Editor’s Note: In this article, Life Extension Advocacy Foundation (LEAF).discusses the link between Cellular Senescence and Cellular Reprogramming. This article was originally published by the
~ Kenneth Alum, Director of Publication, U.S. Transhumanist Party, January 8, 2018
The reprogramming of cells is a well-established technique in medicine and has been for over a decade now. It allows the en masse creation of patient-matched cells and is the basis for multiple current therapies.
Cellular Senescence and Cellular Reprogramming share mechanisms
Induced pluripotent stem cells (also known as iPS cells or iPSCs) can be created directly from adult cells. The iPSC technology was pioneered by Shinya Yamanaka, who demonstrated in 2006 that the introduction of four specific genes encoding transcription factors could convert adult cells into pluripotent stem cells. These factors are Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc (OSKM), or as many call them, the Yamanaka factors.
Today, we have a new paper that discusses how induced pluripotency and cellular senescence, two of several possible cellular states, share similarities. It is likely no surprise that the two states are closely related and that some of the mechanisms for one process are shared by the other. It appears that certain key signaling molecules are important in determining both cell fate and senescence.
Controlling cell behavior in living animals
As our understanding of guiding cell fate grows rapidly by the passing year, it has huge implications for therapies that seek to control cellular activities and encourage certain types of cells to be created. Research is now starting to move beyond the petri dish and to where cells are being programmed in situ in living animals.
In 2013, the Hallmarks of Aging proposed that epigenetic changes are a primary reason we age, but, at the time, the evidence in living animals was lacking. All this changed in late 2015 when researchers induced pluripotency in living animals using the OSKM reprogramming factors, in much the same way as iPSC technology creates on-demand cell types outside the body. In this case, they only very briefly induced OSKM so that the aging markers in cells were reset but not long enough to cause the cells to revert to a developmental state.
The results of this first attempt to reprogram cells in living animals resulted in the cells of the mice becoming functionally younger in many ways and increased their healthy lifespan. These results lend yet more support for the hypothesis that epigenetic alterations are one of the reasons we age and that reversing those changes is a path to maintaining health and tissue function as we age. A number of research teams are now exploring cellular reprogramming in living animals with a view to translating this to humans. We discussed the findings of this paper during our monthly Journal Club here.
This paper may be of interest to those wishing to delve deeper into the world of cell fate and understand the connection between cellular senescence and induced pluripotency. This builds on the knowledge we already have, and it is not difficult to imagine a time in the near future when we will have a very high level of control over our cells via reprogramming techniques.
If the hypothesis of epigenetic alterations being one of the causes of aging turns out to be correct, then that would be a real game changer. We are likely not too far off from determining if this is the case or not, and we may have the answer in the next few years, given the current pace of progress.
Literature Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. cell, 126(4), 663-676.  Mosteiro, L., Pantoja, C., Martino, A., & Serrano, M. (2017). Senescence promotes in vivo reprogramming through p16INK4a and IL‐6. Aging cell.  López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M., & Kroemer, G. (2013). The hallmarks of aging. Cell, 153(6), 1194-1217.  Ocampo, A., Reddy, P., Martinez-Redondo, P., Platero-Luengo, A., Hatanaka, F., Hishida, T., … & Araoka, T. (2016). In vivo amelioration of age-associated hallmarks by partial reprogramming. Cell, 167(7), 1719-1733.
About Steve Hill
As a scientific writer and a devoted advocate of healthy longevity technologies, Steve has provided the community with multiple educational articles, interviews, and podcasts, helping the general public to better understand aging and the means to modify its dynamics. His materials can be found at H+ Magazine, Longevity Reporter, Psychology Today, and Singularity Weblog. He is a co-author of the book Aging Prevention for All – a guide for the general public exploring evidence-based means to extend healthy life (in press).
About LIFE EXTENSION ADVOCACY FOUNDATION (LEAF)
In 2014, the Life Extension Advocacy Foundation was established as a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to promoting increased healthy human lifespan through fiscally sponsoring longevity research projects and raising awareness regarding the societal benefits of life extension. In 2015 they launched Lifespan.io, the first nonprofit crowdfunding platform focused on the biomedical research of aging.
They believe that this will enable the general public to influence the pace of research directly. To date they have successfully supported four research projects aimed at investigating different processes of aging and developing therapies to treat age-related diseases.
The LEAF team organizes educational events, takes part in different public and scientific conferences, and actively engages with the public on social media in order to help disseminate this crucial information. They initiate public dialogue aimed at regulatory improvement in the fields related to rejuvenation biotechnology.