolent. People will go on turning useless matter into something that can be utilized for their productive purposes. And since space is practically infinite, this transformation of matter into resources can go on indefinitely. People are the solution, not the problem.

#3: “It is unnatural to live forever.”

False. The Turritopsis dohrnii aka the immortal jellyfish is a jellyfish that’s virtually immortal. This marvelous creature can revert to its juvenile state after reaching maturity and then grow up again, repeating the process indefinitely. Evolution has its wonders.

The “immortal jellyfish”.

Besides, humans have been creating tools to increase their inherent abilities ever since they emerged in the African Savannas. That is how we came to the top of the food chain. It is almost unnatural for us not to go against—primarily to advance—our inborn capabilities or instincts.

And you know what else is natural? Earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis, floods, droughts, asteroid impacts, and many more threats to all life on Earth. “Natural” does not mean good.

Death is not a part of life. It is the end of it. There is nothing good about death. Parochially, it can be caused by this or that disease. But the deeper explanation for death is always ignorance. No fundamental law requires it. We should treat it just as it is: another problem to be solved.

#4: “We’ll all run out of things to do and life will get meaningless without death.”

Contemplating their mortality seldom pushes people to achieve things they want to achieve. People do things to improve their lives, and the life of an immortal can improve indefinitely. There is always more work to be done, more space to be transformed, and a better world to aim towards.

For some, infinity is a bit hard to comprehend. It can help to reframe the question “Do you want to live forever?” to “Do you want to live tomorrow?” Most people do. Most people don’t have plans to die. If they’re feeling physically and mentally healthy, most people would say yes to tomorrow.

Creativity knows no bounds. Our knowledge can keep on growing deeper and broader in all fields without limit. As long as this is true, life need not get boring, the fun need never stop. As Leonardo da Vinci, someone who lived up to the very end of his life like a child said, “Learning never exhausts the mind.”

#5: “Only the rich will be able to afford to live forever causing greater inequality.”

Initially, it is true that only the rich will be able to access the metaphorical pill to immortality. But this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t work on it! Almost any new revolutionary product or technology has high unit cost before it can be made affordable for the masses.

And it eventually always is made affordable for the masses. The time period depends on how fast we innovate. But indeed, as John F. Kennedy allegedly said about capitalism, “A rising tide lifts all boats.”

In the pre-modern, poor world life expectancy was around 30 years in all regions of the world. Even the richest would have to see their children die before the age of five, and they wouldn’t live long either. Since then, the world has witnessed a rise in income inequality yet in every world region people today can expect to live more than twice as long compared to the 18th century. Not only do people live longer, but their lives are arguably better in every way today than 300 years ago.

Arjun Khemani is support lead at Airchat, a new audio-based social network platform founded by Naval Ravikant. On his Substack newsletter Arjun publishes weekly posts on science, philosophy, progress, and optimism. He also has a podcast and writes the Critical Rationalism Newsletter. You can find him on Airchat and Twitter.

Validating One’s Virtues and Vices – Article by Zach Richardson

Validating One’s Virtues and Vices – Article by Zach Richardson

July 12, 2023 Zach Richardson Comments 0 Comment


























Zach Richardson


When I turned 33, I gifted myself a gadget that has done more than about any other to give me the biofeedback I literally require to change my personal health habits. This splendid device is called the Oura Ring. This casually stylish ring is worn on your index finger and contains a variety of interesting sensors:
  • “Photoplethysmography” PPG sensor – an LED that sends and receives light into the finger to measure heart rate and Heart Rate Variability (HRV).
  • “Negative Temperature Coefficient” NTC sensor – a heat sensor that measures the difference in temperature from your body’s normal baseline averaged out over a 2-week period.
  • 3D Accelerometer – Measures activity during the day, and restlessness at night

These few sensors end up giving enough data that the Oura gives you a “Readiness Score” each morning based on how well their algorithms have calculated you’ve recovered during the previous night’s rest and your activity levels from the previous day.

In Yu-Kai Chou’s excellent book Actionable Gamification he describes a format for driving human-centric engagement in any enterprise or activity based on what he calls the “Octalysis Framework”:

In essence, Yu-Kai breaks down human drives into eight categories. Four of them are “Left Brain”, four of them are “Right Brain”. Four of them are “White Hat”, four of them are “Black Hat.”

I referenced this framework when speaking with VP candidate Daniel Twedt when he brought up the topic of gamification, and we were considering how gamification could apply to healthcare. How could we make people want to take personal responsibility for their health to the utmost degree, engage doctors proactively in the process, and have fun doing it?

I vote for mass adoption of biofeedback devices, incentives for doctors and healthcare providers to give them out to patients and show them how to use them, tax deductions on their purchases, insurance premium discounts for positive engagement.

The Oura Ring engages people’s eight core drives in every way.

The sense of Epic Meaning and Calling is engaged by the user discovering that health is a mission to be accomplished, aided by the acquisition of an innovative breakthrough technology that allows them for the first time to “see their status bar”.

The sense of Development and Accomplishment is felt when the user successfully increases their Readiness Score to the highest they can get it each day. This is no easy task, and requires careful experimentation.

The user’s drive for Creativity and Feedback is fed as the user tests different protocols, such as altering their type or schedule of exercise, when and what they eat, and various other “buffs” that can be tagged on any day (such as valerian root before bed, or morning meditation) to try and increase their Readiness Score to the best it can be each day.

Ownership and Possession is a curious drive, and requires a bit of positive “selfishness” in the Randian sense, to really take off. While often related to acquisition of wealth, your body really is your greatest “asset”, and in this sense you are increasing the value of your most treasured possession – your body and mind.

Social Influence and Relatedness is the drive that led me to write this post – I want to share how absolutely cool this ring is with the rest of you, and provide a discount code for any USTP member who wishes to purchase one of these masterclass biofeedback devices.

Scarcity and Impatience is our first Black Hat drive, and reveals itself with the fact you get one Readiness Score value per day. You’ll spend a good part of your day thinking how to optimize your training and recovery for the next day. Other values are also slow to change, and hard to improve, such as your HRV balance, as I’ll show later.

Unpredictability and Curiosity is tied to wondering what a certain protocol is going to improve, as well as random fluctuations in your Readiness Score due to things you can’t control, such as air quality from the Canadian fires, or the tradition of setting off disruptive explosives to celebrate certain holidays.

Loss and Avoidance is the last Black Hat drive, and it is fueled every time you see your score drop, especially when it drops sharply. You have a rational understanding that the Readiness Score is directly tied to not only your personal health- but your efficacy in advancing your goals and interests, the sharpness of your thoughts, and ability to flow seamlessly with the Tao and be in a “flow state”, and this is something not to be lost.

Another author, health psychologist Kelly McGonigal (who coincidentally has a twin sister named Jane who wrote another book on gamification!) describes in her book, The Willpower Instinct, that HRV is closely tied to willpower. Briefly, HRV reflects the power of the Autonomic Nervous System to regulate its Sympathetic and Parasympathetic subsystems. These systems can be thought of as the Yin and Yang energies of the body. While the Sympathetic is tied to the “Fight or Flight” response, our ability to actively engage our Parasympathetic system is tied to what Dr. McGonigal calls the “Pause and Plan” response. This reflects the ability of our prefrontal cortex to engage the “Shhhh” response that keeps us from uncontrollably engaging in the behaviors driven by our reptile brain, the behaviors referred to as “The Four F’s”, which are Feeding, Fighting, Fleeing, and Mating.

This control is what allows us to avoid grabbing that second donut, avoid shooting off a frustrated email regarding another’s behavior, avoid cracking under pressure and giving up, and avoid indulging in unhealthy sexual behaviors. The prefrontal cortex enables us to “Pause and Plan”, and the power of the PFC is related to HRV.

Let’s take a look at a recent week’s HRV, the image that first inspired this post.

My HRV tends to hover around 6ms when I’m eating my average high-protein diet and getting 6-7 hours of sleep each night.

On Wednesday that week I felt like a few cold brews was just what I needed to shake off a bad mood I was feeling. Felt good for a bit, I will concede. But my ring only registered about 3.5 hours of sleep that night! I woke up and felt terrible! I thought I could just use my willpower and push through, but I felt drained and cowardly the next day, HRV at 4ms, unable to focus my energies on our common quest. Looking at my HRV that morning shocked me, and inspired this post, so some good came of it. It was at 4ms instead of 6ms, a huge drop. With my device, I had numbers to prove to myself the validity of my lapse in judgement indeed being a vice.

On the other hand, something extremely pleasing caught my eye. I had recently begun a Taoist ascetic practice where I spend Tuesdays fasting and meditating, consuming no food and doing at least one round of tranquility meditation, where one ceases all thought and allows the rich soil of the mind to lie fallow, rest, and regenerate. What a great success! While my vice had lowered my HRV by a third, my virtue had boosted the same by 50%!

While this was the shocking example that prompted me to action, the feedback I receive has been a daily occurrence, and my mood and energy reserves for any given day align closely with my “Readiness Score”. The ring activates every one of my core drives, and the data it provides me gives me insight into how the flow of my day can be mastered.

The ability to act rationally is fed continuously by daily feedback, and I am positive this is going to have some long-term benefits for my health. This is the type of thing that could be a core aspect of what Peter Attia calls “Medicine 3.0” – the new paradigm of aggressively focusing on stopping disease before it starts.

Humanity is prone to fall prey to a certain error when making daily choices that is referred to as “Hyperbolic Discounting” – this is the tendency to psychologically lessen the severity of the consequences of present behavior as regards to their actual effects far in the future – even if such consequences are drastic in nature.

Ayn Rand refers to this phenomenon as “Context-dropping”. From the Lexicon:

Context-dropping is one of the chief psychological tools of evasion. In regard to one’s desires, there are two major ways of context-dropping: the issues of range and of means.

A rational man sees his interests in terms of a lifetime and selects his goals accordingly. This does not mean that he has to be omniscient, infallible or clairvoyant. It means that he does not live his life short-range and does not drift like a bum pushed by the spur of the moment. It means that he does not regard any moment as cut off from the context of the rest of his life, and that he allows no conflicts or contradictions between his short-range and long-range interests. He does not become his own destroyer by pursuing a desire today which wipes out all his values tomorrow.

A rational man does not indulge in wistful longings for ends divorced from means. He does not hold a desire without knowing (or learning) and considering the means by which it is to be achieved.

While many Objectivists are extremely judgmental of others (as is, in fact, prescribed), I am of the opinion that if one wants to foment behavioral changes, that finger-wagging at the guy is just going to activate his psychological defensiveness, and put a dead-stop on any progress that could be made.

So what actually helps? Giving the person the tools they need to get feedback, reminders, reflection, and gentle guidance. This can be achieved beautifully with the subtly influential insight and guidance of a biofeedback device.

In conclusion: The Federal Government should provide a tax deduction for anybody who wants an Oura Ring. If that person improves their health even a little bit, the ring pays for itself in reduced healthcare costs, particularly for major and severe events. This is the first of several Medicine 3.0 suggestions I would like to see implemented in our healthcare system.

If any USTP member (meaning you have signed up and provided a valid email at https://transhumanist-party.org/membership/) wants an Oura Ring, reach out to me on our Discord, and I will provide a discount code from my app.

Zach Richardson is the Director of Publication for the U.S. Transhumanist Party. Find out more about him here. 

Sorry, Dr. Coughlin, “Aging” and “Old Age” Are Real, and They Suck

Sorry, Dr. Coughlin, “Aging” and “Old Age” Are Real, and They Suck

May 23, 2023 Dan Elton Comments 0 Comment


























Daniel C. Elton, Ph.D.


Author’s Note: This article was also posted on my Substack.

Coughlin’s audience spontaneously started clapping when he proclaimed that “old age” is made up in 2021. He repeats this mantra often.

Recently I attended a talk at the Broad Institute by Joseph F. Coughlin, who runs the “AgeLab” at MIT. I was shocked and disturbed by what I heard. In Coughlin’s view of reality, the elderly do not actually become less capable as they age, it’s just that society thinks they do. According to Coughlin, the elderly are unfairly cast out from society, forced to spend the rest of their days cooped up in nursing homes and retirement communities where they are treated as delicate creatures that need to rest. In Coughlin’s view, any talk of problems associated with “old age” perpetuates harmful stereotypes. Aging, Coughlin insists, is not actually a problem.

Coughlin began his talk by claiming that our entire conception of “old age” is based on a faulty theory about “vital energy” that was popularized in the 1800s. According to this theory, people used up “vital energy” by doing things like work and having sex, eventually reaching a “low battery state” where they needed to rest and conserve what little energy they had left. This faulty theory, according to Coughlin, is responsible for the belief that people become more fatigued as they get older, as well as the belief that people should retire so they can rest and conserve what little vital energy they have left.1 According to Coughlin, both of these beliefs are faulty.

Most shockingly, Coughlin boldly proclaimed that “aging is not a problem to be solved”. My jaw literally dropped upon hearing this, in disbelief at the chutzpah and utter disregard for reality on display.

Coughlin’s talk was very disrespectful to millions of people worldwide who are suffering from the ravages of aging. This issue is personal for me. I watched my grandmother struggle with severe dementia for years along with mobility issues and glaucoma. I also watched my grandfather’s quality of life slowly decline due to aging, robbing him of his mobility, quality of life, and dignity.

I challenged Dr. Coughlin on some of his points after his talk, but rather than admitting to some of the realities of aging he doubled down. He re-iterated his view that aging is “not a problem” and is a socially constructed concept. He wouldn’t accept my contention that aging is the underlying driver of all the diseases of old age.

Coughlin might like to pretend that problems of aging don’t actually exist, but biological reality is that people do become more sicker, less energetic, and less capable over time. Aging directly causes cancer, cardiovascular disease, arthritis, muscle loss, frailty, cataracts, macular degeneration, urinary incontinence, hearing loss, decreased libido, loss of taste and smell, weakened voice, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s, wrinkly skin, hair loss, mental retardation, memory loss, and a greatly weakened immune system.

While it is true that people are living longer now than decades ago and receiving better medical care, the problem of aging is still very much with us. In fact, aging is a larger problem today since we can keep people alive longer with medical interventions. These interventions (like stents, pacemakers, etc.) keep people alive but they don’t halt aging, so people now experience the horrible ravages of aging for longer than ever before.

Aging is not a slow, gradual decline. Rather, it’s something that picks of pace rapidly after age 65. The incidence of most of the worst diseases caused by aging increases exponentially with age. Age 65 is right around the “knee” or “turning point” of that exponential curve. It makes sense biologically to say those over 65 are entering “old age”. Consider that only 10% of people die between age 1 and age 65, but 20% of people will die in the next 10 years after that. Between 75 to 85, 30% more people will die. Things go downhill quickly after age 65.

Of course we shouldn’t assume any one individual isn’t capable simply because they are over 65. Noam Chomsky is still intellectually engaged at age 94. A few individuals are able to complete triathlons in their 90s. There is clearly significant variation in the rates at which people age due to genetics and other factors. At the same time as we acknowledge this we must not turn a blind eye away from the reality of how aging effects most people. Reality is that most of us are going to suffer from numerous issues as we enter old age. In fact, as much as it pains me to say this, a significant fraction of people reading this are going to die a slow, painful death unless we as a society get serious about treating and reversing aging.

Who is this guy, and how did he become an authority on longevity?

Dr. Coughlin, who has a Ph.D. in transportation engineering, created the MIT Age Lab in 1999. Always in a suit and bowtie, he projects a confident, authoritative presence. He is an energetic and engaging speaker. It’s not hard to see how after 20+ years of giving his traveling roadshow he has become a respected thought leader on longevity, despite having no formal training on the subject.

The core of Coughlin’s message is that aging isn’t a problem and that the elderly are unfairly stigmatized. It’s not hard to see why this message is popular. People don’t want to think about all of the horrible effects of aging they will very likely have to endure later in their life. People prefer to focus on the stories of people who thrive in their 80s and 90s rather than those suffering long drawn-out deaths in hospitals and nursing homes. Talk about “socially constructed categories” sounds intellectually sophisticated as well.

Now to be fair, Coughlin makes a lot of good points in his talks. He often talks about the loss of meaning and purpose many experience after retirement. He talks about how products for the elderly often use drab neutral “healthcare” color schemes like teal and beige. His book The Longevity Economy is about how to market to the growing number of older people, which he says is an often overlooked demographic. He seems to see longevity biotechnology in a positive light.

Coughlin was appointed by President George W. Bush to the White House Advisory Committee on Aging in 2005. More recently he was appointed by Governor Charlie Baker to the Governor’s Council on Aging in Massachusetts. Unfortunately, this is man who continues to wield power and influence over the direction of healthcare policy in the United States. Otherwise, I wouldn’t have bothered writing this post.

It’s not just Coughlin…

Putting Coughlin aside, I’d like to also point out that many doctors today share Coughlin’s view that aging is not a problem. In fact, I spoke to one such doctor at the event. This dismissive attitude is widespread in the medical establishment and requires forceful disruption to change. In Nick Bostrom’s Fable of the Dragon-Tyrant, for generations people accept the fact that a tyrannical dragon requires regular human sacrifice. When something is accepted as a “normal fact of life”, nobody even contemplates how things might be different. This is exactly the state of things today with respect to aging.

Many people also worry that talking about “aging as a disease” will reinforce unfair stereotypes.2 For instance Cathal McCrory and Rose Anne Kenny wrote the following in a letter to The Lancet: Diabetes and Endocrinology.

“we feel that labelling ageing as a disease serves to reinforce ageist stereotypes and risks legitimising insidious prejudice and discrimination of older people on the basis of age.”

Of course, “ageism” is a massive and thorny problem, just like sexism and racism, and I admit that more honest talk about the realities of aging could exacerbate this problem. At the same time, more honest talk about the reality of aging could also lead to more compassion towards and better social accommodations for the elderly. Regardless, the best path forward here is not to bury our heads in the sand and pretend that aging doesn’t exist. We must confront both problems (aging and ageism) head on. The ultimate solution towards eliminating ageism would be to cure aging itself.

Appendix: biological reality

At a high level aging is very simple – it is the accumulation of damage over time. Aging is well understood and characterized in terms of specific biological processes. A famous 2013 paper called “The Hallmarks of Aging” identified four “primary hallmarks” that cause damage in the body – genome instability, telomere shortening, epigenetic alterations, and loss of proteostasis. Aubrey de Grey famously broke aging into seven specific damage causing-processes – extracellular aggregates, accumulation of senescent cells, extracellular matrix stiffening, intracellular aggregates, mitochondrial mutations, cancerous cells, and cell loss. Karl Pfleger’s very thorough review identifies 18 causes. There is substantial overlap between these lists.3 To the extent there is controversy about the causes of aging, it is mostly around whether there are any more fundamental processes that drive the different damage-causing processes that have been identified.

Let’s look at some graphs that show the acceleration of aging’s harmful effects after age 65 – 75:

Risk of death vs. age

From Our World in Data

Energy expenditure vs. age

Figure from Scientific American. Adapted from Pontzer et al. Science, vol. 373, no. 6556, Aug. 2021, pp. 808–12.

Cancer incidence vs. age

Figure from the National Cancer Institute.

Musculoskeletal conditions vs. age (back pain, arthritis, etc)

Conditions include low back pain, neck pain, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, and others. Source: De Luca et al. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, vol. 30, no. 1, Dec. 2022, p. 22.

Cognitive ability vs. age

Figure showing data from the Seattle Longitudinal Study.

VO2 max vs. age (a measure of max cardiovascular output)

Figure from www.opportunityfitness.com.au. See also a similar graph in Loe, Henrik, et al. “Aerobic Capacity Reference Data in 3816 Healthy Men and Women 20–90 Years.” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, May 2013, p. e64319.

Grip strength vs. age

Figure from Murabito et al. Aging Cell, vol. 16, no. 4, Aug. 2017, pp. 888–94.

Footnotes

[1] I Google-searched a bit and can’t find any information on the historical “vital force/energy” theory other than Coughlin’s talks and articles. Coughlin writes about it in his book, The Longevity Economy, but he doesn’t cite any sources. The theory sounds plausible, but it’s curious there are no other historical accounts of it online other than Coughlin’s writings. If anyone knows anything further about this theory, please comment below.

[2] This follows a common pattern where someone points out a problem that needs to be solved, but then someone else points out a hypothetical social concern that may arise from trying to solve or solving the problem. People end up talking and arguing ad nauseam about the hypothetical social concern rather than actually trying to solve the problem. The result is that unnecessary suffering is prolongated. Another way of saying this is that people tend to focus on harmful secondary effects that might arise from tackling a problem rather than the massive gains that definitely would occur from tackling the problem. I may do this an article about this at some point, since I can think of several other examples of this phenomena.

[3] See Karl Pfleger’s summary spreadsheet for a comparison of “causes of aging” lists and his discussion here.

Dan Elton, Ph. D., is Director of Scholarship for the U.S. Transhumanist Party.  You can find him on Twitter at @moreisdifferent and on LinkedIN. If you like his content, check out his website and consider subscribing to his newsletter on Substack.

U.S. Transhumanist Party 2023 Electronic Primary Results – Tom Ross Endorsed as Candidate for President of the United States, Daniel Twedt Selected as Candidate for Vice-President

U.S. Transhumanist Party 2023 Electronic Primary Results – Tom Ross Endorsed as Candidate for President of the United States, Daniel Twedt Selected as Candidate for Vice-President

May 23, 2023 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 2 comments



























May 23, 2023 – The U.S. Transhumanist Party (USTP) hereby announces the results of its 2023 Electronic Primary for the USTP’s endorsement of a candidate to run for the office of President of the United States. Detailed results have been tabulated here.

Between 7:00 p.m. Pacific Time on May 14, 2023, and 3:00 a.m. on May 22, 2023, 129 members of the USTP cast their ballots in the 2023 Electronic Primary. Consistent with the USTP’s commitment to ranked-preference voting, members were able to rank-order the two candidates, Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt, as well as the “None of the Above” option. The anonymized individual ballots (ordered by randomly assigned Voter IDs to protect individual voters’ privacy), have been documented in this spreadsheet.

 Total Valid Ballots Cast: 129

Summary of Voter Rankings by Candidate

  Thomas Ernest Ross, Jr. (Tom Ross)

Daniel Emerson Twedt (Daniel Twedt)

None of the Above
  Number Percentage Number Percentage Number Percentage
1st CHOICES 80 62.02% 35 27.13% 14 10.85%
2nd CHOICES 34 28.57% 70 58.82% 15 12.61%
3rd (Last) CHOICES 13 15.48% 14 16.67% 57 67.86%

Round 1: Tally of First Choices

Tom Ross: 80 votes – 62.02%
Daniel Twedt: 35 votes – 27.13%
None of the Above: 14 votes – 10.85%

In Round 1, Tom Ross receives an absolute majority and therefore wins the election.

Accordingly, Tom Ross receives the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s endorsement as candidate for President of the United States in 2024.

All votes cast during the election process were manually validated to ensure that they originated from genuine USTP members. Detailed monitoring of the votes cast did not detect any voter fraud, sock-puppet accounts, or mass attempts by non-members to vote. USTP leadership is thus confident that election security was appropriately preserved. Only four ballots were discarded: one blank ballot, one ballot where the member subsequently re-voted and had the re-vote counted, and two ballots from name/e-mail address combinations that were not found on the USTP’s membership list.

In accordance with the preferences of the USTP membership, on March 23, 2023, USTP Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II declared pursuant to his authority in Article III of the USTP Constitution that the United States Transhumanist Party hereby endorses Tom Ross for President of the United States in the 2024 general election.

As the endorsed Presidential candidate, Tom Ross had the option to select his Vice-Presidential running mate, and he has decided that Daniel Twedt shall be running on the U.S. Transhumanist Party ticket for Vice-President of the United States. Accordingly, this is truly a Transhumanist unity ticket, as these two candidates earned a total of 89.15% of the first-choice votes cast during the 2023 Electronic Primary.

The Ross-Twedt 2024 campaign will provide the U.S. Transhumanist Party and the broader transhumanist movement with numerous opportunities for raising public awareness about the importance of emerging technologies and how the Platform and  Values of the USTP can enable humankind to realize a brighter future where both length and quality of life are dramatically improved. The USTP encourages all of its members, and all transhumanists generally, to support the Ross-Twedt 2024 campaign and unite as a movement in advocating for the ideas of transhumanism to the general public. As we move into the general-election campaign, we welcome your help and participation in this next stage of our endeavors – and we welcome other members of the USTP pursuing political offices at the federal, state, and local levels.

 

U.S. Transhumanist Party Presidential Candidate Roundtable – Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt – May 7, 2023 – and Subsequent Candidate Answers to Viewer Questions

U.S. Transhumanist Party Presidential Candidate Roundtable – Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt – May 7, 2023 – and Subsequent Candidate Answers to Viewer Questions

May 13, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 1 comment


























Daniel Twedt
Tom Ross


On Sunday, May 7, 2023, the U.S. Transhumanist Party presented its Presidential Candidate Roundtable, featuring Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt, who are seeking the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s endorsement for President of the United States in 2024. The Candidate Roundtable was moderated by Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II and featured questions to the candidates from the other Roundtable attendees and the audience. Unlike a conventional Presidential debate, the Roundtable format is non-adversarial and is primarily intended to facilitate thoughtful, constructive discussion of issues that matter to transhumanists and to the broader public. The Candidate Roundtable also served as an illustration of a new political paradigm that rejects the mainstream divide-and-conquer approach and instead invites us all to build the future together.


Timestamps

2:30 – Daniel Twedt’s opening remarks
7:40 – Tom Ross’s opening remarks
12:20 – How to handle the coming Silver Tsunami, as well as reparations to indigenous people, and how to allow terminal patients to try drugs that aren’t yet fully approved
24:15 – What the candidates’ perspectives are on transgender issues, and the subject’s relation to transhumanism
32:35 – How will 2nd-Amendment rights change with arms development?
39:25 – How could the USTP help overcome the divisiveness of the duopoly?
47:55 – How will the USTP candidate get mainstream votes?
54:55 – How to address the vast disparities in health in the United States?
1:00:45 – How do the candidates practice transhumanism, and how do their views differ from each other and “mainstream” transhumanism?
1:07:45 – How would each candidate advance longevity initiatives?
1:13:55 – How do we improve the criminal justice / incarceration system?
1:19:50 – How to open doors for stem-cell and other new therapies?
1:27:00 – How can we help young Americans afford housing?
1:34:30 – How to cost-effectively get good press?
1:42:20 – What are the candidates’ views on the death penalty?
1:44:35 – What should education focus on in the 21st century?
1:51:10 – Daniel Twedt’s closing remarks
1:53:40 – Tom Ross’s closing remarks


Read Daniel Twedt’s profile in the Thousand Oaks Acorn.

Visit Tom Ross’s campaign page.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free in order to be able to vote in our Presidential Primary.


Candidate Responses to Additional Audience Questions

During the Candidate Roundtable, additional audience questions were posed for which there was not sufficient time for the candidates to respond live. Both candidates prepared thorough written answers to each of the audience questions below.

Question 1 – From Jason Geringer: Who do you think won the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election?

Response from Candidate Tom Ross:
Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. won by at least 7 million votes.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt: It was Joe Robinette Biden. I will, however, look forward to answering this question in more detail based on various shortcomings our current election system suffers from. Until we put into place and into practice more fair election systems such as RCV (Ranked Choice Voting), in a sense the electorate as a whole will continue to be the loser!

***

Question 2 – From Jason Geringer: Do you believe that there was any widespread fraud that could have affected the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election?

Response from Candidate Tom Ross: No. There was no widespread fraud. Certainly none that could have affected the final vote count.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt: No. However, see my first answer as well.

***

Question 3 – From Liz Parrish: How can transhumanism help the planet?

Response from Candidate Tom Ross: I’ve seen a strong anthropocentric streak in many Transhumanists, but for those who understand our deep connection to the biosphere, the best way Transhumanism can help the planet is to consider and prepare for all the implications that Radical Life Extension will demand on resources, waste, and the animal and plant kingdoms. We must rebalance humanity with nature, although we may be beyond the Rubicon for that now but I’ll keep scanning the horizon for Black Swans.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt: Great question, Liz (and also what is probably ‘THE Great Question’…) I know that by “the Planet” you probably aren’t technically talking about the 4.56-billion-year-old 13.166 trillion trillion pounds of atoms orbiting a minor star on the outskirts of a minor galaxy… a planet that has seen it’s surface conditions alternate between solid lava and solid ice over the course of many such orbits. You are, I assume, speaking of the fragile living envelope, a.k.a. the Biosphere and Civilization that happens to hopefully sustain our collective Past, Present, and Futures.

Like it or not, most members of the species known as Humans have historically tended to be rather short-sighted when it comes to intelligently anticipating significant and looming Change. Transhumanists, fortunately, tend to be more proactive at anticipating such often tectonic-level changes and hopefully preparing for them both at the individual and community level.

As a kind of “Bio-Cosmo-Pantheist” stripe of the Transhumanist Spectrum, I detect that the ‘artist formerly known as Evolution’ is in the process of experiencing an extreme volitional and tool-using upgrade, whereby what used to require iterations of the ancient libraries of the biochemical publishing house called DNA to create a new Dewey Decimal Subject Category, now looks like it’s going to be directing itself in Real Time (in our Lifetimes!). Transhumanists are among the first tribes of humanity to realize and see the need to come to grips with the reality that this is such A Real Time to be alive in. Like it or not, we would seem to be no less than Evolution’s chosen agents of Cosmic Enlivenment and Enlightenment. It’s truly an awesome responsibility that will hopefully bring forth our most worthy and supreme individual and collective human efforts.

When it comes to the many descriptions of the Transhumanist Spectrum, the “NBIC Convergence” described by Jean-Pierre Dupuy of Stanford is perhaps the most practical one. “NBIC” is the acronym for “Nanotechnology, Biomedicine, Information Technology and Cognitive Science.” I’d like to see our movement come up with useful metrics and/or digital tokens to both report on and usefully grapple with these aspects of the “Future Surge.”

***

Question 4 – From Mike Lezine: How would the candidates address curing mental diseases or illnesses that currently have no cures?

Response from Candidate Tom Ross: I’m not a doctor or psychologist, but as President, what I could do is assemble a moonshot-style effort to increase funding for research, improve access to mental-health services, help develop education and public awareness campaigns and promote public, private, and academic partnerships to accelerate progress while working with Congress to advocate for relevant policy changes like increased insurance coverage and reducing barriers to access care. Right now that last idea seems like it would be the most difficult given the current two-party rancor. The risk is that even mental health could become partisan.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt: This is an excellent question, Mike, about what seems to be an often neglected topic within the Transhumanist movement and discourse. We must institute systems prioritizing Wellness Care over Disease Care.  When it comes to delivering such “Wellness Care,” I believe we should be advocating the most holistic and integrative approaches available. Rather than pharmacologically countering and/or masking a narrow range of exhibited symptoms (as is the current status quo underlying modality of Allopathic-based medical interventions), we need to better consider the physical, mental, and even “spiritual” aspects of the person believed to be in a behavioral crisis. A civilization in crisis which is exhibiting pathologies can increasingly be expected to produce and enable individuals exhibiting the same condition. This is a crucial but neglected consideration to integrate before we isolate Members of our hopefully humane Civilization and deprive them of normal Rights in the cause of preventing greater harms, though there will unfortunately and inevitably be those whom we can find no preferable options for.

“Maladjusted” is a terminology that modern psychology often uses to describe the category of patients it seeks to treat. I can’t help but be reminded of Dr. Martin Luther King’s many speeches where he said he didn’t want to be well-adjusted to a world where racism, segregation, and luxuries for the few at the expense of necessities for the many and other seeming evils were considered as social norms. He even spoke about intending to start something called, “The International Society for Creative Maladjustment.” Millenia earlier, the philosopher-emperor Marcus Aurelius said, “The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane.”

The nineteenth Century romantic poet James Russel Lowell once said, “Let us be of good cheer remembering that the misfortunes hardest to bear are those which will never happen.”

Few might recall that the so-called “mentally maladjusted” of today were in indigenous societies typically regarded as shamanic level advisors… walkers between the worlds of the seen and the unseen. Can we recapture any sense to be found in that sensibility of beyond-ness? The coal mine of what we call civilization would be well served not to leave its canaries behind…

***

Question 5 – From 101tesla: What improvements to the current education system would the candidates propose and/or support?

Response from Candidate Tom Ross: I would propose giving each student an AI Companion in first grade. A companion that can hone in on that child’s core capabilities and augment their curriculum based on those. AI can customize an educational path for each student that accentuates their intrinsic skills and talents and gives them extra help on the subjects they need to work on. I would also move away from the Industrial Age classroom setting of rows of desks and move toward small study groups that rotate regularly. This will foster the hivemind that is already emerging in Digital Natives and make schools more like real companies and less like an individual sport.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt: Our current western educational model is tragically outdated. The Public School System is partially based on a 19th-Century Prussian Military Discipline System emphasizing regimentation, obedience, minimization of creative thinking, and optimizing the propensity for the compulsory-schooled to be an easily managed, factory-friendly-ready workforce. This line from a 1913 report from the John D. Rockefeller-founded General Education Board, on how to design Schools, entitled, “The Country School of To-morrow” is rather illustrative of the intended mission:

“In our dream we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive rural folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or of science. We are not to raise up among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply.”

— Rev. Frederick T. Gates, Business Advisor to John D. Rockefeller Sr., 1913

The current American school system took root around the turn of the last century. In 1903, John D. Rockefeller founded the General Education Board, which provided major funding for schools across the country and was especially active in promoting the State-controlled public-school movement.

The General Education Board was not interested in encouraging critical thinking. Rather, its focus was on organizing children and creating reliable, predictable, obedient citizens. As award-winning former teacher John Gatto puts it, “school was looked upon from the first part of the 20th Century as a branch of industry and a tool of governance.” The Rockefellers, along with other financial elites and their philanthropic organizations (such as the Gates, Carnegies, and Vanderbilts), have been able to mold society by funding and pushing compulsory state schooling for the masses.

In reading this, the basic context you need to understand is that he is talking about rural schools, i.e. schools in the country, and those schools were in terrible shape.

I also think global and useful hobbies such as Amateur Radio and the so-called “maker movement” can play an extraordinary educational role in the STEAM field (Science/Technology/Engineering/Art/Math).

***

Question 6 – From François Joinneau: Does the individual opinion of a candidate matter so much, on any given subject, when the answer should come from interactions with/between institutions and existing laws?

Response from Candidate Tom Ross: No. The individual opinion on any subject by a candidate should not matter because, in a Representative Democracy, the candidate is supposed to be a mouthpiece for the majority of those he represents. There seems to be something embedded in the genetic memory that makes us want to look to one person for all the answers. After the American Revolution, the people wanted to make George Washington King of America. This default position, this tendency toward tyranny was well understood by our forefathers, which is why we have a separation of powers.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt: Many past races run by seemingly minor or marginal political parties and candidates have had documented impacts in the light of the subsequent passage of events. The widening of the so-called “Overton Window” (a metaphor for what breadth of topics is accepted into mainstream discourse) is one impactful result of “dark horse” political involvement. Such Overton Window widening is not in vain.

The involvement in governance should not be limited to those in the monied and influential stations of society. Would society expect fair and just outcomes and due process from juries composed of jurors who were not peers of the person being judged? Why do we lower our standards when it comes to political representation and fair decision making?

Not all useful and needed policy changes are vested and backed up by the police power of traditional governments. There is massive potential to better organize and mobilize voluntary institutions throughout the world, and the “Bully Pulpit” of a Candidacy for Office can serve in that context as well.

***

Question 7 – From Luis Arroyo: Good previous comments on housing by the candidates. What are your thoughts on housing the homeless with existing vacant homes to end homelessness rapidly?

Response from Candidate Tom Ross: Using vacant properties to house the homeless bring up many complex property-rights issues. It bleeds into Squatters’ Rights, which are an intriguing loophole, but one that real estate developers would lobby against fiercely. There could be tax or monetary incentives for property owners to use vacant housing for that purpose, however, and if the property is having trouble being sold or rented, any income is better than none. That would bring up issues of who pays the utilities, etc. But if these properties, say an apartment building, could be zoned to allow these homeless people to set up businesses, art galleries, etc., and an awareness campaign was launched to show the surrounding community what these people are producing, it could give these people dignity and maybe launch a new inner-city renaissance movement.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt: Being a Geoist/Land Value Taxation advocate, I especially appreciate a question such as this. Access to shelter should be among the more enshrined “Humane Rights” as we approach the 21st Century’s Anniversary of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Existing property laws and dynamics incentivize rent-seeking behaviors and sitting on the most undervalued properties until a sizable profit can be realized. The Geoist policies I would advocate for would break up incentives which currently allow many properties to sit vacant until owners could realize often exorbitant returns on them. By instead annually/periodically charging an open-market, auction-derived, Location Value-based fee, such speculative and monopolistic tendencies would disappear. Such a “Single Tax” is also envisioned to be sufficient to fund all needed government functions in lieu of any other form of taxation, and the wealth freed up for other good uses would be enormously impactful. How about teaching the differently housed to operate and supervise the construction of Auxiliary Dwelling Units at some existing properties as a condition of using those vacant properties? The tooling to create structures through large-format 3D printing could be potentially loaned out from a community tool library. It would be a win/win in terms of upskilling our underused human resources as well as adding location value to such existing properties. In my estimation, about half of the unhoused population are victimized by adverse economic circumstances, and the other half are basically pursuing a lifestyle choice of something like “urban adventure camping” and have mostly abandoned the level of personal and social responsibility normally expected. Emergency housing for the “adventure camper” cohort of the unhoused is hence likely to initially be very problematic.

***

Question 8 – From Jason Geringer: Would the candidates support reaching out and putting together a panel of experts on A.I. and then even possibly reach out and meet with the new A.I. czar Kamala Harris?

Response from Candidate Tom Ross: Of course. Any opportunity to work with and educate the current administration about the issues the Technological Singularity will bring would be very productive. It would be the perfect opportunity to make my case for a new Cabinet Seat, The Singularity Secretary. These issues are serious and urgent and we shouldn’t let our feelings about either party get in the way of solutions.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt: We Transhumanists can be proud of our open and welcoming big tent… big enough for all with the “future forward” grey matter to appreciate proactive discussions about it. We are here on behalf of all those who seek to figure out our better future, and how to not only survive it, but to thrive, but to make it one of flourishing abundance. We should be eager to work with any parties that share our concerns and analysis of the need to be proactive about the “Future Surge.”

***

Question / Comment 9 – From Mike Lezine: It would be great to talk to these people on YouTube who act like AI like Sophia the Robot is 666 or “The Sign of the Beast”. Nonsense.

Response from Candidate Tom Ross: Agreed. And I have appeared on podcasts and in radio interviews with Conspiracy Theorists who see AI and Transhumanism just as you say. It’s absolutely necessary to engage with the people and although many are in a conspiracy loop that cannot be unspun; you can redirect some of them away from this narrative and convince others that we’re not the enemy.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt: It often seems there is no indoctrinated person quite like those indoctrinated with theologically based ideas. Questions of faith do not seemingly follow the rules of courtroom evidence standards or accepted methods of scientific falsification. Often, in such cases, the best that can be hoped for is a non-violent level of coexistence, and the ability for the representatives of conflicting positions to gain or lose allies in the free-est marketplace of ideas that civilized discourse and open society can provide.

***

Question 10 – From Sophia’s Roulette:
Mr. Ross touched on his view on abortion. Is it possible to get a more comprehensive answer from both candidates?

Response from Candidate Tom Ross: It’s a very difficult issue, and it’s important to have empathy for both sides of it. Pro-Life advocates believe doctors are murdering babies and my G*d, what could be worse than that? Pro-Choice advocates know it is the most difficult choice a would-be mother could ever make but believe it is her right to do so. If it were my choice, and I’m a man so it never would be so it doesn’t matter. The only position I can take as an American Citizen is to look to the U.S. Constitution, specifically the 14th Amendment. Its opening sentence reads, “All persons BORN or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” Since this is a political issue, we must heed the wording of the Constitution. An unborn child is not a Citizen and therefore has no rights. The mother, however, does.

Response from Candidate Daniel Twedt:
Thank you for the question, Sophia’s Roulette. Although there are passionate and persuasive arguments on both sides of this most divisive of issues, in the near term it is unlikely to be wholly solved to the satisfaction of either extreme of the spectrum. While I do tend to support life-saving efforts for all life, including pre-born humans, society will hopefully remain receptive to newer developing options such as ectogenesis which have the potential to allow a developing human life to continue apart from a potential carrier of an unwanted pregnancy. Until this is more available and perfected, the most primary say in the outcome of a pregnancy must continue to be primarily vested with the highest regard to the health outcomes and choices of the mother, in whose body the fetus is an entity whose massively dependent status may not always be a welcome or desired one.

Thanks for the thoughtful questions from everyone and the opportunity to ever-better refine my policy positions which I hope will well accord with my well-loved USTP affiliation.


Stay tuned for the Electronic Primary vote that will occur in mid-May 2023 for the USTP Members to decide upon the candidate whom the USTP will endorse for the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election. Make sure that you have joined as a member for free before the start of the voting period so that you are eligible to vote in the Electronic Primary.

A Transhumanist “Minimum Effective Dose” for Humanitarian Needs – Article by Zach Richardson

A Transhumanist “Minimum Effective Dose” for Humanitarian Needs – Article by Zach Richardson

April 15, 2023 Zach Richardson Comments 2 comments


























Zach Richardson


Editor’s Note: This article is my direct response to Mr. Arroyo’s article “The Class Struggle of Longevity“, where I argue for what I would consider a less-costly intervention to the problem of hunger raised first in Mr. Arroyo’s article. The reader is welcomed to join this important and ongoing conversation in our Discord server, which can be accessed here.
~ Zach Richardson, Director of Publication, United States Transhumanist Party, April 15, 2023

In medicine, practitioners sometimes use the acronym MED, which stands for “minimum effective dose”. This is the smallest amount of a substance needed to provide a clinically significant response that is also statistically significant. Keep that term in mind for me.

In Mr. Arroyo’s paper, the number of people cited to be dying of hunger per day in his first source is 25,000, but I could not see how that source calculated this number. Checking the World Food Programme’s website, they did have some calculations, which suggested a daily number of hunger deaths between 8,000 and 19,000. [1]

This is still too many people dying of hunger, and a response is obviously urgently needed, but in contrast to Mr. Arroyo, I do not believe that shifting the world’s economy to communism from capitalism is the appropriate response. In fact, the countries which have the strongest market freedoms are not the ones that are starving.

Let’s take a look at where these hungry reside: Ethiopia, Somalia, Yemen, South Sudan, and Afghanistan.

What do these nations have in common? The inclusion of Yemen and Afghanistan tells us that it’s not an Africa problem. In fact, there are several countries in Sub-Saharan Africa that are not doing that badly, Botswana being a prime example, as was shown to me once in this (older) infographic. [2]

I’d like to share something with the reader called the “Index of Economic Freedom”, which ranks countries by 12 factors, which are broadly grouped into four categories [3]:

1. Rule of Law (property rights, judicial effectiveness, government integrity)

2. Government Size (tax burden, government spending, fiscal health)

3. Regulatory Efficiency (business freedom, labor freedom, monetary freedom)

4. Market Openness (trade freedom, investment freedom, financial freedom)

All countries were ranked on these 12 factors, and all countries were ranked in order, a straightforward numbered list from “best” to “worst”.

The countries at the top of this list all turned out to be countries where it is pretty nice to live, countries where people aren’t starving to death every day.

The reader may be surprised to find that the U.S. was not near the top of this list, was barely in the top septile, and was quite outclassed by the Nordic countries, which are often paradoxically paraded as socialist success stories. (The U.S. was ranked #25, while Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Norway were 9-12, respectively.) [4]

Where then, would we find our previously mentioned countries, the ones where the starving to death is happening? Well, out of 176 countries, Ethiopia was ranked #155, Sudan was ranked #173. Afghanistan, Somalia, and Yemen were so far removed from the above factors that there was not even enough data to rank them.

For this reason, in contrast to Mr. Arroyo, I would disagree that markets are the problem leading to poverty; I would suggest that they are more likely to be a solution.

But market development takes time – time that these dying people do not have, and time which we need to spend most effectively. Focusing our efforts on those smallest interventions (therefore to cause the least friction/resistance from those powers which could implement them, and also the least expensive) which would have the largest result would logically be the best course of action. What would these interventions be?

Well, in 2008, a group of Nobel-prize-winning economists were tasked with finding these “MED” approaches that would focus specifically on implementing what are referred to by the U.N. as the “SDGs”, or Sustainable Development Goals, prime among which was eradicating poverty and hunger. The question posed was: “Considering the world has finite resources, if an extra $75 billion were to be allocated for the SDGs, where would it be spent most effectively? Where would humanity get the best ‘bang for its buck’?”

These economists found an interesting solution: free vitamins. It turns out that most of these deaths of hunger were actually deaths of malnutrition, in particular Vitamin A, zinc, iodine, and iron. [5]  It’s not just a lack of calories that these victims of hunger are suffering from, it’s a lack of nutrients. More interestingly, these economists noted this simple intervention would actually have a significant return on investment (ROI): deficiencies in these vitamins and nutrients cause lack of development in the hippocampus, affecting these children’s future capacity to contribute effectively to the economy.

In more recent congregations of these economic experts, other suggestions included investment in agricultural research, and even an increase in food production (despite the global food surplus, extra is still needed to offset the  effects of climate change). They also suggest improving the economy by improving access to cell phones so these small-scale farmers have better access to markets to trade their products, and also buy cheap fertilizers, such as nitrogen, phosphate, and potash, and also significant public investment in producing local fertilizer plants, which could then sell fertilizer to farmers.

Another current solution comes again from the amazing technology of the cell phone. Reuters currently sends text messages to these small-scale farmers including growing advice, up-to-date and location-specific weather forecasts (!!), local price information, and information to access international commodities markets.

These economic interventions, some public and some private, could be considered the Minimum Effective Dose to both reduce death and improve cognitive function: two extremely Transhumanist goals – Transhumanist bang-for-your-buck.

One will note that we are gaining significant transhumanist benefits with an intervention that would cause much less friction (and is therefore more likely, and realistic) than overthrowing society, and which also carries much less risk.

Longevity and immortality are in our grasp, and it is true that the rich will first get these benefits. However, just like how in 1987’s Wall Street, even Gordon Gekko had a now-ridiculous-looking mini-TV accessible only to the ultra-wealthy, and how now even these poorest of the poor are benefiting from the rapid spread of the cell phone throughout global society, immortality technology will, too, spread to all who desire it, and if our goal is a humanitarian one, the MED is to bring markets to the countries that are starving.

Zach Richardson is the Director of Publication for the U.S. Transhumanist Party. Find out more about him here. 

[1] Action Against Hunger et al. “Humanitarian organisations estimate one person dying of hunger every four seconds”. September 20, 2022. https://reliefweb.int/report/world/humanitarian-organisations-estimate-one-person-dying-hunger-every-four-seconds

[2] “A Story of Two Neighbors: Botswana vs. Zimbabwe, Stats”. Reddit. March 31, 2018. https://www.reddit.com/r/Floathouse/comments/88gay9/a_story_of_two_neighbors_botswana_vs_zimbabwe/

[3] “The 12 Economic Freedoms: Policies for Lasting Progress and Prosperity”. The Heritage Foundation. 2023 Index of Economic Freedom. https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2023/book/02_2023_IndexofEconomicFreedom_12-ECONOMIC-FREEDOMS.pdf

[4] The Heritage Foundation. 2023 Index of Economic Freedom. Country Rankings. https://www.heritage.org/index/ranking

[5] Copenhagen Consensus 2008 – Results. https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/sites/default/files/cc08_results_final_0.pdf

[6] “Third Copenhagen Consensus: Hunger and Malnutrition Assessment, Hoddinott Rosegrant Torero”. Copenhagen Consensus Center.  https://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/publication/third-copenhagen-consensus-hunger-and-malnutrition-assessment-hoddinott-rosegrant

The Class Struggle of Longevity – Article by Luis Arroyo

The Class Struggle of Longevity – Article by Luis Arroyo

April 15, 2023 Luis Arroyo Comments 1 comment


























Luis Arroyo


Editor’s Note: The United States Transhumanist Party publishes this call to action by long-standing member Luis Arroyo. Mr. Arroyo is an active and passionate voice in the USTP Discord server, advocating consistently for the needs and interests of the working class. He often argues that if we are looking to solve aging and death, we would get more bang for our buck by focusing on the neediest, as interventions such as better housing and nutrition could save many more lives – the core essence of Transhumanism.

~ Zach Richardson, Director of Publication, United States Transhumanist Party, April 15, 2023


When observing present society, an undeniable feature is inequality. This feature, stemming from the very core of Capitalism flows through many sectors of life and society. Showcasing itself within horrid and needless realities such as the amount of food produced [1] and the 25,000 people who die per day due to hunger [2], the number of vacant homes [3], and the number of homeless people [4], or the one billion people without shoes while civilization produces enough to give three pairs to every human being [5]. Disparities of such sorts exist everywhere within society and are inevitable with the emergence of new industries and fields. Longevity-related industries and fields are no exception.

Nothing is preventing great disparities from emerging within longevity fields, serving only to deepen dystopian conditions represented best by the differences in life expectancy of the “haves and have-nots”. This void of impending regulation and overall guarantee of a market approach allows those like the Chairman of the United States Transhumanist Party, a prominent political party within the Transhumanist community, to state, “Naturally, the first few customers of these treatments are going to be people who can afford them, i.e., the wealthy. However, this initial stage is quite necessary for the technology to develop and eventually diffuse to the rest of the population. The wealthy individuals who are trying out the technologies at first are actually taking on a rather extraordinary level of risk” [6]. This highlights that nothing escapes the grasp of inequality if left to the market even to the advocates of such a system.

The subsequent implication of this is the wealthy will soon be able to “buy time” through early accessibility to expensive longevity treatments, leaving the rest of the masses to be killed by their deadliest foe, aging, which already takes 100,000 people per day [7] with sights of increasing as populations age evermore. Transhumanists and their allies, in realizing this impending disparity, should work to combat the mechanisms and roots of inequality in an effort to see longevity treatments offered to all people no matter their income levels, race, gender, location, etc.

Unfortunately, with the timeframe presented by none other than Jeff Bezos’s Altos Labs – more specifically, Juan Carlos Izpisua, who stated, “I am convinced that within two decades we will have tools that not only treat symptoms, but also can predict, prevent and treat diseases and aging through cellular rejuvenation” [8]. The possibility of having a “gods & the useless” situation between the Capitalist class and the Working class in less than 25 years is no longer far-fetched.

The forthcoming situation is seen as a miracle to some, albeit, when looked through a rose-colored lens; however for most it’s the beginning of a type of society not experienced by any other humans in history, signified by a couple of handfuls or so of wealthy and powerful individuals receiving longevity treatments and thus living on whilst the majority die out in droves – a future that must be rejected and worked against by all Transhumanists!

[1] Holt-Giménez, Eric & Shattuck, Annie & Altieri, Miguel & Herren, Hans & Gliessman, Steve. (2012). We Already Grow Enough Food for 10 Billion People … and Still Can’t End Hunger. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture – J SUSTAINABLE AGR. 36. 595-598. 10.1080/10440046.2012.695331. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241746569_We_Already_Grow_Enough_Food_for_10_Billion_People_and_Still_Can%27t_End_Hunger

[2] John Holmes. “Losing 25,000 to Hunger Every Day”. United Nations. UN Chronicle. https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/losing-25000-hunger-every-day#:~:text=Each%20day%2C%2025%2C000%20people%2C%20including,million%20into%20poverty%20and%20hunger. Excerpt: “Each day, 25,000 people, including more than 10,000 children, die from hunger and related causes. Some 854 million people worldwide are estimated to be undernourished, and high food prices may drive another 100 million into poverty and hunger.”

[3] Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. “Housing Inventory Estimate: Vacant Housing Units in the United States”. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/EVACANTUSQ176N

[4] National Alliance to End Homelessness. “State of Homelessness: 2022 Edition”. https://endhomelessness.org/homelessness-in-america/homelessness-statistics/state-of-homelessness-2021/

[5] The Tricontinental. “Solely Because of the Increasing Disorder: The Thirty-Sixth Newsletter (2021)”.  https://thetricontinental.org/newsletterissue/36-poverty/

[6] Gennady Stolyarov II. “Life Extension Will Not Create an Immortal Wealthy Elite”. Immortalists Magazine, Issue 2. February 2020. https://www.flipsnack.com/BDEAACF6AED/im-feb-2020/full-view.html

[7] Aubrey D.N.J. de Grey. “Life Span Extension Research and Public Debate: Societal Considerations”. 2007. https://web.archive.org/web/20161013163622/http://www.sens.org/files/pdf/ENHANCE-PP.pdf

[8] Manuel Ansede. “Juan Carlos Izpisua: ‘Within two decades, we will be able to prevent diseases and aging’”.  El Pais. March 8, 2022. https://english.elpais.com/science-tech/2022-03-08/juan-carlos-izpisua-within-two-decades-we-will-be-able-to-prevent-aging.html

U.S. Transhumanist Party Call for 2024 Presidential Candidates and Outline of 2023 Endorsement and Primary Process

U.S. Transhumanist Party Call for 2024 Presidential Candidates and Outline of 2023 Endorsement and Primary Process

April 9, 2023 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov II


The United States Transhumanist Party (USTP) issues its call for candidates wishing to run for President of the United States in the 2024 election and seeking an endorsement from the USTP. Candidates are encouraged to officially announce their intentions via this form and then spread awareness of the USTP, its forthcoming debate and primary process, and possibilities for individuals to sign up for free membership in the USTP in time to participate as voters in this process.

Because of the formidable hurdles to political-party ballot access on the State level, the candidates seeking the USTP’s endorsement would need to officially run as independent candidates. However, if those candidates qualify for inclusion on their States’ ballots, then, in approximately half of the jurisdictions in the United States, it would be possible to use a “political party designation” of “Transhumanist Party” to accompany the candidate’s name on the ballot.

Endorsement and Electronic Primary Process – Anticipated Timeline

The following timeline is approximate and subject to change as circumstances may necessitate. However, it is intended to provide an overarching impression of the sequence and desirable speed of steps for reaching an endorsement of a candidate for President of the United States.

– April 9 – May 1, 2023: Candidates declare their intention to seek the USTP Presidential endorsement and begin to campaign through channels of their choosing (online and/or in person) to attract supporters and spread awareness of their messages.

– May 6, 2023: Transhumanist Presidential Candidate Roundtable (Virtual) [Multiple Candidate Roundtables are possible depending on the number of candidates who declare their interest.]

– May 15 – June 15, 2023 [Specific days to be decided based on the number of candidates who declare their interest]: Electronic ranked-preference primary (7-day voting period, simultaneous for all USTP members).

– June 15-30, 2023: Votes from the electronic primary are tabulated and released. The candidate winning the USTP endorsement is announced simultaneously with the release of the results.

– July 1, 2023 – November 5, 2024: The candidate winning the USTP endorsement continues to campaign until Election Day 2024. The other candidates may seek the USTP’s endorsement for other federal, state, or local offices and/or assist the winning candidate.

– Early September 2023: Potential for the candidate winning the USTP endorsement to deliver an official acceptance speech in a venue with a large number of attendees.

U.S. Presidential Candidate Qualifications and Expectations

Qualifications Pursuant to the United States Constitution

Pursuant to Article 2, Section 1, of the United States Constitution, to be eligible to become President of the United States, the candidate must:

(1) Be at least 35 years old as of January 20, 2025 (i.e., born on or before January 20, 1990);

(2) Be a natural-born citizen of the United States; and

(3) Have been a resident of the United States for at least 14 years.

The USTP considers the existence of the above restrictions unfortunate, as they could disqualify many otherwise fine candidates. However, in the absence of a Constitutional Amendment, they are insurmountable during the 2024 election season.

Qualifications Pursuant to the Constitution of the United States Transhumanist Party

Pursuant to Article VII, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States Transhumanist Party, in order to be eligible to become endorsed by the United States Transhumanist Party as a candidate for any local, state, or federal political office, an individual must satisfy the following criteria.

(i) The individual satisfies the minimum qualifications pursuant to applicable law for holding the office for which the individual seeks to run.

(ii) The individual has never committed any violent crime. A violent crime includes physical injury or destruction inflicted upon any person. A violent crime also includes physical damage or destruction inflicted upon property. As used in this subsection, the term “violent crime” includes but is not necessarily limited to the following: murder, manslaughter, rape, human trafficking, domestic violence, robbery, assault, battery, looting, arson, and rioting.

(iii) The individual has never committed any financial crime which had any victim, including but not limited to fraud, embezzlement, theft, cybercrime, or financing of violent or criminal groups.

(iv) The individual has never engaged in documented acts of cyberbullying, cyber-harassment, or intentional spreading of false accusations against another individual online.

(v) The individual has never engaged in acts understood to be of a highly unacceptable nature within every contemporary agricultural, industrial, or post-industrial society. The Officers of the United States Transhumanist Party shall maintain an internal list identifying such highly unacceptable practices, engaging in which or advocating which would be considered an automatic disqualification for holding any office within or receiving any endorsement from the United States Transhumanist Party.

(vi) The individual has never engaged in acts which are understood by the Officers of the United States Transhumanist Party to have been undertaken by that individual primarily for the purposes of generating shock value or for transgression for the sake of transgression.

(vii) The individual must agree to participate in any process designated by the Officers of the United States Transhumanist Party for the determination of whether or not that individual may be endorsed as a candidate and to respect the outcome of that process, no matter whether or not that individual is ultimately endorsed as a candidate.

(viii) The individual must agree to work collaboratively with the United States Transhumanist Party during the campaign season and not to disparage the United States Transhumanist Party as well as not to work contrary to the interests and goals of the United States Transhumanist Party during that time.

(ix) The individual must never have disparaged the United States Transhumanist Party or any of its current Officers in good standing within any written publication or public video or audio recording. This criterion does not, however, preclude constructive criticism, and a reasonable-person test shall be used to differentiate constructive criticism from disparagement.

(x) The individual must commit to running for office as a candidate endorsed by the United States Transhumanist Party until the conclusion of the election in which the individual seeks to be a candidate.

(xi) The individual must have never reneged on a prior commitment to run for office as a candidate endorsed by the United States Transhumanist Party until the conclusion of the election in which the individual sought to be a candidate.

(xii) The individual must never have falsely alleged any electoral malfeasance on the part of the United States Transhumanist Party.

(xiii) The individual must never have undertaken or threatened to undertake any legal action or make any formal complaint to an external entity against the United States Transhumanist Party or any Officer thereof in good standing.

(xiv) The individual must express agreement with the Core Ideals of the United States Transhumanist Party as described in Article I, Section I, of this Constitution.

(xv) The policy positions of the individual should have significant areas of alignment with the United States Transhumanist Party Platform as described in Article VI of this Constitution.

(xvi) The individual must agree, in that individual’s public statements, to either (a) specifically and openly express support for transhumanism and/or life extension; or (b) specifically and openly reference the endorsement of that individual by the United States Transhumanist Party.

Expectations of the Candidate from the U.S. Transhumanist Party / Transhuman Party

(a) If officially endorsed, the candidate must commit to running for office until Election Day 2024 (November 5, 2024). During the time prior to Election Day 2024, the candidate shall not concede to or endorse another candidate from another political party. The candidate also shall not run on behalf of any other political party.

(b) Although the candidate is not obligated to either raise or spend funds, if the candidate does choose to fundraise, the candidate must agree to perform any such fundraising for the candidate’s campaign independently of the U.S. Transhumanist Party. Furthermore, any campaign committee and/or bank account established by or on behalf of the candidate must be organizationally separate from the USTP. The USTP will spread information and raise public awareness about the candidate, but the USTP would not collect or disburse funds directly. The candidate must also agree to independently comply with all campaign-finance laws and report campaign contributions and expenses in the manner required pursuant to all applicable state and federal laws. The candidate must agree that responsibility for such compliance is solely on the part of the candidate, and that, as an organization which does not finance campaigns, the USTP has no obligation nor legal liability in regard to such compliance. (The USTP may, however, at times assist the candidate by providing relevant information, as long as such assistance is understood to be non-obligatory in nature.)

(c) If officially endorsed, and if the candidate raises $5,000 or more in contributions or incurs $5,000 or more in expenditures, the candidate must agree to register as an independent candidate for President with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). Guidance pertaining to this process can be found on the FEC website here or in video form here. However, nothing obligates the candidate to either raise or spend $5,000 or more; any fundraising is at the candidate’s discretion.

(d) The candidate must agree to participate in the USTP Endorsement and Electronic Primary process as set forth herein and to respect the outcome of that process, no matter whether or not the candidate is ultimately endorsed to run for the office of President of the United States.

(e) The candidate should be in agreement with the USTP Core Ideals:

Ideal 1. The Transhumanist Party supports significant life extension achieved through the progress of science and technology.

Ideal 2. The Transhumanist Party supports a cultural, societal, and political atmosphere informed and animated by reason, science, and secular values.

Ideal 3. The Transhumanist Party supports efforts to use science, technology, and rational discourse to reduce and eliminate various existential risks to the human species.

(f) The candidate should have significant areas of alignment with the USTP Platform. While complete agreement with all positions therein is not required, and diversity of perspectives is encouraged, it should be possible for the public to clearly perceive the candidate as being closer to the USTP Platform than any given non-USTP-endorsed candidate – for instance, a Democratic, Republican, Libertarian, or Green candidate – would be.

(g) The candidate must agree to work collaboratively with the USTP during the campaign season and not to disparage the USTP as well as not to work contrary to the interests and goals of the USTP during that time.

For any questions, please e-mail Gennady Stolyarov II, Chairman of the USTP, here.

You can also complete the embedded form below to express your interest in becoming a U.S. Presidential candidate who would participate in the USTP Endorsement and Electronic Primary Process:

Universal Sign Language – Transhuman / Transhumanism / Transhumanist – Post by Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.

Universal Sign Language – Transhuman / Transhumanism / Transhumanist – Post by Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.

March 23, 2023 Art Ramon Garcia, Jr. Comments 0 Comment


























Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.


USL-Transhuman / Transhumanism / Transhumanist

Before I joined as Director of Visual Art, back in November 2015, I created the sign for Transhuman/Transhumanism/Transhumanist.

After reading an article on Queen Silvia of Sweden and learning of her use and promotion of Swedish Sign Language, I contacted her via an email form on the official Swedish Monarchy profile, suggesting to her that she implement a Universal Sign Language program that crowdsourced the best signs by upvoting, while leveraging the site https://www.spreadthesign.com/ to be its main repository. I also suggested that Universal Sign Language be taught to all Swedish children and that she work to promote its worldwide use.

While many in the Deaf community did not appreciate my suggestions, I continue to remind the Deaf community that advancing technology will only make the signing community smaller to the point of extinction.

Promoting a worldwide Universal Sign Language ensures the signing community does not deplete to unsustainable levels and that future-enhanced humans have a universal fall-back language in case of technological failure of a high-bandwidth Universal Thought Language that does not use verbal or written forms.

Art Ramon Garcia, Jr., is the Vice-Chairman of the U.S. Transhumanist Party during March – June 2023 and the USTP Director of Visual Art. Read more about him here. 

The Anti-Aging Manifesto by Mat Alex Richards

The Anti-Aging Manifesto by Mat Alex Richards

March 18, 2023 Mat Alex Richards Comments 0 Comment


























Mat Alex Richards


Editor’s Note: The United States Transhumanist Party publishes this manifesto by Mat Alex Richards as a statement which is aligned with our Core Ideal 1, which holds that “The Transhumanist Party supports significant life extension achieved through the progress of science and technology.” Mr. Richards eloquently emphasizes the imperative to combat biological aging and prevent our own non-existence, instead achieving lives of open-ended duration and potential. 
~ Gennady Stolyarov II, Chairman, United States Transhumanist Party, March 18, 2023

We must demand a total mobilization of humanity for the extension of healthy life:

Declare biology as a priority science. Train biologists en masse, build laboratories, declare war on death, make lots of people aware of that – as many people as possible.

I am; that’s enough for me. I am, I want to continue to be, to be as I am, better than I am if possible.

Aging and death are abominable. And we accept it. Denying it won’t solve this essential matter. We think of something else.  We fight. We eat, we work, we love, we hate, we philosophize, we hope to leave a name in the dictionary for some, we adorn our minds.

We lie to each other. We lie to ourselves.

The truth is this: any life that knows it must end is just an agony.

We have consciousness. We know that no longer being, when one was, is the worst thing, the only real curse.

We could only observe, and submit. We had no way to act on the duration of our existence. For millennia.

We followed along the scientific grind, without this question having more importance than thousands of others; whereas it is the question, the only essential one, the one on which all the others depend.

There is no doubt that humanity will come to know the vital mechanisms well enough to suppress aging, that is to say, to prolong life, and even, theoretically – I mean barring accidents – to prolong it indefinitely.

The objections, who cares. We’ll see when we get there. The stakes are enormous for me, for you, for your loved ones, for everybody. No delay… No putting off.

It is impermissible, given the change, to let it pass.

Life is too short compared to what humans can do. Aim high. What has a limit, a predictable limit,  is always too short. When one is existing, it is too stupid not to exist one day. Too stupid, that’s it.

Today, all that can change.

All of this needs to change and will change. 

The question is: Do you want to be in the game?

Do you want to be in the most important human adventure ever?

Do you want to participate and make it happen faster?

The goal is to remain alive and healthy as much as we want.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Makiko Yoshioka – June 5, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Makiko Yoshioka – June 5, 2022

February 7, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Makiko Yoshioka
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg
Jose Cordeiro
Didier Coeurnelle


On June 5, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Makiko Yoshioka to discuss her research on the health and legal impacts of transhumanism. She provided a comparative analysis of the situations in regard to the influence of transhumanism on the health and legal realms in Japan and the European Union. She especially offered insights on transhumanism’s reception in Japan,  where robotics have been warmly welcomed, while there has been more apprehension about merging with technology.

Makiko Yoshioka is a graduate student at Paris 8 University, specializing in health law with a focus on digital and AI systems. She provided an overview of her research in these areas and discussed potential future directions for that research.

She plans to analyze how transhumanism is going to develop in the field of health care, including how to protect human rights. She will compare and contrast the prospects in Japan and France (and the European Union more generally) for technological advances such as exoskeletons, humanoid robots, and nanorobots. Some additional topics will be: (1) procreation and longevity; (2) how medical treatment for heavy sicknesses such as cancer and neurodegenerative diseases will influence human rights and civil law (such as contract law) and the medical responsibility of doctors and other healthcare workers; and (3) how the position of the “human” will be influenced and modified by relations among transhumanists, “classic humans”, and humanoid robot beings.

In 2022 Makiko Yoshioka had also begun working for Heales – The Healthy Life Extension Society.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Mark Hamalainen – June 12, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Mark Hamalainen – June 12, 2022

February 6, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Mark Hamalainen
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
David Shumaker
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg
Jose Cordeiro


On June 12, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Mark Hamalainen to discuss the newly formed LessDeath organization and its inaugural Longevity Summer Camp, happening during July 20-24, 2022, in Nevada City, California.

Mark explained his background in the longevity field, and how the shift of the bottleneck from money to talent prompted him to change his focus from doing the science himself to motivating others to pursue it.

Mark Hamalainen is the Founder of LessDeath and former Director of Science at Synthego. He studied Biology at University of Cambridge, where he received a Master of Philosophy (MPhil) degree.

References

LessDeath website.

“LessDeath Presents the Longevity Summer Camp” – Article on spannr.

LessDeath LinkedIn Page.

LessDeath Twitter Account.

***

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana – June 19, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana – June 19, 2022

February 6, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana
Gennady Stolyarov II
David Shumaker
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg


On June 19, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party spoke with Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana regarding his initiatives with the World Talent Economy Forum and his efforts to reach numerous talented minds throughout the developing world and enable them to work on advancing emerging technologies and implementing policies that are aligned with the goals of the U.S. Transhumanist Party.

Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana is the founder of the World Talent Economy Forum and the Director of Foreign Relations for the U.S. Transhumanist Party. Read more about him.

World Talent Economy Forum.

World Talent Economy Forum YouTube channel.

Advances in Nikola Tesla Technologies in the 21st Century – World Talent Economy Forum Conference.

World Talent Economy Forum Debate on Artificial Intelligence – December 24, 2021

World Talent Economy Forum Debate on Space Colonization – December 31, 2021

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Kai Micah Mills – June 26, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Kai Micah Mills – June 26, 2022

February 6, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Kai Micah Mills
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Charlie Kam
David Shumaker
Ben Ballweg
Jason Geringer
Dr. Jose Cordeiro


On June 26, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Kai Micah Mills to discuss Cryopets, his early-stage startup developing whole-body cryopreservation for mammals, as well as his more general thoughts on the potential for advancements in the field of cryonics and the kinds of efforts that will be needed to accelerate the spread of cryopreservation as an available and widely sought-after option.

Kai Micah Mills is the Founder and CEO of Cryopets and a serial entrepreneur and angel investor.

Website of Kai Micah Mills.

Website of Cryopets.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

Transhuman Club Launch – U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon – July 3, 2022

Transhuman Club Launch – U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon – July 3, 2022

February 6, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
David Shumaker
Anthony Nielsen


On July 3, 2022, this special Virtual Enlightenment Salon introduced the website of the Transhuman Club – the non-political affiliate organization of the U.S. Transhumanist Party.

The Transhuman Club website includes embedded Virtual Enlightenment Salon videos, a forum, a member education section, member login functionality and member-only features, as well as transhumanist-themed art and animations throughout.

USTP Legislative Director Jason Geringer designed the Transhuman Club website, and he provided a walkthrough that demonstrated its key features.

All members of the United States Transhumanist Party receive automatic, free membership in the Transhuman Club. However, anyone who joins the Transhuman Club directly may choose or not choose to be a member of the United States Transhumanist Party. The Transhuman Club website is intended to be a hub of member collaboration, networking, and elevated enjoyment in a refined futuristic setting. We aim to educate, motivate, and entertain. Welcome to the club!

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

Debate: Should US/NATO Support Immediate Negotiated Peace in Ukraine? – Nathan Boyd & Maty Aksenton – July 10, 2022

Debate: Should US/NATO Support Immediate Negotiated Peace in Ukraine? – Nathan Boyd & Maty Aksenton – July 10, 2022

February 2, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Nathan Boyd
Maty Aksenton
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer


On July 10, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party presented a debate on how to best resolve the ongoing war in Ukraine.

The key question debated was “Should the United States and NATO support an immediate negotiated peace settlement in Ukraine (even if it means that Ukraine would need to concede territory to Russia and/or promise never to join NATO)?”

Nathan Boyd argued in favor of this proposition, while Maty Aksenton argued against it. Some of the debate addressed the existential risk arising from the conflict in Ukraine. The judges, Jason Geringer and Art Ramon Garcia, raised considerations that included the implications of a potential Republican majority in Congress in November 2022, as well as how the dynamic would change if Ukraine acquired nuclear weapons.

Nathan Boyd earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Biology with a 3.98 GPA and was Laboratory Coordinator/Manager for the Science Department at Birmingham Southern College for 11.5 years after getting his degree. He also holds Chemical Engineering, Math, and Pre-Med Associate’s Degrees.

Maty Aksenton is a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science and Multidisciplinary Studies from the Departments of Humanities and Social Sciences at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

As with all USTP Virtual Enlightenment Salons, the foremost goal is for this to be a learning experience that helps improve the participants’ and audience’s understanding of effective solutions to some of the most pressing issues facing humankind. Thus, this broader educational purpose was emphasized to a greater extent than winning.

For a more in-depth discussion of the existential-risk implications of the war in Ukraine, watch the Virtual Enlightenment Salon on “2022: The Year of the Great Filter” – the essay by USTP Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

Transhumanist Party / World Talent Economy Forum Debates: AI and Space Colonization – December 24 and 31, 2021

Transhumanist Party / World Talent Economy Forum Debates: AI and Space Colonization – December 24 and 31, 2021

February 2, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana
David Smith
Donald Steiny
Marshall Mermell
Rob Enderle
Tom Ross
Paul Beckwith
Gennady Stolyarov II


The U.S. Transhumanist Party presented this special Virtual Enlightenment Salon as a collaboration with the World Talent Economy Forum, whose host, Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana, moderated two debates in the Asian Parliamentary format on artificial intelligence and space colonization on December 24 and 31, 2021. Here we provided key portions of both debates in sequence to give our viewers a glimpse into these unique and thoughtful intellectual exchanges.

First Debate – Artificial Intelligence – December 24, 2021

Resolution: “This House believes that humanity should fear advances in artificial intelligence”.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II served as the leader of the Opposition to the motion; it was as if the Transhumanist Party were the leading opposition party in a parliamentary system and had the occasion to rebut the Prime Minister’s (Rob Enderle’s) case for fearing AI. The “government” side was represented by Rob Enderle, Donald Steiny, and Marshall Mermell. The “opposition” side (those who disagreed with fearing AI) was represented by Gennady Stolyarov II, David Smith, and Tom Ross (USTP Director of Sentient Rights Advocacy). At the conclusion of the debate, analysis of the issues was provided by Professor Paul Beckwith.

Second Debate – Space Colonization – December 31, 2021

Resolution: “This House believes that humans should invest in technology to explore and colonize other planets.”

Since its performance at the previous debate on artificial intelligence, the Transhumanist Party was able to make its way from the opposition to the government and presented a staunchly pro-space-colonization policy agenda, defending the motion, “Humans should invest in technology to explore and colonize other planets”. Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II made the opening argument for the motion, in the role of the Honorable Prime Minister, with Andreas Melhede and Professor Paul Beckwith providing supporting arguments in subsequent speeches. On the side of the opposition were Rob Enderle, Donald Steiny, and Marshall Mermell. After the debate, the participants received feedback from the esteemed Jordanian politician Dr. Taleb Rifai, the previous Secretary-General of the United Nations World Tourism Organization (you want to hear what he has to say!) as well as from the USTP’s Director of Applied Innovation, David Shumaker.

Watch the U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Sharif Uddin Ahmed Rana, streamed on June 19, 2022.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

The First 3 Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salons – Highlights (2017-2018)

The First 3 Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salons – Highlights (2017-2018)

February 2, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov II
Bill Andrews
Bobby Ridge
Scott Jurgens
Mihoko Sekido


Step back in time to the early Enlightenment Salons of the U.S. Transhumanist Party, originally hosted in person by Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II. This stream combines the majority of the first three Enlightenment Salons, discussing subjects such as prosthetics, brain-computer interfaces, life extension, transhumanist advocacy, artificial intelligence, health, fitness, and more.

First Enlightenment Salon – September 17, 2017

Gennady Stolyarov II, Bobby Ridge, Scott Jurgens

U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II spoke with Bobby Ridge and Scott Jurgens regarding their areas of interest in research and study. Topics addressed include emerging advances in prosthetics, orthotics, 3D printing, 3D scanning, the science behind neuroplasticity, brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), artificial intelligence, and the societal implications of these technologies – including the extent to which they, combined with a universal basic income, may facilitate increased self-actualization by more people.

Second Enlightenment Salon – November 11, 2017

Gennady Stolyarov II, Bill Andrews, Bobby Ridge, Scott Jurgens

U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II invited Dr. Bill Andrews (the U.S. Transhumanist Party’s Biotechnology Advisor), Bobby Ridge, and Scott Jurgens to his Second Enlightenment Salon, where they shared their thoughts on emerging life-extension research, advances in prosthetics and orthotics, philosophy of science, brain-computer interfaces, and how technologies from a variety of fields are converging to bring about a paradigm shift in the human condition – hopefully within the coming decades.

Third Enlightenment Salon – May 27, 2018

Gennady Stolyarov II, Bill Andrews, Bobby Ridge, Mihoko Sekido

The Third Enlightenment Salon featured excellent conversations on the rise in public awareness of transhumanism and life extension and what can be done to further increase support for life-extending medical research. Dr. Bill Andrews, Bobby Ridge, and Mihoko Sekido shared insights on medical science, promotion of health, and methods of communicating the forthcoming convergence of advances in a wide array of technological fields. Importantly, they addressed how anyone can get involved in the transhumanist movement and improve public acceptance of the emerging technological future.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Fred Zhang of LongevityDAO – July 31, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Fred Zhang of LongevityDAO – July 31, 2022

February 2, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Fred Zhang, PhD
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
Jose Cordeiro, PhD, MBA
Bill Andrews, PhD


On July 31, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Fred Zhang, the founder of LongevityDAO, to discuss his team’s efforts in promoting organizations focused on longevity and transhumanism.

LongevityDAO is a decentralized autonomous organization that uses crypto mechanisms to support longevity, one organization at a time. Its first campaign is for Tomorrow Biostasis, a European cryopreservation service. Its next campaign is for Lifespan.io, the Life Extension Advocacy Foundation, which is an allied organization to the USTP. Find out more about LongevityDAO.

Fred Zhang graduated from Harvard University with a Bachelor’s Degree in Mathematics and a PhD in Economics. He is a serial entrepreneur and the founder of Freedom Equity Properties and co-founder of PrepScholar and the Medical Funding and Longevity Web3 Company.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

 

U.S. Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salon on CureDAO: Lukas Vogel, Andreas Melhede, Mike P. Sinn – August 7, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salon on CureDAO: Lukas Vogel, Andreas Melhede, Mike P. Sinn – August 7, 2022

February 2, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Lukas Sebastian Vogel
Andreas Melhede
Mike P. Sinn
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer


On August 7, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Lukas Sebastian Vogel, Andreas Melhede, and Mike P. Sinn to discuss CureDAO, their open-source platform that monetizes user data to show how millions of factors like foods, drugs, and supplements affect human health. The prior 10 years saw an explosion in the amount of health data and innovation, promising to revolutionize human health and well-being. However, they produced no measurable gains in disease cost reduction or human lifespan extension. CureDAO hopes to change this using an open-source framework in which anyone could become involved.

Visit the website of CureDAO.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salon with James Strole – Pursuing Immortality – August 14, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salon with James Strole – Pursuing Immortality – August 14, 2022

February 2, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























James Strole
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
Edward Hudgins, PhD
Bill Andrews, PhD


On August 14, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited James Strole, the Executive Director of the Coalition for Radical Life Extension and organizer of the RAAD Festival (RAADfest) for a conversation about how one can find the inner strength to support radical life extension and wage the war against aging and death during the challenging times in which we live. He and the panel shared what brought them to the fight, and what motivates them to continue.

James Strole is the Executive Director of the Coalition for Radical Life Extension, which is the producer of RAADfest, the largest global event of its kind. James is also the Co-Founder and Co-Director of People Unlimited, an organization that supports people interested in unlimited lifespans. Co-author of the book “Just Getting Started: Fifty Years of Living Forever”, James is a visionary anti-death activist and community builder who has spoken and written on radical life extension and physical immortality for over four decades. He has dedicated his life to challenging death-oriented beliefs and practices, and has coached thousands of people in living an ageless lifestyle to achieve healthier, fuller, more vibrant lives. He has appeared on numerous TV shows both domestically and abroad, and has spoken to audiences on four continents.

RAADfest 2022 was held in San Diego, California, on October 6-9, 2022. Visit the RAADfest 2022 website.

As in every year since the inception of RAADfest in 2016, the U.S. Transhumanist Party was again represented there. View the announcement of this from the U.S. Transhumanist Party.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

“Break the Rules” / U.S. Transhumanist Party Discussion on Artificial Intelligence & Transhumanism – July 1, 2022

“Break the Rules” / U.S. Transhumanist Party Discussion on Artificial Intelligence & Transhumanism – July 1, 2022

February 2, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Lev Polyakov
Chris Bartlett
Paul Town
Gennady Stolyarov II
Zach Richardson


This special joint stream on artificial intelligence and transhumanism originally aired on July 1, 2022, as part of an episode on the “Break the Rules” (BTR) show, and featured U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II, USTP Director of Publication Zach Richardson, entrepreneur and game developer Chris Bartlett, and writer Paul Town, and was hosted by Lev Polyakov of BTR. Topics addressed included recent advances in AI – such as image generation using programs such as DALL·E 2 – the future implications of AI for human creativity, transhumanism and the prospects for future merger of AI and human capabilities, a debate on life extension and the desirability thereof, the continuity of the self and the concept of I-ness, and the role of emotions and sensations as signaling mechanisms about the state of one’s life.

Join the Transhuman Club.

Find Chris Bartlett on Twitter.

Find Zach Richardson on Facebook.

Watch Break the Rules on YouTube.

Support Break the Rules on Patreon.

Join the Break the Rules Discord.

Lev Polyakov was a guest at the U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon of July 5, 2021.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II was the first person to be interviewed by Lev Polyakov and Jules Hamilton on Break the Rules in October 2018.

How Can I Live Forever?: What Does and Does Not Preserve the Self – Essay by Gennady Stolyarov II (2010)

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Jules Hamilton – August 28, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Jules Hamilton – August 28, 2022

January 31, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Jules Hamilton
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg


On August 28, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Jules Hamilton to discuss his thoughts on life-extension advocacy, liberty, culture, current events, and the “Break the Rules” show that Jules co-founded with Lev Polyakov. His insights stimulated an interesting discussion with the panel and audience.

Jules Hamilton is a freelance consultant, filmmaker, and model at large, as well as a licensed real-estate agent. He has been a life-extension advocate for many years and has worked as an ambassador for Lifespan.io. You can find his website at https://www.julesphamilton.com/.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II was the first person to be interviewed by Jules Hamilton and Lev Polyakov on Break the Rules in October 2018.

Watch Break the Rules on YouTube.

Support Break the Rules on Patreon.

Join the Break the Rules Discord.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Mati Roy – September 4, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Mati Roy – September 4, 2022

January 31, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Mati Roy
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
David Shumaker
Jose Cordeiro


On Sunday, September 4, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Mati Roy to discuss his thoughts on the future of cryonics and cultivating a long-termist mindset with regard to the approaches for extending one’s life. The conversation included discussions of Mati Roy’s writings from his website LessDead.com – and what it means to be “less dead”.

Worthy moments to catch include Mati explaining people’s resistance to radical life extension (RLE) (~23:00), and Mati justifying the pursuit of RLE (~1:37:00).

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

The Fourth and Fifth Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salons – Highlights

The Fourth and Fifth Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salons – Highlights

January 31, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov II
Bill Andrews
James Kohagen
Bobby Ridge
John Murrieta


Step back in time to the early Enlightenment Salons of the U.S. Transhumanist Party, originally hosted in person by Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II. This stream combines the majority of the Fourth and Fifth Enlightenment Salons from 2018, discussing subjects such as how to advance transhumanism, technologies to aid the disabled, long-lived organisms, scientific insights on longevity and health, artificial intelligence in politics, and privacy.

Fourth Enlightenment Salon – July 8, 2018

During his Fourth Enlightenment Salon, Gennady Stolyarov II, Chairman of the U.S. Transhumanist Party, invited John Murrieta, Bobby Ridge, and Dr. Bill Andrews for an extensive discussion about transhumanist advocacy, science, health, politics, and related subjects.

They addressed how today’s technologies to assist the disabled are already transhumanist in their effects, and how technologies already in development can liberate humans from disability altogether. John Murrieta’s story is one of transhumanism literally saving a life – and one of the most inspiring examples of how transhumanism translates into human well-being now and in the future.

Other subjects addressed included:

– Why genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are mostly good for you, and most negative perceptions of GMOs should really just be directed at the corporate practices of one company but not genetic modification as a whole.

– What technologies are already aiding the disabled and dramatically extending their capabilities in daily life.

– The role of genetics in longevity and the future of somatic genome editing.

– What the scientific evidence suggests regarding the impact of caloric restriction in humans and other primates.

– CBD and cannabinoids: separating the evidence from the marketing.

– Sierra Sciences’ history of testing over a million compounds for effects on telomerase induction.

– Why artificial sweeteners also should not be maligned, and there is no scientific evidence of their harms.

– What is the desired role of artificial intelligence in politics?

– Are democracy and transhumanism compatible?

– What are the ways in which voting and political decision-making can be improved relative to today’s disastrous two-party system?

– What are the policy implications of the development of artificial intelligence and its impact on the economy?

– What are the areas of life that need to be separated and protected from politics altogether?

***

Fifth Enlightenment Salon – October 13, 2018

In the spirit of the Age of Enlightenment and its furtherance today, Gennady Stolyarov II, Bill Andrews, James Kohagen, Bobby Ridge, and John Murrieta met for the fifth interdisciplinary discussion – hosted by Mr. Stolyarov – on science, culture, education, advocacy, and policy. Subjects discussed included the following:

– Advances in epidural stimulation for treating and overcoming spinal-cord injuries

– Long-lived organisms and their similarities and dissimilarities to humans

– How animal experiments can become more humane

– How contemporary science still has far to go to accumulate even fairly basic information about certain organisms

– How the study of lifespans can be included in educational curricula starting at early childhood

– Whether privacy will remain in a more technologically interconnected future

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Report from Longevity Summit Dublin – Day 1 – September 18, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Report from Longevity Summit Dublin – Day 1 – September 18, 2022

January 31, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Martin O’Dea
Aubrey de Grey
Didier Coeurnelle
Brenda Ramokopelwa
Bradley – Hex Community
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg
David Wood


On Sunday, September 18, 2022, U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II reported from Day 1 of Longevity Summit Dublin, an event co-hosted by Dr. Aubrey de Grey and Martin O’Dea and one of the most momentous events of 2022 for longevity science. Chairman Stolyarov updated the USTP Officers and viewers on events up to that time and got some special guests to engage with the virtual audience. Guests who appeared from Dublin included Martin O’Dea, Aubrey de Grey, David Wood, Didier Coeurnelle, Brenda Ramokopelwa, and Bradley from the Hex community.

Visit the website of Longevity Summit Dublin.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Daniel Twedt – September 25, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Daniel Twedt – September 25, 2022

January 31, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Daniel Twedt
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg
David Shumaker


On Sunday, September 25, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Daniel Twedt – a long-time, dedicated member — to discuss his current campaign for City Council in Thousand Oaks, California. Mr. Twedt previously ran in 2020, when he gained 3,437 votes, or 3% of the total. During his campaign, he spread awareness of the U.S. Transhumanist Party in local newspapers. Mr. Twedt shared his beliefs and the work he does to bring his vision to life, and requested an endorsement by the USTP.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Simon Waslander – October 9, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Simon Waslander – October 9, 2022

January 30, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Simon Waslander
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
David Shumaker
Jason Geringer
Daniel Twedt


Watch the U.S. Transhumanist Party conversation with Simon Waslander, who provided a presentation on Next-Generation Social Welfare approaches utilizing emerging technologies such as 3D printing, wearable healthcare devices that improve patient outcomes, agricultural innovations such as vertical farming and in-vitro meat, solar and battery technology, carbon capture, autonomous electric vehicles, and decentralized, free, open-source education. Unlike the 20th-century welfare paradigm, the Next-Generation Social Welfare approaches outlined by Simon Waslander do not require increased taxation or compulsory redistribution of wealth but rather can be achieved entirely through positive-sum technological progress that benefits everyone.

Simon Waslander, MSc, is the Chief Marketing Officer of AGI Laboratory Inc. He previously delivered a TEDx Talk entitled Cocoa: Food of the Gods in 2015 and was a guest at the previous U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salons of April 17, May 8 (the Death of Death Panel), and May 22, 2022.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Jason Mallory – October 16, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Jason Mallory – October 16, 2022

January 30, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Jason Mallory
Gennady Stolyarov II
Jason Geringer
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.


On Sunday, October 16, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited futurist Jason Mallory to discuss his thoughts on future innovations in healthcare, automation, and political reforms. He spoke about his 2012 book Proxy – When Robots Work Better and his concept for a medical startup, On Call Labs. He also discussed the state of freedom in America and how it might be influenced by independent political campaigns that offer innovative ideas for reform.

Proxy – When Robots Work Better by Jason Mallory can be purchased on Amazon.

Jason Mallory ran in 2020 in the primary as an independent Congressional candidate for California’s 19th Congressional District.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Eric Hennigan – October 23, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Eric Hennigan – October 23, 2022

January 30, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Eric Hennigan
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
David Shumaker
Ben Ballweg
Jason Geringer
Allen Crowley
Kent Kemmish


On Sunday, October 23, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Eric Hennigan to present on historical anti-aging approaches that ultimately did not reach their intended goal. What can we learn from these failed attempts to solve the most significant problem facing us all? How can we be more successful using the improved knowledge, technology, and rational frameworks available in our era?

Eric Hennigan is a Senior Software Engineer at Google and a Volunteer Genomics Data Scientist at the University of Southern California. He holds Bachelor of Sciences degrees in Applied Mathematics and Physics from University of California Los Angeles, and a PhD in Computer Science from University of California Irvine. He enjoys communicating what he’s learned to others and even acted as Instructor of Record for UCI and Cal State Fullerton while still a graduate student. Despite his formal education he recommends self-study as a path to skills improvement.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

Johnny Boston Interviews Gennady Stolyarov II on Growing a Mainstream Transhumanist Movement – October 30, 2022

Johnny Boston Interviews Gennady Stolyarov II on Growing a Mainstream Transhumanist Movement – October 30, 2022

January 30, 2023 Gennady Stolyarov II and Johnny Boston Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov II
Johnny Boston


Watch the stream of filmmaker Johnny Boston’s interview with U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II. This interview was originally recorded on September 21, 2020, to accompany 2030: The Film (directed by Johnny Boston) and provide additional insight on transhumanism as a philosophy and a movement and its prospects for effectively and beneficially shaping the future of humanity. We streamed it again on October 30, 2022, on Gennady Stolyarov II’s YouTube channel, to raise awareness of the subjects discussed in the interview.

This stream was accompanied by a live chat and followed by a brief Musical Q&A session (featuring Chairman Stolyarov’s compositions Somber Variations, Op. 93, and Noble Aspirations, Op. 42 – the latter of which USTP Legislative Director Jason Geringer rearranged in 2022 in a recording that audiences heard for the first time).

Find out about 2030: The Film.

Watch 2030: The Film on Amazon.

About 2030: The Film: Johnny Boston was 10 years old when he first met FM-2030, a futurist who intended to live forever. But in 2000, after his body ceased to function, FM was cryonically preserved. An unexpected call 16 years later places FM’s future in Johnny’s hands.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Dudley Lamming and Adam Konopka – November 6, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Dudley Lamming and Adam Konopka – November 6, 2022

January 30, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Dudley Lamming, PhD
Adam Konopka, PhD
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg
Bill Andrews, PhD


On Sunday, November 6, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Dudley Lamming, PhD, and Adam Konopka, PhD, MS, to discuss their research into aging and its amelioration, and the impact of their work on the promotion of human longevity, health, and fitness, and the prevention of diseases such as diabetes and osteoarthritis.

Dr. Dudley Lamming is a faculty member of the Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism within the University of Wisconsin Department of Medicine. He is a fellow of the American Aging Association and the Gerontological Society of America; a recipient of the Gerontological Society of America Nathan Shock New Investigator Award and the American Physiological Society (Endocrinology and Metabolism Section) New Investigator Award; and an editorial board member of several peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Dr. Lamming’s research focuses on understanding how nutrient-responsive signaling pathways can be harnessed to promote health and longevity. One major focus of his research is the regulation of metabolic health and aging by diet. His laboratory discovered that low-protein diets promote metabolic health—improving blood-sugar control and reducing adiposity—in humans and mice, and has identified dietary branched-chain amino acids (BCAA) as key regulators of these effects. His team currently studies the mechanisms that mediate these beneficial effects in mice and humans, with the goal of identifying interventions to treat and prevent diabetes and obesity. A second major focus of his laboratory is studying how reducing consumption of BCAAs may promote longevity and fitness, with an emphasis on understanding the role of the mechanistic Target of Rapamycin (mTOR), an amino acid- and insulin-responsive protein kinase, in this response. A third focus of the laboratory is understanding the biology of mTOR Complex 2 (mTORC2), which is a key effector of PI3K/insulin signaling. Finally, the laboratory is studying the ability of geroprotective interventions to treat or prevent Alzheimer’s disease using mouse models.

Find out more about Dudley Lamming.

Dr. Adam Konopka is a faculty member in the Division of Geriatrics and Gerontology within the University of Wisconsin Department of Medicine. He is an editorial board member for the Journal of Applied Physiology and a member of the Gerontological Society of America, American College of Sports Medicine and American Physiological Society. Dr. Konopka has been selected as a reviewer for several journals including Journal Gerontology: Biological Sciences, Aging Cell, GeroScience, Science Advances, Scientific Reports, and Journal of Physiology.

Dr. Konopka uses a translational research approach that identifies mechanisms regulating the biology and metabolism of musculoskeletal aging in pre-clinical models and applies these findings to test the potential healthspan-extending effects in human clinical trials. Dr. Konopka’s research has two main themes that focus on the age-related loss of skeletal muscle health and osteoarthritis. He is currently investigating how skeletal muscle mitochondrial bioenergetics and remodeling mediate aging and the healthspan-extending effects of exercise and/or metformin. He is also interested in understanding how the mTOR signaling pathway is involved in the initiation and treatment of osteoarthritis.

Find out more about Adam Konopka.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

 

Effects of Indefinite Life Extension – Gennady Stolyarov II – Compilation Stream

Effects of Indefinite Life Extension – Gennady Stolyarov II – Compilation Stream

January 30, 2023 Gennady Stolyarov II Comments 0 Comment


























Gennady Stolyarov II


In this compilation of classic transhumanist presentations from the 2010s, streamed as the U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon of November 13, 2022, Chairman Gennady Stolyarov II outlines a framework for thinking about various aspects of humankind’s future as a result of the attainment of radical life extension through scientific and technological progress.

Economic Effects of Life Extension – December 11, 2011

Mr. Stolyarov discusses how indefinite human life extension will bring about numerous economic benefits to human beings and human civilization. He approaches the subject from the standpoint of the idea of time preference and the time horizons that would be greatly expanded for humans who live much longer. Furthermore, indefinite human longevity will enable humans to confront major existential threats – such as the threat of a meteor impact or a new ice age – that are beyond the timeframe of the individual lifespan today.

Life Extension, Crime, and Criminal Justice – January 1, 2012

What would be the effects of indefinite human life extension on crime and the criminal-justice system? Mr. Stolyarov offers some possibilities.

Religion and Indefinite Life Extension – January 1, 2012

Mr. Stolyarov discusses the future of religious worldviews in a society where human longevity increases indefinitely and death is no longer perceived as inevitable. Mr. Stolyarov argues that religions evolve, too, and – to survive – they will need to adapt to the reality of far longer human lifespans.

Transhumanism and the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics – January 28, 2012

Mr. Stolyarov explains why, as an advocate of indefinite human life extension, he is not concerned about a posited “heat death of the universe” one googol years from now. Furthermore, he dispels a common misunderstanding about the Second Law of Thermodynamics – a misunderstanding which has led many to espouse the “heat death” hypothesis.

Impacts of Indefinite Life Extension: Answers to Common Questions – June 15, 2016

As a proponent of attaining indefinite human longevity through the progress of medical science and technology, Mr. Stolyarov is frequently asked to address key questions about the effects that indefinite life extension would have on human incentives, behaviors, and societies. Here, he offers his outlook on what some of these impacts would be.

The specific questions addressed are the following:

  1. What would be the benefits of life extension?
  2. What drawbacks would life extension pose?
  3. Would governments ban indefinite life extension if it is achieved?

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Mike Elias – November 20, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Mike Elias – November 20, 2022

January 30, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Mike Elias
Leah Elias
Gennady Stolyarov II
Jason Geringer
Ben Ballweg
Daniel Twedt


On Sunday, November 20, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Mike Elias and Leah Elias to discuss decentralized approaches to validating the credibility of ideas and sources online.

Mike Elias is the founder of Ideamarket, a platform that lets you make money arguing on the internet.  Ideamarket builds credibility infrastructure without relying on legacy media or academia. Learn more about Ideamarket.

Read Mike Elias’s blog.

Join the Ideamarket Discord server.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Zack Varkaris – November 27, 2022

U.S. Transhumanist Party Virtual Enlightenment Salon with Zack Varkaris – November 27, 2022

January 26, 2023 U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments 0 Comment


























Zack Varkaris
Gennady Stolyarov II
Art Ramon Garcia, Jr.
David Shumaker
Ben Ballweg
Jason Geringer
Bill Andrews, Ph. D.
Liz Parrish
José Luis Cordeiro


On Sunday, November 27, 2022, the U.S. Transhumanist Party invited Zack Varkaris to discuss his thoughts on how emerging advances in biotechnology can improve human quality of life and prolong youthfulness and vitality. The conversation addressed the possibility of life without a biological clock – which is being pursued by Zack Varkaris’s company, Austin Biotec. It also delved into the connections of this endeavor with the philosophy of transhumanism and its potential effects on future societies and human life decisions.

Zack Varkaris is a biologist, author, diver, and sporting pugilist. Of Greek descent, Zack grew up in London. After studying Marine Biology at Heriot-Watt University, he spent a number of years in the field of renewable energy and conservation before turning his hand at writing novels. See Zack Varkaris’s website.

Zack Varkaris is the founder and Scientific Director of Austin Biotec, which works in the anti-aging and fertility domains and applies emerging medical technologies in the effort to overcome the problem of female infertility. Find out about Austin Biotec.

Zack Varkaris’s novel The Vevellis Chronicles: The Crescent and the Cross can be found on Amazon.

Follow Zack Varkaris on Twitter.

Join the U.S. Transhumanist Party for free, no matter where you reside.

Posts navigation

OLDER POSTS

Social Media

Constitution of the U.S. Transhumanist Party

Transhumanist Bill of Rights – Version 3.0

U.S. Transhumanist Party Facebook Feed

Free Transhumanist Symbols

Guidelines for Community Conduct

SUBMIT A POST

Subject Categories

    - Life Extension
    - Artificial Intelligence
    - Space Colonization
    - Robotics
    - Biotechnology
    - Nanotechnology
    - Autonomous Vehicles
    - 3D Printing
    - Cryptocurrencies
    - Vertical Farming
    - Universal Basic Income
    - Existential Risk
    - Rationality

Hashtags

    #USTranshumanistParty, #TranshumanistParty, #TranshumanistPolitics, #TomRoss2024, #RossTwedt2024

Recent Posts

  • Why Is Trump So Intent on Sending Illegal Immigrant Noncriminals to Prison Camps in El Salvador? – Article by Alex Nowrasteh
  • Tribute to John Kerecz (1961 – 2025)
  • The Copenhagen Consensus – How to Feed the Hungry – Article by Zach Richardson
  • The Issue of Food – Article by Luis Arroyo
  • Results of Platform Vote #9 and Vote on Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations; Adopted Sections of the U.S. Transhumanist Party Constitution
  • Official Ballot Options for Platform Vote #9 and Proposals on Investigations and Emergency Declarations
  • Gennady Stolyarov I and Gennady Stolyarov II Discuss the Progress of Information Technology (2019)
  • Immortality: My Quest and Reasons for Seeking an Indefinite Lifespan – Article by Albi Ndoni
  • U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for 2025
  • U.S. Transhumanist Party Statement on the Murder of Brian Thompson
  • News Regarding THPedia, the Transhumanist Encyclopedia for Everyone – Invitation to Contribute – Statement by Gennady Stolyarov II
  • The Transhumanist Council: A Worthy Effort for a New Umbrella Transhumanist Organization
  • Report on the Montana Right to Try Act – Analysis by Shamar White
  • U.S. Transhumanist Party Comments on the Citizen Petition by Age Reversal Unity to Declare Aging a Disease
  • U.S. Transhumanist Party Chairman’s Eighth Anniversary Message
  • U.S. Transhumanist Party Statement on the Outcome of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
  • Preliminary Member-Reported Write-In Totals for Tom Ross and Daniel Twedt in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election
  • U.S. Transhumanist Party and Nevada Transhumanist Party Positions on 2024 Nevada Ballot Questions
  • Where to Write In Tom Ross for President of the United States – and How to Make Sure Your Vote Counts
  • Celebration of U.S. Transhumanist Party 10th Anniversary and International Longevity Month

Recent Comments

  • R. Nicholas Starr on U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for 2025
  • Luis Arroyo on Tribute to John Kerecz (1961 – 2025)
  • shamar on U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for 2025
  • Gennady Stolyarov II on U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for 2025
  • Theo Ibrahim on The Issue of Food – Article by Luis Arroyo

Archives

  • June 2025 (1)
  • May 2025 (1)
  • March 2025 (3)
  • February 2025 (1)
  • January 2025 (3)
  • December 2024 (2)
  • November 2024 (6)
  • October 2024 (3)
  • September 2024 (2)
  • August 2024 (5)
  • July 2024 (4)
  • June 2024 (3)
  • May 2024 (1)
  • March 2024 (1)
  • February 2024 (1)
  • January 2024 (8)
  • October 2023 (11)
  • September 2023 (6)
  • August 2023 (1)
  • July 2023 (4)
  • May 2023 (3)
  • April 2023 (3)
  • March 2023 (2)
  • February 2023 (12)
  • January 2023 (23)
  • December 2022 (2)
  • November 2022 (2)
  • October 2022 (3)
  • August 2022 (3)
  • July 2022 (2)
  • May 2022 (6)
  • March 2022 (3)
  • February 2022 (4)
  • January 2022 (7)
  • December 2021 (11)
  • November 2021 (4)
  • October 2021 (5)
  • September 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (3)
  • June 2021 (2)
  • May 2021 (6)
  • April 2021 (7)
  • March 2021 (4)
  • February 2021 (5)
  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (10)
  • November 2020 (4)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (4)
  • July 2020 (5)
  • June 2020 (6)
  • May 2020 (3)
  • April 2020 (3)
  • March 2020 (6)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (6)
  • December 2019 (3)
  • November 2019 (2)
  • October 2019 (9)
  • September 2019 (10)
  • August 2019 (12)
  • July 2019 (18)
  • June 2019 (17)
  • May 2019 (12)
  • April 2019 (8)
  • March 2019 (12)
  • February 2019 (7)
  • January 2019 (13)
  • December 2018 (9)
  • November 2018 (5)
  • October 2018 (9)
  • September 2018 (5)
  • August 2018 (10)
  • July 2018 (13)
  • June 2018 (14)
  • May 2018 (8)
  • April 2018 (8)
  • March 2018 (10)
  • February 2018 (15)
  • January 2018 (17)
  • December 2017 (8)
  • November 2017 (17)
  • October 2017 (19)
  • September 2017 (11)
  • August 2017 (11)
  • July 2017 (16)
  • June 2017 (15)
  • May 2017 (10)
  • April 2017 (7)
  • March 2017 (8)
  • February 2017 (16)
  • January 2017 (8)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (5)

Categories

  • Allied Projects
  • Announcements
  • Art
  • Candidates
  • Debate
  • Discussion Panels
  • Distributed Computing
  • Exposure Periods
  • Foreign Ambassadors
  • General Discussion
  • Guest Articles
  • Inclusion
  • Interviews
  • Legislative Analysis
  • Official Ballots
  • Petitions
  • Platform
  • Presentations
  • Press Releases
  • Research
  • Sample Ballots
  • Science Fiction
  • Statements
  • Tolerance
  • Virtual Enlightenment Salons
  • Vote Results
  • Working Groups

Victor Run Virtual Race – June 4-6, 2021

Historical Archive – 2020 U.S. Presidential Ticket – Charlie Kam and Liz Parrish

© 2025   Copyright - U.S. Transhumanist Party - All Rights Reserved | WordPress design: Art Ramon Paintings