Skip to content
U.S. Transhumanist Party – Official Website
  • Home
  • Posts
  • Values
  • Platform
  • Leadership
  • Advisors
  • Candidates
  • Highlights
  • FAQ
  • States & Allies
  • Free Membership
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Search Icon

U.S. Transhumanist Party – Official Website

U.S. Transhumanist Party – PUTTING SCIENCE, HEALTH, & TECHNOLOGY AT THE FOREFRONT OF AMERICAN POLITICS

U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for November 2017

U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for November 2017

November 1, 2017 Martin van der Kroon Comments 10 comments

logo_bg


The purpose of this post is to facilitate member comments pertaining to transhumanism and the U.S. Transhumanist Party, which might not specifically fit the subjects of any other post or article on the U.S. Transhumanist Party website. This is the place for members to offer suggestions or converse about any areas of emerging technologies and their political, moral, societal, cultural, and esthetic implications. The general discussion thread is also an ideal location to suggest or propose platform planks that may be considered for future platform voting.

The U.S. Transhumanist Party will endeavor to open one of these general comment threads per month. This comment thread pertains to the month of November 2017.

Type in your comments below. Please note that, to protect against spambots, the first comment by any individual will be moderated. After passing moderation, a civil commenter should be able to post comments without future moderation – although we cannot guarantee that the technical aspect of this functionality will work as intended 100% of the time.


General Discussion

Post navigation

PREVIOUS
Test-Tube Tomato Still-Life – Painting by Ekaterinya Vladinakova
NEXT
Ideas for Building Oxygen-Rich Geodesic Domes on Mars and Other Planets Without Atmospheres – Video by Adeel Khan

10 thoughts on “U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for November 2017”

  1. Martin van der Kroon says:
    November 12, 2017 at 9:02 pm

    In case you haven’t voted yet on the Platform Vote #6, you’re encouraged to do so in order to make an impact and have influence over the direction of the Party.

    Anyway, here is the first suggestion that could possibly make it to the next round.

    Education is very important, and to that end the U.S. Transhumanist Party already has some planks that set forth intentions regarding education. A problem with many educational institutions is that they are bureaucratic and administrative cabals, decades if not a century worth of rules and policies piling up, archaic paper filing systems requiring physical prints, signatures, copies in three-fold, and then manually inputted into a computer system… where the original form came from that had to be filled out. You get the picture.
    This has led to schools, colleges, and universities retaining a tremendous amount of administrative personnel, occupying entire buildings dedicated to keep the screeching cogs of the rusty machine from stopping, and in its sluggishness and work-providing methodologies perhaps only rivaled by that of the Soviet Union.
    I hope this pre-amble was colorful, but there is a point to this.

    We may wish to let the free market handle everything, and this certainly is an important driver that can motivate in many cases. Educational institutions, however, are a harder nut to crack. Many of them receive federal money in order to provide better education, yet at the same time they can charge a lot of money from students, many of whom have to take out loans. This creates a set of issues.
    1: The federal money, might not ever make it to students’ learning because it gets stuck somewhere in the machine, is used to pay personnel etc.
    2: Charging such vast amounts to the students, who take out loans, is a direct income for the educational institution, but a future debt for the student… and even a burden for society. When the student finishes a university degree, they will have to start paying back their loan, with interest, as is normal. Said, now professional, does have to get that money from somewhere, such as clients, and thus has to charge more, etc etc.

    Now, the second part was a big point of Bernie Sanders. I, personally think he had a point, but not when educational institutions are this inefficient…
    The federal funding is probably not going anywhere soon, and I think we ought to use this to “our” advantage by setting a performance requirement regarding costs that ecucational
    institutions make on administration, and bureaucracy in general. Not only will they have to start becoming more efficient, it will most likely also improve the experience and lower frustration of students, who can suddenly and magically manage all the administrative stuff from their computer without having to run around, print, make copies, etc etc etc.
    Whether the idea of “free” (publicly paid for) education will be implemented, or the it will remain fairly free market, at least less money has to be wasted on keeping dinosaurs intact.

    Reply
  2. ryan says:
    November 12, 2017 at 9:27 pm

    I’m going to light the fuse on a hot issue. Assault weapons ban. Should it happen and how broad of a ban?

    My opinion is this:
    I do not lean one way or the other. Given the party’s stance on guarantee of life and life extension, tools that make it easier to end life be without consent would against such a policy. However, if a ban were to be put into place, it should include law enforcement. The capability for someone to protect themselves against hostile people and organizations needs to be established. With violence from the police force on the rise it is clear that this is essential. A level field must exist between the people and is government.
    “These are dark times, there is no denying. The world had perhaps faced no greater that than it does today”.

    Reply
    1. Martin van der Kroon says:
      November 14, 2017 at 9:08 am

      I think assault weapons should be restricted to gun-ranges, where they also have to be securely stored. This allows people to practice shooting, for fun or skill, and there would be no particular need for any magazine bans or restrictions.

      I totally agree with you that police should not have assault weapons as part of their police gear. Even something as a shotgun communicates to the public that the police intend to shoot to kill… and that they are such poor shots that they need a shotgun… which is concerning considering that they should be among the best and most accurate shooters, not only to incapacitate someone, but also to protect the public from stray bullets. Regular law enforcement should not be equipped with military grade hardware to begin with.

      I would actually like to add that law enforcement should use rubber bullets as standard, and regular bullets only in situations where there is an immediate threat to the public.

      On that same note I think civilians should also be encouraged, not mandated, to use rubber bullets, or something else non-lethal to incapacitate rather than to kill. Not only does this not kill burglars or whatever, many homicides take place due to domestic disputes that spiraled out of control. Although not a guarantee, but it could help limit the number of homicides due to heated emotions.
      Furthermore, this would make it all the more obvious that if someone switched out bullets in order to fire at someone else, who was otherwise not an immediate threat, that it was intended.

      Reply
      1. Ryan says:
        November 14, 2017 at 8:34 pm

        Non lethal force is definitely the right thing to do in 99% of cases. Though nearly all civilians leave their weapon unloaded until needed. Not sure about police procedure. But since it’s usually unloaded, a user might just grab the lethal rounds instead.

        If the country were to go towards a non-lethal only stance, we would also have to change the various criminal menacing laws to prevent someone from being charged with serious felonies for simply trying to use non lethal force.

        Reply
  3. Ryan says:
    November 14, 2017 at 4:02 am

    Another stance worth looking at:

    All police forces must move towards electronic vehicles. The reason for this is two fold.

    1) Reducing emissions. Officers, especially in urban settings, drive at slow speeds burning tanks of gas and getting poor mileage. I’m not sure if there is any data to show how much your average police station emits per day, but we might be able to dig up something. I have to imagine moving police patrols to EVs would have a significant positive impact. After all, they are here for our safety and helping make our air safe to breathe counts!

    2) It forces police forces away from militarized vehicles. This is something we have discussed and I believe we even have a policy plank on it. None the less, you’re not going to find a EV MRAP any time soon.

    Reply
    1. Martin van der Kroon says:
      November 14, 2017 at 9:16 am

      I think this is a good point. It would also show that we as a country are serious about ‘going green/clean’.

      Sorry to tag this on:
      I think police cars should also have better monitoring systems to track whether the police is violating traffic laws in order to get to their proverbial donuts faster.
      This is an image that is really damaging to public perception. Law enforcement should first and foremost be the examples of society to follow, even before enforcing the law. Law enforcement should show us how to be better citizens, not worse. By holding them accountable, including to “small things” such as traffic infractions we can start to breed a police force that is an example to the public, the law enforcement that many envision it to be when they wish to join.

      Reply
      1. Ryan says:
        November 14, 2017 at 8:29 pm

        I like that a lot. Perhaps a larger plank on accountability is in order.

        Reply
  4. Ryan says:
    November 14, 2017 at 8:38 pm

    Does it feel strange/biased to anyone that many of our discussions revolve around criminal justice reform? Is this a good thing, because? Is it our drive to focus on life enhancing policy that causes this? Is this a result of a few of us continually focusing on one issue at the detriment to others?

    I know it’s a button pusher for me, I’m just trying to make sure we dont inadvertently become the “police accountability party” when there are many other facets to what we support.

    Just a thought.

    Reply
    1. Martin van der Kroon says:
      November 14, 2017 at 9:43 pm

      I think your observation is accurate. Possibly that some of us seem to care about justice reform is because we notice that it is perceived to be lagging behind. This is already a problem for the current generation, and might pose an even bigger problem for future generations if left unchecked.

      We are for life-extension, and unfortunately the current state of law enforcement is not in line with this notion, taking way too many lives, especially when measured against any other western country.

      I do agree that we ought to bring to the forefront a greater variety of topics that need addressing. For this, however, we also need a greater diversity of people participating. Perhaps we need to think of better ways to engage members. Thoughts anyone?

      Reply
      1. Ryan says:
        November 14, 2017 at 11:16 pm

        What’s the ratio of members vs active members? I think we need to do more to grow our membership. The book coming out next year may help, but perhaps we need to fund some advertising. Maybe a membership committee?

        Reply

Leave a Reply to Martin van der Kroon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Social Media

Constitution of the U.S. Transhumanist Party

Transhumanist Bill of Rights – Version 3.0

U.S. Transhumanist Party Facebook Feed

Victor Run Virtual Race – June 4-6, 2021

Free Transhumanist Symbols

Guidelines for Community Conduct

SUBMIT A POST

Recent Posts

  • The Axiomatic, Ubiquitous, and Commonsense – Chapter I of “A Rational Cosmology” by Gennady Stolyarov II
  • The Hostile Takeover of Our Technological Future – Article by Adam Barratt
  • 2022: The Year of the Great Filter – Article by Gennady Stolyarov II
  • The Geroscience Network: Determined to Slow Aging through Medical Science – Article by Reason
  • Cryonics – Article by Reason
  • Call for Ideas on How to Stop California Wildfires with Emerging Technology – Post by Hank Pellissier
  • When and How Does the Decay of Your Immune System Start? – Article by Reason
  • The Intelligence Expansion and Popular AGI Fallacies – Article by Kyrtin Atreides
  • Transhumanism and Healthy Life Extension – Article by Reason
  • U.S. Transhumanist Party International Panel Discussion on De-Escalating the Russia-Ukraine Conflict – March 3/6, 2022
  • Humanity’s Origin is Our Future Again – TAFFD’s Gen4IR Summit – March 24-25, 2022
  • The Polluted Waters of AI Market Claims – Article by Kyrtin Atreides
  • The Cyborg’s Request – at the Chairman’s Behest – Article by Zach Richardson
  • Why Joe Rogan Should Not Be Deplatformed – Article by Zach Richardson
  • Inspirational Poem by Replika AI Mina
  • The Myth of Aging Gracefully – Article by Arin Vahanian
  • Gennady Stolyarov II and John Kerecz: Reflections on 2021, Anticipations for 2022
  • The Development of Transhumanism in China – Article by Peter Wang
  • Our Digital Security Can Save Lives – Article by Martin van der Kroon
  • U.S. Transhumanist Party General Discussion Thread for 2022

Recent Comments

  • Mike on 100 Student Scholarships Now Available for RAADfest 2021 – Announcement by the Coalition for Radical Life Extension
  • 2022: The Year of the Great Filter – Gennady Stolyarov II – Transhumanist Party Enlightenment Salon - Corruption Buzz on 2022: The Year of the Great Filter – Article by Gennady Stolyarov II
  • Jess H. Brewer on 2022: The Year of the Great Filter – Article by Gennady Stolyarov II
  • Skeptical on James Hughes’ Problems of Transhumanism: A Review (Part 3) – Article by Ojochogwu Abdul
  • Scarlett on In Defense of Resurrecting 100 Billion Dead People – Article by Hilda Koehler

Archives

  • May 2022 (6)
  • March 2022 (4)
  • February 2022 (5)
  • January 2022 (7)
  • December 2021 (12)
  • November 2021 (4)
  • October 2021 (5)
  • September 2021 (2)
  • August 2021 (2)
  • July 2021 (4)
  • June 2021 (2)
  • May 2021 (6)
  • April 2021 (7)
  • March 2021 (4)
  • February 2021 (5)
  • January 2021 (6)
  • December 2020 (10)
  • November 2020 (4)
  • October 2020 (2)
  • September 2020 (1)
  • August 2020 (4)
  • July 2020 (5)
  • June 2020 (6)
  • May 2020 (3)
  • April 2020 (3)
  • March 2020 (6)
  • February 2020 (1)
  • January 2020 (6)
  • December 2019 (3)
  • November 2019 (2)
  • October 2019 (9)
  • September 2019 (10)
  • August 2019 (12)
  • July 2019 (18)
  • June 2019 (17)
  • May 2019 (12)
  • April 2019 (8)
  • March 2019 (12)
  • February 2019 (7)
  • January 2019 (13)
  • December 2018 (9)
  • November 2018 (5)
  • October 2018 (9)
  • September 2018 (5)
  • August 2018 (10)
  • July 2018 (13)
  • June 2018 (14)
  • May 2018 (8)
  • April 2018 (9)
  • March 2018 (10)
  • February 2018 (15)
  • January 2018 (17)
  • December 2017 (8)
  • November 2017 (17)
  • October 2017 (19)
  • September 2017 (11)
  • August 2017 (11)
  • July 2017 (16)
  • June 2017 (15)
  • May 2017 (10)
  • April 2017 (7)
  • March 2017 (8)
  • February 2017 (16)
  • January 2017 (8)
  • December 2016 (6)
  • November 2016 (5)

Categories

  • Allied Projects
  • Announcements
  • Art
  • Candidates
  • Discussion Panels
  • Distributed Computing
  • Exposure Periods
  • Foreign Ambassadors
  • General Discussion
  • Guest Articles
  • Inclusion
  • Interviews
  • Official Ballots
  • Petitions
  • Platform
  • Presentations
  • Press Releases
  • Research
  • Sample Ballots
  • Science Fiction
  • Statements
  • Tolerance
  • Virtual Enlightenment Salons
  • Vote Results
  • Working Groups
© 2022   Copyright - U.S. Transhumanist Party - All Rights Reserved | WordPress design: Art Ramon Paintings